JV ZOO Product of the Day!!! [SEO] Hit Page One of Google in Record Time and STAY THERE FOREVER!

[RussRuffino]

Here's what people have said about my previous WSOs...

Originally Posted by Dave Iago

I can't believe you guys are doing this!

If you're on the fence on this one-stay there! Because me and the others who took action on this baby are gonna run you down!!

1 WSO-About 12 Bucks
$104,000 and counting in 5 months-Priceless

Originally Posted by Johannes Krygsman

For each and every one of you still in limbo, procrastinators or doubtful wanderers...stop it all, look up the sky, close your eyes and say Thanks! You have finally found yourself the last piece of the IM puzzle! Now you have in front of you, within you reach right before your eyes all you need to finally break the cycle of nothingness, you finally have the opportunity to make it BIG with Internet Marketing!

Originally Posted by antoncipri

Buy this now! I am only on the second video and the information is excellent. The concepts that Russ is telling us about in this WSO are not going away! Hit the buy button and dig in.

Originally Posted by jay3866

Ok guys I received a review copy of this thing and I'll give it to you straight from someone who is making over $450/day ON THE SIDE, from Russ's last WSO. This course is pure Gold. So darn good in fact I feel guilty about having a review copy and decided to pay for it anyway, hell I may send the guy a tip, it's the least I can do.

Listen, and this is no exaggeration- If you are not making at least a day and you are still hopping from wso to wso, you need to get this WSO, put your blinders on for 30 days. Cut the distractions, apply these tactics and get paid.

Originally Posted by nidz09

I have gone through this WSO and all I can say is W.O.W. What an information Russ has delilivered through this WSO! Really Awosome. i can't wait to implement it. So, dont go for another WSO, just buy it and implement it, before the price will go up.

Cheers

Originally Posted by yankforlife41

Russ really hit the nail on the head this time, maybe one of the best WSO's of the YEAR...Yes it's that good.

Originally Posted by fxmmorale

Hi Russ,

I managed to block out some time to go through the course
and here are my feelings about it:

The information in module two alone is the kind of quality that's missing from many overhyped products that are littering the IM niche today.

The energy and conviction conveyed from the presentations will keep you involved and give you many Aha! moments.

The explanation of the concepts are simple and direct making it easy to put the information into practice.

Thought provoking, insightful and practical. This stuff just makes sense.

Originally Posted by arewethereyet

All I can say is...WOW!

Russ, this is one amazing course...

I cannot wait to see the results I get upon implementation.

Many, many thanks,
Rick

Originally Posted by SimpleSpencer

Russ -

Seriously man this is one of the BEST courses I've seen here on Warrior Forum (and I've seen a lot)!

Video 4 especially was exceptional...thank you for illustrating the power of that one simple concept. That really hit home to me.

I can't wait to share this with the people on my list...they deserve to know this stuff.

Great job man!

~Spence

Originally Posted by momurph

This isn't the first thing I bought from you but dude this is definitely one of the best! Thanks so much for way overdelivering on this. I can't wait to start implementing and getting some great results because I know I will with the knowledge you've given me. I really enjoyed and actually still am enjoying 86 your day job, another great deal. You've outdone yourself here. Thanks again and I'm always looking to see what you have coming up next. Morris Murphy (Murph)

Originally Posted by Robster0880

This is the third WSO that I buy from Russ.

Russ like always over delivered. Great info. I can see a connection between all your WSOs as an affiliate machine system.

This is a great WSO. This is much more than those CB $97 products

[quote=hawkisee1;3945899]Russ is a breath of fresh air in comparison to many of all the other product or affiliate marketers on the Net today. My B.S. detector is very sensitive and I haven't felt it go off. I qualify myself as someone in sales for over 30 years and have been on the Internet since 1996 that purchased $10,000's of products and sat through countless presentations. Although I have just purchased this product because the subject interests me and have only gone through the introduction, I can sense already that the rest of the product information to be presented will be just as thorough and honest in a straight forward manner that respects the viewers time. And if I'm wrong, there is the product guarantee. How can you go wrong?? The price is a steal for anyone. My recommendation is to buy as the correct decision to make.[/QUOTE]

Originally Posted by dadhere

Aww I was trying to get out of the forum before I spent any more money and came across
this jewel...

