Dominate Google's FIRST PAGE! First packet of 30 High Page Rank backlinks FREE!

[jamesjoin]

Hi Angela

I have sent you the payment so please send me the October packets as i am your in manually payer list. So please send me the packet as early as possible .

Payment details
Amount: $5.00 USD
Transaction Date: 02-Oct-2009
Transaction ID: 77P50824LY4216703

James

[rohesiarain]

Hey Angela,

As always my prayers and thoughts are with you!

Lina

[light-v]

Originally Posted by rohesiarain

Hey Angela,

As always my prayers and thoughts are with you!

Lina

hi Angela
i just want to tell you my Payment details:

Amount: $10.00 USD
Transaction Date: Sep. 30, 2009
Transaction ID: 7NP8408191704581W

i sent them to (contact me)

with my love for you and your husband

[drakedillon]

Send your Paypal email address to my Contact Form (in my sig file) and I will investigate that and get that packet to you.


OK...sent

[Bagless]

Angela, hi, apologies in advance if the questions I am about to ask have already been answered, I trawled through quite a few of the 51 pages in this thead but admitted not all of them.

Two things that I am trying to get my head around:

1. The authority sites are clearly well ranked but how can you achieve link power from internal pages that have no PR themselves?

2. I am not sure how many people subscribe to the packets but guess it is a fair number. Wont Google devalue a huge number of links coming from the same sources?

Thanks in advance and hope things improve for your husband..

Regards,

Bagless

[Jack Doug]

sorry to hear your hubby's plight... hope he can recover from the stress mentally.

[Kysersoze]

I love these packages but i do have a question. i started October's package and from the first 10 sites I tried I had 5 that would not allow me o have changed their page. I will probably go through all 30 by tomorrow, anyone else having issues? it might just be m,y timing.

[turbohips]

nope same here I think these links are passed out to others before they reach us and that's the problem. I just finished my last one now and had around 6 that didn't work. It's still worth the money in my opinion. I went from 11 million on Alexa to 7 million in just 2 days after doing the links. I'm hoping these new links will get me even higher.
I've also did this for one other site and it had a bigger jump from 26 million to 17 million.

[BigBlueSky]

I finished the packet and 9 sites didn't work or are moderated. The first link got deleted after one hour since I posted the link.

[TrafficMystic]

my thoughts are with you and your husband angela, I hope his recovery starts to go well ...

[oldskoolSEO]

I posted the same reply on Paul's thread, but I am not sure which is getting updated more frequently and I really want to hear from the proverbial "horse's mouth."

I am an OLD SCHOOL SEO, which means I have many, many years of hands-on experience. I have seen EVERYTHING possible with regard to link building and taking shortcuts to inflate PR quickly. Sadly, all of them have one thing in common: Google killed them.

1. Do you think that one of Matt Cutts' team members has already signed up for your "service" and is now sitting back and logging all of the websites you are disclosing in your packets? Do you think it would be easy for them to also log all of the websites with links from these websites?

2. What do you think will happen to your website and all of the websites that are using or are included in these packets? I could tell you what I think will likely happen, but I would like to hear what your experience has been thus far and perhaps, why you think this tactic will not get any of the participating websites into trouble (penalty, red flag, banned).

Sorry for sounding a bit harsh with my line of questioning, but I am one very JADED SEO and I hate seeing things like this that come and go, leaving nothing but a wasteland of banned websites and upset webmasters and business owners--who didn't know any better--in their wake.

Thank you in advance for your candid answer(s).

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by garyt

Angela, a suggestion for you. Your pdf files are very large and outsourcing using this is clumsy. Or even reading it.

Why don't you make a video and use it to explain the account opening and linking, etc? You can use the free video at Jing | Add visuals to your online conversations

Just a suggestion to make things easier for your users and maybe yourself

I am really untechie and videos are not something I have ever done. But I do appreciate your recommendation.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by younghamir

In your experience, how long really it will take before you can see your site ranking using angela's packets? thanks guys.

It actually depends on the competition. Ranking for 50,000 is a lot quicker than ranking for 50 million.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by topbuyer

Anglea,

Great Service !

What is the future of this method. They way it is spreading, google's buddy might came to know about this by now. They might be reading your's and Pauls pdf's.

It would really great to have your thought on this.

PS: If you already explained it somewhere, please redirect me.

