Amazon Associates - Have you recovered from Penguin

34 replies
  • SEO
  • |
All the associates out there who were hit by the April 26th update, have you recovered your sites to either their original ranking or seen a partial improvement? If so, what backlinking strategy did you follow.

My rankings have gradually got worser since April 26th to the point where im only at about $250/month.

In April, I changed the anchor texts of some existing backlinks including generic anchor texts, but that made no positive difference.

I should consider some backlink outsourcing options, but im not sure what direction to take as I don't know what type of backlinks would be most effective nor whether it would be a waste of money because the sites may not recover.

I would consider buying new domains and moving the content over as some people have suggested, but I don't know if that is necessary because Penguin is algorithmic, so its an option i'll have to give further consideration.
#amazon #associates #penguin #recovered
  • Profile picture of the author Peep
    "G" has their own product ads now showing up at the top of the search results so I believe they hit these Amazon sites to drive down the competition and they will continue to play this game.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6923530].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cooler1
      Originally Posted by Peep View Post

      "G" has their own product ads now showing up at the top of the search results so I believe they hit these Amazon sites to drive down the competition and they will continue to play this game.
      Big G always had those ads though so that isn't the reason for this. Penguin had a very big affect, like moving the keywords down dozens of pages down in the SERPs.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6926305].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Nelapsi
      Originally Posted by Peep View Post

      "G" has their own product ads now showing up at the top of the search results so I believe they hit these Amazon sites to drive down the competition and they will continue to play this game.
      The only thing this post is missing is... "In my 16 minutes in the industry,"

      These updates have had nothing to do with that and everything to do with your content and backlinks basically. Personally speaking part of my strategy has been the attempt to keep things looking natural by appearance.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6926350].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Fernando1954
    Yes i'm starting to see a recovery, on the 24th June i recieved in webmaster tools

    We've detected that some of your site's pages may be using techniques that are outside Google's Webmaster Guidelines

    They de-indexed the site, I re-wrote all content added a static front page with over 1000 words and images and youtube video, filed 2 re-consideration requests both were knocked back said still violated there terms.

    So i just left the site and started over as there wasn't much else i could do all the reviews were unique and not spammy. Then around 2 weeks ago I noticed the sites were back in google for some keywords they are on page 4 at the moment but were on page 1 before google slap.

    All that was done was to re-write the posts made them longer, added non review articles (how to and help type) no backlinks were created as I had left the site, just hope it continues to rise back to where it was, have started slow backlinking again from web 2 and high PR bookmarking sites.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6926590].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cooler1
      Originally Posted by Fernando1954 View Post

      Yes i'm starting to see a recovery, on the 24th June i recieved in webmaster tools

      We've detected that some of your site's pages may be using techniques that are outside Google's Webmaster Guidelines

      They de-indexed the site, I re-wrote all content added a static front page with over 1000 words and images and youtube video, filed 2 re-consideration requests both were knocked back said still violated there terms.

      So i just left the site and started over as there wasn't much else i could do all the reviews were unique and not spammy. Then around 2 weeks ago I noticed the sites were back in google for some keywords they are on page 4 at the moment but were on page 1 before google slap.

      All that was done was to re-write the posts made them longer, added non review articles (how to and help type) no backlinks were created as I had left the site, just hope it continues to rise back to where it was, have started slow backlinking again from web 2 and high PR bookmarking sites.
      That sounds like a manual penalty rather than Penguin which is algorithmic and doesn't send notices to webmasters. Did the site get affected on April 24th also or not until June?

      It seems like a vague message they sent you. Telling you you're outside the guidelines, but no mention of unnatural linking. Maybe it was on page over optimization that casued it, so re-writing your articles de-optimized your site to let it recover.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6927318].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6928133].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cooler1
      Originally Posted by ldiaz117 View Post

      PM me your site cooler
      It isn't just one site, I have multiple sites. Besides, I think the problem is lack of anchor text variation and maybe backlink quality. I used AMR so maybe that submitted to too many low quality sites which caused it. I noticed that sites where I only submitted 1 article to AMR, they only dropped about 3-4 pages in the SERPs so it seems there maybe a decrease depending on the number of poor quality links to a site.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6935720].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Yaduvanshi
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6935753].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cooler1
      Originally Posted by Bestseller91 View Post

      There you are . Now you know what did it.
      I suspected months ago that AMR was the problem. I still don't know with 100% certainty though because I had a site which I used AMR for but it still was on page 1 after Penguin for some months until around July or August, but for some reason it's no where to be seen now anywhere in the top 20 pages in the SERPs.

