Google Page Freshness Trend

by yukon Banned
37 replies
  • SEO
  • |
I've been ranking a page for a very popular keyword phrase in my niche, I'm usually ranked #1 & I keep an eye on the SERPs only because I know the niche traffic is good, I'm sure my competition knows about the traffic for this keyword.

This past week I noticed the largest forum in this niche (about the same size as Warrior Forum) was slowly moving up the SERPs for my keyword. This same forum has the Google warning "This site may harm your computer." below it's SERP title. The Google warning is switching back & forth about every other day, one day the SERP warning shows, the next day the SERP warning is gone, the trend repeats as the forum page keeps climbing the SERPs.

Today the large forum bumped me down to position #2 for my keyword. I cleared my browser cache/history/ect..., ran CCleaner, used Chrome Incognito, multiple times, even reset my DSL modem. I was still sitting at position #2 for my keyword.

Time to deal with this forum page.

Remember when I said I noticed a trend with the Google warning for the large niche forum alternating back & forth for a week or so. I think what made that forum page work it's way up the SERPs was Google detecting changes on the forum page, this is an old forum page (2010), PR0, mostly internal links. My internal page is originally from 2008, PR3, plenty of internal links.

I went to my site, logged in, updated the page title, went to a few other internal pages that link back to the ranked page, updated those two other internal pages.

Cleared my history/cache/etc... fired up CCleaner, reset my modem (overkill?) went back to Chrome Incognito did my original keyword search.

Bam, I'm #1.
#freshness #google #page #trend
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    BTW, I'm 99.99% sure the reason the niche forum is getting a warning message in the SERPs is, they're running a Chitika Ad in their page header. I had the same SERP warning while testing Chitika Ads on my own site a few years ago.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7536548].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
    That must be a pretty weak serp. I rarely see freshness paying a great role in a competitive serp plus I don't think the forum is truly competing for the term. With a forum as large as WF you couldn't keep up with their fresh content supplied by hundreds of people posting.
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7536612].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

      That must be a pretty weak serp. I rarely see freshness paying a great role in a competitive serp plus I don't think the forum is truly competing for the term. With a forum as large as WF you couldn't keep up with their fresh content supplied by hundreds of people posting.

      It's not a weak comp. keyword, lol.

      The forum has multiple relevant pages listed (like most VB forums have).

      You must not do many news searches If you haven't noticed freshness working. My keyword isn't news related, but freshness is still happening in the SERPs.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7536637].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
        Originally Posted by yukon View Post

        I
        You must not do many news searches If you haven't noticed freshness working. My keyword isn't news related, but freshness is still happening in the SERPs.
        Nice try but no one ever said Freshness does not work. I said in very competitive niches they don't work as much. You must not do many searches in competitive niches.

        if all anyone in a competitive niche had to do was change their titles and do some update then the serps would change several times for the day every day and people on the front page would just update their titles every day several times a day.

        As a strategy its ridiculous anyway. Better to go out and get better links so freshness doesn;t hit you out of position (again in a competitive serps thats not what happens to a well SEOed site)

        You can say Bam! I am number one and then you competitor can make a change and say Bam! number one back and forth all day. Its a pointless exercise.
        Signature

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7538910].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author yukon
          Banned
          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

          Nice try but no one ever said Freshness does not work. I said in very competitive niches they don't work as much. You must not do many searches in competitive niches.

          if all anyone in a competitive niche had to do was change their titles and do some update then the serps would change several times for the day every day and people on the front page would just update their titles every day several times a day.

          As a strategy its ridiculous anyway. Better to go out and get better links so freshness doesn;t hit you out of position (again in a competitive serps thats not what happens to a well SEOed site)

          You can say Bam! I am number one and then you competitor can make a change and say Bam! number one back and forth all day. Its a pointless exercise.

          You & your links, meh... :rolleyes:

          Sure links are important but get a grip, links aren't the only thing going on in the SERPs. Take you blinders off & test things on your own instead of making excuses & falling back on the tired link talk.

