Google's January update has changed SEO forever

by ct_roy
16 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Hi,

I'm relatively new here but follow SEO developments closely. I'm sure everyone here is aware of Google's major SERP's updates in January.

Well today, Aaron Wall pubished an article which is a MUST READ for anyone who is involved in Internet Marketing and SEO.

You can read it over on - seobook dot com / google-branding (can't post direct link right now as I don't have 15 posts yet - will take you 5 mins to read)

In summary, SEO just a LOT easier for big brands. Google is looking to bring back trust into it's SERP's (weeding out the cesspool that the internet has become according to Eric Schimdt) and the recent algorithm changes have dramatically boosted the rankings of big established brands into EXTREMELY competitive search phrases.

What does this mean for the little guy out there? Are we going to see the big "G" start to squeeze less established "brands" who have spent years building their content and products into strong positions in the SERP's who have already seen themselves fall off the radar only to be replaced by billion dollar businesses (who in many cases do not provide more compelling content but have a higher perceived trust rank)

What goes it mean for Google's ad revenues? Big brands will typically spend significant sums on PPC. Stronger organic rankings might lead to them spending less on PPC.

This would impact Google's revenues in a BIG way.

Overall, my own opinion is that in the long run, this will work out for the better. It's getting harder and harder to manipulate Google's SERP's through traditional SEO techniques.

By increasingly raising the trust barriers to top rankings, Google is ensuring the long term success of those who invest time and effort in producing top quality content and products.

As long as Google does not develop a complete algorithmic bias in favour of big brands over all others at all costs, this should be beneficial to all of us who focus on quality content and product.

The big question now for all of us must be

"How do I build my brand online?"
"What influencing factors determine whether Google views my site as a brand or not?"

I'd be really interested to get your guys views on all this.
#changed #forever #google #january #seo #update
  • Profile picture of the author kflanagan28
    I've read this post. It would seem odd Google is going to allow big brands to simply just dominate Google from now on. They are meant to show the most relevant searches per search not simply show whatever the biggest brand is. But Aaron wall is rarely wrong about this kind of stuff.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[553118].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ct_roy
      Originally Posted by kflanagan28 View Post

      I've read this post. It would seem odd Google is going to allow big brands to simply just dominate Google from now on. They are meant to show the most relevant searches per search not simply show whatever the biggest brand is. But Aaron wall is rarely wrong about this kind of stuff.
      yip - it does indeed at first glance look like a direct contradiction with the founding principles of what made the main google search engine successful in the first place - i.e. the democratisation of search engine results

      however, if I read more into it - I think Google is being very smart here. What they're basically reinforcing are 2 things:

      1.) Trust - people trust brands - simple. Brands take time and money to build. Brands are less likely to scam and spam you.
      2.) Quality content and products - Brands go to great lengths to ensure that their products meet with their customers expectations.

      The examples Aaron used were quite startling because it showed how several billion dollar businesses came from nowhere to dominate the top 10 serps in their inustries most competitive search phrases.

      Hence the concerns about Google somehow becoming less democratic. However, I think if we scratch the surface here a bit more, Google is still being democratic. Google is not going to start changing the fundamental principles it become successful on.

      Or at least I HOPE they're not!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[553187].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bgmacaw
    When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[553123].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ManAbout
    And how does Google decide which brands to show and how to order them on the page? Market size? Their ad budget? Number of employees? Market buzz?

    Doesn't make sense.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[553188].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ct_roy
      Originally Posted by ManAbout View Post

      And how does Google decide which brands to show and how to order them on the page? Market size? Their ad budget? Number of employees? Market buzz?

      Doesn't make sense.
      financials etc. wouldn't make sense - too simplistic given the complexity of their algorithms at this stage.

      Market buzz might be the direction they are going. But this has it's own risks for abuse.

      It would be interesting to know if anyone experienced big big upsurges in traffic post the Jan update and look at their experiences.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[553239].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ManAbout
    And besides when you consider the tens of thousands of niches out there, is Google really going to go out there and find out who the brand leaders are in each niche?

    All those niches that he showed are super competitive. You shouldn't be targeting them anyway. If you are trying to optimize your site for ranking for "credit card" or "airline tickets' or "health insurance", then you are nuts.

    Every week there is some guru who comes out with their own dire, doom and gloom predictions. Last week it was "Social media and Web 2.0" promotion is dead and it's the end of SEO as we know it. Today it is this.

    As long as you follow the basic principles of niche targeting, creating good content and link building, you should be fine.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[553284].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TheEnthusiast
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[553297].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author reapr
      I think I will have to disagree a bit here.

      If a site has great content and appears to be a contender in a niche it will fare well.

      I have dozens of sites and the ones that have great content are doing very well on this last update. The ones that were just thrown together and have little content that were doing well have tanked.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[553978].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Matt Hoey
    What does this mean for us?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[554852].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author negropay
    All the noise about google and seo ranking should not be alarming. Small buget businesses will simply find workable alternatives. From the biginnig of the world BIG as not been able to wipe out SMALL,Not then ! Not Now! and Not ever!.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[555116].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author zoobie
    I don't have a problem with that. As ct_roy points out brand takes long time to build.
    And Google seems to get away with the web spammer with this kind of thing. That's great but who cares about so called "smaller brand". A branding means history as well. If a website exits in a web space for long, it can be a big brand as well.

    So there is no contradiction in my opinion.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[555365].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jon99
    Most of us here ain't into competitive big brands, so I guess there's not much impact for "peasants" like us?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[555538].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author digitalpimps
    highly unlikely, but you never know..if thats the case then they just threw delivering the most relevant results right out the window
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[555587].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author daniel160wong
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[555656].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Hyaku_Man
      Whatever happens with highly competitive keywords doesn't really affect me because I target small niches.

      But since January I have noticed that all of my blogs with high quality content have shot up the SERPs while my hack projects dropped down. Whatever they've done it seems to make perfect sense. They're rewarding me for good behaviour like they should. I don't like having to make crap content to get good SERPs.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[555708].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author ct_roy
        Originally Posted by Hyaku_Man View Post

        Whatever happens with highly competitive keywords doesn't really affect me because I target small niches.

        But since January I have noticed that all of my blogs with high quality content have shot up the SERPs while my hack projects dropped down. Whatever they've done it seems to make perfect sense. They're rewarding me for good behaviour like they should. I don't like having to make crap content to get good SERPs.
        that's good to hear.

        BTW: This topic made the webpronews newsletter today...
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[556470].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Oling
    Very interesting. So does everyone goes from hereon... I just hope they do not the have the bias that will give the behemoths more controlling power over little guys like me. I am just starting out and hope to get somewhere with this hard work.
    Signature

    Learn More About Me later...

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[556633].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Oling
    Is google getting more devilish in their quest to cater to whims? This is hard for some who have work their butts out and soon cannot find any placement for their sites because of unfair business practises.. but Big G controls the internet as we know it so I think there's not much we can do, can we?

    Oling
    Signature

    Learn More About Me later...

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[556652].message }}

Trending Topics