Any luck with .EDU Backlinks?

11 replies
  • SEO
  • |
I keep on seeing ads for these but it doesn't make much sense to me. How can anyone guarantee you 50 or 100 .EDU backlinks? Do they have deals with the owners of these sites? Or are they simply going to submit comments to .EDU blogs and charge you even if your comments don't get accepted? I just downloaded a list of sites that you can SUPPOSEDLY use to build backlinks. I didn't see a single backlink on those sites.
#backlinks #luck
  • Profile picture of the author jahangir
    No doubt that getting .Edu and .Gov links is an uphill task because its very much licked by Google because of their authenticity. Try 100 blogs you will get about 5-7 links, i think.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4998605].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
      Banned
      Originally Posted by jahangir View Post

      No doubt that getting .Edu and .Gov links is an uphill task because its very much licked by Google because of their authenticity.
      No ... sorry, Jahangir - this simply isn't so.

      Many people think so, I know: it's a hugely misunderstood subject.

      Which TLD extension represents the domain of which a backlink appears on any given page doesn't in itself affect the value of the linkjuice at all. So say Matt Cutts, Google, my experience, the experience of others I trust, and the authors of all the standard SEO textbooks.

      And it would be very, very bizarre and quite unaccountable if it did!

      This is one of the most persistently propagated, widely-believed urban myths in the whole of internet marketing.

      .edu, in itself, means nothing to the value of a backlink.

      Don't assume that .edu backlinks are necessarily going to be valuable "just because they're .edu backlinks". That isn't how it works at all.

      Domain-extensions have no bearing, in themselves, either on SEO or on the value of backlinks. It's perfectly true, of course, that many .edu backlinks are very good backlinks to get, but correlation isn't causation, and it's not the fact that they're on .edu pages that, in itself, confers any "extra benefit" at all.

      The point here is simply that many (by no means all!) .edu sites are also, at least to some extent, authority sites, and that's what makes their backlinks valuable ones.

      Other .edu pages aren't "authority sites" at all.

      I have a couple of .edu blogs, myself, but sadly their backlinks are worth no more than a backlink from any of my .com, .info or any other sites, and in fact usually worth quite a bit less, because some of my main .info/.com sites are now building up quite a bit of "authority" and some of their pages are building up some higher PR's, too.

      So don't imagine that "being on a .edu site" necessarily makes a backlink better than any other sort of backlink. Sadly.

      The analogy that always springs to mind, in this context, is the belief that having a "blog" rather than a "non-blog website" is going to confer extra SEO/backlink benefit "because Google loves blogs". Again, the logic here is pretty mistaken, and in the same way: it's the attribution of causation that's at fault. The reality, in this case, is simply that "Google loves regularly updated websites", and a lot of blogs do happen to be regularly updated websites. Again, correlation is not causation.

      If you have a niche site about arthritis remedies, for example, a .edu backlink from a university's/med-school's rheumatology site is going to be potential gold-dust, while a student forum or blog which - like so many - is non-context-relevant and PR-0 will actually be no better at all than any other random non-context-relevant, PR-0 backlink such as an article directory.

      Contrary to popular belief, it isn't the "being on a .edu site" aspect of it that gives any advantage.

      Call me a skepchick, but (as with so many other things in internet marketing) if you ask people selling them, of course, you may hear a slightly different story.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4998619].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author DPM70
        Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

        No ... sorry, Jahangir - this simply isn't so.

        Many people think so, I know: it's a hugely misunderstood subject.

        Which TLD extension represents the domain of which a backlink appears on any given page doesn't in itself affect the value of the linkjuice at all. So say Matt Cutts, Google, my experience, the experience of others I trust, and the authors of all the standard SEO textbooks.

        And it would be very, very bizarre and quite unaccountable if it did!

        This is one of the most persistently propagated, widely-believed urban myths in the whole of internet marketing.

        .edu, in itself, means nothing to the value of a backlink.

        Don't assume that .edu backlinks are necessarily going to be valuable "just because they're .edu backlinks". That isn't how it works at all.