Russ's stuff rocks, so I can't pass it up. Now to tell the girlfriend its pizza nite, not
dinner and movies (she'll thank me later)

Thanks

Originally Posted by willdean

Thanks for the great product Russ! I just finished going through the whole package. Awesome value even if you charged 5 times the price.

If anybody is sitting on the fence wondering if they should buy this WSO, I would say to you, "If you want to make more money, you need to get this and apply it immediately"

[RussRuffino]

Reserved for FAQ

[TrafficURL]

Hi,
How does your guide compare to the Fast Attack SEO guide you promoted a while back?

Quote:
But finally, I've found an SEO guide that really
spelled it out for me. I was lucky enough to get
an advance copy, and now...

If you've ever struggled with SEO in the past, then
you MUST check out my pal Craig's latest WSO:

russruffino.com/fastattackseo

I promise that when you're done reading it,
you will know more about SEO than 99% of people
out there. What's more - you'll have a road map
to hitting page one of Google faster than you
ever thought possible.

End quote

[alfrescoid]

Hi Russ, is there an OTO, and if so details and price please.

[bosanci28]

hi,
quick question!

is this a service that you guys do?,or i have to do it from my part?...

thanks,
regards,
bosanci28

[RussRuffino]

Originally Posted by TrafficURL

Hi,
How does your guide compare to the Fast Attack SEO guide you promoted a while back?

That was a different product (not mine) with a different focus. The recent Google updates have CRUSHED some Internet marketers, and so this one is all about how to so SEO in the safest, most effective way possible right now in 2012.

In my opinion, ALL the SEO courses on the market need to be updated, because Google is getting smarter and smarter about de-indexing sites. We've designed this course to teach SEO that's slap-proof for the foreseeable future.

Russ

[RussRuffino]

Originally Posted by bosanci28

hi,
quick question!

is this a service that you guys do?,or i have to do it from my part?...

thanks,
regards,
bosanci28

This is a course on how to do SEO, not a service. :-)

Even if you're planning on using a service, you should definitely have this guide so you know that what they're doing is Google-friendly. A lot of people THOUGHT they had rock-solid SEO and got their incomes wiped out with the last update. This course is designed to get you on Page One and keep you there, by working WITH Google and not against it.

Russ

[RussRuffino]

Originally Posted by alfrescoid

Hi Russ, is there an OTO, and if so details and price please.

There is an OTO, but it is NOT an extension of this course. This course is 100% complete, with NOTHING held back. If you buy the front-end product, you'll know everything we have to teach about SEO.

For the OTO, I'm offering 2 of my best-selling courses (currently available on Clickbank for around $200) at a HUGE discount to the Warrior Forum.

Russ

[mytheory]

Hi Russ,

Love your products... and have purchased most of them.

I want to jump on this one too, but have a quick question...

In the sales letter you talk about exact match domains, is this method(s) heavily reliant on using exact match domains? Or can these methods be used to rank sites even without exact match domains?

Thanks!

[bosanci28]

Originally Posted by RussRuffino

This is a course on how to do SEO, not a service. :-)

Even if you're planning on using a service, you should definitely have this guide so you know that what they're doing is Google-friendly. A lot of people THOUGHT they had rock-solid SEO and got their incomes wiped out with the last update. This course is designed to get you on Page One and keep you there, by working WITH Google and not against it.

