Travel company sues Google's adsense

by GGpaul
50 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Travel company takes on Google's ad ban

I decided to share this since lately all I see are people getting banned from adsense. I don't know if this will change anything for everyone else that uses adsense, but I found this to be interesting.
#adsense #company #google #sues #travel
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    Seriously?

    The guy is suing because he didn't get $120?

    He has too much free time on his hands.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262299].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author discustipated
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      Seriously?

      The guy is suing because he didn't get $120?

      He has too much free time on his hands.
      hehe they wont win ****. They will spend more on court cost. Google has there TOS down. lol It even states that they dont have to pay anyone. These people are stupid for thinking that they are going to get that money.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5268275].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author kolbywhite28
        Originally Posted by discustipated View Post

        It even states that they dont have to pay anyone.
        This may have no effect if it contravenes the local laws.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5268382].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262312].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by AlexTheKid View Post

      Lol, wouldn't all the fees greatly exceed $120? What lawyer would take on this kind of case .
      Exactly!

      If I was Google I would bury him in counter suit legal fees just for wasting my time over $120.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262319].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author paolocans
    Well, I am also banned before. That is good. At least there is a company that stands for the good of the many.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262313].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Robert Michael
    I feel for them. & the people saying "why sue over 120 dollars"

    Its pretty simple - It isnt about the money.

    Its about standing up for honest publishers and forcing someone to look into the way Adsense does things.

    If any company could monopolize the globe, its Google. So I think its about time people started saying "I dont give a damn how much money you have, I can still take legal action if you want to pull some shady sh*t"

    I hope this guy wins, man I'd love it. I might not get what they owe me, but it would still be an awesome feeling to know that someone got back at them.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262328].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Whos That Guru View Post

      I feel for them. & the people saying "why sue over 120 dollars"

      Its pretty simple - It isnt about the money.

      Its about standing up for honest publishers and forcing someone to look into the way Adsense does things.

      If any company could monopolize the globe, its Google. So I think its about time people started saying "I dont give a damn how much money you have, I can still take legal action if you want to pull some shady sh*t"

      I hope this guy wins, man I'd love it. I might not get what they owe me, but it would still be an awesome feeling to know that someone got back at them.
      I guarantee buried in the TOS everyone that is running Adsense waived all rights when they clicked that signup button.

      The guy is wasting his time, Google is smart enough to hire high dollar lawyers to create that TOS before it ever went public for any of us.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262371].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Mike Grant
        Originally Posted by yukon View Post

        I guarantee buried in the TOS everyone that is running Adsense waived all rights when they clicked that signup button.

        The guy is wasting his time, Google is smart enough to hire high dollar lawyers to create that TOS before it ever went public for any of us.
        Whatever is in the ToS does not mean it is legal and the contract will hold up in court. Paypal, for example, has been raped on this multiple times.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262546].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author dp40oz
        Originally Posted by yukon View Post

        I guarantee buried in the TOS everyone that is running Adsense waived all rights when they clicked that signup button.

        The guy is wasting his time, Google is smart enough to hire high dollar lawyers to create that TOS before it ever went public for any of us.
        I legally beat Myspace on a TOS violation. Ive talked about it a few times on this board. A TOS holds very little legal power. You can write whatever you want in a TOS, that doesn't mean its legal. I can write "Everyone who clicks on this owes me $500 and I have the right to take their car when I want", does't mean it holds up in court.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262722].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author kolbywhite28
        Originally Posted by yukon View Post

        I guarantee buried in the TOS everyone that is running Adsense waived all rights when they clicked that signup button.

        The guy is wasting his time, Google is smart enough to hire high dollar lawyers to create that TOS before it ever went public for any of us.

        This may not always be true. Some of the terms may contravene local laws and thereby render them ineffectual. Didn't someone else win a suit against Google some years back over a small matter similar to this?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5268165].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Robert Michael
    Probably, but its still a nuisance. I applaud the guy. Maybe he wins, maybe he loses. Either way, hes forcing Google to spend some cash on defense attorneys. All is well that ends well.

    I'm sure he doesnt really think he will get his account back, nor the money that was lost.