        Domain-extensions have no bearing, in themselves, either on SEO or on the value of backlinks. It's perfectly true, of course, that many .edu backlinks are very good backlinks to get, but correlation isn't causation, and it's not the fact that they're on .edu pages that, in itself, confers any "extra benefit" at all.

        The point here is simply that many (by no means all!) .edu sites are also, at least to some extent, authority sites, and that's what makes their backlinks valuable ones.

        Other .edu pages aren't "authority sites" at all.

        I have a couple of .edu blogs, myself, but sadly their backlinks are worth no more than a backlink from any of my .com, .info or any other sites, and in fact usually worth quite a bit less, because some of my main .info/.com sites are now building up quite a bit of "authority" and some of their pages are building up some higher PR's, too.

        So don't imagine that "being on a .edu site" necessarily makes a backlink better than any other sort of backlink. Sadly.

        The analogy that always springs to mind, in this context, is the belief that having a "blog" rather than a "non-blog website" is going to confer extra SEO/backlink benefit "because Google loves blogs". Again, the logic here is pretty mistaken, and in the same way: it's the attribution of causation that's at fault. The reality, in this case, is simply that "Google loves regularly updated websites", and a lot of blogs do happen to be regularly updated websites. Again, correlation is not causation.

        If you have a niche site about arthritis remedies, for example, a .edu backlink from a university's/med-school's rheumatology site is going to be potential gold-dust, while a student forum or blog which - like so many - is non-context-relevant and PR-0 will actually be no better at all than any other random non-context-relevant, PR-0 backlink such as an article directory.

        Contrary to popular belief, it isn't the "being on a .edu site" aspect of it that gives any advantage.

        Call me a skepchick, but (as with so many other things in internet marketing) if you ask people selling them, of course, you may hear a slightly different story.
        Yeah, but that's what he said. He said it would be 'licked' by Google :p
        Signature
        I don't build in order to have clients. I have clients in order to build. - Ayn Rand
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4999199].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ClarkKent
    .edu's usually are follow enabled comments.
    They work well, are often considered bluefart though.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4998613].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author aygabtu
      Originally Posted by ClarkKent View Post

      .edu's usually are follow enabled comments.
      They work well, are often considered bluefart though.
      Sorry, what is bluefart?
      Signature

      Check top 300 Google SERP results free. WhatsMySERP.com tracks and graphs changes for multiple domains/keywords/regions. Also includes advanced keyword density tool.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5000572].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author RosieCain
    I agree .edu links do not carry magic. Don't waste time and money on them. I have been there before.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4999851].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author realmaverick
    Alexa, great answer. I agree entirely, though one small point.

    And it would be very, very bizarre and quite unaccountable if it did!
    To me, it would make some sense, because .edu is a TLD that can't be readily purchased.

    But that said, evidently Google doesn't think it makes sense to give any extra weight to .edu either
    Signature
    SEO, Web Design, Graphic Design

    Realisation: 10% of the members on WF, are making money from the other 90%.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5000318].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author gameutopia
    Most likely you would get an .edu backlink from a blog or .edu forum profile or signature out of it. Nothing wrong with that as long as they aren't blasting out a bunch of links in it, or leaving a comment that makes absolutely no sense, or stuffing it full of keywords.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5000519].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nadavs
    Alexa gave a great answer. .edu links aren't much different from other backlinks.

    However, from what I've seen, some .edu pages have the amazing ability to gain PR very quickly (one of them is from this year and has PR 7!), which makes them a valuable source of links. That's my strategy - I comment on pages in sites that have a history of very high PR posts.

    The best thing about this strategy is that after the post is old enough, moderators don't approve any more comments for it, which keeps OBL at a low number.

    nadavs
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5000920].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kashem
    Great explanation by Alexa Smith . Your explanation will help a lot to many webmaster to understand when a link is valuable and clear misconception about .edu links
    Signature
    Niche Masterly - Get Revenue Generating Keywords For Your Niche Site.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5000989].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WSO Scholar
    I believe they are better than normal backlinks though the difference is minimal
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5001190].message }}

Trending Topics