Question about Blogger.com appearing in search results

11 years ago

Originally Posted by rahmanpaidar

PR of the page is responsible for how deep the page is indexed.
For new pages it takes awhile to get pageranks so only titles and descriptions
get indexed. It's the waste of resource and time to fully index non important pages.

That make absolutely no sense, and is absolutely not true.

As soon as a page is indexed, it's game for search results.

PR has nothing to do with indexing. New pages? These threads on WF are
new, no PR, and get completely indexed within seconds.

I think you are mixed up on a lot of things.

Has nothing to do with blogger either. Unless you told google not
to index it.

Paul

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8332904].message }}

marketingcode

11 years ago

Originally Posted by paulgl

That make absolutely no sense, and is absolutely not true.

As soon as a page is indexed, it's game for search results.

PR has nothing to do with indexing. New pages? These threads on WF are
new, no PR, and get completely indexed within seconds.

I think you are mixed up on a lot of things.

Has nothing to do with blogger either. Unless you told google not
to index it.

Paul

thanks for your answer,i have same quesition

Thanks

Signature

Pokerstars Bonus Code 2014 : PSP17264
get $600 FREE bonus at largest poker site
PokerStars Bonus Code 2014
$3000/month from poker professional

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8333416].message }}

danparks

11 years ago

Originally Posted by rahmanpaidar

PR of the page is responsible for how deep the page is indexed.

I hang around Warrior Forum because there are a handful of people I do like to follow, and do sometimes pick up useful tidbits of information. When I see this kind of post, though, I'm torn between swearing off WF, or putting a bullet in my head.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8332972].message }}

Kevin Maguire

11 years ago

Originally Posted by trade4861

If I started a blog on blogger.com. Does it take a while for the content to be searchable in Google search results? The URL is indexed but if I copy and pose some of the unique content then nothing appears. The blog is brand new, so wondering if it just takes awhile to be fully indexed.

You say its indexed. Are you sure?
Try intext:"your content quote"

Originally Posted by rahmanpaidar

PR of the page is responsible for how deep the page is indexed.
For new pages it takes awhile to get pageranks so only titles and descriptions
get indexed. It's the waste of resource and time to fully index non important pages.

2 years a member
280 posts

And this is what you have learned?

Like Danparks said: If We stick our heads together, We can save a bullet.

@paulgl

I turned on show sigs 2 days ago

What does
"Beware, your SEO guru might be catfishing." mean? New one to me, never heard the term.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8333085].message }}

rahmanpaidar

11 years ago

Originally Posted by danparks

I hang around Warrior Forum because there are a handful of people I do like to follow, and do sometimes pick up useful tidbits of information. When I see this kind of post, though, I'm torn between swearing off WF, or putting a bullet in my head.

Don't do that. You should learn a lot of things about search engine
pruning and how they treat contents in web differently.

Don't expect that search engines treat two different contents
with different pageranks the same. They don't index a lot of html
code for low pr documents and vice versa.

Web consists of more than 50 billion pages according to scientific
searches but less than that that are indexed currently by Google.

They prune documents and contents. They are not 100% ideal.

Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire

2 years a member
280 posts

And this is what you have learned?

Like Danparks said: If We stick our heads together, We can save a bullet.

Unfortunately I couldn't learn anything from this forum

Originally Posted by paulgl

That make absolutely no sense, and is absolutely not true.

As soon as a page is indexed, it's game for search results.

PR has nothing to do with indexing. New pages? These threads on WF are
new, no PR, and get completely indexed within seconds.

I think you are mixed up on a lot of things.

Has nothing to do with blogger either. Unless you told google not
to index it.

Paul

I suggest to reread my post.

Thanks

Signature

Ø·Ø±Ø§ØÛŒ Ø³Ø§ÛŒØªØŒ Ø·Ø±Ø§ØÛŒ ÙˆØ¨ Ø³Ø§ÛŒØª

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8333277].message }}

yukon

Banned 11 years ago

Originally Posted by rahmanpaidar

PR of the page is responsible for how deep the page is indexed.
For new pages it takes awhile to get pageranks so only titles and descriptions
get indexed. It's the waste of resource and time to fully index non important pages.

What are you smoking?

If a page is indexed (a typical web page) odds are it has a Google Cache which means the Google bot looked at the entire text/links on that same page.

Do a Google search for any root keyword (ex: cruise vacation) & change the Google search date option to Past Hour, now grab any URL off that list of web pages published/indexed in the last hour & add cache: to the front of the URL.

BINGO, entire page crawled, not just titles/descriptions on high PR pages.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8333364].message }}

rahmanpaidar

11 years ago

Originally Posted by yukon

What are you smoking?

If a page is indexed (a typical web page) odds are it has a Google Cache which means the Google bot looked at the entire text/links on that same page.

Do a Google search for any root keyword (ex: cruise vacation) & change the Google search date option to Past Hour, now grab any URL off that list of web pages published/indexed in the last hour & add cache: to the front of the URL.

BINGO, entire page crawled, not just titles/descriptions on high PR pages.

Redo your research with a new site and see if Google shows any cache
within Past HOUR. Search a unique content from that new site and see if google list your content. Don't take bbc.com as an example and extend the results.