    Sounds to me like he just wants to inconvenience them like they have done to him, along with millions of other honest people.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262386].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author faridaziz
    Ha ha... way to go Mr. Bowyer!

    "...accuse Google of unconscionable conduct - a legal definition that refers to harsh or unfair behaviour by a stronger party over a weaker party."

    I love this sentence
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262391].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author outwest
    I would not be so sure google will lose this one
    Google and Microsoft are routinely sued all over the world, and they often lose
    Signature
    Tech article writing .Native English Speaker(with Proof)
    specializing in SmartPhones , Internet security, high tech gadgets, search engines, tech shows, digital cameras.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262440].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by outwest View Post

      I would not be so sure google will lose this one
      Google and Microsoft are routinely sued all over the world, and they often lose
      Maybe, but they probably settle out of court depending on the court location. Don't they handle the case in the state/country that the suit is filed? For $120 it would be cheaper just to settle.

      Then again, I've worked for an international business years ago, large companies never do anything low cost & practical, they waste a lot of money on silly overpriced things.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262465].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author bigp1612
        Seems like a good way to gain some publicity......
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262529].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Talen
    Google will settle out of court and probably pay the guy's legal fees. If this went to court it would cost Google tens of thousands of dollars...they will take the cheaper route.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262463].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author outwest
    considering attorneys cost 300 bucks per hour, anything would be cheaper than that
    Signature
    Tech article writing .Native English Speaker(with Proof)
    specializing in SmartPhones , Internet security, high tech gadgets, search engines, tech shows, digital cameras.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262535].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author RatRaceWatch
    I hope he wins too, I still cringe when I think they finalized $1880, and took it away. Guess finalized is a loose word eh?
    Signature
    At Manifest Income our mission is to Help You Build A Business That Matches Your Passion.

    We offer: Free Business Plans, Web Design, Online Marketing Training, Mentorship, & Support!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262844].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author iAmNameLess
    Good for him.

    As for an attorney that would take the case... there are many. I'm surprised a firm hasn't tried to file a class action suit yet. Even if the guy represents himself, it costs Google more just to defend it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5262891].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5266873].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author paulgl
      Originally Posted by craigslistleedz View Post

      Here's a guy that sued Google for banning his adsense account and he won: Aaron Greenspan: Why I Sued Google (and Won) [Updated]
      LOL!!! That Aaron Greenspan has made the rounds many times...
      UNFORTUNATELY....people fail to see THE REST OF THE STORY:
      Aaron Greenspan: Why Google Bothered to Appeal a $761 Small Claims Case (and Won)

      Google appealed....AND WON!

      Google gets sued a Brazillian times a day. And the point is..........?

      They care more about getting sued for patents...something that
      happens almost on a daily basis. One reason why they have been
      buying companies to own as many patents as they can.

      Silly people.

      Why not post that this happens to Microsoft, Apple, IBM, etc.
      also on an almost daily basis?

      And when you read the fine print of the article the OP posted,
      you will realize that the courts had already ruled in google's
      favor. They are just trying for some end around BS. Court
      will probably once again slap it down.

      And life will go on.

      Paul
      Signature

      If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5267051].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Fraggler
        Originally Posted by paulgl View Post

        And when you read the fine print of the article the OP posted,
        you will realize that the courts had already ruled in google's
        favor. They are just trying for some end around BS. Court
        will probably once again slap it down.
        If you are talking about the last paragraph you'll see the appeal they are talking about is a separate issue: Google misleading users' into thinking Google's ads are organic search results.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5267410].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author paulgl
          Originally Posted by Fraggler View Post

          If you are talking about the last paragraph you'll see the appeal they are talking about is a separate issue: Google misleading users' into thinking Google's ads are organic search results.
          Yeah, true, but it means google had already beaten them once,
          which is really what I should have said.

          Point is, this stuff happens all the time. Where was the mania
          when an xbox user sued MS for $500 billion?

          Think that was silly? Exactly.

