100 Spun Vs Unique Articles - Which One Has More Ranking Power?

8 replies
  • SEO
  • |
I am trying to figure out...

Which one has more ranking power?

A. 100 articles spun off to 90% uniqueness from one single seed article

or

B. 100 articles each of them unique from each other?

Assumptions:

1. Target on the same medium competitive keyword (says, with monthly EXACT search volume between 1000 to 10,000).

2. Each article at least 150 words long (basically this is what is required for BMR)

3. Each of the article to be published to different blogs (each with different domains and IP address) in the same blog network.

Can anyone share your opinion experience or even better experimental results (if any)?

Thank you..
#100 #articles #power #ranking #spun #unique
  • Profile picture of the author chandan_dutta
    Definitely B is going to win the game. SEO is getting harder and unique content always get first preference when we compare with spun content. I have tested it myself.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5019471].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author harrysehgal
    You should try to post unique articles.
    Signature
    Contact me for Guest Posting on Tech Blogs
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5019667].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tomreyes
    I have read from one of the posts in this forum that after panda update, content uniqueness has been a crucial part of a site.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5076526].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author krishacetravison
    Unique contents definitely. But those kinds of contents are very prone to be spun and use by other people.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5076557].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author andynathan
    Unique content all the way! my blog his post 9000 per month. Mostly because of the search engine traffic that comes from the 500 + blog posts I have on the site.
    Signature

    Delighfully Inexpensive: The Scientific Formula For Profitable Blogging takes you step-by-step into how to create mind-blowing content that inspires your readers to learn more about your services.
    Scientific Formula For Profitable Blogging Link

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5076645].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author phans
      sure unique is best but something you have to see is, how long does it take to wirte 100 unique articles compared to one very good spun article? if you outsoruce what is more expensive? 100 unique articles or 1 very good spun article? it's obv that spinning is a lot cheaper and imo that def something you have to consider as well
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5076726].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
    If an article is spun to 90% uniqueness, then it basically is an original article at that point, so I think the argument between the two is kind of pointless.

    However, I would love to see an article that is spun to 90% uniqueness and still readable.
    Signature

    For SEO news, discussions, tactics, and more.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5076911].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author AndyBlackSEO
    I think Google can identify bad grammar. That is often an easy way to identify spun content. If content reads well... then it could do ok in the search engines. Google just doesn't want to peddle cap to it's searchers.
    Signature
    [FREE SEO TOOL] Build 29 Effective, High Authority Backlinks that Will Increase Your Google Rankings in 2020... CLICK HERE ...
    ... Instant backlinks that can get you results within 24-72hrs.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5076937].message }}

Trending Topics