Blog networks and Links disappearing - Warriors Needed

by axar
7 replies
  • SEO
  • |
I have created more than 16 2.0 webs in the past three months related to my niche (sites such as: wordpress, tumblr, blogpost,..) . In 80% of those blogs, I have submitted articles from spin (the spin was done manually and was good quality). 3 to 5 articles per 2.0 web, and posted a couple of links to my money site (plus links to other authority sites). Those articles were submitted manually to the blogs.
I have built quality social bookmarks to those sites, like 10-15 SB per week.
What is really weird is that Google has indexed all the content of those blogs but not my links. Let me explain this. If I make a search in Google with the appropiate filters, I´m not able to find the links pointing to my money site in those blogs (although the blogs content is indexed as I said).

Another weird thing is that I have one PR3 and one PR4 domains that I bought recently (before the last PR update in November, they still keep the same PR). I´m hosting them in a different A class IP (also with a different Owner). I put unique content on them, several articles and just one link in the whole website pointing to my money site. The situation is the same as with the blogs. These websites are indexed, the content is indexed, but I can´t find the link in Google search. Apparently those links have Zero value but I dont understand why.

Could you please Warriors give me some clues of what might be happening here?
#blog #disappearing #links #needed #networks #warriors
  • Profile picture of the author nik0
    Banned
    Google is not showing everything, that's your answer, that does not mean Google isn't counting it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7374854].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author axar
    But that doesnt make sense. I´m able to see links in Google search from posts I made in article directories or social bookmarks... Why Google is not showing these links when they should have more weigh than those coming from article directories or Social bookmarks (I´m thinking in the links mentioned from my PR3 and Pr4 domains).
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7375048].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nik0
    Banned
    Well, a social bookmark and article ends up on the homepage of these sites before they end up deep in an inner page. A web2.0 never see's a link from the homepage, hence the bad index rate without doing additional work so I think that has to do with it.

    And no a brand new web2.0 definitely has not more weight then an article or bookmark. Many web2.0's are even on sub domains of the web2.0 platform and thus you get literally zero juice from them without boosting it up.

    Sites like SEOmoz and Ahrefs and few others also hardly show web2.0's, what they do show 9 out of 10 times are nofollow bookmarks, which again carry zero weight but they are on pages that are indexed already and part of a larger thing while web2.0's as I said are really a stand alone thing on most platforms.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7375383].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ProSence
    What you need to check is all the web 2.0 were indexed or not on which you have created content, if not indexed then you have to work on that to get them indexed then you are going to get benefit from.
    Signature

    three great FREE tools - www.sitebeak.com, www.GAtective.com and www.impersonal.me

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7375604].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author axar
      Originally Posted by ProSence View Post

      What you need to check is all the web 2.0 were indexed or not on which you have created content, if not indexed then you have to work on that to get them indexed then you are going to get benefit from.
      All the content of those 2.0 webs is indexed, that´s the weird thing. Otherwise I won´t be asking for advice
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7376896].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Sheila Ross
    If those 2.0 sites are already indexed, it is natural that the links in those sites are indexed too. I did not get how google search will show the links in the content. Google only shows 2 lines of a page in it's search result. If would like to become clear about your question first. Is it possible for your to take a couple of screenshot and then describe the things?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7376917].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author axar
      Originally Posted by Sheila Ross View Post

      If those 2.0 sites are already indexed, it is natural that the links in those sites are indexed too. I did not get how google search will show the links in the content. Google only shows 2 lines of a page in it's search result.
      Sorry if I didnt explain myself clearly.

      Let me put an example.

      Imagine I post an article in one of the 2.0 webs. Let say wordpress: mysite.wordpress.com. In that post I have added a link to my money site.

      Three days later I see that this post has been indexed by Google.

      Now I go to google search and I type my money site url (mysite.com) or my "money site" keyword "mysite". I filtered the search by "Search tools" - past week results.

      This way I will only see all the results regarding my money site that have been indexed in the past week.

      As I said the post that was indexed by Google has a link to my money site so I should see that link, that keyword in the search results of the past week. I go through all of those results but I can´t see that link.

      If the content has been indexed, why Google search results aren´t showing the link to my money site?

      Does this make sense?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7377169].message }}

Trending Topics