(FREE NO OPT-IN) *Google Niche Detective System 1.0* Position #2 With 45,300,000 Competitors - HOW??

[JC-PureProfitsHQ]

My Site Reached Position #2
In Google With 45,300,000
“Competitors” In Just
A Few Months… HOW??

I’m going to be honest with you: I’m a little reluctant while writing this post, because I’m about to commit Internet marketing suicide by revealing one of my more profitable niches here…

But putting that aside for now, take a look at the following screenshot:

Are you one of the people that think marketing infoproducts in niches are dead??

Think again.

As huge as the dating market is, this one site was solely responsible for nearly replacing my day job income within just a few months. And what’s amazing is that this is just one of the many, many profitable niches that I’m in.

How is this possible? How could I have ranked SO EASILY for a keyword that is supposedly “high competition” and marketers are told to stay away from?

I’m going to tell you right now, this is not because of some ninja SEO tactic that you didn’t know about.

I’m willing to bet that it’s because everything they’ve taught you about finding low-competition keywords in profitable niches is WRONG.

What’s The Fundamental Secret That Other Experts Are HIDING FROM YOU About How To Build Niche Businesses That Consistently Deposits AT LEAST $500 to $2500 In Your Pockets… EVERY SINGLE MONTH?

I’ll give you a hint: it’s not in your product (although that matters). It’s not in your copywriting (although that matters too). It’s not even in your PPC or SEO methods (although, you guessed it, that matters as well).

Truth be told, you could do all of the above things PERFECTLY, but your business won’t have a chance in succeeding in today’s cutthroat markets without…

…Profitable Niche Selection & Excellent Keyword Research!

I mean, it makes sense, doesn’t it? Choosing the right keywords that has little to no competition will allow you to rank for it and build a consistent stream of FREE traffic that pays you out for months, if not years, to come.

But have you ever sat down to do your research, and come to the horrifying realization that plagues most aspiring Internet marketers:

“Finding a niche to get into is MUCH TOUGHER than I thought; the competition for every keyword I want to use is simply just WAY TOO HIGH!!”

Let me ask you something here...

• Have you ever been DISMAYED that the keyword you thought would be super easy to rank for suddenly seems impossible?

• Or let’s say that you somehow managed to rank for your keyword… Have you ever suddenly realized after a month that it’s giving you MUCH LESS traffic than you first estimated?

• Hell, you could’ve even gotten first position for your keyword plus a steady stream of traffic, but did you then realize that your visitors are JUST NOT PULLING OUT THEIR WALLETS to purchase your offer?

(If none of the above situations apply to you, then feel free to skip the rest of the thread — there’s nothing here for you. Congratulations, you’re already successful or you’re already on your way to success.)

Enter… Google Niche Detective System 1.0

This report is perfect for you if:

• You want to sell infoproducts in markets that is NOT the “make money online” niche (let’s face it — getting rich peddling information on how to get rich is corny and, well, a little sleazy) but are struggling to find niche markets that you have a chance of competing in…

• You know which niche to cater to, but are struggling to find the right keywords that you should use because a.) they don’t have enough traffic, b.) have too much competition, or c.) both…

• You have absolutely no idea which ones of your potential keyword candidates will give you access to your “starving crowd” – which is the #1 MUST-HAVE with any niche market you want to get into.

While I did write this with the newbie in mind, even the experienced marketers that have read this report picked up something new after they read it. So it certainly wouldn’t hurt to take a look no matter what your experience it. Heck, it wouldn’t cost you a single dime.

What's Inside The Google Niche Detective 1.0?

Now… What will you learn inside this FREE report? (I don’t even ask you to opt-in to read it!)

• The mysterious reasons why Site A ranks higher for Keyword 1 (position #2) than Site B ranks for Keyword 2 (position #6) — despite the fact that Keyword 1 is SUPPOSED to be the “difficult” keyword to rank for! (I’m committing Internet marketing SUICIDE by actually REVEALING MY SITES and showing you the results for rock-solid proof)

• Watch me as I DESTROY the myth that most wannabe gurus are teaching you about how to find keywords with so-called “weak competition” — and discover the missing link on how to REALLY evaluate how easy it would be to rank for those “difficult” keywords!

• Discover the secret of finding profitable niches (that ISN’T the “make money online” niche) that you can easily dominate through SEO and will pay you off for months, if not YEARS, to come. Say hello to profitable keywords with search volume, and stop wasting your time trying to rank for keywords in niches that won’t bring you any traffic and sales!

• Find out why most people think Google’s keyword tools are inaccurate, causing your predicted traffic to be almost always WAY OFF from your actual traffic — and learn the actual method that most Internet marketers refuse to reveal that will give you the most accurate estimates for your actual search traffic!