I don't know who "Google's Buddy" is. If Google was so worried about MY little program, why aren't they shutting down "do follow" blog lists, the Wordpress "Keywordluv" Plug In, and Social Bookmarking sites. After all, MILLIONS of people are using such tools, as opposed to my relatively small group of subscribers.

If Google was worried about people getting their own backlinks, all of this stuff would be shut down or "devalued", ESPECIALLY Social Bookmarking. As it is, people were "predicting" this same thing about Social Bookmarking two years ago, and when I started my program over a year ago, I had folks who wouldn't TOUCH the Social Bookmarking sites on my list. And yet, people today are using Google's OWN advertising program to advertise Social Bookmarking software and services on Google's own index!! Take a look: Social Bookmarking. Obviously, BIG BUCKS are being spent to advertise this stuff.

Google knows that it can't actually tell who's doing external backlinks and it was Google who created the "links are king" algorithm. If external links someday become harmful to one's site, then competitors would all be doing backlinks for their competition, to get them dropped. Here is what Matt Cutts says about a link scenario that is supposed to be harmful to one's site:

Stephan Spencer: Great.
How concerned are you over the tactic of aggressive link buying to competitors' sites in order to take down competitors? How long, do you think, it will be until competitors start taking each others' sites out in Google with aggressive link buying?


Matt Cutts: I do not think a smart competitor will even try that second one because they would be more likely to help. The thing is, we are very aware that site 'A' could buy links to site 'B', and then spam-report site 'B' and try to frame site 'B'. So we try very hard, in all of our spam techniques, to make it so that one site can not sabotage another site.


Interview with Google's Matt Cutts at Pubcon


So yeah, you can join the "the links might someday be devalued" camp just like folks did two years ago about Social Bookmarking. It's up to you. I am going to use what works. It's actually a few website owners who 'devalue' the links on their own sites due to abuse of their sites by some spammers as opposed to anything Google is doing.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by turbohips

Angela,
I'm a tad confused. I did the links but had 2-3 keywords linked to the same site. Will that work? Also as for the Google dance, I've notice that it went from having only 2 pages indexed to now 28. That is really strange but I love it. What's the deal with that?
Bruce

If the keywords go to different pages, that should be fine. Some say that it won't help you to have different keywords going to the same page, but that is not something I have tested and I like to use information that I have personally seen and tested, since there is SO much misinformation being passed around about backlinks.

I don't know why you have more pages indexed, but I agree; that's excellent.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by sebans

angela,

since I always has problem in receiving my montly list and I always had to email you to have it resent

can you post here when the october list is sent out and your email address so I can check it out inside the spam folder

It went out in the wee hours of the morning; about 12 hours later than normal. You should have it now and if you don't, send a note to my Contact Form. I am not yet caught up with email, though...just so you know.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by idevelop

Im sorry to hear that Angela.. I wish you and your husband better times to come.. Stay positive, My thoughts are with you.

Thank you very much for your kind words, idevelop.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by jamesjoin

Hi Angela

I have sent you the payment so please send me the October packets as i am your in manually payer list. So please send me the packet as early as possible .

Payment details
Amount: $5.00 USD
Transaction Date: 02-Oct-2009
Transaction ID: 77P50824LY4216703

James

Hi James,

I am working through email for the rest of the day and hope to be caught up before tonight. You should have that packet soon.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by rohesiarain

Hey Angela,

As always my prayers and thoughts are with you!

Lina

Thank you very much, rohesiarain. This means a lot.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by light-v

hi Angela
i just want to tell you my Payment details:

Amount: $10.00 USD
Transaction Date: Sep. 30, 2009
Transaction ID: 7NP8408191704581W

i sent them to (contact me)

with my love for you and your husband

Thank you for your kind words, light-v. I should be done working through email by tonight...I hope.

[Kysersoze]

Originally Posted by oldskoolSEO

I posted the same reply on Paul's thread, but I am not sure which is getting updated more frequently and I really want to hear from the proverbial "horse's mouth."

I am an OLD SCHOOL SEO, which means I have many, many years of hands-on experience. I have seen EVERYTHING possible with regard to link building and taking shortcuts to inflate PR quickly. Sadly, all of them have one thing in common: Google killed them.

