4 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}
4 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}

I just love redirections - anyone tried this?

by nik0 Banned
3 replies
  • SEO
    • |
Let's say we want to target a page and we have a technique that we can't use or don't want to use in an unlimited way cause it might be too spammy, so I was thinking about this:

website innerpage <---- url shortener <--- blast links

url shortener <---- 2nd url shortener <---- blast links

2nd url shortener <---- 3rd url shortener <---- blast links

3rd url shortener <---- 4th url shortener <---- blast links

How bl@ckhat would that be? Anyone tried this?

ps I dont use this in the services that I sell, this are pure personal experiments which I would like to share opinions on. I just like to game things and I do realize that this might be temporarily solutions to gain huge advantes in short amount of times, you could compare it to short term investments / daytrading
#love #redirections
  • Profile picture of the author TheProgrammer
    hhhmm seems like a good idea, i think its time to load lists in scrapebox.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6350232].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author AlexPandian
    It seems good idea, I never heard of it, Well, will it be considered as black-hat SEO? may be, because, it does NOT Look NATURAL, isn't?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6350352].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author rob1123
      If you're going to try this you may as well skip the url shorteners, granted 301's do absorb a little bit of the page rank if won't be enough to make you link building look algorithmically natural.

      Instead you should set up either a forum profile or web 2.0 property to act as a buffer, blasting links to those raises the amount of PR passed to your site while not tripping and red flags.
      Signature

      derp.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6350523].message }}

Trending Topics