Generated AI image shouldn't be in social media platforms at all

AI images ARE user generated.

The user instructs the AI image maker about the
details on the type of image they want, and then the
AI system produces it. AI doesn't generate images
on its own.

If I need an image of a house, it's a whole lot easier
to develop an AI image to my specifications, than to
search for it all over the internet, or ride around town
looking for the ideal house to take a picture of.

On top of that, when I generate an AI image, I am the
copyright holder. That means I own it and I don't have
to ask other people's permission to use it.

Whether you agree with me or not, there's not much
you can do to change the fact that AI images are
going to be EVERYWHERE.

how is copy authentic?


its effing hard to find anything with google today.

take any topics:its almost always some "10 best tips to ... " lifted from copywriter's playbook and the 10 tips are almost always beginner tips or some platitude like "ur destiny is to accomplish ur destiny".

@WarriorForum.com,

Really?! A total ban of AI-generated images across the world's most used social media platforms?
• Your proposed solution is something that can only be attained within a reasonable time frame through the concerted effort and mutual agreement of governments, grassroots communities and industries of the free world?

Why not start with something that can be attained organically through the natural movement of these governments, grassroots communities, and industries?
• I mean, any image, AI or human generated, won't have any meaningfully measurable effect if it can't:

** Pass the concerted policing efforts of governments, grassroots communities and industries;
** Grab the attention of the publisher's target viewers;
** Entice 'em target readers to check out the ongoing relevant conversation;
** Make those leads trust the authority and knowledge of the publisher; and
** Compel 'em target customers to take immediate action that's mutually beneficial for themselves and the publisher.

Any content, AI or human generated, still need to qualify for the target audience's current consensus of how they calibrate value.
• So this organically segregates crappy content from that with value. And this takes time. Though not as much time as you'd likely need if you're waiting for a ban to happen in the foreseeable future.

"Generated" is Fair Use spun every which way... BUT Fair Use is not a bad thing... to better understand Fair Use try this for a start ( https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/index.html ) And the reason I bring this up.... anything AI "generates" is in whole or part(s) of existing work(s) - its just what it is.

I would think at some point here AI generated anything should be tagged as such. There is a more than clear line between "Generated" and "Original" or to throw that into another perspective, there is a clear line between "Fantasy" and "Reality". And when terms like this are used is it not then a reasonable assumption to suggest an end user should be aware of what they are looking at, reading, listening to.

And then this leads to the question of the OP... should it be removed? I think the more viable answer is it should be identified. And it just so happens that this is the path that has been taken, read here: ( https://about.fb.com/news/2024/02/la...m-and-threads/ ) or here ( https://www.pcmag.com/news/openai-la...easily-removed ) and this article brings up the more than valid point that Image Meta data can simply be removed... then you read ( https://searchengineland.com/google-...-center-437645 ) and I think Google is making it clear that if no Meta Data is present, the image will probably be removed.

SO now that we understand the landscape of AI "Generated" content as it pertains to its use on Social Media and beyond, we can say that the answer to the question... should it be removed? is already answered for us... NO. it will not be removed, BUT it will be identified as such.

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Plus (+)

Chicken Little

Equals (=)

The Sky is Falling

OMG

AI is going to take over the WORLD!!!

FYI

Using AI for content creation is no different than using a

GHOSTWRITER.

Except I don't have to wait two weeks for delivery.

The images it produces are original enough.

Did AI invent yellow, red, or blue?

Obviously it's going to use the same

COLORS

That Leonardo Da Vinci, Renoir, Michelangelo, Monet,
Van Gogh and everybody else ever used.

The Bible (Ecclesiastes 1:9) says

There is nothing new under the Sun

But of course there's something new, specifically AI that
the OP is referring to is relatively new, it certainly was not
in existence when The Bible was written.

If I ask ChatGPT a complex question like:

ChatGPT, I am going to combine STEP 5 with STEP 12,
flip it sideways and stand it on its head, what will the
outcome be?

ChatGPT's output will be original content because that
question has never been asked of it before.

Now that we have attempted to dumb this down...

Color... sure Leonardo Da Vinci, Renoir, Michelangelo, Monet,
Van Gogh used color... prehistoric man by default drawing on cave walls used color... again sure ok fine.

BUT could any of those examples replicate a color? and when I say replicate I mean exact? in todays world... depending on the color spectrum you use there are millions of colors... RGB as an example there are 16,777,216 colors to be exact. and at any given moment you can replicate a color used - EXACTLY. we have unparalleled accuracy, as compared to our predecessors. it wasnt that long ago we had access to 256 colors... and now, we can replicate the full spectrum of color. Digital is different.

The day will come.... that the current language of choice be it Binary (00000000 to 11111111) or hexadecimal (00 to FF) will be a thing of the past - There are simply to many limits... case and point there are only 16,777,216 colors. THIS will increase exponentially.

We are in the early era of the Digital revolution... and to understand what that will look like i the future, we can look to the past... we can look at the mechanical revolution. The mechanical revolution replaced muscles with machines. There are people on this earth today that were alive when "Horseless Carriage" was a thing - the Muscle power of horses were replaced with the mechanics of cars. Look at were we were in say 1900 vs now mechanically? its mind boggling.

The digital revolution has been taking place for 50 years now? we have more power in our hands ( phones ) than a room of electronics had back in the day.

