New!!! Earn Passive Recurring Income With The Link Juicer Affiliate Program!!!

[toberto]

Is anyone having any success with this at all? I've had the free trial going for a month and had no backlinks of any kind - other than the ones I initiated myself..

It generates links alright and is a huge time saver. This is brillaint but.... out of about 500+ odd links I've only found 12 that were actually indexed by Google (even these were initiated by me). The text I spun is averaging 0.40 and in some cases 0.83 which is well above the average recommendation for randomness.

Of the links that appear in the online report I've checked these thoroughly and none of them are being indexed by any of the search engines.

It's been mentioned above by one or two people that they're not seeing any results at all. I'm in the same boat.

I checked the links the system created. These are links on new blogs, social media accounts etc etc. However, when I did a bit of delving I discovered that not one of them was pinged to any feed readers.

Are the developers aware of this? If a page, site isn't pinging the feeds then this could take 4-6 months for Google to crawl these pages.

I hope this information is helpful and maybe the WSO owner can shed some light on this.

[Peter Adamson]

@AlfaMike,

Yes, The Link Juicer can be used to promote any type of site as long as it is within the Terms of Service (no porn, illegal etc).

[Peter Adamson]

Originally Posted by toberto

It generates links alright and is a huge time saver. This is brillaint but.... out of about 500+ odd links I've only found 12 that were actually indexed by Google (even these were initiated by me). The text I spun is averaging 0.40 and in some cases 0.83 which is well above the average recommendation for randomness.

Are the developers aware of this? If a page, site isn't pinging the feeds then this could take 4-6 months for Google to crawl these pages.

I hope this information is helpful and maybe the WSO owner can shed some light on this.

Case in point: I have a page that ranks between #4 and #7 on page one of Google for its keyword. This page has had no promotion whatever other than The Link Juicer. It has over 400 links now. There is no question that these links are why it ranks. Only 4 of them show up in Yahoo site explorer. When I look for links indexed by Google it shows one link. And that is an internal one. So basically Google does not return one single external link to this page in a link: search yet it has given enough importance to those links to rank the page #4 to #7. This to me is absolute proof that if a link does not show up in a search this does not mean Google does not know about the link nor does it mean the link has no importance as far as Google is concerned.

Regarding pinging: all the pages both bookmarks and blogs are pinged to 75 pinging services. Blogs are pinged when there is a new post. Bookmark pages are pinged up to once a day if they have new content.

Getting bookmarking pages indexed it difficult. Some sites do, some don't. Blogs however are getting indexed very quickly. One WPMU site that was provided by a TLJ member recently now has 15,910 postings and 14,500 pages indexed in Google. I think the numbers speak for themselves.

However, as the amount of content available on the Internet increases exponentially, it is getting harder and harder to get pages indexed and keep them indexed.

The main thing is results. If you have seen improvements in your rankings, nothing else matters.

[jsmith2482]

Peter,
So basically I can target up to 50 different keywords/urls and get a combination of up to 900 backlinks to them per month? Do these backlinks show up in yahoo site explorer? Also do you have a restrictions on if the page is a content page, sqeeuze page or sales letter?

[toberto]

Originally Posted by Peter Adamson

1. This page has had no promotion whatever other than The Link Juicer. It has over 400 links now. There is no question that these links are why it ranks.

2. Regarding pinging: all the pages both bookmarks and blogs are pinged to 75 pinging services. Blogs are pinged when there is a new post. Bookmark pages are pinged up to once a day if they have new content.

3. Getting bookmarking pages indexed it difficult. I think the numbers speak for themselves.

4. However, as the amount of content available on the Internet increases exponentially, it is getting harder and harder to get pages indexed and keep them indexed.

5. The main thing is results. If you have seen improvements in your rankings, nothing else matters.

I'll try and be as constructive as possible as I really want this to work but I am just getting zero results from your service.

1. I too have done this on a particular page and I have had no results whatsoever. I got an SEO company to check this out thoroughly and none of the pages have been indexed.

We used an exact keyphrase that was unique. None of the links from link juicer were indexed on any of the search engines. Our page wasn't indexed either.

We did the same for a page not on link juicer using another unique keyphrase and got this indexed within 30 secs. It still ranks a week later.

2. OK if they are being pinged then I selected 5 of these at random, asked an SEO to double check them for me and neither of us could find any evidence of them being listed, ranked or even indexed. Zero.

3. I disagree and so did the SEO. They showed me examples of getting our page bookmarked in minutes.

4. I again disagree. I put this to the SEO and posted this on some very well respected SEO forums and they all disagreed with this statement.

5. I agree entirely. However I have seen absolutely no improvements in rankings, indexing etc of any kind on the pages I have added in your trial.

I am only presenting facts here and taking advice from very highly respected professionals.

If you have examples of how well people are doing from your application then can you PM me or provide examples.

I've had a couple of messages from some other people who are using your service who saw my post an have the same concerns. None of them are seeing any difference or results at all.

If people are follwoing your advice and instructions (like me) and are not getting results then surely something is missing?

Is it not in your interests to make this WSO as attractive as possible? There have been other people saying the same things as me earlier in the thread.

[Peter Adamson]

toberto,

I empathise with you. I have requested information from a number of participants on this thread asking for specifics of their campaigns so I could try to identify possible sticking points. Not one responded. If I don't know who they are, I can't help.

There are pages that are hard to get indexed. Bookmarks in particular are very difficult. Even some well-known BM sites don't get indexed. Blogs on the other hand do get indexed very quickly. I recently did a random spot check and found a little less than half the public urls that I checked were indexed. It is time consuming and I don't do it much. But there are pages indexed, that is for sure.

