[HighPADomains]

Hi,

I am Jason from High PA Domains. My partner Bill and I were sick and tired of paying a ridiculous amount of money for high PR domains for our private blog network. So, we decided to do some testing.

The Results BLEW OUR MIND!

We discovered that we could much more accurately predict how much power a PBN site would deliver based on a combination of metrics from Moz and Majestic.

We quickly realized that PR as a metric is DEAD!

Don't get me wrong, Google still uses it, but they no longer report on it. But there are TONS of sites out there that have plenty of power, but don't show up as having Page Rank.

We found so many of these sites that we decided to offer them to our friends and colleagues in the SEO World.

After selling HUNDREDS of Domains, We want to bring that offer to you.

High PA Domains
-[CLICK HERE]-
UNLEASH THE POWER!

Bulk Discounts are available. If you have any questions - simply Contact Us!

[webmarke]

This sound interesting...But how can we be sure what you are saying is true about page rank and google. How can we be sure this is not a gimmick to get people to buy worthless domains?

Do you have any proof to back up these claims?

[Happybearent]

Web this is a common question that I see people ask. The last PR update that I am aware of was on Dec 5th, and by all accounts this was "an accident". By accident I mean that it was never meant to be released.

By my best guess, and others too, the update may have been from the data they had in Aug of 2013. I say this because of some sites I had. I was able to see what sites I had been testing, what sites were newer, and I looked at what I was doing to each of them with the notes I took, and the dates the SEO I did to them were done.

So in 2013 there was a Feb update, and a Dec update, and again only 1 should have happened (based on what Matt Cutts said). So here we are in 2014, and its been 9 months since the latest PR update. If you count that it may have been from around Aug, we're looking at year old metrics. How reliable are year old metrics? In internet time that's like 12 years.

I hate to see people throw away money on a metric that is for the most part dead. I've bought domains from these guys before, and I'm happy with the results I've gotten. I know I can go out and source my own domains, but the problem is it takes time, and I'd rather pay them to do it so I can spend my time making even more money.

I'm not here to sell you, again I hate to see people throw away money. Do some research on Moz and the PA/DA metrics. This post I found very helpful, and I usually tell people to read it when they're first learning about PA and moving away from PR.

Ask questions, do some research, and read sites testimonials. See what people have to say about things, and always ask other people their thoughts. You'll see what their results were and get all your questions answered. Or, you can PM me if you have any questions.

Take care.

[HighPADomains]

Originally Posted by webmarke

This sound interesting...But how can we be sure what you are saying is true about page rank and google. How can we be sure this is not a gimmick to get people to buy worthless domains?

Do you have any proof to back up these claims?

Hi! - Sorry for the late response, but this question is a good one and deserves an in-depth response.

The opinion that PR is not a metric to rely upon is now widely accepted across the SEO Community.

But to back it up, I will start at the beginning, and walk you all through where the concept behind High PA Domains came from.

First - we better define exactly what PageRank is.

Wikipedia explains it perfectly:

PageRank is an algorithm used by Google Search to rank websites in their search engine results. PageRank was named after Larry Page, one of the founders of Google. PageRank is a way of measuring the importance of website pages. According to Google:

PageRank works by counting the number and quality of links to a page to determine a rough estimate of how important the website is. The underlying assumption is that more important websites are likely to receive more links from other websites.

PR is still very much in use, and sites increase and decrease in PR all the time.

Up until recently, Google would release PageRank (PR) data periodically, generally three to four times every year. When the data came out, it was basically a Snapshot of PR frozen at the time it was released.

This data could be accessed using the Google Toolbar. Most people today can't even install and use the Google Toolbar, as Google stopped updating it after IE 6.

But PageRank had already embedded itself as the predominant measure for how much "Power" a link would carry.

This all changed in 2013 when the 2nd PageRank update did not come. The SEO industry were expecting it in May or June at the latest - and it just did not come.

In October, Matt Cutts surprised everyone when he replied to a Tweet from Niels Bosch asking "Will there be a PR update before 2014?". Matt's answer was simple and straight to the point. "I would be surprised if that happened."

Then, on December 4-5 2013, PR updates started making their way out. Matt Cutts response to this was "[the] team was fixing a different backend service and did a PR update along the way.”

Now, as I mentioned before, PR is still alive, but as we can see, Google does not report on it any more. I am sure they have their reasons.

It was about this time that my partner Bill and I decided we needed to try and figure out another way to predict PR, without having to rely on Google's infrequent (if at all) releases.

After extensive testing, we developed a system using Moz and MajesticSEO's metrics (PA/DA, CF/TF) where we could accurately predict the linking "Power" of domains that had no PR.

But the Metrics alone are not enough. All of our sites are expired domains, and are hand-selected. All domains must meet strict criteria. We actually have at least 14 different criteria that a domain must meet before we put it up on our sales page. These include things like back-link profile and anchor-text ratios.

I will be honest, and I will never say our domains are 'Spam Free'. Spam, as annoying as it is, is natural. If a domain has a 'natural' amount of Spam, and all other criteria are met, we will sell it.

But what we sell are Natural looking domains with Natural histories and Natural back-link profiles.

Originally Posted by webmarke

How can we be sure this is not a gimmick to get people to buy worthless domains?

I know that the 'normal' thing on Warrior Forum is to post lots of graphs with arrows pointing up and offering it as proof, but lets be honest - There are too many variables in ranking a website to say that rankings increased simply because of one or two links. Can they have that effect? Sure! But it can be lots of other things as well. I had a website that was getting 10 hits a day, and I increased it to over 40 hits in a day just by submitting a new sitemap to Webmaster Tools.

What I can tell you is that over 80% of my customers are repeat customers, and keep coming back for more. Why? Because it is not a gimmick. They work. Plain and simple.

We encourage all of our customers to do their own research before purchasing, and we are more than happy to provide you with a few URLs so you too can do your own research.

Take Care,
Jason

[Torphin]

Hi Jason,

I've done a lot of work with domain sales and do a similar guide. I do agree that PR is becoming slowly outdated and you can't really purchase domains off a certain Pr as it will take months for Google to come by. So what if found is that i look more at the DA/PA using Moz and MagesticSEO then anything else.

You can find a PR3 and discover that it only has 3 PR2 backlinks. The common situation is that some strong backlinks fall off and when the next update comes, that site falls to a PR2, losing you good money.

Oh and on the topic of spam. A really helpful method i've found is using ahrefs to analyze the anchor text. Sometimes you can get an idea of what the site was. Also you can mix in past screenshots in archive.org. Anyway i'm sure you know this but i thought id give you guys and any indecisive customers.

[HighPADomains]

Hey Torphin,

Thanks - I appreciate the Vote of Confidence in what we do.

I agree with you as well, the anchor cloud on Ahrefs is simply amazing! - And we do check all of our domains in Archive.org as well, however I find that is only about 85% effective.

Really - It comes down to experience. You have to do this day in - day out to really get a feel for what is a good domain and what is not.

Cheers,
Jason

[teazers4]

Hey Jason,

I just sent you an email (subject: Information on url...) for more information on one of your sites you've researched and have available.

Thanks,

Neil

[HighPADomains]

Thanks Neil - I believe our Customer Service Rep got back to you right away.

Cheers,
Jason

[liwern]

I have sent email through the contact us page, and no reply.