My web2.0's are not getting indexed. HELP

9 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Hello,

I know that web2.0s work quite well nowadays. However, lately I have been struggling to get my web2.0s indexed. I only get about 20%-30% of the web2.0s indexed. Some of the webs are not even indexed after 2-3months.

1) I submit 1 UNIQUE 400-word article (un-spun) to 10 different web2.0s
2) I send 300 social bookmarks to 10 different web2.0s. So each web2.0 gets about 30 social bookmarks.

What should I do to get them indexed? Those are my theories:

1) Maybe google is blocking them to get indexed since they are all duplicate, but I have no proper spinning software so I just submit them manually. I think there is nothing bad having 10 same articles on the internet, isn't it?

2) Maybe I should backlink my social bookmarks with blog comments (as tier3) to get them bigger boost and help them getting indexed?

3) Maybe I should PING the web2.0s?

4) Maybe my social bookmark service is sucks?

Should I be worried? Since as far as I know, there is no point continuing making web2.0s if they are not getting indexed by google..
Thanks
#indexed #web20
  • Profile picture of the author Buyseech
    Originally Posted by mandos123 View Post

    I think there is nothing bad having 10 same articles on the internet, isn't it?
    Seriously? 1 is original the other 9 are 100% duplicate content, which will hardly ever rank, if it gets indexed at all.

    Why would you even do that? Are you linking back to the "original" article with them? That just doesnt make any sense.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6855691].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author mandos123
      Originally Posted by Buyseech View Post

      Seriously? 1 is original the other 9 are 100% duplicate content, which will hardly ever rank, if it gets indexed at all.

      Why would you even do that? Are you linking back to the "original" article with them? That just doesnt make any sense.
      Yeah, I'm linking back to the original articles. It's called article syndication as far as I know and there is nothing wrong with it. For example, Matt Cutts wrotes an article about SEO, it gets syndicated all over the web for thousands of websites and they all get indexed.

      I don't like the idea of spinning. When I wrote and article and I would like to promote my website through this then why should I spin it? Press releases are not spinned..
      Signature

      None

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6855742].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author trytolearnmore
      Originally Posted by Buyseech View Post

      Seriously? 1 is original the other 9 are 100% duplicate content, which will hardly ever rank, if it gets indexed at all.

      Why would you even do that? Are you linking back to the "original" article with them? That just doesnt make any sense.
      The purpose of syndicating content is not to get the pages ranked, but to get traffic and - to a lesser degree - backlinks.

      Duplicate content works just fine and there shouldn't be (theoretically) any punishment for that.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6855799].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author johnben1444
    The chunk of the social bookmarking you are using are low profile site and holds little water when it comes to giving your web 2.0 recognition and chance to be indexed on time.

    I know several web 2.0 takes time to be index but not as long as two months.

    Just to let you know, using software to index your site might turn out to do more harm than good.

    I suggest bookmarking your web 2.0 with top social bookmarking sites and blogs.
    Signature
    Grow your social media account, Spotify Streams, YT Views & IG Followers & More
    Software & Mobile APP Developer
    Buy Spotify, Facebook Bot & IG M/S Method
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6855814].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
    Wait... So you are writing an article, posting it on your site, then sending the same article to 10 Web 2.0's with links back to that same article on your site? Not good.

    I'm okay with the same article on the 10 Web 2.0's, but I would link them to something other than the exact same article again.

    Also, if you are creating an account on a Web 2.0 site, posting 1 article with a link in it, and nothing else, there is a good chance those Web 2.0's are going to get axed. I would put 2-3 articles with no links first, then an article with a link.

    As for them not being indexed, 2 things. First, are you sure they are still around? Like I said, Web 2.0 sites are usually quick to delete the SEnuke style of posting 1 article with a link and are. Second, are you searching for the specific URL in Google to tell they are not indexed or just using some crappy backlink checker?
    Signature

    For SEO news, discussions, tactics, and more.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6855893].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author mandos123
      Originally Posted by MikeFriedman View Post

      Wait... So you are writing an article, posting it on your site, then sending the same article to 10 Web 2.0's with links back to that same article on your site? Not good.

      I'm okay with the same article on the 10 Web 2.0's, but I would link them to something other than the exact same article again.

      Also, if you are creating an account on a Web 2.0 site, posting 1 article with a link in it, and nothing else, there is a good chance those Web 2.0's are going to get axed. I would put 2-3 articles with no links first, then an article with a link.

      As for them not being indexed, 2 things. First, are you sure they are still around? Like I said, Web 2.0 sites are usually quick to delete the SEnuke style of posting 1 article with a link and are. Second, are you searching for the specific URL in Google to tell they are not indexed or just using some crappy backlink checker?
      Thanks for your input. Sometimes I link back to my article, sometimes I just write unique article and post it to 10 web2.0s. I check the indexing via. google.com (typing the exact URL). And some of the web2.0s that havent been indexed are still live and un-deleted..
      Signature

      None

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6856109].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author rightseosteps
    Well first off your link building might suck, no offence. Also you need content links or more authority links to push your web 2.0 for ranking change. It's actually very difficult to rank them as web 2.0 gets added with content one time and that's it but it doesn;t stop you from getting a pagerank and getting more link juice. I suggest you get more .edu, .gov and a bit of article submission to give it a boost OR use other web 2.0 and link them...try not to link wheel them though.
    Signature
    Click Here- Guest posting service, per relevant post just 20$. Includes links for safe rankings to push your rankings to the top! Can't get this at a better price.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6858498].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Demetrius
    I wonder what can be the reasons of taking so much time to get those web 2.0 links indexed. . I think you have made all those social bookmarking in a hip and that is why your web 2.0 blogs were marked as spam. This can be the only reason.

    There is no problem with the duplicate content. Because even if they are duplicate, they should be indexed. Remove those bookmarks. Take some time and bookmark those blogs one by one after every 2-3 days in reddit, stubmleupon, digg and delicious only. Do not use the same title and description for each of those bookmarks. Wait for 7 days. I hope it will work.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6859314].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mandos123
    Thanks.. Any other suggestions?
    Signature

    None

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6860644].message }}

Trending Topics