The new google era. Here's my guide to rank now. The day after panda

by lrdc
7 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Yes. 99% were affected by the new so-called Google update.

Google is a search engine. It MUST care about the quality of the provided results. It MUST think first of all about the visitor and not about the IM'ers. Google didn't ask anyone to earn money on its shoulders, and that's what's happening now.

Just like you, I got a small strike (it wasn't big, and it's pretty recoverable), and now I will share 5 thoughts about what will play the role from now one. I've read a lot in the past days (a lot of bulls**t as well), and here's my personal opinion about how's the game now:

1) We did everything wrong all the time. But it worked! An IM'er was, untill yesterday, a link spammer. Anything more than it. I worked with email marketing 10 years ago, and it was almost the same thing. Link building was about spamming stuff everywhere, running Senuke, Scrapebox, BMR, ALN crazily, like hell. Unlike the email "spammy" marketing, which dead 10+ years ago, Google just caught 90% of us today, 10 years later. Is email marketing dead? Absolutely not! It's more expensive. And we must use it in an intelligent (and non-spammy way).

My solution: Let's start thinking different now. It's the very very first step. Building USEFUL content, written by someone WHO KNOWS what he's doing, will play the role. Forget about spam, and mass-automated stuff.

2) We can't use silly patterns! We must look NATURAL! "I had a private blog network deindexed. Each blog had 100 posts, each post with 300 words, 1 backlink, all do-follow, etc etc" ... There isn't a very-default recipe. I have read about many people saying this. It was very obvious that Google would catch you early or later on. It's quite simple to identify spammy sites. Just look at who you are linking to (OBL). Matt Cutts already stated it years ago: "linking to bad neighbourhood will pennalyze you".

My solutions: Do *not* link to someone you don't know. Use different patterns in your blog posts. Write some posts without links, and without keywords.

3) Who is the blog writer? Does he exist, does it have a photo ? No? Oops....
I have personally never seen SEO-purposed blogs with a photo, neither an identification about who's writing it.... Didn't it look so obvious in the past?

My solution: We must create REAL blogs. A WP blog always was and will always be a powerfull tool. We CAN create blog networks, of course, but let's make it real. Let's make it USEFUL for someone to read. If you work in a company with 5 employees, why not encourage each of them to write their own blog ?

4) Google detected unnatural links.... Just take a look into your backlinks history. I have personally done this mistake, and for sure, many of you did. I overstuffed 90% of my backlink anchors with keywords. Silly me. Do you think it sounds natural to be linked all the time with keywords? Absolutely not.

My solution: We must create natural backlinks. Ouch, what's a natural backlink? Using the anchors "click here", "www.mydomain.com", "read more", "john doe", "here's the opinion of john doe about [keyword]", and finally, a couple with "[keyword]". I would say no more than 30% of your backlinks can have your keyword now.

5) SEO Gone slow now. We can't hurry anymore.
Instead of overoptimizing one single site about one single keyword, we should create more than one site about one same content. First think about the visitor, and then about Google. If you are doing something useful for the visitor, G will like it for sure.

6) My final thought.. Don't you think Google's crew aren't here, reading the same posts as you ? I have never seen anyone mentioning this here. I always see posts "how to rank #1 in NN days, follow these steps". Wasn't it so obvious?

That are my thoughts about how will the game be played now. We must be NATURAL, and generate USEFUL content nowadays. Blog posters must EXIST. That's simple. Robot-like blogs won't go any farther from now on

Success and good luck for everybody!
#day #era #google #guide #panda #rank
  • Profile picture of the author cagliostro
    You are right. But think about it for a while. You create a GREAT / REAL website about something you know and love.

    And then what ? You sit there and wait for someone to link "naturally" to you. It will happen ? Maybe in a few years you get a few backlinks, while your $competion is buying ads in Adwords or elsewhere.

    Also don't forget that Google is a BOT. Nothing else.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5905872].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author lrdc
      Originally Posted by cagliostro View Post

      You are right. But think about it for a while. You create a GREAT / REAL website about something you know and love.

      And then what ? You sit there and wait for someone to link "naturally" to you. It will happen ? Maybe in a few years you get a few backlinks, while your is buying ads in Adwords or elsewhere.

      Also don't forget that Google is a BOT. Nothing else.
      We can and we must create backlinks, for sure. I would go farther: we CAN use blog networks like ALN, BMR, also use Senuke as well.

      But we can't use that to disseminate BAD content. We must disseminate USEFUL content. That's the point.

      Ferrari is a very fast car. But it can KILL people if used in the wrong manner.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5905902].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author cagliostro
        Originally Posted by lrdc View Post

        We can and we must create backlinks, for sure. I would go farther: we CAN use blog networks like ALN, BMR, also use Senuke as well.

        But we can't use that to disseminate BAD content. We must disseminate USEFUL content. That's the point.

        Ferrari is a very fast car. But it can KILL people if used in the wrong manner.
        Checking my niche, i still see in the first 5 serps some crapy/spamming websites.

        Google can't really tell if an article is quality content for sure, it can only ASSume from other factors.

        Maybe it will get better in time but i doubt.

        But YES, you should improve our content and above ALL we should STOP to polute the Internet with junk spam comments. I agree.

        But for me all those changes mean that IM will just become an expensive game for rich owners. At least in the lucrative niches.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5905935].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author lrdc
          Originally Posted by cagliostro View Post

          Checking my niche, i still see in the first 5 serps some crapy/spamming websites.

          Google can't really tell if an article is quality content for sure, it can only ASSume from other factors.

          Maybe it will get better in time but i doubt.

          But YES, you should improve our content and above ALL we should STOP to polute the Internet with junk spam comments. I agree.

          But for me all those changes mean that IM will just become an expensive game for rich owners. At least in the lucrative niches.
          There will always exist spammy/crappy sites. Even in better serps than yours. If you build more than one site about the same content, you will reduce the risk of being pennalyzed (and losing all your $), and also you will be able, sometime, to get 2 positions in page #1.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5906019].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author hicksdelight
      Originally Posted by cagliostro View Post

      You are right. But think about it for a while. You create a GREAT / REAL website about something you know and love.

      And then what ? You sit there and wait for someone to link "naturally" to you. It will happen ? Maybe in a few years you get a few backlinks, while your is buying ads in Adwords or elsewhere.

      Also don't forget that Google is a BOT. Nothing else.
      Then buy ads yourself, Google has never said you cannot buy links to get traffic to your site, just add nofollow link with it, get targeted visitors and go from there.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5905904].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author hicksdelight
    My solution: We must create natural backlinks. Ouch, what's a natural backlink? Using the anchors "click here", "www.mydomain.com", "read more", "john doe", "here's the opinion of john doe about [keyword]", and finally, a couple with "[keyword]". I would say no more than 30% of your backlinks can have your keyword now.
    I agree with that, throw in links with no keyword anchor or something more natural, like has been said, mix it in with links with your keywords.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5905894].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    The day after panda
    The day after Panda?

    That was months ago, where you been?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5905924].message }}

Trending Topics