Russ

as i am a newbie in this,how long will this course be ,to achieve page 1 in google? how long for me is to follow your guide from start to finish?
and is it a clear guide to follow.


thanks,
regards,

[RussRuffino]

Originally Posted by bosanci28

as i am a newbie in this,how long will this course be ,to achieve page 1 in google? how long for me is to follow your guide from start to finish?
and is it a clear guide to follow.


thanks,
regards,

It's crystal-clear, and foolproof to follow. But I can't tell you how long it will take to get to page one, because that REALLY depends on how competitive your niche / keyword is. That's true for ALL SEO methods, as you'll find out.

What makes this method special is that it works around the recent Google updates, and any updates for the foreseeable future. What you learn with this will ensure that you get to KEEP the results you get from your SEO!

Russ

[Un4seen72]

Hi Russ! Is this software newbie friendly? I'm looking to make money online and want something that really works!

[RussRuffino]

Originally Posted by mytheory

Hi Russ,

Love your products... and have purchased most of them.

I want to jump on this one too, but have a quick question...

In the sales letter you talk about exact match domains, is this method(s) heavily reliant on using exact match domains? Or can these methods be used to rank sites even without exact match domains?

Thanks!

Thanks! Everything in here applies to exact-match domains and non-exact match. But we have some VERY cool methods in here for finding exact-match domains that have been overlooked, because having one DOES give you a serious edge with Google.

Russ

[alfrescoid]

Hey again Russ,

Does your method teach starting sites from scratch with newly registered (not aged) domains?

Can your strategies work with existing sites that need a boost?

Oh and didn't Google recently announce they place less emphasis on EMDs with their latest updates?

[RussRuffino]

Originally Posted by alfrescoid

Hey again Russ,

Does your method teach starting sites from scratch with newly registered (not aged) domains?

Can your strategies work with existing sites that need a boost?

Yes and yes. ;-)

Russ

[mtntgr]

Hi Russ,

Nice to land on a page / wso run by an outstanding Warrior.
(And nice guy, too!)

Questions:

Since this strategy is EMD dependent...

• What happens when G starts watching these domains like a hawk?
  (It being such an obvious play.)
  What I mean here is that G like a (straight) guy will always check out the blond with the hot bod as it approaches, but if the apparent hottie looks like Friday the 13th upon closer inspection. Fight or flight kicks in. ;-)
  I assume you address this relevancy issue in sufficient detail?
• Is software required for finding these domains per your criteria?
• I believe you have recently been using an alternative platform?
  Is this training still WordPress oriented?
• What type of costs (ballpark) are required for the "Backlinks Trident"?
• If the EMD is for an unknown new product, isn't that getting more into branding than EMD?
  i.e.- A new totally unknown solution for Article Marketing is called (for some strange reason) Pop Tart Marketing. Would you still go EMD or go for a domain that describes the solution/problem?

Thanks

[RussRuffino]

Originally Posted by smartintelligence

This is the smartest thread that I have seen so far on the WF. So you are saying that keyword relevant sites are the kings now?

What? No. Keyword-relevance is important (duh), but there are a TON of factors that cause Google to move your site up in the rankings, or to de-index it into oblivion. This course is about making sure that your site takes advantage of the Google-friendly ways to rank, and AVOIDS the ones that will get you slapped or de-indexed.

Russ

[RussRuffino]

I'll answer these questions one-by-one...

Originally Posted by mtntgr

Hi Russ,

Nice to land on a page / wso run by an outstanding Warrior.
(And nice guy, too!)

Thanks man! Appreciate that!

Questions:

Since this strategy is EMD dependent...

This strategy is NOT EMD dependent AT ALL. Finding an EMD is one of our recommendations (and we show some really cool ways to do it), but it is NOT essential to making any part of this course work.

[LIST][*]What happens when G starts watching these domains like a hawk?
(It being such an obvious play.)
What I mean here is that G like a (straight) guy will always check out the blond with the hot bod as it approaches, but if the apparent hottie looks like Friday the 13th upon closer inspection. Fight or flight kicks in. ;-)
I assume you address this relevancy issue in sufficient detail?