          Paul
          Signature

          If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5267882].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Fraggler
    The bloke in the OP is not suing Google. He has made an official complaint to Fair Trading and now has complained to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. The ACCC takes care of it if they think Google is breaking their rules. ACCC have taken it to court, not the complainer.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5267392].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author outwest
    Where the Guy sued google and WON, and Then Google Appealed it and WON the appeal, the guy had trashed them in the Huffington post, and I think they got ticked off at the bad publicity
    He had filed the case in small claims court so he had no attorneys fees


    I do also think its noteworthy to mention that on appeal
    Google won the appeal by saying that this guy basically
    had his Adsense acct terminated for saying PICK A LINK
    above his Adsense Ads

    He was also Placing Adsense on Blank Domains with no content
    Signature
    Tech article writing .Native English Speaker(with Proof)
    specializing in SmartPhones , Internet security, high tech gadgets, search engines, tech shows, digital cameras.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5267506].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author BigNorm
    Even if he did win we would never hear about it. Google would probably pay him to shut up.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5267617].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author timpears
    Seems like more trouble than it is worth. But sometimes you have to take a stand. I don't know how it works in Australia, but if it was in the USA, I know if Google lost, they would just appeal until the plaintiff ran out of money to pursue the case.
    Signature

    Tim Pears

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5267732].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kolbywhite28
    Oops, it was posted before.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5268177].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author outwest
      Originally Posted by kolbywhite28 View Post

      Oops, it was posted before.
      He won his case but he never got his money
      He blabbed about it on Huffington post, it got picked up by NYtimes etc etc Google didnt like the negative publicity, they appealed the verdict

      they won the appeal, the judge ended up giving the guy 0 dollars and 0 court costs
      Signature
      Tech article writing .Native English Speaker(with Proof)
      specializing in SmartPhones , Internet security, high tech gadgets, search engines, tech shows, digital cameras.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5268237].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author discustipated
        [QUOTE=outwest;5268237]He won his case but he never got his money
        He blabbed about it on Huffington post, it got picked up by NYtimes etc etc Google didnt like the negative publicity, they appealed the verdict

        they won the appeal, the judge ended up giving the guy 0 dollars and 0 court costs

        I didnt even bother reading the article but like you just said - Its stupid. No ones going to get **** from it. It would have cost them more in court cost anyways if they did when and google has there **** down. lol
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5268297].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author yukon
        Banned
        Originally Posted by outwest View Post

        He won his case but he never got his money
        He blabbed about it on Huffington post, it got picked up by NYtimes etc etc Google didnt like the negative publicity, they appealed the verdict

        they won the appeal, the judge ended up giving the guy 0 dollars and 0 court costs
        That's funny.

        Maybe the NY times or Huffington post, paid him $120 for his story?

        The guy was definitely determined to get his $120 , lol!




        I want my $2!


        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5268435].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author evertd
    I would think this would make a perfect situation for a class action suit for banned publishers against adsense.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5268261].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TolyZ
    If everyone sued google for their banned adsense accounts, may be we can make a change?
    Honestly, dealing with google is like dealing with a wall. They don't care about you unless you are spending substantial amount of money with them. It's always a one way communication.
    Signature
    Professional SEO Company marketing1on1.com that gets results.
    BuyBacklinksCheap.com
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5268324].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author outwest
    I actually do think this is a prime opportunity for a class action suit against google
    not sure if it would be granted class action status though, since the situations vary for banning with each webmaster
    but it would get their attention
    Signature
    Tech article writing .Native English Speaker(with Proof)
    specializing in SmartPhones , Internet security, high tech gadgets, search engines, tech shows, digital cameras.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5268335].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kolbywhite28
    If you can have a class action suit that requires Google to provide better customer service or that they must reveal the reasons for any ban (maybe suing for costs due to lost business, time or money), that would be great.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5268397].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bhuff85
    It took me a minute after clicking the link to realize that in this instance, "smh" stood for the "Sydney Morning Herald".
    Signature
    Want to speed up your writing and save time?
    This book will show you how:
    --> Write Fast: 21 Powerful Ways to Cut Your Writing Time in Half! <--
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5268705].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author outwest
    I think everyone reading this thread should read both the story of the guy suing google and then the story where google appealed it and won. VERY INTERESTING stories about Googles attorneys, the judges questions and reactions

    Initially when He sued Google he did it in small claims court. There are no attorneys allowed. (I am sure Google hated this) So his costs were only about 40 dollars court costs and obviously he represented himself. Google sent a legal assistant or some other lowly person on this case.

