301 or Canonical to handle Site Jacking?
- SEO |
I'm trying to decide to handle it by doing a 301 redirect that changes URLs that changes the foreign domain to my domain. I'm leary about doing this because most of these sites are very fishy sites (Russian sites with spammy content). Wouldn't Google think these are all doorway sites?
If I use the rel canonical tag, I'm going to have to do it dynamically by just reading the request URI and replacing the domain as oppose to hand-coding because our site is 90% dynamic (lots of form field values in the URLs). This actually seems like the better route since it is telling Google the original content for this page is at our site and it isn't telling them (I hope) that this page has been MOVED (redirected) - at least not as strongly as the 301.
What I want to tell Google is - we own this content but we have nothing to do with these other domains!
One funny thing I thought about doing was hijacking THEIR domain! In essence all I have to do is setup their domain on my server config (its a dedicated server). I could then host whatever content I wanted on their domain (as long as they kept pointing to our IP) and thereby leverage what domain authority they had by passing link juice through links to our site. Problem is, it can be time consuming to setup the site with unique content and enough of it so Google doesn't consider it a doorway.
* Get Results - Outsource Your PPC Management |
* Don Burk Advertising & Marketing - www.donburk.com