Well, this is true for ANY domain that starts to rank, whether it's an EMD or not. When your domain starts to rank (for ANY reason) Google's algorithm takes a closer look at it to see if it's spam-based or if it provides real value.

Using this system will ensure that your site provides REAL value as far as Google is concerned, and so you'll keep your rankings! :-)

[*]Is software required for finding these domains per your criteria?

Absolutely not.

[*]I believe you have recently been using an alternative platform?
Is this training still WordPress oriented?

You can build your sites on whatever platform you want with this method and you'll be just fine. For SEO sites, we use Wordpress.

[*]What type of costs (ballpark) are required for the "Backlinks Trident"?

None. It's totally free.

[*]If the EMD is for an unknown new product, isn't that getting more into branding than EMD?
i.e.- A new totally unknown solution for Article Marketing is called (for some strange reason) Pop Tart Marketing. Would you still go EMD or go for a domain that describes the solution/problem?

Can you clarify this for me? I'm not sure exactly what you're asking here.

Russ

[alfrescoid]

Last one from me before I jump in...do you cover content issues? Eg uniqueness, auto-generated, curated?

I'm lazy and hate writing my own LOL.

[ebusiness]

This SEO WSO looks very intresting and am considering it on buyers comments.

ebusiness

[daddykool]

As ever Russ delivers! This is a great WSO, topical, works as stated and has a few extras you would pay more for than the actual purchase price of the main WSO! In fact how can it actually be this cheap in the first place! Buy it while you can!

[RussRuffino]

Originally Posted by daddykool

As ever Russ delivers! This is a great WSO, topical, works as stated and has a few extras you would pay more for than the actual purchase price of the main WSO! In fact how can it actually be this cheap in the first place! Buy it while you can!

Thanks man!!! Glad you enjoyed it!

Russ

[Flores]

Originally Posted by alfrescoid

Last one from me before I jump in...do you cover content issues? Eg uniqueness, auto-generated, curated?

I'm lazy and hate writing my own LOL.

Thanks for the questions

We tell you what kind of content Google loves. Google does not love spun/ auto-generated content. Curation is a good strategy. If you want to outsource or spin your content, you are taking a risk, in that the same content may be somewhere else, and of low quality.

[Flores]

Originally Posted by MarketingNinjah

hi,

please explain the methods that you use.

gregory smith

That's why we made SEO Traffic Firestorm! To do just that

[mtntgr]

I guess what I'm trying to say here is -
any techniques for pumping up a low search volume term?
i.e.- enhancing popularity of a site that is based a new / low search volume keyword

Or is that asking too much? ;-)

Quote:[*]If the EMD is for an unknown new product, isn't that getting more into branding than EMD?
i.e.- A new totally unknown solution for Article Marketing is called (for some strange reason) Pop Tart Marketing. Would you still go EMD or go for a domain that describes the solution/problem?
Can you clarify this for me? I'm not sure exactly what you're asking here.

Russ

[Flores]

Originally Posted by mtntgr

I guess what I'm trying to say here is -
any techniques for pumping up a low search volume term?
i.e.- enhancing popularity of a site that is based a new / low search volume keyword

No, we teach people how to rank on Google. Gaining more awareness and exposure for a product or service (search term) is more about branding, advertising, and other elements of the marketing cycle.

If you want to enhance popularity of a site, the strategies outlined in this course will definitely help with that, however that is not the emphasis of the course. We show you how to identify good search targets and then attack those.

[ahmeds14]

did any one has tries it here?

[Mike Hlatky]

I no longer see your site listed for the keyword. But, the livestrong and weight loss resources sites are still there.

Actually, your site is now empty, why is that?

https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C...un+three+miles

Runthreemiles.com

[Flores]

Originally Posted by Mike Hlatky

I no longer see your site listed for the keyword. But, the livestrong and weight loss resources sites are still there.

Actually, your site is now empty, why is that?

https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C...un+three+miles

Runthreemiles.com

We took the site down because the site directly implemented all of the strategies that we talk about in this course. If we were to show the site, there would be absolutely no need for the course. Anyone could reverse engineer what we did.