          Try telling any news site that freshness is ridiculous, they'll show you the door (thanks for stopping by, lol).

          I don't have to keep manually updating a page, that's what php is for.

          What else ya got?
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7538935].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
            Originally Posted by yukon View Post

            Try telling any news site that freshness is ridiculous, they'll show you the door (thanks for stopping by, lol).
            You always resort to strawmen when caught in a corner. No one said anything about freshness not being effective for news sites. You just made that up as a dodge. You see forum posts listed in news? Or did you forget it was a forum and not a news site outranking you? :rolleyes:

            I don't have to keep manually updating a page, that's what php is for.
            Already covered that. Besides read your OP. You did do it manually

            We will all wait for the WSO on how to rank in any competitive serp with a PHP script. Like many easy secrets that supposedly other people don't know about it should sell well - only thing is the serps for most people will stay the same.
            Signature

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7538970].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author yukon
              Banned
              Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

              You always resort to strawmen when caught in a corner. No one said anything about freshness not being effective for news sites. You just made that up as a dodge. You see forum posts listed in news? Or did you forget it was a forum and not a news site outranking you?
              There he is with his strawman comment, dude get some original content, that is weak as it was yesterday. You always claim strawman when you can't figure something out. You can do better than that.

              Your stuck on links & that's all you got going on. Really, learn something in addition to links.













              Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

              -Already covered that. Besides read your OP. You did do it manually

              We will all wait for the WSO on how to rank in any competitive serp with a PHP script. Like many easy secrets that supposedly other people don't know about it should sell well - only thing is the serps for most people will stay the same.
              No $hit Sherlock, I did what I said manually in OP. That doesn't mean it can't be automated, learn some php (Google it).

              Lol, at your WSO comment. Sounds about like your special super star link builders training camp. Probably like McDonalds, over 1 billion served.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7539700].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                Originally Posted by yukon View Post


                Your stuck on links & that's all you got going on. Really, learn something in addition to links.
                Yes Oh mighty Yuke. We will all listen now. We can now all rank number one by following your lead of ignoring links . All we need do is change the title and update our sites using PHP and we will all rank number one. We have heard and we will obey. we get it now. Yukon Cutts has spoken. Seriously though Yuke theres nothing actionable in this its just another look at me and what happened with my site thread. Its not transferable as any real technique for ranking where there is any real competition.

                Originally Posted by yukon View Post

                Oh, what's that Mikey, so now it does work?

                Make up your mind which side of the fence you want to be on. :rolleyes:
                Sigh........See if you can understand the following written several posts ago. Maybe the second time will help you digest the clear English written. Like they say if at first you don't succeed try try again.

                Nice try but no one ever said Freshness does not work. I said in very competitive niches they don't work as much.
                QDF only affects some serps.
                When you stop dishonestly making up strawmen I won't have to point them out for what they are. Its only old because as anyone can see from those quotes you just keep making strawmen up. Its basically lying about what my position is when the evidence of your lying is right here in the thread.
                Signature

                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7539917].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author yukon
                  Banned
                  Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                  Yes Oh mighty Yuke.

                  First your opinion is it doesn't work, then your opinion is it works for news sites, then you say it does work temporarily.

                  You only claim it works when you reply to another forum member besides myself, which proves you BSing & trying to post crap in my thread, just like the useless crap you & GGpaul posted above.

                  You have no idea what's going on with freshness so stop posting your usual dribble.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7542129].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                    Originally Posted by yukon View Post

                    First your opinion is it doesn't work, then your opinion is it works for news sites, then you say it does work temporarily.
                    too childish to spend much time on today.

                    People can read from my very first post. Anyone who reads it and all my other posts will see you are just lying. From my very post I indicated QDF works but rarely in competitive niches. My posts stating that are sitting right here in this forum which makes your attempts at fabricating especially entertaining.

                    Have a happy New year man and remind yourself you don't own any thread on WF.
                    Signature

                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7542191].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author yukon
                      Banned
                      Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

                      From my very post I indicated QDF works but rarely in competitive niches.

