Will backlinks lose their importance in the near future? Matt Answers

20 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Will backlinks lose their importance?



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iC5FDzUh0P4
#answers #backlinks #future #importance #lose #matt
  • Profile picture of the author himanuzo
    Hmmm....

    Backlinks are still needed for SEO at Google....
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9169597].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Synnuh
    Short answer: no

    Long answer: hmm, still no

    Until someone can break the protocol used to connect web pages to each other, links will ALWAYS be used.

    Relevance between pages and sites is going to become more and more strict, along with site age and so called "authority", but LINKS aren't going anywhere anytime soon.

    Google's "author score" is a good example of this. Rankings based on the author / publisher instead of the domain's authority.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9170156].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    Funny how he suggest Google is working on Star Trek type language comprehension. What he's actually talking about is Googlebot scraping structured text data from Wikipedia & freebase.com.

    Welcome to 2010 (Knowledge Graph).
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9170187].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author RandySwanston
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      Funny how he suggest Google is working on Star Trek type language comprehension. What he's actually talking about is Googlebot scraping structured text data from Wikipedia & freebase.com.

      Welcome to 2010 (Knowledge Graph).
      But his answers are most of the time skeptical...
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9170286].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      Funny how he suggest Google is working on Star Trek type language comprehension. What he's actually talking about is Googlebot scraping structured text data from Wikipedia & freebase.com.

      Welcome to 2010 (Knowledge Graph).

      It's not that crazy. If you have been paying attention to Google's acquisitions and patents, they have been working towards that goal for quite awhile now.

      How close they are to it, is a different discussion.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9171106].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author yukon
        Banned
        Originally Posted by MikeFriedman View Post

        It's not that crazy. If you have been paying attention to Google's acquisitions and patents, they have been working towards that goal for quite awhile now.

        How close they are to it, is a different discussion.
        Those are all physical/proximity sensors (self driving cars, bots, drones). I guess that's what your talking about.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9171123].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
          Originally Posted by yukon View Post

          Those are all physical/proximity sensors (self driving cars, bots, drones). I guess that's what your talking about.
          What? No. I'm talking about the conversational search thing. That is something they have been working towards for about a decade.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9171136].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author yukon
            Banned
            Originally Posted by MikeFriedman View Post

            What? No. I'm talking about the conversational search thing. That is something they have been working towards for about a decade.
            I'm sure their idea of conversational search would be more along the lines of Youtube video transcripts, sort of like converting audio to plain text then doing the usual search. Google has search by voice, I've never used it but I see the option. Even much smaller businesses have had that technology (converting audio to text) for a few years (ex: Dragon Naturally Speaking). Google is looking at source code on webpages, they're not comprehending what's on the page like a human does.

            I doubt Google is going full blown AI on us anytime soon. The day that happens we'll have bigger things to worry about besides SEO or search engines.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9171205].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author paulgl
              So Matt Cutts says backlinks and their importance will be around for
              many years to come....and people take that to mean...what?

              Google has been tweaking the importance of backlinks for years. But
              people forget the rest of the line...

              Backlinks that are spammed, idiotic, or just don't make sense in various
              ways are losing their importance.

              Google's algorithm has always tweaked that. What's more important,
              one link from NYT, or 1,000 on some Joe Blow and his army's blogs?

              Does that mean backlinks lose their importance? Of course not. But
              some SEO guru in a cave will broadcast that it means backlinks are
              losing their importance. Hardly.

              Google keeps trying to convince webmasters to stop spamming and
              creating useless links. That's a different than saying backlinks won't
              count.

              Paul
              Signature

              If you were disappointed in your results today, lower your standards tomorrow.

              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9171344].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author AskAnAffiliate
    I think this only depends on if the sites your linking from lose there importance or disappear. This is why backlinking is so effective because its truly a pyramid. If you have links coming from multiple sites and they keep ranking well building importance, than your links will remain active and strong.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9171083].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CutPasteProfits
    What I hate about Matt Cutts is that he still leaves a lot of questions unanswered in his videos. He's very vague whereas I would expect a Google employee to be much more articulate and explain things better. I saw some of his other videos on guest posting, disavowing links, etc and can't take him seriously.