1. Do you think that one of Matt Cutts' team members has already signed up for your "service" and is now sitting back and logging all of the websites you are disclosing in your packets? Do you think it would be easy for them to also log all of the websites with links from these websites?

2. What do you think will happen to your website and all of the websites that are using or are included in these packets? I could tell you what I think will likely happen, but I would like to hear what your experience has been thus far and perhaps, why you think this tactic will not get any of the participating websites into trouble (penalty, red flag, banned).

Sorry for sounding a bit harsh with my line of questioning, but I am one very JADED SEO and I hate seeing things like this that come and go, leaving nothing but a wasteland of banned websites and upset webmasters and business owners--who didn't know any better--in their wake.

Thank you in advance for your candid answer(s).

Wow that is a scary thought! I would hate to get hammered with some type of ban.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by Bagless

Angela, hi, apologies in advance if the questions I am about to ask have already been answered, I trawled through quite a few of the 51 pages in this thead but admitted not all of them.

Two things that I am trying to get my head around:

1. The authority sites are clearly well ranked but how can you achieve link power from internal pages that have no PR themselves?

2. I am not sure how many people subscribe to the packets but guess it is a fair number. Wont Google devalue a huge number of links coming from the same sources?

Thanks in advance and hope things improve for your husband..

Regards,

Bagless

I answer that very question in the first part of the first PDF; it's the first thing you come to. Keep in mind that these same sites have put ALL of my projects on Page One of Google and have kept them there for more than 7 months.

As far as the other question, I keep on saying it and folks keep on being given misinformation by others about it, which causes panic:

If Google was so worried about MY little program, why aren't they shutting down "do follow" blog lists, the Wordpress "Keywordluv" Plug In, and Social Bookmarking sites. After all, MILLIONS of people are using such tools, as opposed to my relatively small group of subscribers.

If Google was worried about people getting their own backlinks, all of this stuff would be shut down or "devalued", ESPECIALLY Social Bookmarking. As it is, people were "predicting" this same thing about Social Bookmarking two years ago, and when I started my program over a year ago, I had folks who wouldn't TOUCH the Social Bookmarking sites on my list. And yet, people today are using Google's OWN advertising program to advertise Social Bookmarking software and services on Google's own index!! Take a look: Social Bookmarking. Obviously, BIG BUCKS are being spent to advertise this stuff.

Google knows that it can't actually tell who's doing external backlinks and it was Google who created the "links are king" algorithm. If external links someday become harmful to one's site, then competitors would all be doing backlinks for their competition, to get them dropped. Here is what Matt Cutts says about a link scenario that is supposed to be harmful to one's site:

Stephan Spencer: Great.
How concerned are you over the tactic of aggressive link buying to competitors' sites in order to take down competitors? How long, do you think, it will be until competitors start taking each others' sites out in Google with aggressive link buying?


Matt Cutts: I do not think a smart competitor will even try that second one because they would be more likely to help. The thing is, we are very aware that site 'A' could buy links to site 'B', and then spam-report site 'B' and try to frame site 'B'. So we try very hard, in all of our spam techniques, to make it so that one site can not sabotage another site.


Interview with Google's Matt Cutts at Pubcon


So yeah, you can join the "the links might someday be devalued" camp just like folks did two years ago about Social Bookmarking. It's up to you. I am going to use what works. It's actually a few website owners who 'devalue' the links on their own sites due to abuse of their sites by some spammers as opposed to anything Google is doing.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by Jack Doug

sorry to hear your hubby's plight... hope he can recover from the stress mentally.

Thank you very much, Jack.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by turbohips

nope same here I think these links are passed out to others before they reach us and that's the problem. I just finished my last one now and had around 6 that didn't work. It's still worth the money in my opinion. I went from 11 million on Alexa to 7 million in just 2 days after doing the links. I'm hoping these new links will get me even higher.
I've also did this for one other site and it had a bigger jump from 26 million to 17 million.

You might want to go back and try the sites again. I JUST got done with the packet at about 8:30 last evening and my friend uploaded it to my site then. I got it out to everyone by about 4 this morning. I seriously doubt the sites could have been SO abused this early in the game that they shut things down.

Besides, if you noticed, I included a few more of the types of sites that only take a link this time around and that is because those sites ASK for your URL. If they not only allow it, but provide a space for it marked "Your Homepage", I really don't see how they can complain about people putting their links there, do you? There's no way to abuse these sites.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by TrafficMystic

my thoughts are with you and your husband angela, I hope his recovery starts to go well ...

