On a Scale of 1-10. Tell me how hard it should be to rank these 9 Websites! (Results Provided).
- SEO |
UPDATE: More information on Competition.
Anyways, all of the competing sites have 100-400 backlinks at most (95% are low ranking sites just who is, stat sites and business directories, etc.) Very weak backlinks and they have NO SEO link building or anything of that nature.. Most of the domains are anywhere from 2-6 years old. They all have some on-page SEO but it's very poor and doesn't really look like anything's been done. Most of the sites are anywhere from 40-100 pages with 80% of the pages being inner product pages. Very little real content, just a lot of product specs and scrambled words on the pages.
#1
About 7,980,000 results (0.23 seconds)
#2
About 1,250,000 results (0.20 seconds)
#3
About 300,000 results (0.22 seconds)
#4
About 152,000 results (0.35 seconds)
#5
About 42,700 results (0.24 seconds)
#6
About 181,000 results (0.27 seconds)
#7
About 1,210,000 results (0.22 seconds)
#8
About 689,000 results (0.23 seconds)
#9
About 2,460,000 results (0.23 seconds)
-
komplex Banned-
Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5308628].message }} -
-
komplex Banned-
Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5311925].message }} -
-
cashcow -
Thanks
SignatureGone Fishing{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5311992].message }} -
-
terryd -
Thanks
Signature{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5312012].message }} -
-
komplex Banned-
Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5312200].message }} -
-
cashcow -
[ 1 ] Thanks - 1 reply
SignatureGone Fishing{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5312233].message }}-
komplex Banned-
Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5312589].message }} -
-
-
chukcha -
Thanks - 1 reply
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5312644].message }}-
komplex Banned-
Thanks - 1 reply
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5313258].message }}-
Clint Faber -
Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5313493].message }} -
-
-