We ranked the site for proof that the system works, now we took it down so there would actually be a need for the course.

[john Roberts]

Do these methods work with local site? thanks

[Flores]

Originally Posted by john Roberts

Do these methods work with local site? thanks

Yeah they do

[logyko]

Originally Posted by Flores

We took the site down because the site directly implemented all of the strategies that we talk about in this course. If we were to show the site, there would be absolutely no need for the course. Anyone could reverse engineer what we did.

We ranked the site for proof that the system works, now we took it down so there would actually be a need for the course.

So, Do you have evidence that the system really works in this exact moment?

Thanks!

[mytheory]

Hi,

Would these methods work on ANY type of site? How about ecommerce sites (very important)?

Thanks!

[Flores]

Originally Posted by logyko

So, Do you have evidence that the system really works in this exact moment?

Thanks!

lol I love it.

Evidence that the product works in the exact moment is in the thread. Like I said, we took it down so that everyone will not reverse engineer it. The evidence that you are looking for is one of our URL's that is ranking? Again, that would be dumb of me and Russ to do because you would be able to simply reverse engineer what we did. The course is not hard, just precise.

[Flores]

Originally Posted by mytheory

Hi,

Would these methods work on ANY type of site? How about ecommerce sites (very important)?

Thanks!

Yes, any type of site. Assuming that the site is actually of value. This system is not about tricking Google into thinking you are of quality. If your e-commerce site is of good quality (like we talk about in the course), you will be great!

[mytheory]

Originally Posted by Flores

Yes, any type of site. Assuming that the site is actually of value. This system is not about tricking Google into thinking you are of quality. If your e-commerce site is of good quality (like we talk about in the course), you will be great!

Nice! I'm in... I've always learned something of great value from Russ's WSOs so I'm confident that this one will be no different.

Can't wait to get started.

Thanks!

[bosanci28]

i am still not decide about your product,so other question for you:

i have a product site that has 20.000 pages,

maybe this may take sometime for me to get to the top...

thanks

[Flores]

Originally Posted by bosanci28

i am still not decide about your product,so other question for you:

i have a product site that has 20.000 pages,

maybe this may take sometime for me to get to the top...

thanks

Everything takes work. Google works on a daily basis to make sure we put quality into our sites in order to rank. This product teaches you how to rank. There are several different elements that go into ranking. You can use one of the tools we teach or all of them. I am 100% confident that what we talk about in SEO Traffic Firestorm will help your site rank rank better.

[Anthony Aires]

BOOOOM now this is an awesome SEO Package...super fantastic offer here warriors.

Great training...easy to consume and implement...

LOVE THIS,

Anthony Aires

[river99]

What the purpose to give proof if we can't see it real? Who can guarantee it will immune to latest penguin update (penguin 1.1) and next update?

You guys could talk whatever you want that your method works but we need proof of it. Afraid of being duplicated? That's risk you should taken in this SEO games.

[joe0074]

Spun article is great because it can save your time but you need to finishing touch your article to make it readable. (It is already unique after you spin it). I have no problem to spin my article and get my site ranked on page 1 because my spun article is so unique and readable. Google will never know it is spun article.

Thanks,

Originally Posted by Flores

We tell you what kind of content Google loves. Google does not love spun/ auto-generated content. Curation is a good strategy. If you want to outsource or spin your content, you are taking a risk, in that the same content may be somewhere else, and of low quality.

[joe0074]

I totally agree. Too many WSO's about panda, penguin, zebra or whatever are launched in the past few weeks. Every WSO claims that they provide full proof method to get the site ranked or recover your ranking after being slapped by panda, penguin, zebra update. Don't know which one is the real deal. I can't keep buying it again and again to learn the same thing. Hope to find something new in your guide.