                      There it is again, claiming it works, but rarely. Consistent much?

                      That's like claiming your the fastest runner, but only sometimes.
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7542213].message }}
                      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
                        Originally Posted by yukon View Post

                        That's like claiming your the fastest runner, but only sometimes.
                        ROFL....this is what goes for intelligent analysis and analogy round these parts? So um the guy that is fastest in the 100 meters is the fastest at the 400 meters? or you can't come in first if the fastest runners don't show up? Look up the word fastest and don't embarrass yourself. Its a comparison term so yes Einstein you can be the fastest today in a race and not be the fastest in a race tomorrow. Sheesh think.

                        Thats why QDF can work with some terms (they are weak and the competition to use your analogy is slower so you CAN come in first). This is just BASIC stuff and here you are not only failing to make a point but using analogies that show how ridiculous you are being.

                        Even my kid knows that the fastest in a race today might not be tomorrow. Think first. Type after
                        Signature

                        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7542308].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author lutherlars
    I'm assumeing that your own page was an internal page? If so, when changing your page title, your url string to that page would also change so you would have to modify all the internal links pointing at that page also to avoid 404's?
    ?Also, if you are pointing other internal links away from that page, why would it actually increase in rank?
    Originally Posted by yukon View Post

    I've been ranking a page for a very popular keyword phrase in my niche, I'm usually ranked #1 & I keep an eye on the SERPs only because I know the niche traffic is good, I'm sure my competition knows about the traffic for this keyword.

    This past week I noticed the largest forum in this niche (about the same size as Warrior Forum) was slowly moving up the SERPs for my keyword. This same forum has the Google warning "This site may harm your computer." below it's SERP title. The Google warning is switching back & forth about every other day, one day the SERP warning shows, the next day the SERP warning is gone, the trend repeats as the forum page keeps climbing the SERPs.

    Today the large forum bumped me down to position #2 for my keyword. I cleared my browser cache/history/ect..., ran CCleaner, used Chrome Incognito, multiple times, even reset my DSL modem. I was still sitting at position #2 for my keyword.

    Time to deal with this forum page.

    Remember when I said I noticed a trend with the Google warning for the large niche forum alternating back & forth for a week or so. I think what made that forum page work it's way up the SERPs was Google detecting changes on the forum page, this is an old forum page (2010), PR0, mostly internal links. My internal page is originally from 2008, PR3, plenty of internal links.

    I went to my site, logged in, updated the page title, went to a few other internal pages that link back to the ranked page, updated those two other internal pages.

    Cleared my history/cache/etc... fired up CCleaner, reset my modem (overkill?) went back to Chrome Incognito did my original keyword search.

    Bam, I'm #1.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7537290].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by lutherlars View Post

      I'm assumeing that your own page was an internal page? If so, when changing your page title, your url string to that page would also change so you would have to modify all the internal links pointing at that page also to avoid 404's?

      No, that's not how Wordpress works, If your talking about WP/URLs.

      On WP once you create a Post & the Post goes live, when you go back to edit the Post title the URL doesn't change unless you manually change it yourself. There's no broken URLs.





      Originally Posted by lutherlars View Post

      Also, if you are pointing other internal links away from that page, why would it actually increase in rank?
      I updated multiple pages linking to each other (all relevant) to get Google to return to my site. When I update this blog it gets re-cached instantly, it's an old established blog. I wanted the Google bot back on my page to see that the page has been updated.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7538418].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author jonathan Cole
      Originally Posted by lutherlars View Post

      I'm assumeing that your own page was an internal page? If so, when changing your page title, your url string to that page would also change so you would have to modify all the internal links pointing at that page also to avoid 404's?
      ?Also, if you are pointing other internal links away from that page, why would it actually increase in rank?
      Changing title of page does not change the URL string all the time. It depends which CMS you are using for your website.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7540098].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author perfect
    Do you mean is just as simply as like this? why are many people not doing it? I don't think these guys are really competitor.
    Signature

    Submit your articles to www.365articledirectory.com FREE, approval within 48 hours

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7537759].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by perfect View Post

      Do you mean is just as simply as like this? why are many people not doing it?