• Should you always go with the keyword that has the most searches? See how a simple test PROVES that a keyword with nearly just half of the traffic can actually produce HIGHER profits than the #1 most searched keyword!

• Save yourself the money you’ll buy with expensive software, because don’t even need to pay a single cent to use any of research tools (yes, these tools can be used by ABSOLUTELY ANYBODY — you just have to know how to use it PROPERLY)

• Equip yourself with all the tools and knowledge that you need to SNIPE your way into so-called competitive markets like dating and weight loss. Laugh your way to the bank with so-called “competitive” keywords that they won’t touch with a 10-foot pole, while everybody else fights for scraps!

Just in case you missed it, how much will this information cost you? Get ready for the biggest surprise of all…

$0

Yep, that’s right. While other Warriors are charging you $17, $27 or even $97 for rehashed information from PLR products, I’m giving you my very own true, time-tested methods completely FREE OF CHARGE. It’s my way of setting the bar and hopefully wrecking the curve.

The only thing that I ask from you is that you actually do read the report and go through it in detail. I’m confident you’re going to learn a few new tricks, so that’s really for your own benefit as well.

Why Am I Releasing This Product For Free?

I know it’s such a cliche and obviously just another sales tactic, but after seeing the junk that people are selling: I can say with 200% integrity that I really should be charging AT LEAST a few bucks for this.

(And yes, my personal integrity matters to me — even if I’m just another screen name on some forum to you. If I didn’t care about my integrity, I definitely would’ve been more outrageous with my headlines and what this product can do for you!)

But let’s get this straight — I’m new to the Internet marketing game. To most of you, you don’t know me just as much as you don’t know the guy standing behind you in the grocery counter line the last time you bought some milk.

By posting this report for free, it’s really the best way I could think of to build credentials and get a few worthwhile testimonials.
In a week or two, I’m probably going to be charging at least a couple of bucks for access. But until then, it’s yours on the house — absolutely free of charge.

With that said, let’s begin.

BEGIN HERE

[jazbo]

Hi

I read your report with interest, but felt I had to comment.

If I search for bay area flooring without brackets I get this in top spot under the Google shopping results:

In San Mateo, CA shop at Bay Area Floors & Design for all your flooring needs.

PR0 - but it has 11,100 inbound links according to Yahoo. So it has weak visible PR as a page but a large amount of links for the site as a whole. Most people know, just from using Google, that high PR sites are constantly outranked by low PR sites, so I cant understand your reasoning for using PR as the primary means to measure the strength of a site within the SERP's? Looking at the strength and depth of inbound links rather than considering PR is surely the key?

You also say "After all, it takes hundreds (if not thousands) of backlinks to grab a position on the top 3… right?"

It is surely the strength of the individual links that also count, not just the quantity?

You describe 11 links difference as "paltry", but you are only judging links in terms of volume, which is absolutely and fundamentally ignoring the reality of the power of individual links from sites with a high TrustRank.

So number one result has 11,100 links, and they appear to be mostly low quality links build en-masse, so that site appears to be there on the overall power of a lot of low value links probably deep-linked throughout their site. But another site could rank as high if they were to get as few as a dozen high quality links.

[JC-PureProfitsHQ]

Hi jazbo,

Thanks for your comment on the report.

Originally Posted by jazbo

If I search for bay area flooring without brackets I get this in top spot under the Google shopping results:

In San Mateo, CA shop at Bay Area Floors & Design for all your flooring needs.

PR0 - but it has 11,100 inbound links according to Yahoo. So it has weak visible PR as a page but a large amount of links for the site as a whole. Most people know, just from using Google, that high PR sites are constantly outranked by low PR sites, so I cant understand your reasoning for using PR as the primary means to measure the strength of a site within the SERP's? Looking at the strength and depth of inbound links rather than considering PR is surely the key?

Later in the report, I actually say this:

Keep in mind that the Google PR value is also out-of-date pretty much all the time.For the most part, unrated sites simply mean that Google hasn’t gotten around to updating it’s toolbar yet, which is common for new sites. So in addition to the page’s PR value, you should also be looking at the how many links those pages have. But for quick and dirty analysis, looking at the PR value is good enough.

I should mention that in addition to how many links the Competitor X has, you should also look at how strong his incoming links are.

And to measure how strong the pages are that's linking to Competitor X, you have to measure how strong the incoming links are to Linking Page X.

And to measure how strong the incoming links are to Linking Page X.... You get the picture.

Going by the page's PR is pretty much a "shortcut" to measuring how strong the page is, but as you know, it isn't THE end-all-be-all determining factor of how high your page is going to rank.

True, factors like anchor text, strength of page linking to you, domain diversity, etc. are all more powerful ranking factors than actual page PR.