Thanks,

Originally Posted by river99

What the purpose to give proof if we can't see it real? Who can guarantee it will immune to latest penguin update (penguin 1.1) and next update?

You guys could talk whatever you want that your method works but we need proof of it. Afraid of being duplicated? That's risk you should taken in this SEO games.

[Flores]

Originally Posted by joe0074

Spun article is great because it can save your time but you need to finishing touch your article to make it readable. (It is already unique after you spin it). I have no problem to spin my article and get my site ranked on page 1 because my spun article is so unique and readable. Google will never know it is spun article.

Thanks,

Originally Posted by joe0074

Too many WSO's about panda, penguin, zebra or whatever are launched in the past few weeks. Every WSO claims that they provide full proof method to get the site ranked or recover your ranking after being slapped by panda, penguin, zebra update. Don't know which one is the real deal. I can't keep buying it again and again to learn the same thing. Hope to find something new in your guide.

Thanks,

Couple Things.

1) if you have no problem getting your site ranked on page one, then why do you keep buying products "again and again?"

2) Spinning your content and then taking the time to go back and re-shape everything to make it readable kinda defeats the purpose of lazy spinning, don't ya think?

3) We understand that people will not like the product, which is why we offer the money back guarantee.

4) Google reads over 200 different signals for SEO, only a handful of which we know of for sure. You think that they might have a thesaurus on hand to plug into their algorithm and tell if your article has a few different words with the same meaning, right? Just be careful, even if you do not buy this product, many low quality techniques are being eradicated, this one included.

Feel free to email seotrafficfirestorm@gmail.com if you wanna chat more

Originally Posted by river99

What the purpose to give proof if we can't see it real? Who can guarantee it will immune to latest penguin update (penguin 1.1) and next update?

You guys could talk whatever you want that your method works but we need proof of it. Afraid of being duplicated? That's risk you should taken in this SEO games.

The reason why we make this claim is because this entire coursed is based on value driven, quality marketing and ranking techniques that would worsen the user experience of Google should they decided to (for whatever reason) punish anything we teach. That is why we make the guarantee.

As far as the proof goes, if you are going to be that paranoid about the truth behind the proof, and you think we are scamming you, then by all means, PLEASE, do not purchase this product. We ranked the site to show it could be done, then removed it so that we can sell our methods and there actually be a demand.

You can also email seotrafficfirestorm@gmail.com if you want to talk more.

[joe0074]

[QUOTE=Flores;6348732]

1) if you have no problem getting your site ranked on page one, then why do you keep buying products "again and again?"

I keep buying products because my client sites drop in ranking from page 1, so I want to help them get their ranking back on page 1 before they cancel my service LOL. I don't think it is about article because offline client websites don't have much content on their sites as usual. But it is about the backinks system that need to be changed and update.

2) Spinning your content and then taking the time to go back and re-shape everything to make it readable kinda defeats the purpose of lazy spinning, don't ya think?

No, it is not. It is much better than writing article from scratch. It can also save your money from hiring people to write for you.

Thanks,

[Flores]

[quote=joe0074;6348889]

Originally Posted by Flores

1) if you have no problem getting your site ranked on page one, then why do you keep buying products "again and again?"

I keep buying products because my client sites drop in ranking from page 1, so I want to help them get their ranking back on page 1 before they cancel my service LOL. I don't think it is about article because offline client websites don't have much content on their sites as usual. But it is about the backinks system that need to be changed and update.

2) Spinning your content and then taking the time to go back and re-shape everything to make it readable kinda defeats the purpose of lazy spinning, don't ya think?

No, it is not. It is much better than writing article from scratch. It can also save your money from hiring people to write for you.

Thanks,

You are 100% right about that! It does save time and money. But it is not all about content anymore. It is more about how people interact with that content, which is why I am generally against spun content. We talk about user experience and metrics in the training modules. Feel free to PM me if you want. We can talk about your clients. I would be more than happy to brain storm some recovery ideas for your clients. Thanks!

