This is how i got myself recovered from Penguin!

14 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Okay this penguin stuff has been a pain in head for so many including me. One of my established website that used to get around 3000 UV a day all from organic search went down to a few hundreds. Rankings for almost all of my keywords were tanked. My main keyword has an exact match of 301,000 searches a month and i ranked #3. I had page 1 rankings for around a dozen of other keywords too. So around 25 days ago my world went upside down. I was hit by penguin.

On my way to recovery.


The time when i was hit by penguin was when everyone knew little about what has happened and what needs to be done. As about me i knew lesser than little. I read people making experiments to reach conclusions on what this penguin thing was about so i decided the same and followed my own approach. All i knew that penguin was about over optimization. Let me discuss every step one by one:

1) Content: I admit my content was quality but i had way too much on page seo done. I had almost all of my two word keywords bolded , italicized , underlined , h1 tagged etc. Each of my article had around 10 exact matched or partial match keywords bolded, italicized ......... etc. I reduced the number to two.

2) Internal links: Similar to the point above, i had too many internal links with exact match keywords pointing to other pages of my site. I reduced them to a maximum of two again and transformed the anchors from exact match to relevant phrases. For example "nikkon cameras" became "the new nikkon cameras outperform its competitors" . This is just an idea.

3) Backlinks: I analyzed my backlink profile via Open Site Explorer .
I recorded my anchor text data and all of my backlinks i put into an excel sheet. Around 70% of my anchor texts exactly matched my keyword.After analylizing my backlinks i found that i had around 20% of backlinks coming from very low quality sources like forum profiles , spammed to death blogs etc. What i did first was to dilute my anchors. I didn't resort to building links with anchors like click here , visit the website etc but to use long term phrases that describe my keywords. I hope you understand what i mean.

Basically i ignored correcting low quality existing links and built new high quality links with phrases relating to my anchors.

I used scrapebox to find niche related blogs and posted comments on low obl blogs (generally less than 40 obl). Around 80% of the blogs were moderated ones and i got my comments approved on around 80% of those 80%. may be rest 20 didnot bother to check if new comments were posted lately. For blog comments it very unlikely to get them approved with long phrases , so i used "SOME NAME @ company ltd or SOME NAME- website.com or SOME NAME- keyword". Did you get the idea?

Then i used UAW. I hope most of you are familiar with it. I made 1 submission each 3 days and i used some 200 resource boxes for each. As mentioned before i used long phrases as anchors to my website. I pointed around 40% of the links to homepage and rest all to innerpages. I set the submission rate to 15 articles a day.

I wonder if it had been useful but i created 2 accounts on high pr web 2.0 properties each day and posted 300 word articles on each of them with two links pointing to my website. One to homepage and one to inner pages.

Okay i followed the process above for 20 days and i promised to myself not to check my ranking before 20 days. And guess what , today is the 20th day. I rank #5 for my main keyword , #4 for secondary keyword and rank on page 1 for around 10 other keywords. Thats pretty much close to what i was before i was eaten up by penguin. The traffic yesterday was 2496 UVs.

Conclusion:
So the idea behind all i did was that google has started deciding relevance not by exact keywords but something that describes your content in more words and more sense. I mean , obviously i am not gonna link to a "rabbit cage's site" by the exact term rabbit cage if i liked something about it. I will link it with terms like "some rabbit cage is wonderful" or " how to properly use some rabbit cage". I hope i conveyed my message.


Thanks for reading and very sorry for my extremely bad enlgsih
#penguin #recovered
  • Profile picture of the author colourofspring
    I thought Penguin was a manually run filter, not part of the algorithm - just like Panda is a manually run filter, that's why they have numbers after each manual run, like the last one was 3.5. Perhaps your site wasn't hit by Penguin on 24th April but was penalised by the algo, and that's why you see continual improvements.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6300389].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CombatMode
      Originally Posted by colourofspring View Post

      I thought Penguin was a manually run filter, not part of the algorithm - just like Panda is a manually run filter, that's why they have numbers after each manual run, like the last one was 3.5. Perhaps your site wasn't hit by Penguin on 24th April but was penalised by the algo, and that's why you see continual improvements.
      Yeah even i don't know what penguin actually is. I suspect its something else that flee from the zoo in penguin's disguise. Anyways i couldn't see a reason my site should have been penalized if it was not done by so called penguin. The way webmasters are discussing here about penalization , all i could think that penguin was about over anchoring and links from irrelevant sites.
      And by the way where do you get these numbers from "3.5" ?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6300456].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author retsek
    More likely you were not affected by Penguin but rather many of your links were devalued. By building more links, you started to regain your rank.