So what in part ( or whole ) is driving this revolution? The answer is DATA... easy enough, so then the question to ask is where is this data? Its easy to answer this by saying "the internet" but that is a real shallow answer... I have said for years now... maybe even years and years... Google is not a search engine company, they are in the business of collecting data - and I might add at a scale I dont think we can quite comprehend. Google Maps is mind boggling... Every sing word from every single book in the Library of Congress has been scanned by Google... the data collected from any and every Android phone - and the extent of that data capture I am sure is far greater than we can even begin to assume. Google itself probably has all the data needed to solve any and every human problem present and unknown.

Someone that is probably the most public figure for AI... Elon Musk sees the writing on the wall... understands the path AI is taking. Ponied up 44 BILLION dollars to stay in the game and maintain an amount of influence. Musk did NOT buy Twitter to save free speech... he bought Twitter because of all the AI elements the one part and probably most important part he was missing was LANGUAGE, and more importantly language that is devoid of filtering, censorship, and bias.

I would ask who has played with Grok... but i know there might be 3 of us that could answer yes to that.... GROK, is a LANGUAGE data base, and more importantly an OPEN SOURCE language data base. Those with programming knowledge currently have access to the cleanest least filtered least censored least biased platform of data.

To maybe better understand this think about the Internet in China... I dont think any of us will disagree that it is highly regulated, censored and Biased. what would ChatGPT look like running that set of data? it would be silly. and then you have ChatGPT as it is here in the States... and then think what it might be like running off of the GROK data. I can personally tell you - Its night and day. I keep saying this, the Google data sets we have access to are flawed, and I would say less by default and more by intention. There is not a doubt in my mind Google can filter the flaws. AI is only as good as the data it has access to.

The AI we currently have access to is pretty much dumb as a box of rocks. At this point... much like computers in general, it is only as smart as the person in front of it. Look at me I have proprietary prompts is laughable... start filtering data through 2 3 4 8 different language filters before you "prompt" and then you are getting somewhere.

And the whole there is no difference between GPT and a Ghostwriter? oh my... I would never ask GPT to write an article for say a law firm ( as an example ) but I would ask a law professor.

And at the more Macro level... AI written material is... well has become... the bare minimum at this point. Go look at the SEO section... "my stuff is not indexed" and you get into it and the articles are poorly written and duplicate.... those days are done... The MINIMUM is some precontrived spew by AI, and anything less than that is no longer indexed... in many ways its a good thing, and I in no way knock the whole idea... but I personally dont shoot for minimums - ANYBODY can reach the minimum... its the 5% that go beyond that and introduce knowledge and experience into the writing.

Well i get your point but why social media dont need to use ai images but websites use AI content ?
Getting to your point it should that nothing should use ai content but its used more and more
So i think we should accept it as part of our marketing strategy etc

I will tell you more. Stack Overflow won't allow you to post anything generated by ChatGPT because... they give their data to OpenAI to train their models, so they don't want to train them on the content generated by AI. What an irony )

where i can find for learning about AI create Image


[Sig file violation. English language only - please refer to forum rules]

One can manually generate image. Also can take help of AI. But the created image must be crosschecked, whether it is unique and actually helpful. Creator must use prompt engineering properly. If so, then I think it can be used in social media too.

In my opinion, AI images have their own advantages and disadvantages. It makes the work easy for businesses or entrepreneurs who want to improve their businesses. However, it's like disrespectful to real artists out there as well as to their natural talents.

Aw, see here how Taylah Swift dressed up as Scarlit Yannosum to kinda set whatevah in motion?

Or was it Starlit Supposesum who lit up Maybe're Drift as a meme you might wanna tap inta?

Do my distinctions buttween The Taylstah an' Whack! Ditto! surprize or 'maze ya?

Gotta figure this is less to do with MOI an' yr own cuppassity to distinguish Princess-indooced ROT frahm ACTSCHWL ROT than mebbe immediate to yr eye-2-brain co-ords rn.

See, bcs, in our hearts an' minds an' lives, we thrive so vurrmuch bettah on our exchanges of enthoosiasm an' authenticity that we do 'pon artifice destined to invite only harm.

Gaht no ideah musself what it takes to make Ms YoHaveswumm's tits look joocieah than mine, in that technopersuazo kinda way AI's hellhole compels one an' all now to PLUMMET SUPAHDOWNO, but less'n we can compare mortal zistoes we gotta measure out on virtyool improbables.

Or did I say Swollen Thrift an' Smylat Allglancewon?

tbh, without tangible refrnce, all you gaht are boats driftin' out noplace on a doomwish.

Where I Can Find Create Animate AI Images? Is there Any App or Site To Generate

I agree that AI generated image are not authentic. If not carefully used then it might cause a serious trouble in future.

It's getting more difficult to see the difference between human made and AI made. But however, how can we talk about authenticity and real content if 90% of selfies on social media a being photoshoped or face tuned? I guess that is a new reality

If you can't win, lead

AI-generated images should not be allowed on social media platforms due to concerns about misinformation, authenticity, and potential misuse.

Hi, thanks for all informations

I think AI should be used in some places where necessary and not everywhere

i feel you can use it to enhancew your work but not to be used in everything

I totally get where you're coming from. The idea behind social media has always been about connecting through real,