But we can't ignore that page PR is reflective of the strength of a site (at least, since the last Google PageRank update), and when you're doing niche and keyword research en masse, it would simply be impractical to go into such detail for EVERY SINGLE KEYWORD you're thinking about.

Once you've narrowed your potential keyword candidates down, then and only then do I look into the competitor's strength with such detail. At the beginning stages of weeding out candidates, looking at the page PR and getting a general idea of the number of links is enough to know whether a keyword is good enough to make it to "the next stage."

I should point out that this is NOT an SEO report, and I only wanted to point out how using the number of competing pages is actually irrelevant.

Rule #1: The actual number of competing pages for your keyword is pretty much a useless metric to evaluate your competition. Instead, you should be measuring the STRENGTH of the pages that are currently ranking for your main keyword.

But you bring up a good point, and I'll be sure to add in those notes.

Originally Posted by jazbo

You also say "After all, it takes hundreds (if not thousands) of backlinks to grab a position on the top 3… right?"

It is surely the strength of the individual links that also count, not just the quantity?

You describe 11 links difference as "paltry", but you are only judging links in terms of volume, which is absolutely and fundamentally ignoring the reality of the power of individual links from sites with a high TrustRank.

So number one result has 11,100 links, and they appear to be mostly low quality links build en-masse, so that site appears to be there on the overall power of a lot of low value links probably deep-linked throughout their site. But another site could rank as high if they were to get as few as a dozen high quality links.

True, but I was specifically referring to the difference of 11 links between the two sites -- which are fundamentally the similar by nature.

Keyword here is "in most cases" and assumes that the links are of the same quality. If I could get a homepage link each from Yahoo.com, Apple.com, CNN.com, and BBC.co.uk, those 4 links would surely make me unstoppable.

You bring up a good point, and again, the only reason why I didn't go into such detail is because this isn't an full-on SEO report.

Thanks for pointing it out, and I'll fix the semantics.

[JC-PureProfitsHQ]

Note: I've sent a PM to everybody who didn't receive a download link.

[jazbo]

Hi JC

Thanks for the response, I cant agree with some of what you say I have to admit, such as:

"But we can't ignore that page PR is reflective of the strength of a site (at least, since the last Google PageRank update), and when you're doing niche and keyword research en masse, it would simply be impractical to go into such detail for EVERY SINGLE KEYWORD you're thinking about."

In my first post I showed that the number one site has no PR but strong linking, so no I dont consider PR as reflective of the strength of a site, only of individual pages, and from the results in your example search I could see little evidence that PR showed any correlation to the SERP. I also think that if you are going to spend time, money and effort exploiting a niche then yes you do owe it to yourself to go into such detail for every keyword you are considering, otherwise opportunities could be missed.

Anyway, apologies for the questioning, and I say to anyone reading that if you are looking for a quick overview of practical keyword tactics then this is well worth a read.

[JC-PureProfitsHQ]

Now I'm starting to think you're disagreeing just for the sake of disagreeing here, maybe nitpicking on things just to cause a commotion? I don't know.

Originally Posted by jazbo

so no I dont consider PR as reflective of the strength of a site, only of individual pages

With every sentence before and after the one you pointed out, I was talking about PAGES and in a mild slip, I used the word "site." It was late; sue me.

Neither am I disregarding going into a detailed analysis. I don't know if you just missed it or overlooked it on purpose, but:

Once you've narrowed your potential keyword candidates down, then and only then do I look into the competitor's strength with such detail.

And then...

Once you've narrowed your potential keyword candidates down, then and only then do I look into the competitor's strength with such detail.

For quick throwaway sites that I want to build once and forget about, I wouldn't even think about using a keyword with PR 5+ results littered all over the front page.

If there's one part that I have to stress, it's this: in most cases, keywords that return PR5+ results all over the front page would be much more difficult to rank for than a keyword that returns PR0-PR2 results -- even if the former has much less competing pages. And that's exactly what that particular aspect of the method is trying to show.

When you have 100 potential keyword candidates to prune out per niche, in my opinion it's simply impractical to be looking at the link profile of each and every site that comes up under the results. I'd much rather narrow that keyword list down first by eliminating those that return results with strong PR and link profiles, then going into a deeper level analysis when I have less keywords to work with.

I've NEVER used PR to correlate positions at the SERPs, so I don't know why you're even bringing that up?

Let me say once again that the section you're commenting on was written to shift people's mindsets of evaluating keywords based on counting the number of competing pages to evaluating the strength of the competing pages -- by looking and taking note at the page PR for the first top 10 results.

[MarkR]

JC,

Well done! A few eye-openers in there.

[JC-PureProfitsHQ]

Thanks for the comments Mark!