The Truth About Negative SEO

Before you judge me, read to the end. If you don't then you are uneducated on my ideas your opinion is invalid. Even if you think I am wrong I guarantee you will be entertained.

So now finally people realize that negative SEO is possible... something that I have known for months due to testing the theory for myself. Now that more people are realizing it is a reality I shall tell you why I think it is happening.

The reason Google allowed/wants negative SEO to happen.

For years now governments and the media have wanted to control the internet. Big business tycoons such as Rupet Murdoch would love to get a share of the Internets media but have failed. For example when he bought out Myspace and everyone moved to Facebook, primarily due to his seedy agenda for the website.

Up until now no one has been able to tame the internet and it is the home of free speech, a place where anyone can make a website and be heard. This is where Google comes into this with negative SEO.

As most of you know negative SEO effects small to medium sized websites who have a low backlink profile and relativity low amount of "trust" with Google. These types of website make up the majority of the internet. This is bad for the big media empires that control most of television, news papers and radio and who want to run the world.

For a group of elite individuals to control the internet, the internet first must be run by a select few people. Use for example searching 'questions'. If you type a basic question into Google 90% of all queries will result in Yahoo answers or EHow being the top results.

The reason why the internet needs to be run by these select few people is that once the market share of the internet is controlled by lets say 10,000 major websites controlling all subject areas for first and second page results then they can be bought. Be it buying the company outright or paying for them to censor or manipulate their website content in a way that is favorable to the buyers interests. If for example you were one of the wealthy elite of this world then you could pay each of those webmasters $1,000,000 or more to post your medias agendas or just plain buy out the website and still have plenty of cash left. Or maybe those 10,000 websites would be bought out by 100 different larger companies consolidating the "owners" of the internet further and allowing for the fixing of ideas or whatever else, this idea seems likely since it is how television media has become.

Google knows that negative SEO will create a war of the webmasters and we will eventually destroy each others websites leaving Google's hands blood free. Destroying websites this way leaves Google out of the focus. It was your competitor that destroyed your website, not Google.

Once the small and medium webmasters are out of the game then the internet can be run by an elite group of people. These people can then control the herds of people by manipulating them, just like what happens in mainstream media elsewhere. Want an example? Look at Fox News.

Google are relying on the average user of the Google's search engine to be pig ignorant about us webmasters. And it is a bet with high odds in their favor. Your average person knows nothing about us webmasters, we are the invisible cogs that power the internet, no one cares if the cogs disappear as long as the machine keeps working. They are relying on the fact that the users wont notice nore care that these big brands control the market. After all what average person stops to care if an independent small site is on the top of Google for their search query? The answer is none. Users just want to get their fix of whatever they come online for, they don't care who gives it to them.

Could your website generate money for you to bother keeping it running without organic SEO? For most people the answer is no. Eventually most of your average webmasters will disappear off the internet as their audience will diminish. Further down the line the elite will have the power to reduce the traffic flow to webmasters of their choosing. Whoever controls the user can control where they go.

But why do Google care about this? Greed, power, wealth. Perhaps it is not Google that cares but more that they are just puppets for someone else, perhaps the owners of Google receive "gifts" or promises of power and prestige for the future from wealthy and powerful individuals, Google must of course repay those gifts and favors by helping them reach their goals.

Google is one of the wealthiest internet companies of this time and one of the most powerful companies on the internet. Do you really think they would implement negative SEO without an agenda? Big companies such as Google don't make mistakes like that. Instead they have plans and agendas that they can call "mistakes" if their greedy manipulative plans are uncovered. Just look at George Bush for example; he said it was a mistake that Iraq didn't have weapons of mas destruction after he claimed they did. It was "bad intelligence". It was no mistake, so called "mistakes" by such powerful people are just a bull s*** excuse they use to scapegoat their true plans. Mistakes so big don't happen when you have unlimited resources to plan. Extensive planning = no mistakes.

Look at what has happened to the internet lately, the media and governments have been on a rampage. An example of this is the shutting down of piracy websites and the imprisoning of (in my eyes) innocent webmasters. It's quite obvious that wealthy and powerful people are waging war on the Internet and in my opinion Google is on their side.