Thank you very much, Steve.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by oldskoolSEO

I posted the same reply on Paul's thread, but I am not sure which is getting updated more frequently and I really want to hear from the proverbial "horse's mouth."

I am an OLD SCHOOL SEO, which means I have many, many years of hands-on experience. I have seen EVERYTHING possible with regard to link building and taking shortcuts to inflate PR quickly. Sadly, all of them have one thing in common: Google killed them.

1. Do you think that one of Matt Cutts' team members has already signed up for your "service" and is now sitting back and logging all of the websites you are disclosing in your packets? Do you think it would be easy for them to also log all of the websites with links from these websites?

2. What do you think will happen to your website and all of the websites that are using or are included in these packets? I could tell you what I think will likely happen, but I would like to hear what your experience has been thus far and perhaps, why you think this tactic will not get any of the participating websites into trouble (penalty, red flag, banned).

Sorry for sounding a bit harsh with my line of questioning, but I am one very JADED SEO and I hate seeing things like this that come and go, leaving nothing but a wasteland of banned websites and upset webmasters and business owners--who didn't know any better--in their wake.

Thank you in advance for your candid answer(s).

I keep on saying it and folks keep on being given misinformation by others about it, which causes panic:

If Google was so worried about MY little program, why aren't they shutting down "do follow" blog lists, the Wordpress "Keywordluv" Plug In, and Social Bookmarking sites. After all, MILLIONS of people are using such tools, as opposed to my relatively small group of subscribers.

If Google was worried about people getting their own backlinks, all of this stuff would be shut down or "devalued", ESPECIALLY Social Bookmarking. As it is, people were "predicting" this same thing about Social Bookmarking two years ago, and when I started my program over a year ago, I had folks who wouldn't TOUCH the Social Bookmarking sites on my list. And yet, people today are using Google's OWN advertising program to advertise Social Bookmarking software and services on Google's own index!! Take a look: Social Bookmarking. Obviously, BIG BUCKS are being spent to advertise this stuff.

After more than two years, Social Bookmarking is stronger than ever. Which means this portion of your post:

I am an OLD SCHOOL SEO, which means I have many, many years of hands-on experience. I have seen EVERYTHING possible with regard to link building and taking shortcuts to inflate PR quickly. Sadly, all of them have one thing in common: Google killed them.

is completely untrue. MILLIONS of people are "social bookmarking" their own stuff. And Social Bookmarking is alive and well, as we all know.

Google knows that it can't actually tell who's doing external backlinks and it was Google who created the "links are king" algorithm. If external links someday become harmful to one's site, then competitors would all be doing backlinks for their competition, to get them dropped. Here is what Matt Cutts says about a link scenario that is supposed to be harmful to one's site:

Stephan Spencer: Great.
How concerned are you over the tactic of aggressive link buying to competitors' sites in order to take down competitors? How long, do you think, it will be until competitors start taking each others' sites out in Google with aggressive link buying?


Matt Cutts: I do not think a smart competitor will even try that second one because they would be more likely to help. The thing is, we are very aware that site 'A' could buy links to site 'B', and then spam-report site 'B' and try to frame site 'B'. So we try very hard, in all of our spam techniques, to make it so that one site can not sabotage another site.


Interview with Google's Matt Cutts at Pubcon


So yeah, you can join the "the links might someday be devalued" camp just like folks did two years ago about Social Bookmarking. It's up to you. I am going to use what works. It's actually a few website owners who 'devalue' the links on their own sites due to abuse of their sites by some spammers as opposed to anything Google is doing.

2. What do you think will happen to your website and all of the websites that are using or are included in these packets? I could tell you what I think will likely happen, but I would like to hear what your experience has been thus far and perhaps, why you think this tactic will not get any of the participating websites into trouble (penalty, red flag, banned).

Incoming links can't hurt your site.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cllu7g4Rmms

[kennyk3]

Despite this, I am still hopeful.

I still feel as though I'm being impatient, yet I'm seeing no movement. I'm going to use the new packet for 30 (or however many sites work) to see how well it does.

My first article is still on page 10

All the other articles... no where (2 are on page 1 and 2, but only in quotes)

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by kennyk3

Despite this, I am still hopeful.