      Probably the same reason you have 7 different anchor-text links in your forum sig. all pointing at the same URL.

      Maybe they don't know any better?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7538433].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by perfect View Post

      Do you mean is just as simply as like this? why are many people not doing it? I don't think these guys are really competitor.

      Exactly. As a strategy to be used across the board it sucks. IF this worked against good competition then you could just set your server up to push new updates every half an hour and rank number one. QDF only affects some serps. Shucks if it even worked on medium competition as a general rule then everyone here in the top five or first page in their serps would rank number one after they made a new post

      Fact is large forums are SELDOM EVER SEOed for long tail by the owners. WF ranks for all kinds of terms that you will see created by USERS. So yeah in a weak serp where a site is ranking for some term the owner isn't even optimizing his site for the keywords. Just about any change may put you over the top.

      Representing that thas is a viable strategy for everyone to use that most people don't know about is just nonsense.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7538946].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GGpaul
    Mikey Boy. I know you been busy trying to sabotage my wedding, and creating some kind of game plan with Nest. But you got to help your boy out too with them Private networks .
    Signature

    RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7539008].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by GGpaul View Post

      Mikey Boy. I know you been busy trying to sabotage my wedding, and creating some kind of game plan with Nest. But you got to help your boy out too with them Private networks .

      You are out my man. You been spying on my PMs or you would not know that less than an hour ago I was talking about 2013 being golden if I roll out some new ventures and then we crash your wedding (that part is not joke...really just was Pming Nest and talked about crashing your wedding).

      Didn't know you were waiting on me. Must have got lost in translation somewhere (you know you Californians can't talk good english). I'll Pm you shortly.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7539062].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author GGpaul
        Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

        You are out my man. You been spying on my PMs or you would not know that less than an hour ago I was talking about 2013 being golden if I roll out some new ventures and then we crash your wedding (that part is not joke...really just was Pming Nest and talked about crashing your wedding).

        Didn't know you were waiting on me. Must have got lost in translation somewhere (you know you Californians can't talk good english). I'll Pm you shortly.
        LOL! Well that's Hollywood for you. A bunch of idiots.
        Signature

        RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7539091].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
          Originally Posted by GGpaul View Post

          LOL! Well that's Hollywood for you. A bunch of idiots.

          phffft! This ain't a WSO. You don't have to pretend. Long Beach aint anywhere near Hollywood.
          Signature

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7539134].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author GGpaul
            Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

            phffft! This ain't a WSO. You don't have to pretend. Long Beach aint anywhere near Hollywood.
            Okay okay. It's near Compton though
            Signature

            RIP Dad Oct 14 1954 - Mar 14 2015.

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7539241].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author yukon
              Banned
              Originally Posted by GGpaul View Post

              Mikey Boy. I know you been busy trying to sabotage my wedding, and creating some kind of game plan with Nest. But you got to help your boy out too with them Private networks .
              Originally Posted by GGpaul View Post

              LOL! Well that's Hollywood for you. A bunch of idiots.
              Originally Posted by GGpaul View Post

              Okay okay. It's near Compton though
              Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

              phffft! * This ain't a WSO. *You don't have to pretend. *Long Beach aint anywhere near Hollywood.
              Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

              You are out my man. You been spying on my PMs or you would not know that less than an hour ago I was talking about 2013 being golden if I roll out some new ventures and then we crash your wedding (that part is not joke...really just was Pming Nest and talked about crashing your wedding).

              Didn't know you were waiting on me. Must have got lost in translation somewhere (you know you Californians can't talk good english). I'll Pm you shortly.

              Don't ever get pissed off If I start posting a bunch of off the wall crap on your threads like your posting here.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7539716].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Icematikx
    I've noticed this trend quite frequently.