      The problem with AMR is that the articles from the directories it submits to get syndicated onto other sites, probably poor quality ones so there is no way to delete them.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6935846].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nik0
    Banned
    It's one big CONSPIRACY
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6935767].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nik0
    Banned
    Cooler1, the sites that syndicate the articles are not the poor quality ones (or probably they are as well), the article directories IT SELF are the poor ones cause they are on average low pr and get spammed a million times a day.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6935873].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cooler1
      Originally Posted by nik0 View Post

      Cooler1, the sites that syndicate the articles are not the poor quality ones (or probably they are as well), the article directories IT SELF are the poor ones cause they are on average low pr and get spammed a million times a day.
      I gathered the article directories are poor quality also. I don't know why Penguin would penalize a site for that though because what if someone submits an article to a decent quality article directory then it gets syndicated to a number of poor quality article directories.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6935905].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nik0
    Banned
    That's why I think it's more and more important to use brand and url anchors in your articles instead of keywords. It's really the combination of.

    On the other hand, most of the scraper sites do not scrape your hyperlinks, they only grab the content. You see the same with pressreleases, people who sell them say look how often you are found, 2500 times in only 3 days, yeah true, but only a dozen or so of the sites that syndicate it link back to you.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6935995].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sensini
    It's very important to various backlink, mix as many type as you can but you also need have a plan with the type target (blog post and web2 are ok).
    With content, you also need to make diversity anchor text and content need to unique and natural.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6937754].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MrMatts
      well it is not so easy the problem is when you have a aff link at your site they know of cause that you are owning a bridge page. And a bridge page is spam according to their leaked quality guide so you are sort of unwanted in the serps before you have even started.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6937948].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author nik0
        Banned
        Originally Posted by MrMatts View Post

        well it is not so easy the problem is when you have a aff link at your site they know of cause that you are owning a bridge page. And a bridge page is spam according to their leaked quality guide so you are sort of unwanted in the serps before you have even started.
        Unless you provide useful content like price comparisons and legit in depth reviews. But yeah, most sites that don't have that are just spam according to the guide.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6938166].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author wolfmmiii
    My sites have been largely unaffected by Penguin (and Panda for that matter). If anything, my sites continue to improve in search with every iteration of each animal.
    Signature
    Want a REAL Online Business That's Fun to Run?
    CLICK HERE FOR INFO
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6938710].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GGpaul
    Hey Wolf, have you ever had an incident where someone bought an item that was worth thousands of dollars that you didn't have on your site? But the fact that it has the "24 hour cookie?"
    Signature

    RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6938718].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author wolfmmiii
      Originally Posted by GGpaul View Post

      Hey Wolf, have you ever had an incident where someone bought an item that was worth thousands of dollars that you didn't have on your site? But the fact that it has the "24 hour cookie?"
      Sure. I've had large purchases unrelated to my site. Back when I was an eBay affiliate (CJ days), someone purchased a car after hitting one of my sites!
      Signature
      Want a REAL Online Business That's Fun to Run?
      CLICK HERE FOR INFO
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6938760].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author GGpaul
        Originally Posted by wolfmmiii View Post

        Sure. I've had large purchases unrelated to my site. Back when I was an eBay affiliate (CJ days), someone purchased a car after hitting one of my sites!
        WOW. I'm waiting for the day that someone buys some kind of engine (if they sell those on Amazon since they don't sell cars).

        I've received some funny orders lately such as this 4 disc blu ray Titantic set.

        That will be the day when someone starts ordering the sex section that has no relation to my site at all lol.
        Signature

        RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6938811].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Fernando1954
          Originally Posted by cooler1 View Post

          . Did the site get affected on April 24th also or not until June?
          It seems like a vague message they sent you. .
          Not affected till June 24th, It's still climbing slowly if it comes back fully it will be a bonus as i said i moved on and build a new site in the niche and that is doing nicely.

          Yes the message is very vague you are just stumbling in the dark as to the problem. Had 2 guy's who know their stuff look it over they couldn't see anything that would cause any problems.