I still feel as though I'm being impatient, yet I'm seeing no movement. I'm going to use the new packet for 30 (or however many sites work) to see how well it does.

My first article is still on page 10

All the other articles... no where (2 are on page 1 and 2, but only in quotes)

Yeah, that's really strange, when so many other projects are on Page One. In any case, this sort of thing has happened a time or two and a few weeks later, the person finds their site in a really high position on Page One. Keep me posted.

[nazri97]

Must have it!!

[KristofferW]

I would say maybe 1/4 of my links have been indexed so far.. maybe a little less since a few of them were indexed, but have since been de-indexed and never appeared again. (the profiles are still there, i checked, but the site doesn't count as a backlink anymore)

Anyway.. is there anyway to get profiles indexed faster? does pingomatic help at all?

PS. some of the PR8 & PR7 sites are working great though, being indexed very fast, and are definitely counting for a lot of my SERPs rankings.

[Kysersoze]

Angela one question, should I use 2-3 keywords for each packet or can I just use one? I really would like to use just one to focus in on my mian keyword but don't know if it will be penalized.

By the way great information on your reply regarding the linking process, makes a lot of sense.

[lanta99]

Hi Angela,

Sorry if this has already been answered in the thread, but am I allowed to purchase previous month packets? If so are they at the same price?

Thanks!

[dizen]

My site is finally ranked #19 for a very competitve term, the competition for this term is brutal. Everyone is after this term.

I am pretty sure that I can push it to the first page using Angela's link ,however there is one potential issue for me, maybe I am just being paranoid.

In Yahoo site explorer and backlinkwatch.com , people can easily see that there are a lot of profile pages linking to my site. Kinda scared that my competitors will report my site to Google if I make it to top 5 for terms for the term which is very competive . Thoughts?


Thanks

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by KristofferW

I would say maybe 1/4 of my links have been indexed so far.. maybe a little less since a few of them were indexed, but have since been de-indexed and never appeared again. (the profiles are still there, i checked, but the site doesn't count as a backlink anymore)

Anyway.. is there anyway to get profiles indexed faster? does pingomatic help at all?

PS. some of the PR8 & PR7 sites are working great though, being indexed very fast, and are definitely counting for a lot of my SERPs rankings.

I really don't know the answer to any "indexing" questions...I never look for that. The one and only thing I look at is my movement in Google. Sorry I couldn't provide a better answer.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by Kysersoze

Angela one question, should I use 2-3 keywords for each packet or can I just use one? I really would like to use just one to focus in on my mian keyword but don't know if it will be penalized.

By the way great information on your reply regarding the linking process, makes a lot of sense.

You can certainly focus on only one keyword; that's a great way to do it...focus on one thing until it's where you want it. Intelligent way to do it, if you ask me.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by lanta99

Hi Angela,

Sorry if this has already been answered in the thread, but am I allowed to purchase previous month packets? If so are they at the same price?

Thanks!

Yes. I provide an FAQ booklet to every subscriber called "Biggest Questions Answered". In this booklet, I tell you exactly how to get these previous months' packets.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by dizen

My site is finally ranked #19 for a very competitve term, the competition for this term is brutal. Everyone is after this term.

I am pretty sure that I can push it to the first page using Angela's link ,however there is one potential issue for me, maybe I am just being paranoid.

In Yahoo site explorer and backlinkwatch.com , people can easily see that there are a lot of profile pages linking to my site. Kinda scared that my competitors will report my site to Google if I make it to top 5 for terms for the term which is very competive . Thoughts?


Thanks

So what happens if your competitors report your site to Google? If it was THAT easy to get someone's site affected in Google's index, then folks would be reporting their competitors for EVERYTHING they can think of. So what if you have a lot of profiles? There are tons of people who have that. Some of the spots I found great sites in were sites where the site owner listed all his profiles all over the web. Some of these guys have quite a few profiles. It's a common thing to do. A lot of sites even have spots where you can list all your profiles from everywhere on the web.

Stephan Spencer: Great.
How concerned are you over the tactic of aggressive link buying to competitors' sites in order to take down competitors? How long, do you think, it will be until competitors start taking each others' sites out in Google with aggressive link buying?