What you are watching from Google cache is the html code from html
repository. That doesn't mean necessarily all links and words are counted.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Ø·Ø±Ø§ØÛŒ Ø³Ø§ÛŒØªØŒ Ø·Ø±Ø§ØÛŒ ÙˆØ¨ Ø³Ø§ÛŒØª

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8333420].message }}

yukon

Banned 11 years ago

Originally Posted by rahmanpaidar

Redo your research with a new site and see if Google shows any cache
within Past HOUR. Search a unique content from that new site and see if google list your content. Don't take bbc.com as an example and extend the results.

What you are watching from Google cache is the html code from html
repository. That doesn't mean necessarily all links and words are counted.

I'm not building a new site just to prove a point when a simple Google search will show the same thing.

I've built new sites in the past that get indexed with a fresh default Wordpress install, so I know Google doesn't care about PR when indexing a web page. I have no idea why anyone would even suggest Google cares about PR when indexing pages, doesn't even make sense.

Example search/site/page/cache below, & don't claim an established domain, because a fresh site still gets indexed cached just the same.

1) cruise vacation

2)

3) Google Cache (Jul 28, 2013 11:22:12 GMT)

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8333788].message }}

rahmanpaidar

11 years ago

We can't understand each others because:

Originally Posted by yukon

I'm not building a new site just to prove a point when a simple Google search will show the same thing.

I never said you build a new site. Read my post again.

Originally Posted by yukon

I've built new sites in the past that get indexed with a fresh default Wordpress install, so I know Google doesn't care about PR when indexing a web page. I have no idea why anyone would even suggest Google cares about PR when indexing pages, doesn't even make sense.

Because you never wrote a search engine in past.

Originally Posted by yukon

Example search/site/page/cache below, & don't claim an established domain, because a fresh site still gets indexed cached just the same.

1) cruise vacation

2)

3) Google Cache (Jul 28, 2013 11:22:12 GMT)

Don't claim you never know green bar PR is something totally
different than real PR used in ranking.

Just look at the sites listed and judge by yourself that high PR homepage
leaks pr quickly to its new pages. If huffingtonpost stops updating their site
for a while, then you will see that after the next PR update, that new
page is a high PR.

Thanks

Signature

Ø·Ø±Ø§ØÛŒ Ø³Ø§ÛŒØªØŒ Ø·Ø±Ø§ØÛŒ ÙˆØ¨ Ø³Ø§ÛŒØª

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8333971].message }}

Alexa Smith

Banned 11 years ago

Originally Posted by rahmanpaidar

PR of the page is responsible for how deep the page is indexed.
For new pages it takes awhile to get pageranks so only titles and descriptions
get indexed.

This is completely wrong. It's pure fiction - even judging by the depressing standards of this part of the forum, for "information quality", it's total nonsense.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8333708].message }}

rahmanpaidar

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Alexa Smith

This is completely wrong. It's pure fiction - even judging by the depressing standards of this part of the forum, for "information quality", it's total nonsense.

Congrats. Increased your post count with another useful, standard and informative post.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Ø·Ø±Ø§ØÛŒ Ø³Ø§ÛŒØªØŒ Ø·Ø±Ø§ØÛŒ ÙˆØ¨ Ø³Ø§ÛŒØª

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8334152].message }}

Alexa Smith

Banned 11 years ago

Originally Posted by rahmanpaidar

Increased your post count with another useful, standard and informative post.

You say that sarcastically, but I really wish - when I was new here, in 2008 - there'd been people around then who would point out, clearly and concisely, when someone was misinforming others and just had their facts totally wrong. If people had been more willing to do that, back then, it might not have taken me all those months to realise that a lot of "information" here was totally wrong, and based only on complete misunderstandings from the Urban Myth School of Internet Marketing.

Anyway, it certainly seems that in this thread, enough people have clarified that pretty unambiguously, so that you can't mislead too many people with your complete fictions. That is a helpful function of the forum. Sorry about that. :rolleyes:

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8334431].message }}

rahmanpaidar

11 years ago

Originally Posted by Alexa Smith

You say that sarcastically, but I really wish - when I was new here, in 2008 - there'd been people around then who would point out, clearly and concisely, when someone was misinforming others and just had their facts totally wrong. If people had been more willing to do that, back then, it might not have taken me all those months to realise that a lot of "information" here was totally wrong, and based only on complete misunderstandings from the Urban Myth School of Internet Marketing.

Anyway, it certainly seem that in this thread, enough people have clarified that pretty unambiguously, so that you can't mislead too many people with your complete fictions. That is a helpful function of the forum. Sorry about that. :rolleyes:

It's so unfotune that a little fraction of people actually think in their life.
I'm quite sure you never ever think about what this thread is all about
but you searched for a member that other people are attacking without a reason
and took part in.

So listen to me carefully:
Build a new site. Index your homepage in google.
Replace the homepage with a new html code of 10GB of garbage text
data and wait to see what google index. Again full html code in cache?

Why do you think google should and must index like an slave all that
garbage documents that are in your mind?

No matter what people were talking to you when you first came to this
forum in year 2008. You just didn't think about what people are talking
in this thread but just took part in.

Thanks

Signature

Ø·Ø±Ø§ØÛŒ Ø³Ø§ÛŒØªØŒ Ø·Ø±Ø§ØÛŒ ÙˆØ¨ Ø³Ø§ÛŒØª

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8334635].message }}

Question about Blogger.com appearing in search results

Trending Topics

Newbie

How did you turn it all around?

A healthy fascination for Hollywood...

Any thoughts on golf's latest phenom...Scottie Scheffler??

What's the Best IM-Related Skill to Learn Today That Can Help in the Future?