    In the appeal. Google brought both their attorneys AND a Google Engineer (who the judge failed to call as a witness) I think its VERY interesting both these stories


    Travel company takes on Google's ad ban

    Aaron Greenspan: Why Google Bothered to Appeal a $761 Small Claims Case (and Won)
    Signature
    Tech article writing .Native English Speaker(with Proof)
    specializing in SmartPhones , Internet security, high tech gadgets, search engines, tech shows, digital cameras.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5269239].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ammy Tisdale
    Originally Posted by GGpaul View Post

    Travel company takes on Google's ad ban

    I decided to share this since lately all I see are people getting banned from adsense. I don't know if this will change anything for everyone else that uses adsense, but I found this to be interesting.


    How can a travel company contest a case against the such a Giant?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5269280].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author outwest
      Originally Posted by Ammy Tisdale View Post

      How can a travel company contest a case against the such a Giant?
      Easy just file a small claims case
      Google is not allowed to bring attorneys for small claims, (nor is the plaintiff)
      Signature
      Tech article writing .Native English Speaker(with Proof)
      specializing in SmartPhones , Internet security, high tech gadgets, search engines, tech shows, digital cameras.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5269411].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author chrislangley
    I don't think the company suing is going to make much of a difference, Google can terminate an account for any reason according to its terms
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5269955].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author iAmNameLess
      Originally Posted by chrislangley View Post

      I don't think the company suing is going to make much of a difference, Google can terminate an account for any reason according to its terms
      Yeah, but like in the article, any reason, is a reason, but no reason is against their own terms. If they can't show up and prove the reason, then its useless.

      A class action would be perfect... its something that could generate enough publicity that it may make them change things.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5272036].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author hcl_23
        I agree with you. A class action would be perfect.

        It is not all about money. There is something called pride.

        Yukon: Would you like if someone calls you fraud and cheater without any reason or doesn't give reason?? Don't spread your BS. If you are not breaking any TOS of google your sites would probably never see the first page of google results.


        Originally Posted by iAmNameLess View Post

        Yeah, but like in the article, any reason, is a reason, but no reason is against their own terms. If they can't show up and prove the reason, then its useless.

        A class action would be perfect... its something that could generate enough publicity that it may make them change things.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5272276].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author yukon
          Banned
          Originally Posted by hcl_23 View Post

          I agree with you. A class action would be perfect.

          It is not all about money. There is something called pride.

          Yukon: Would you like if someone calls you fraud and cheater without any reason or doesn't give reason?? Don't spread your BS. If you are not breaking any TOS of google your sites would probably never see the first page of google results.


          Would you like it If someone gave you instructions (TOS) & you agreed to those TOS, then broke the TOS?

          If you owned Google would you let people walk all over you & your sites/products? Didn't think so.

          Google doesn't owe you anything, let it go. :rolleyes:
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5272833].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author hcl_23
            I wouldn't like to break the TOS and why should I?

            It is in Google TOS that they can ban for any reason but they don't give the reason of ban. Is this not against their own TOS?

            Google does owe because they do not pay the banned publisher as well as the advertisers (however, they say so). Do you think this is fair??

            Originally Posted by yukon View Post

            Would you like it If someone gave you instructions (TOS) & you agreed to those TOS, then broke the TOS?

            If you owned Google would you let people walk all over you & your sites/products? Didn't think so.

            Google doesn't owe you anything, let it go. :rolleyes:
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5277688].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nicnac03
    Not for having brown eyes they can't
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5271909].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Fraggler
    Here is an update on the bloke who made an official complaint to Fair Trading.

    He had is account reinstated and lost amount fully refunded...

    http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/busi...205-1qzve.html
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5558697].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author alexmobile
    Once facebook will launch their own ad network and all publishers will have a real adsense alternative, then google and amazon may start treating us better
    Signature
    QRID.com - login to websites by scanning QR code on your monitor! No Passwords!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5558858].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CharlesFords
    Can't believe this for only 120$ the guy sued google.. :-)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5560668].message }}

Trending Topics