SENuke X + Penguin = Success?

Very interesting because in my campaigns I decided to use URLs instead of anchor text..

It's a combination of, crappy spun with non relevant words in content and/or bad grammar, links that you lose have a very heavy effect (deindexing blog networks), and then the anchor diversity.

Ofcourse it is so that the more low quality links you build the higher the chance they will get removed cause of spam, and that is exactly why you should focus on better links, as there is nothing that leads so fast too a penalty as losing links.

If you think you get away by keep building low quality links then you haven't learned anything, as this is just the start and it only gets worse. Google ain't quitting after a few updates, they keep improving their alghorytm so better start working on a long term strategy that will last.

Hi, i'm banned at fiver for no reason at all (sucks) but i really want to order your service. How can we work this out? Can i pay you directly to paypal? I can not send PM so maybe you can send me a PM with your emailadress so that i can contact you?

Regards,
Jim

I completely agree. It's not the tool that is effective or ineffective it's the SEO strategy that is used. Tools like SEnuke X just make it easier.

As for all this talk of Google improving their algorithm by going after spam links all I can say is ... the only thing improving is Google's bottom line!

Google isn't as smart as everyone gives them credit for and Penguin was about penalising anchor text usage. You can see the garbage in the SERPs still a year after Penguin was launched.

That same garbage that is ranking high has just as much spammy backlinks as the sites that were hit EXCEPT they have a more varied anchor text ratio which just happens to fit in with Google's latest "improvements" to their algo!

Most of them are not as relevant as the sites that got hit either because most businesses that use SEO also use copywriters and professional web designers.

Penguin was about increasing adsense revenue and throwing SEOers off the scent when Google started placing their own comparison websites as "sponsored" links (complete with white background looking like an organic listing) above everyone else.

There are searches now where the real estate above the fold is completely controlled by Google money-making schemes aka adsense ads and sponsored google site links - not even 1 organic listing.

Wake up people this was never about targeting spam it was about targeting people who actually care about their websites and traffic - the people who needed to turn to advertising after Penguin! It wasn't even aimed that much at professional SEOs because they knew we would figure it out.

I think Google will eventually implode. Since Sergey and his mate sold off Google to the highest bidder (greedy banks...and we all know what they are like) the only thing they are interested in is improving their revenue.

So until Google blows themselves up we will just have to keep rolling with the punches and adjusting. No doubt they will throw another spanner in the works but it won't be an improvement to the SERPs or even the algo. It will be just another tightening of the screw as they introduce a different ridiculous rule to the game.

This is of course just MHO. But, IMHO, I think everyone just needs to keep up-to-date with the latest changes in SEO by listening to people who test, test and test some more and we should stop trying to please Google.

Play them like they play us. :p

I buy original articles for all of my sites I use some of those + spun

Yes, This is the best explanation. Some experts don't understand it :rolleyes:
I use anchor text variation, Highly spun articles, variation of user names etc to avoid footprints. Still majority of sites get high amount of SERP.

IMO, anything created by the program is spam. Building out several Web 2.0 sites just for the purpose of linking out elsewhere is by definition spam. It really doesn't matter whether it was done automatically or manually, the result is the same.

You guys need to wake up. Google does not want to be counting links that don't give off an editorial vibe.

If amateur operations like http://www.linkdetective.com/ can do it, what makes you think Google can't do it many times better and use it against sites whose profiles are made up completely of these low quality links.

BEST. EXPLANATION. EVER. The tool wouldn't run by itself in the first place. The user clicks the start button to make it post a lot of stuff. The user also has control over how much links the program is going to make for a certain campaign. It's really sad that these tools get negative reviews right off the bat without some people realizing that it's actually the user who's plotting all those spam.

SENukeX is just a tool. And Danny hits the nail. It's the user who mindlessly use these tools to spam.

You see, I can also spam the entire internet by hiring a bunch of outsource staff to create links 24/7.

So it's not the tool, not the system, it's YOU, the user.

No, it's not good enough just to spin anchor text now. They are saying that half of your links need to be your domain or bare/naked URL. That's what they consider natural linking.

thank you !

Yes, I have also not seen andbad effect of SEO. Penguin is related to anchor texts and not backlinks..

Hi Dani16,
Can u elaborate more on the web2 with LSI articles? max 2 links? anchor texts variation? How many tier?

Hi Abby,
Mind to share ur senuke strategy? Or any site/page u can refer me for effective strategy?
I was thinking create few web2.0 SN blog page with diff. Related Unique articles, then blast those SN articles with Safe 3Way Attack (with Spun articles), do u think this will work?

Thanks

What is EMD?

Google doesnt know the difference between automated and manual submissions.

How does Google know if a person or tool did it? If a person can do 10 backlinks per day, I can program SENukeX to do 10 backlinks per day as well! If a person can post to xyz site to do backlinks, I can program SENukeX to post to xyz site too to build backlinks.

It's not SENukeX that can get you in trouble with Google, it's the user. People who buy these programs and run everything at default using default templates and settings. People who do not bother to add their own sites as to reduce footprint. People who use one profile for their entire campaign. Etc.

Remember the old adage: "Blame the carpenter, not the hammer."

Its the tool itself. Its what it is designed to do and the links it gives are mostly hot garbage. You all can kid yourself all you want. I see the same lame excuse for this software all the time....its you that have to click the buttons so its on the user. Well the user has to click a button to get a virus from a site too

Poor strategy. At present the links SenukeX gives very little juice you'd be better off using scrapebox for that . At least you could get some links with juice going to your web 2.0 and no monthly $147 going out of your pocket.