Building Tier 1 with web 2.0

by peterperseo

Posted: 10 years ago 12 replies

I'm building the Tier 1 to my money site, after that I will build Tier 2 (lower quality web 2.0, articles directories lower PR) and finally the Tier 3 (thousands of every kind of backlinks).

So for the Tier 1 I submitted good quality articles to the best Article Directories (Ezine, Goarticles, etc), one Youtube video, some Yahoo answers, and now I'm preparing some accounts on web 2.0 (Blogger, Wordpress.com, Weebly, Hubpages, Squidoo).
As all you know, each of these are like a small website, where I can write just one page/post or many pages.

So I was thinking to open just one account with each one, and after that create a page or post for every money site I want to link, with of course the backlinks in the end of the post (just like a private "article directories" ). For example I can create sites like ww w.websitesreview.blogspot .com, ww w.websitesreview.wordpress. com etc. and later publicate my own articles.

Can it works? Bad idea? :confused:
I was reading some people open different accounts for every money site linked.

Thanks for the help!

#backlinks #building #pyramid backlinks #tier #web #web 2.0

rschmitz 10 years ago

You can do that, but there are two issues. One, the links get a ton more juice if they are contextual. So if one of your money sites is on acne and the other is on window tenting, its going to hurt the link juice. Second, it will pull up a red flag during a manual review if posts are unrelated, and then if they look at your backlinks and see random garbage your site could go kaploot.

The standard advice to be the safest, is to create 5 pages minimum of super unique readable content per web2.0 with related images, videos, outbound contextual links to authority sites, etc. That should provide a fool proof tier 1 link.

You can use this web2.0 multiple times, although I would advise that you randomize the money sites that you link it to, having all of your web2's linking to the same sites without mixing it up could send off a red flag.
- [ 1 ] Thanks
- 1 reply
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8680072].message }}
- jadesource 10 years ago
  
  Hi Great advice!
  care to advise more?
  
  I've always bought my own URL and then built a wordpress site from scratch based on what I was targeting.
  
  I want to start branching out into the web 2.0 properties and do exactly what you are describing (good rich content, etc)
  
  I just don't know which ones are worth the effort since I hear bad and good about hubpages, etc.
  
  I want to diversify and don't mind testing, but I hoped you could give me the current state of affairs, or a best practices to start with as you have done here.
  
  I would be very grateful! Or PM me, either way.
  Mark
  
  Thanks
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8727468].message }}

online only

10 years ago

Hey Peter,

This is called "spam" and won't help you much in SEO, unfortunately.

I haven't seen ONE site yet that ranks well on Google and has web2.0s as backlinks. This is garbage, especially if you don't build a proper site out of web2.0, but then again, it's very time consuming.

You would be better of creating useful content (visual assets, how-to posts, guides/tutorials) and the use emails to outreach people in the similar niche.

But best-toaster-review.biz type of sites are history anyway, IMO..

Thanks
4 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8727802].message }}

jadesource 10 years ago

Now THAT I agree with. It's a joke
blue-cap-embroidery.biz

The twilight of that junk

But what if you were going to do what you say in the latter part of the critique, build some decent web 2.0 sites with real pages, good targeting, and good intent.

Not one page spam. But, one can build well with the right tools, assets and time.

M
- [ 1 ] Thanks
- 1 reply
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8727827].message }}
- jadesource 10 years ago
  
  I think I mean, build them with the same intent and care that you build your money sites. Is it doable?
  
  For diversification and for good backlinks. Uncharted territory for me.
  
  Thanks
  
  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8727834].message }}
peterperseo 10 years ago

Originally Posted by online only

I haven't seen ONE site yet that ranks well on Google and has web2.0s as backlinks. This is garbage...

Sorry but.... what planet do you live?

I've seen I lot (I have some too) websites ranked using tiers levels.

Of course the quality of Tiers is very important for longer results.

Originally Posted by online only

You would be better of creating useful content (visual assets, how-to posts, guides/tutorials) and the use emails to outreach people in the similar niche.

This also is good, but it's just another, different, strategy.

Thanks for your reply
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8730986].message }}

jinx1221

10 years ago

Originally Posted by online only

I haven't seen ONE site yet that ranks well on Google and has web2.0s as backlinks. This is garbage, especially if you don't build a proper site out of web2.0, but then again, it's very time consuming..

Originally Posted by peterperseo

Sorry but.... what planet do you live?

I've seen I lot (I have some too) websites ranked using tiers levels.

Of course the quality of Tiers is very important for longer results.

He lives on the planet where you beg/trick other webmasters for links, create pretty infographic linkbait, etc.. apparently those are somehow not time consuming :rolleyes:

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

The Ultimate Private Network Management,
Visualization and Automation Tool

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8733550].message }}

Talent

10 years ago

Originally Posted by online only

Hey Peter,

I haven't seen ONE site yet that ranks well on Google and has web2.0s as backlinks. This is garbage, especially if you don't build a proper site out of web2.0, but then again, it's very time consuming.

.

WOW. The things you read on an internet marketing forum. First time back reading a bit and run into this... This post is the epitome of why you need to be very careful with the advice you get on this forum.

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8737477].message }}

yukon

Banned 10 years ago

Originally Posted by Talent

He's right, 2.0 blows for backlinks when that's their only purpose. Buffer the junk links all you want, junk is junk no matter how far downstream you go.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8737611].message }}

Kevin Maguire

10 years ago

Originally Posted by Talent

Have you been missing because you where on vacation, or because you've never ranked a site and went broke for a while?

My moneys on the latter.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8737707].message }}

KhanhHQ 10 years ago

I have a question when i build content for tiers. Is it necessary to have unique content to each tier?

Example:

If peterperseo (the owner of this thread) creats tier 1's backlinks from article submission services, does he write unique content? (5 new articles to get 5 quality backlinks?)

And the same with tier 2's backlinks from Web 2.0. Does he write unique content? (5 new articles to get 5 quality backlinks from 5 2.0 websites to his money site?)
- Thanks
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8738318].message }}

onlinemarketer23 10 years ago

hey peter,

just use also the wiki backlinks..just pick a submission service or tool to proceed with this step.. some swiki sites are high PR and eventually are contextual type..one single advice..keep things simple!! just try to build 1tier backlinks only and see how your site ranking moves up or down...imagine by building 1tier ones would be enough to get your site up in search result pages for your keyword!! DONT GET THINGS COMPLEX..because in business..simplest things is what works overtime!! cheers to all of warriors in here!!
- Thanks
Signature
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[8738750].message }}

Building Tier 1 with web 2.0

Trending Topics

Google Ads, landing pages, and Clickbank links

Carry out better target audience research

Membership area with multiple income streams

YouTube gets shopping display tools and affiliate partnership updates

A Very Strange Internet Problem