          I don't think it has anything to do with link building as i have 6 other sites that i do same link building on and they were not affected, these are all on same hosting and in my webmaster tools so Google would have no problem connecting them.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6939256].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author wolfmmiii
    Originally Posted by Fernando1954 View Post

    Yea right, you seem to have your posts in a file and just copy paste, you repeat the same thing in most Amazon threads these days. We are not all green as grass newbies and can't see whats going on.
    No dude, sorry - no cut and paste here. Care to show me where I've posted the same cut/paste response in multiple threads?

    You seem to imply that I assume everyone is a newbie.

    Also, please show me where I've hi-jacked every Amazon thread.

    And what, exactly, is "going on"? Forum marketing? Sure, that's exactly what's going on.

    I resent the insinuation that GGPaul and I are somehow a team or something and that it's all part of some grand scheme. If you have a problem with him, take it up with him.

    Here's a "thanks" for you. Since that's what you are after.
    Signature
    Want a REAL Online Business That's Fun to Run?
    CLICK HERE FOR INFO
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6940233].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nasuryono
    Don't just focus on adding backlinks. Add non-review, informational content to your site frequently.

    It seems Google are trying to kill more and more affiliate sites (i.e. sites that do not provide information and just try to sell).

    I used to add backlinks with the hope of escaping Penguin but it didn't work out. When I add content though, the rankings jumped again. It's strange but true...
    Signature
    ----------------------------------------


    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6940564].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author bunnywoof
      Originally Posted by nasuryono View Post

      Don't just focus on adding backlinks. Add non-review, informational content to your site frequently.

      It seems Google are trying to kill more and more affiliate sites (i.e. sites that do not provide information and just try to sell).

      I used to add backlinks with the hope of escaping Penguin but it didn't work out. When I add content though, the rankings jumped again. It's strange but true...
      So if i did a review site on say televisions (seems to be the default example), if i added articles about programs, whats on etc or similar stuff that would be good?

      Thanks Ross
      Signature
      The Ultimate Adsense & Internet Marketing Blueprint & Business Model! Newbie Friendly, Complete Package, Step-by-step Guide,! Still works after Penguin and Panda updates.
      Click here to find out more
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6941038].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Fernando1954
        Originally Posted by bunnywoof View Post

        So if i did a review site on say televisions (seems to be the default example), if i added articles about programs, whats on etc or similar stuff that would be good?

        Thanks Ross
        Well i dont know if TV listings would work if you are trying to sell $700 TV sets, buyers are looking for information before they purchase.

        I would think TV listings are not buying keywords.


        I think what he was meaning was how to articles explanational type articles like

        About Home Theater Systems
        Plasma and LCD What's the Difference
        Buying a Plasma Television

        These are what I added to my hit site and it is now starting to move up the rankings again.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6941229].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cooler1
      Originally Posted by nasuryono View Post

      Don't just focus on adding backlinks. Add non-review, informational content to your site frequently.

      It seems Google are trying to kill more and more affiliate sites (i.e. sites that do not provide information and just try to sell).

      I used to add backlinks with the hope of escaping Penguin but it didn't work out. When I add content though, the rankings jumped again. It's strange but true...
      Im not really sure that makes any difference. I have a site which is ranking on page 1 currently for a number of keywords yet it only has reviews and no informational content.

      If Google had this factor in place which moves down sites that have no content without affiliate links then I doubt id be one page 1 for those keywords.

      I had 6 sales today, at least that is better than usual, which is only about 2 sales post Penguin.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6941596].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Fernando1954
        Originally Posted by cooler1 View Post

        Im not really sure that makes any difference. I have a site which is ranking on page 1 currently for a number of keywords yet it only has reviews and no informational content.

        If Google had this factor in place which moves down sites that have no content without affiliate links then I doubt id be one page 1 for those keywords.

        I had 6 sales today, at least that is better than usual, which is only about 2 sales post Penguin.
        I understand your thinking on this being the case Cooler, but the problem is there is no real pattern why Google pick on one site with good reviews and leave crappy copied site on page 1.

        My site being an example, original content but all reviews and they decided to hit it. Now after adding non reviews starting to see a comeback in serps.

        I checked out some of my competator sites and noticed the ones that were doing well all had non review articles, so for the time it takes to write a few non review articles why not add them.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6945074].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author cooler1
          Originally Posted by Fernando1954 View Post

          I understand your thinking on this being the case Cooler, but the problem is there is no real pattern why Google pick on one site with good reviews and leave crappy copied site on page 1.

          My site being an example, original content but all reviews and they decided to hit it. Now after adding non reviews starting to see a comeback in serps.