    I just built a backlink to one of my Amazon sites which was #4. 10-minutes after the backlink, low and behold, I'm #1 for the keyword (4,800 exact/month). I checked my Amazon site's logs, and I'm getting visitors from #1 position...

    2-hours later, it dropped back to #3.. 3-hours later I'm back at #1 (I'm at #1 atm)..
    Signature

    Just got back from a #BrightonSEO. I was given room 404 in the hotel I stayed at. Couldn’t find it anywhere!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7539009].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by Icematikx View Post

      2-hours later, it dropped back to #3.. 3-hours later I'm back at #1 (I'm at #1 atm)..
      Yeah thats the other thing about QDF its very temporary
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7539068].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author yukon
        Banned
        Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

        Yeah thats the other thing about QDF its very temporary

        Oh, what's that Mikey, so now it does work?

        Make up your mind which side of the fence you want to be on. :rolleyes:
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7539710].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Icematikx View Post

      I've noticed this trend quite frequently.

      I just built a backlink to one of my Amazon sites which was #4. 10-minutes after the backlink, low and behold, I'm #1 for the keyword (4,800 exact/month). I checked my Amazon site's logs, and I'm getting visitors from #1 position...

      2-hours later, it dropped back to #3.. 3-hours later I'm back at #1 (I'm at #1 atm)..

      Thanks, glad someone else knows what I'm talking about. The difference between position #1 & #2 is very noticeable for this particular keyword I'm ranking for. Position #1 gets right at 50% of the monthly traffic according to WMT.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7539748].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TotalGaz
    Yukon so you saying you made your page title more "relevant" and used the same new relevant keyword/phrase in your updated internal page links anchor text. The google bot crawled and saw a possible better page and re-ranked you @ #1
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7539190].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by TotalGaz View Post

      Yukon so you saying you made your page title more "relevant" and used the same new relevant keyword/phrase in your updated internal page links anchor text. The google bot crawled and saw a possible better page and re-ranked you @ #1

      Yes, changed the title by adding a relevant keyword to the existing title. Updated 3 pages total. My blog usually shows the update instantly in Google Cache.

      I've played around with re-caching the page & had the Index page re-cached 4 times in less than an hour, just to see If it would work, it worked as fast as I could update the blog/pages.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7539741].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tinknocker
    Originally Posted by yukon View Post

    I've been ranking a page for a very popular keyword phrase in my niche, I'm usually ranked #1 & I keep an eye on the SERPs only because I know the niche traffic is good, I'm sure my competition knows about the traffic for this keyword.

    This past week I noticed the largest forum in this niche (about the same size as Warrior Forum) was slowly moving up the SERPs for my keyword. This same forum has the Google warning "This site may harm your computer." below it's SERP title. The Google warning is switching back & forth about every other day, one day the SERP warning shows, the next day the SERP warning is gone, the trend repeats as the forum page keeps climbing the SERPs.

    Today the large forum bumped me down to position #2 for my keyword. I cleared my browser cache/history/ect..., ran CCleaner, used Chrome Incognito, multiple times, even reset my DSL modem. I was still sitting at position #2 for my keyword.

    Time to deal with this forum page.

    Remember when I said I noticed a trend with the Google warning for the large niche forum alternating back & forth for a week or so. I think what made that forum page work it's way up the SERPs was Google detecting changes on the forum page, this is an old forum page (2010), PR0, mostly internal links. My internal page is originally from 2008, PR3, plenty of internal links.

    I went to my site, logged in, updated the page title, went to a few other internal pages that link back to the ranked page, updated those two other internal pages.

    Cleared my history/cache/etc... fired up CCleaner, reset my modem (overkill?) went back to Chrome Incognito did my original keyword search.

    Bam, I'm #1.


    You updated the post you were ranking for by adding another keyword to the title? When you added this keyword, did you update the url or did you keep the url the same?