    Long story short - just do what works, without spamming
    Signature
    ->>Sales Letters So Sexy You'll Want To SPANK Them!<<-
    LIMITED TIME OFFER (Not Fake Scarcity).
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9171109].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MikeFriedman
      Originally Posted by CutPasteProfits View Post

      What I hate about Matt Cutts is that he still leaves a lot of questions unanswered in his videos. He's very vague whereas I would expect a Google employee to be much more articulate and explain things better. I saw some of his other videos on guest posting, disavowing links, etc and can't take him seriously.
      He is vague on purpose. You don't expect him to give away algorithm secrets, do you?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9171117].message }}
  • Quality backlinks will not lose their importance. A backlink is a high quality one when it meets the first and some/all of the subsequent characteristics:
    Dofollow
    On a Page with a high PR
    Contextual (If the backlink is surrounded by text related to the targeted keyword used as anchor text)
    Relevant (if the backlink is on a site that is related to your site's niche)
    On a page with low OBL (Out Bound Links)

    On the other hand, nofollow links on spammy blogs (for example) will not help (and can damage) your rankings.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9171695].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Advertising
      Originally Posted by strategic seo services View Post

      Quality backlinks will not lose their importance. A backlink is a high quality one when it meets the first and some/all of the subsequent characteristics:
      Dofollow
      On a Page with a high PR
      Contextual (If the backlink is surrounded by text related to the targeted keyword used as anchor text)
      Relevant (if the backlink is on a site that is related to your site's niche)
      On a page with low OBL (Out Bound Links)

      On the other hand, nofollow links on spammy blogs (for example) will not help (and can damage) your rankings.
      How can nofollow links hurt you? I have never heard this.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9172121].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kevin Maguire
      Originally Posted by strategic seo services View Post


      A backlink is a high quality one when it meets the first and some/all of the subsequent characteristics:

      Dofollow
      On a Page with a high PR
      Contextual (If the backlink is surrounded by text related to the targeted Keyword used as anchor text)
      Relevant (if the backlink is on a site that is related to your site's niche)
      On a page with low OBL (Out Bound Links)

      On the other hand, nofollow links on spammy blogs (for example) will not help (and can damage) your rankings.
      Going by your own standards of what equates to a good link, I guess that means you're screwed.

      If you're taking any orders, mine is a double cheese with large fries and a coke please.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9172127].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author nettiapina
        Originally Posted by Kevin Maguire View Post

        If you're taking any orders, mine is a double cheese with large fries and a coke please.


        Damn, now I want a cheeseburger too. With Link Spam light, please!
        Signature
        Links in signature will not help your SEO. Not on this site, and not on any other forum.
        Who told me this? An ex Google web spam engineer.

        What's your excuse?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9172473].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author RandySwanston
          Originally Posted by nettiapina View Post



          Damn, now I want a cheeseburger too. With Link Spam light, please!
          lolzzzzzzzzzzzz
          Signature
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9174892].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DizenSounds
    I will worry about what Mr Cutts has to say when it's relevant, worrying about something in the future like this isn't worth it.

    For now links work and that's whats the most important thing. Let's focus on now and let Mr Cutts keep making pointless videos.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9171718].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author st0nec0ld
    Can't watch the video doesn't seem to work on my end..
    Anyway, I don't think backlinks will lose its importance.
    No follow and Follow are options we have now so I don't think it is necessary for them to focus on decreasing the importance of backlinks.
    Signature

    12BET | Live Casino Malaysia

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9172131].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Arshid
    I think, google checking spammed urls and sandboxing ...
    Signature

    ::::::::::::::::::WordPress login security plugin [Skype:arshidkv12]::::::::::::::::::

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9172176].message }}

Trending Topics