[RalphManer]

Russ: Thank you for the training videos. I found them very helpful and straightforward, with one exception. The discussion on on-page optimization left a few questions unanswered.

Please reply, or email me privately at jostendorf@ostendorflaw.com with answers to the following (obviously all re Google search):

1. While I understand the META is not too important nowadays, do you have any tips (i.e., should the META info match up exactly with phrases in the body;

2. Should the title regurgitate the main keyword, use it in the beginning in sentence format, or should a synonym of the keyword be buried in the middle, etc.;

3. Same question in "2" as the the h1 and h2 tags;

4. Do you recommend "strong" tags or bold, underline etc. for instances where the keywords appear in the body. How about for synonyms, etc. If either answer is yes, how much strong, underline, bold etc. is too "spammy" for Google?

I realize that it may take some time to answer these questions. In return, as a courtesy, I will thank you publicly for, among other things, disclosing the suggested percentage word density for the keyword in the body.

Thanks for any help you can provide.

[Flores]

I got these for ya These are not addressed for a reason. We avoid these concepts and focus on the really important things

Originally Posted by RalphManer

Russ: Thank you for the training videos. I found them very helpful and straightforward, with one exception. The discussion on on-page optimization left a few questions unanswered.

Please reply, or email me privately at jostendorf@ostendorflaw.com with answers to the following (obviously all re Google search):

1. While I understand the META is not too important nowadays, do you have any tips (i.e., should the META info match up exactly with phrases in the body;

2. Should the title regurgitate the main keyword, use it in the beginning in sentence format, or should a synonym of the keyword be buried in the middle, etc.;

3. Same question in "2" as the the h1 and h2 tags;

4. Do you recommend "strong" tags or bold, underline etc. for instances where the keywords appear in the body. How about for synonyms, etc. If either answer is yes, how much strong, underline, bold etc. is too "spammy" for Google?

I realize that it may take some time to answer these questions. In return, as a courtesy, I will thank you publicly for, among other things, disclosing the suggested percentage word density for the keyword in the body.

Thanks for any help you can provide.

You are WAY over thinking things. I have no problem answering these right here on the forum because they are so unnecessary, and can be harmful, for great SEO. Put yourself in the place of Google. Do you think they are going to sit there and say, "Oh, this guy made this keyword bold and underlined. He must be more relevant, more of an expert, and provide a much better user experience because of that."?

Same goes with the H1, H2 tags, and all those other little tiny elements

Make things bold, underline, and take advantage of H1 and H2 tags on your site and articles whenever it helps break up thoughts, emphasis important concepts, and creates an overall more friendly user experience.

Google does not want us optimizing like this. Spend the time you would have spent doing this stuff on applying the concepts outlined in SEO Traffic Firestorm instead

Thanks!

[Black Hat Cat]

Originally Posted by Flores

We took the site down because the site directly implemented all of the strategies that we talk about in this course. If we were to show the site, there would be absolutely no need for the course. Anyone could reverse engineer what we did.

We ranked the site for proof that the system works, now we took it down so there would actually be a need for the course.

Yeah, sure you did, lol.

tonyflorespsa1Level 1
Sign in to reply
More message actions
Mar 7
Okay, so my site was appearing on the first page of Google for the term "run three miles" and now it is not even appearing in the top 900 results? The website is Runthreemiles.com. I have not done anything shady, and I have good content! I don't even have affiliate links to clickbank or anything like that. Please advise. Thank you!

tonyflorespsa1Level 1
Sign in to reply
More message actions
Mar 7
Okay thank you. The only reason why I am concerned is because, even though it is a new site, it started on page three and then worked its way up to page one. I have five articles on there and only three are indexed, so I guess I should just wait for the next update? Still, even with an exact match domain, don't you think it would have appeared at LEAST on the first 900 results?

[river99]

BUSTED! LOL

[robywaters]

Great SEO WSO. I'll give it to my VA right away and hope to seem some good results for my sites!