    As the other guy said, you can't recover until they run the filter again.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6300421].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CombatMode
      Originally Posted by retsek

      ..............you can't recover until they run the filter again.
      Really ? Did people at google say that penguin is a filter and not an algorithmic change? Anyways , my site didn't move back up slowly. It came back at once 2 days ago according to my rank tracker to positions where it was pre penalty.

      Even if it was a filter , i thing it has run.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6300488].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author orpaz191
    Very nice post. I came to the same conclusions.
    Signature

    Karma is sweet :)
    The only way to succeed is to make others successful.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6300518].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author plsearch
    It is a filter from everything I've red, not part of the algorithm, though the devalued anchor text and possibly other link signals and sources at the same time. I think if you recovered this quickly your links were just devalued.

    My site however seems like it must be the penguin filter as you cant even search for a full sentence or our full title tags and find our previous landing page anywhere, but you will find out contact us page. lol

    I'm tempted to scrap the site and start over but want to wait for them to run the filter again.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6304194].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cooler1
    When you analyze your backlink profile now, what percentage of the anchor exactly match your keyword?
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6304278].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CombatMode
      Originally Posted by cooler1 View Post

      When you analyze your backlink profile now, what percentage of the anchor exactly match your keyword?
      The exact match anchor text backlinks contributed to around 70% of my total backlinks. I suppose after doing all other backlinks i diluted the them to below 20% i suppose.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6319116].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author msu
    Thanks for sharing. I've been doing something similar for a site of mine that took a dip - haven't finished the process yet but just taking out the over SEO'd stuff has already had an impact.
    Signature
    New to WordPress? Save time with my beginner's guide:
    WordPress Step-by-Step
    (for Kindle & Kindle Apps)

    I'm a top-notch WordPress developer: hire me
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6304796].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Raj1106
    Thanks for sharing these tips to recover back from Penguin update..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6304877].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mosthost
    On one hand he says he built high-quality backlinks. On the other hand he says he use UAW for mass article submission and also mass commented.

    Seems unlikely Penguin had much to do with this.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6304903].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CombatMode
      Originally Posted by mosthost View Post

      On one hand he says he built high-quality backlinks. On the other hand he says he use UAW for mass article submission and also mass commented.

      Seems unlikely Penguin had much to do with this.
      Thanks for putting up the contrast but i would like to correct you on this. Yes i did a controlled article submission of manually written articles which were hand spun at sentence and word level and each of the variant was unique and completely readable. Though not high PR but i would call them quality links. Its not the resource but its use which decides whether its spam or not.

      The comments that i posted were in my niche , had extremely low OBL , related to post of the page and most of them were moderated. Hope you won't say them low quality as well.:rolleyes:
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6319125].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author OneManSEO
    I think the key point you missed was that 70% of your backlinks were to your main keyword. In my experience, that is sandbox territory - could be just a coincidence that it happened right around the Penguin update.

    In any case, you did pretty much what I do to get new clients out of that algorithmic filter. Diversify your anchor texts great to lower the percentage of links to a single keyword.

    Just my two cents... congrats on the recovery though!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6305340].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CombatMode
      Originally Posted by OneManSEO View Post

      I think the key point you missed was that 70% of your backlinks were to your main keyword. In my experience, that is sandbox territory - could be just a coincidence that it happened right around the Penguin update.

      In any case, you did pretty much what I do to get new clients out of that algorithmic filter. Diversify your anchor texts great to lower the percentage of links to a single keyword.

      Just my two cents... congrats on the recovery though!
      Yeahh may be its a coincidence. But that was just my opinion. After the recent penguin reupdate , i saw my site doing better then before though.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6319129].message }}

Trending Topics