I can't argue with you if the system isn't working for you. It doesn't work for everyone, and I don't always know why. Especially when the users who don't get results don't step forward and identify themselves or their campaigns.

The whole point of the 30 day trial is to allow you to use it at no risk. If it doesn't work, you haven't spent anything. Yesterday I got an email from a previous trial user who stopped at the end of the 30 day trial because he had no results. A month or two later he saw his rankings shoot up. Now he's back for more.

As for point 4, your SEO friends have their heads in the sand. There is simply not enough electricity, bandwidth or servers on the planet to do the job. Period. The estimated number of Google blade servers went from 600,000 to about 1 million in a little over year. How long do you think they can continue to increase their capacity at exponential rates? I do not doubt that the experts in question are indeed experts in SEO. But do any of them understand the issues of massively distributed computing on Google-scale?

I don't claim to work miracles and I don't claim that TLJ will always get guaranteed results. If you allow me to look at your campaigns I will try to pinpoint any weaknesses I suspect could prevent your getting results. Debating here does not accomplish much unfortunately.

[rimam1]

Peter,

Your mature and patient style is the reason I'm still a subscriber of the Link Juicer. You're no hype... and your thoughtful response to the user who isn't getting results is reassuring

My site is in a pretty competitive niche. I've been using TLJ for about 2 months with 3 campaigns. My site isn't showing up in the top 1000 results for my main keyword phrase yet. If I contact you with my info, would you mind looking into whether or not my campaigns?

Yahoo Site Explorer shows only 70 links, and while I know they aren't always that accurate, I assumed that the pad files that you submit to 200 ebook directories would have shown up by now. I have 3 TLJ campaigns and haven't seen any of these links show up.

Your follow-up would be greatly appreciated. You can PM me if you'd like to look into this.

Best,
Raza

[scar tissue]

Compare to SB 101 - what is the differences and benefits about The Link Juicer ? The link building is completely run on auto pilot "set it and forget it" or do I have to submit other people's URL manually which is very time consuming ?

Sorry for this newbie question

[Peter Adamson]

@rimam1: Absolutely. As always, put in a support ticket (Support>Contact Support) and I will look at your campaigns. That's what tech support is for!!

@scar tissue: You create a campaign which is made up of a title, tags, bookmark text and blog text. These are spun into various different versions using the traditional syntax {like this|and this} which TLJ has dubbed 'Spyntax'. You must spend some time doing this to get your texts to spin well. Once you have created the campaign it is all autopilot. You don't have to manually submit anything. You do need to create a few SB accounts at the start.

[dseisner]

Originally Posted by rimam1

Peter,

Your mature and patient style is the reason I'm still a subscriber of the Link Juicer. You're no hype... and your thoughtful response to the user who isn't getting results is reassuring

My site is in a pretty competitive niche. I've been using TLJ for about 2 months with 3 campaigns. My site isn't showing up in the top 1000 results for my main keyword phrase yet. If I contact you with my info, would you mind looking into whether or not my campaigns?

Yahoo Site Explorer shows only 70 links, and while I know they aren't always that accurate, I assumed that the pad files that you submit to 200 ebook directories would have shown up by now. I have 3 TLJ campaigns and haven't seen any of these links show up.

Your follow-up would be greatly appreciated. You can PM me if you'd like to look into this.

Best,
Raza

I am fairly new to SEO but I just created 5 blogs. All of them were indexed in the top 1000 within 3-7 days without any link building (besides pinging and submitting to digg, mixx).

You are targeting too competitive a niche and/or your on-page SEO is bad. I think link juicer can only give certain sites a chance, IMHO.

[rimam1]

I have gotten other sites ranked in the top 1000 results without the Link Juicer but they were in MUCH less competitive niches.

This niche is very competitive, but maybe my SEO isn't that great either ;-)

I'm going to keep using the LinkJuicer because the concept just makes sense. These links are probably worth much more than article directories or profile links because they are actually getting linked to themselves.

I'm not giving up on the Link Juicer, I'll just be more patient. I'll also set up a campaign or two for some less competitive sites I plan on launching.

[sumbu]

I joined up one month ago and I love it. Too easy!

50 or more links to each of my campaigns and I set it up within the hour. Great stuff.

Thanks

[searchnology]

I'm still on the fence concerning becoming a member but here's an idea that may help everyone....take the URLs of your TLJ backlinks and create an RSS feed from them. Submit that RSS feed to RSS directories for syndication.

This of course could be a nice upgrade to TLJ at some point in the future

[dizen]

Is building multi-tiered network crucial for success using TLJ?

Originally Posted by Peter Adamson

@SEOGuruboy, Ehsan_am:
There are many many factors that can influence the results you get. However, I do notice some patterns. The biggest reasons for not getting results IMO are:
- targetting too competitive a keyword
- pointing all campaigns at the money page rather than building a multi-tiered network
- inadequately spun texts, causing posts to be too similar

[Peter Adamson]

Originally Posted by dizen

Is building multi-tiered network crucial for success using TLJ?

Crucial is a big word. I think the bigger the network the more natural and the more juice. Experience has shown that it is better this way.

[johnrichardjack]

If I cancel my link juicer account for one or two months, will my old account and previous campaigns still be available to me if I decide to rejoin the link juicer membership one or two months later?

[dmderoeck]

I've been a TLJ subscriber for several months and I can strongly attest to the power of this system. You won't necessarily see a blast onto page one for competitive keywords, but you will see slow, consistent improvements.

I use it on multiple sites with various competitive keywords. And the keywords I use it for, seem to "creep" up slowly in the SERPs and stay there.

In my opinion however, you need to use multiple methods of SEO. Use a variety of methods based on different strategies and parameters to achieve good rankings. This is just one I stand by and believe in.

Dan