Increasing seo with nofollow?

As per my research nofollow links are not useful for your site, but the only benefit of nofollow link is traffic.

no follow for external link. link juice is not share or transfer with other websites. PR juice will only crawl inside your website..

In the very first, Why do you want to increase your site SEO with nofollow?
Any particular reason ?

Mohairan,

As mentioned be other members, no-follow links leading to your site will not pass on link authority. This means they will not count as a vote for the importance of your website and hence will not benefit your ranking in SERP’s. They can still be clicked on though which leads to increased traffic to your site and they can also help diversify your backlink profile.
Check out this post from Matt Cutts about link sculpting on your own internal link structure,
PageRank sculpting

Hope that helps,
Shawn

I think Nofollow links wont do you a whole lot of good, but if your link profile is ALL dofollow, surely the googlebots will smell a rat? It's natural to have some nofollow...

No Follow links don't follow your website and can't be counted as backlinks. How can they help you then? kindly explain.

Why do u prefer building only no-follow links? These links are not much valuable. It has an added attribute "rel=nofollow" towards its end. This attribute tells search engine spiders not to crawl that particular link. These links only help in driving traffic towards your website.

Nofollow backlinks ain't gonna give you anything, but it can be helpful for visitors, i use Nofollow targeted seo just for getting traffic neither else.

You can give Nofollow for external links. It will help decrease the outbound links on your site.

No follow will never help you to boost your ranking, It can only be used to allow users to post no follow links on your site.

The only nofollow that will even hint at increasing "SEO," is a twitter link.

There is no reason to have outbound links on your site, and I certainly
would not nofollow them. Why? They signal spam. Why show google you
don't trust a link on your site and/or allow spam?

No reason to allow anyone to comment, add a link, etc. No reason on
a real content page.

If you sell links, perhaps you should nofollow them. If google thinks you
are selling links for PR, they will lower your own PR.

But google can't tell a paid link from a hole in the ground unless you tell them.

Google will now not index a site based on a nofollow link. Does not mean they
won't index the site via another link.

If people have been reading, they would know that google itself is changing
the way it deals with nofollow. Keep in mind that each way google deals with it
is not a positive action. Nofollow signals untrusted spam.

There is no reason to get a nofollow link. Nofollow is as unnatural as you
can get. Couple of exceptions: twitter. But it's not really the link, it's the tweet.
Wikipedia, not the link, but the fact that you got a link as a resource.

Google must look at those links (and similar) in a different light.

Paul

Nofollow backlinks make your site's backlink profile look more "natural" to google.

The only benefit of nofollow links is to generate traffic, rest they are of no worth to your website.