          I checked out some of my competator sites and noticed the ones that were doing well all had non review articles, so for the time it takes to write a few non review articles why not add them.
          I'll see if new content makes any positive difference.

          The difference with your site though is that is sounds like you weren't hit by Penguin because you didn't see downwards movement until June 24th, so im not sure if new content would help a penguinized site in anyway because the Penguin algo is meant to be related to over optimization which sounds like backlinks and on page SEO.
          Signature

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6952190].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author wolfmmiii
    @Fernando....

    I only took umbrage because you implied (intentionally or unintentionally) that we are somehow working together and that I hi-jack a ton of threads and that everything is self-promotion:

    Your comment: "Its wearing a bit thin all this self promotion on every Amazon thread."

    That seems like a shot at me, not GGPaul.

    I appreciate the post edit and I'm willing to keep the peace but I can't just let people go around disparaging me without responding.
    Signature
    Want a REAL Online Business That's Fun to Run?
    CLICK HERE FOR INFO
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6940566].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Fernando1954
      Originally Posted by wolfmmiii View Post

      @Fernando....

      I only took umbrage because you implied (intentionally or unintentionally) that we are somehow working together and that I hi-jack a ton of threads and that everything is self-promotion:

      Your comment: "Its wearing a bit thin all this self promotion on every Amazon thread."

      That seems like a shot at me, not GGPaul.

      I appreciate the post edit and I'm willing to keep the peace but I can't just let people go around disparaging me without responding.
      OK peace, I took umbrage with GGPaul to come in on a thread that was about ( Have you recovered from Penguin ) and ask

      Hey Wolf, have you ever had an incident where someone bought an item that was worth thousands of dollars that you didn't have on your site? But the fact that it has the "24 hour cookie?"

      This is so far off topic and came accross as thread hi-jacking,as you and I know ( and i think GGPaul does too) this has been answered by many Amazon affiliates before in the many Amazon threads on the forum.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6940712].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author GGpaul
        Originally Posted by Fernando1954 View Post

        OK peace, I took umbrage with GGPaul to come in on a thread that was about ( Have you recovered from Penguin ) and ask

        Hey Wolf, have you ever had an incident where someone bought an item that was worth thousands of dollars that you didn't have on your site? But the fact that it has the "24 hour cookie?"

        This is so far off topic and came accross as thread hi-jacking,as you and I know ( and i think GGPaul does too) this has been answered by many Amazon affiliates before in the many Amazon threads on the forum.
        What can I say? I'm still new to Amazon. I simply bought Wolfs strategy trusted 100% at what he had to say. There were things and there still are things that I have no idea about.

        Seriously, I just went straight to writing because that's my expertise. I found a niche. I didn't look into anything else but follow the guideline and just write.

        Honestly, I avoided a lot of Amazon threads never really read them. I just followed Wolfs guideline.

        As far as me being a team with Wolf, no. I'm just trying to get going with internet marketing. It's been a year and a half, and finally I'm seeing results.
        Signature

        RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6943922].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Fernando1954
          Originally Posted by GGpaul View Post

          What can I say? I'm still new to Amazon. I simply bought Wolfs strategy trusted 100% at what he had to say. There were things and there still are things that I have no idea about.

          Seriously, I just went straight to writing because that's my expertise. I found a niche. I didn't look into anything else but follow the guideline and just write.

          Honestly, I avoided a lot of Amazon threads never really read them. I just followed Wolfs guideline.

          As far as me being a team with Wolf, no. I'm just trying to get going with internet marketing. It's been a year and a half, and finally I'm seeing results.
          No problem, and good luck with your Amazon endevours.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6945048].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author wolfmmiii
    Fair enough....
    Signature
    Want a REAL Online Business That's Fun to Run?
    CLICK HERE FOR INFO
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6940959].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bunnywoof
    Nice, thank you for explanation.

    Still getting to grips with all this but getting there slowly.

    Ross
    Signature
    The Ultimate Adsense & Internet Marketing Blueprint & Business Model! Newbie Friendly, Complete Package, Step-by-step Guide,! Still works after Penguin and Panda updates.
    Click here to find out more
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6941305].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author IMSince2003
    Keep in mind that what happens to a SINGLE site by itself is IRRELEVANT. You cannot judge Google's algorithm changes unless you can view thousands of sites all at once and look for trends. Just because it hasn't happened to your site yet does not mean it won't
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6941852].message }}

Trending Topics