Matt Cutts: I do not think a smart competitor will even try that second one because they would be more likely to help. The thing is, we are very aware that site 'A' could buy links to site 'B', and then spam-report site 'B' and try to frame site 'B'. So we try very hard, in all of our spam techniques, to make it so that one site can not sabotage another site.

Interview with Google's Matt Cutts at Pubcon

[dizen]

Thanks Angela . I am kinda nervous because I put adsense ads on that site. All the best for your Husband and you.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Thank you for your kind words, Dizen.

[l23bc]

Angela i am having a few problems with some of the links provided in the first of october subcription some of the links are saying i need to get approval on the account links before i can get the actural links, do you know how long they take to change or a way to get round this

andy

[topbuyer]

Originally Posted by dizen

My site is finally ranked #19 for a very competitve term, the competition for this term is brutal. Everyone is after this term.

I am pretty sure that I can push it to the first page using Angela's link ,however there is one potential issue for me, maybe I am just being paranoid.

In Yahoo site explorer and backlinkwatch.com , people can easily see that there are a lot of profile pages linking to my site. Kinda scared that my competitors will report my site to Google if I make it to top 5 for terms for the term which is very competive . Thoughts?


Thanks

Angela already answered your question. But, why not do some other back-linking as well. So, that you competitor won't know even what is helping your site.

And if you missed video link given by Angela. Additional back-linking won't hurt you

Incoming links can't hurt your site.

YouTube - Can Incoming Links Hurt Your Sites

And, if you don't mind sharing
1. From how many months you are building link using Angela's method for that keyword
2. How much competition is there (google search result)
3. How many links you are placing in one profile.

[KristofferW]

Originally Posted by Angela V. Edwards

I really don't know the answer to any "indexing" questions...I never look for that. The one and only thing I look at is my movement in Google. Sorry I couldn't provide a better answer.

No problem, thanks anyway.. I think I've figured out a tactic, and I'm gonna try it out on all my posted profiles that are still "dofollow" and available publically, but haven't been indexed.
It'll be interesting to see the results.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by l23bc

Angela i am having a few problems with some of the links provided in the first of october subcription some of the links are saying i need to get approval on the account links before i can get the actural links, do you know how long they take to change or a way to get round this

andy

I really don't know the answer to that, Andy. I'm going to have to look into it. People were reporting this far too soon after the packet went out for it to be anything done by the subscribers.

[Angela V. Edwards]

Thank you very much for your post, topbuyer.

[dizen]

1. 77 days
2. 8.500.000 using quotes , exact search, 2 word term, financial niche (brutal isn't it
3. 2 to 4 links

I also do aggressive social bookmarking + article marketing



And, if you don't mind sharing
1. From how many months you are building link using Angela's method for that keyword
2. How much competition is there (google search result)
3. How many links you are placing in one profile.[/QUOTE]

[light-v]

hi Angela,
i see that a lot of people have thier packet of October , but i am not
if there any problem of my subscription plz tell me.

[topbuyer]

Originally Posted by dizen

1. 77 days
2. 8.500.000 using quotes , exact search, 2 word term, financial niche (brutal isn't it
3. 2 to 4 links

I also do aggressive social bookmarking + article marketing



And, if you don't mind sharing
1. From how many months you are building link using Angela's method for that keyword
2. How much competition is there (google search result)
3. How many links you are placing in one profile.

[/QUOTE]

Thanks Mate ! It will help others as well to make some estimates.

Best wishes to you.

[dizen]

My site is now on 11th for ultra competitive niche .. OMG , it's a brand new site that is only 77 day old ... I think I can make it to top 5

[Pedersenmt]

I was just told by another backlinker that Angela's links are no getting "no-followed". Anyone else hear this?

[Angela V. Edwards]

Originally Posted by Pedersenmt

I was just told by another backlinker that Angela's links are no getting "no-followed". Anyone else hear this?

A few sites will do this if they don't like people leaving links. But it's certainly not ALL of my links, or even the majority of them. If that were the case, all of my projects (6 different ones) would have fallen off Page One. As it stands, they are ALL in their excellent spots at the TOP of Google's Page One. You know two of them already: Backlinks and Angela Take a look at those for yourself and see where they are.

When it comes to backlinking, a whole lot of misinformation seems to get passed around. I am not sure why that is. There are really easy ways of checking whether links are No Follow or not. If anyone has a question, all they need to do is use one of the methods. I use the Firefox Plug In that highlights No Follow links.