    The reason I ask this? Because I updated also by adding a keyword to my articles/posts titles on my site and then manually changed the url to include the added keyword. I am thinking I made an error by doing this? :confused:
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7541359].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by tinknocker View Post

      You updated the post you were ranking for by adding another keyword to the title? When you added this keyword, did you update the url or did you keep the url the same?

      The reason I ask this? Because I updated also by adding a keyword to my articles/posts titles on my site and then manually changed the url to include the added keyword. I am thinking I made an error by doing this? :confused:

      It's not a good idea to change the URL.

      If you change the URL your completely starting over, your also creating a 404 for the already indexed page (If you change the URL).
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7542086].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dennis09
    I think what Mike is getting at is that a tactic like this (ranking based on freshness) is pretty pitiful in and of itself. BUT...any critical thinking person can take a lot from what Yukon has observed and incorporate it into an overall SEO strategy.

    "You can show em the truth but you can't make em believe it though"

    p.s. @GGPaul: Southern Cali is overrated anyway...it's all about the Bay!
    Signature
    There is no elevator to success, you have to take the stairs
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7542169].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by dennis09 View Post

      I think what Mike is getting at is that a tactic like this (ranking based on freshness) is pretty pitiful in and of itself. BUT...any critical thinking person can take a lot from what Yukon has observed and incorporate it into an overall SEO strategy.

      I think what Mike is getting at is, he doesn't know much about freshness.

      Nobody is claiming freshness is a single ranking factor, anyone that's been around longer than a month should know there's multiple ranking factors.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7542189].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
      Originally Posted by dennis09 View Post

      I think what Mike is getting at is that a tactic like this (ranking based on freshness) is pretty pitiful in and of itself. BUT...any critical thinking person can take a lot from what Yukon has observed and incorporate it into an overall SEO strategy.
      Whats to incorporate really? Its a temporary boost its not a long term strategy. Good night so yukon started this thread to tell us about QDF? LOL, Didn't every single thinking person who knows a lick of SEO already know that?

      Its pitiful is right. He's even advocating using a script to keep yourself ranking. How lame is that? Its a gimmick that does NOT work in any really competitive serp. Thats just a fact and if Yuke wants to show one competitive serp to contradict me on that he is free to but as usual in these look at me threads (some of which have nothing to do with SEO at all) he never backs up anything he states. The last claim was that he GUARANTEES (his word) google checks the relevance of the backlinks to your backlinks source for relevance on your page. I offered to sponsor a contest to put that theory to the tests and he runs off. So much foe the guarantee.

      Seriously anyone want to buy into this as part of a seo strategy ask yourself - why it is that you don't see the serps on the front page bouncing rankings all over the place EVERY DAY not remain static on MANY serps for days on end even though when you go to the site new stuff even with keywords has been added.

      QDF is designed to give fresh results for serps that are news worthy or where an update might be what the searcher is looking for. In weak serps it will show very nicely but like I said from my first post ( and Yuke keeps lying through his teeth claiming otherwise) though it works for weak serps it seldom does for very competitive terms. So you changed a title and you ranked bam? Shuck frankly the claim of instant reindexing of a Pr 3 every time within minutes is load of garbage in and of itself - its anecdotal (and not even verified just a say so) . That justifies the crappy SEO idea of ranking based on running automatic updates form a cms or PHP?

      We call nonsense on a lot of less silly techniques so I'll call it for what it is here

      Nonsense.

      Go out and build better links or create better content (that will also attract more votes for your site and/or give you a better LSI score) and forget the crappy gimmicks that work only in pitifully weak serps or newsworthy items.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7542288].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dennis09
    Keep in mind too that the weight given to QDF, just like all other factors, is constantly changing and being tweaked.
    Signature
    There is no elevator to success, you have to take the stairs
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7542215].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author yukon
      Banned
      Originally Posted by dennis09 View Post

      Keep in mind too that the weight given to QDF, just like all other factors, is constantly changing and being tweaked.

      True, SERP algos. are built to be constantly changed.

      The first sign of freshness not being effective will be seen on the news sites in the SERPs. Still works today.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[7542231].message }}

Trending Topics