Using AI Creation

by 57 replies
70
People often ask whether it's okay to use AI-generated material. While there are usually no legal restrictions--pure AI creations are open source, and anything generated with a user's creative input belongs to the user--the question is far more complex.

After all, nobody is wondering whether they can send an AI-generated birthday card to their mom. The real concern comes from people who want to use AI-generated content on their websites, books, and videos. And that's where we run into a whole different set of rules, dictated by big companies and their clientele.

I started using AI-generated material on my websites two years ago. After an initial boost, their rankings dropped like stones thrown into the Grand Canyon. Google simply doesn't like AI-generated content. This is especially true for text, but it applies to images as well. If possible, always use a real images, and never ever post AI-generated text without at least doing some very serious editing!

Now, I'm seeing the same trend with YouTube Shorts. When I use clips from stock footage, the short gets promoted. But if I let AI generate the footage, the video will most likely sit untouched. A quick look at the metrics proves that it's not the viewers rejecting it - the short was never even shown in the feed. On the same channel, the next short, which uses real footage and images, performs well - at the very least reaching its 450 test viewers.
#artificial intelligence #ai-generated content #creation


  • Did you submit your websites to your Google Search Console
    where they tell you the exact reason why your pages are not
    indexed, or are you making assumptions as to why your sites
    are not performing well?

    Also, what is your opinion about A.I.-generated code for things
    such as websites, browser extensions, plugins, apps, etc.

    Do you think that A.I. should not be used for any of those.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • I just witnessed the drop, did not use Google Search Console.

      About the AI - don't get me wrong. I like using AI. I pay for ChatGPT premium and use it all the time, as well as Suno for music creation etc. It's just that we need to be extra careful because with Ai we are often sailing uncharted waters. Code creating should be fine because you do not include the AI-created code in the final product.
      • [ 3 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
    • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • That's an interesting perspective, and I've observed similar patterns myself. AI-generated content can be a helpful tool, but it seems like search engines and social media platforms are quietly pushing back against it. Google, in particular, tends to favor content that feels natural, well-researched, and engaging - something AI still struggles to fully replicate.
    • [1] reply
    • yeah bro that is patterns will include with ai can be helpful
  • Well maybe Ai its disliked by google but in my case of not having experience in writing articles probably it will take me 3 to 4 hours to write an article and i dont know if it will be a good one
    So instead i prefer to create an article in few seconds with chatgpt
    Yea for people that want someting serious ai would not be a good option but for those who cannot write content or dont have the time then Ai its better than nothing
  • Using AI creation is an advantage as it helps us to get ideas but not to the point that we have to rely on it entirely.
  • AI-generated content often gets deprioritized by platforms like Google and YouTube. Use real images, heavily edit AI text, and prefer authentic footage for better performance. Quality and authenticity matter.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • To hell with creation, let's figure delivery!

    What if all your meticulously configured marketin' assets were SUMMERIZED by default for the benefit of your audience?
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • That's an interesting observation! It does seem like platforms are actively pushing back against AI-generated content, especially when it's unedited or lacks a human touch. Google's stance on AI-generated text aligns with their broader focus on high-quality, user-first content.

    For YouTube Shorts, it's fascinating that AI-generated clips aren't even getting the chance to be seen. Do you think this is due to YouTube's algorithm specifically flagging AI content, or could it be a matter of engagement signals such as viewers interacting less with AI-generated visuals?

    Also, have you tested mixing AI-generated elements with real footage to see if that makes any difference?
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Anyone looked at the impact when using on facebook or instagram/tiktok? I have run across a lot of AI content in my feeds so I assume it's not de-prioritized...but maybe there's just a ton out there?
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • For text content, if done purely via AI, it might get de-prioritized. But if content is original supported by AI images instead of stock images that should not be problem. Especially if images are contextual. I have seen good blogging platforms like hackernoon give an option to generate cover image via their AI.
  • The key to Ai is treating it like an employee - Virtual assistant.

    With the right prompting you can get Ai to pass all Ai detection software.

    The real problem that I see in the Ai is being use as a short cut instead of a new path.

    For example on the X platform people love to write Ai generated comments. They are easy to detect and tend to upset people. That's a shortcut.

    The new path is to take a comment string along with the original post and have Ai detect the tone of the comments and then building a framework around that to create a comment that will get engagement. On viral posts this is a great way to get engagement because you can create a comment that touches everyone in the comments section. It works great. Instead of having to read all the comments let Ai do it.
  • I can only speak for myself but I gotta say havin a bit of caution really can't hurt. I saw an article in passing saying something about the government finally made a ruling on copyright in music via AI. I can't find it but I point it out to say that their will be regulation it just takes time.

    Beyond that it can accelerate learning and massively boost productivity if used correctly. I would say it's becoming a very important tool but no you shouldn't lean on it to do your thinking for you. The more effort you put in the better quality output you receive even on the free tiers. Just put all your creative juice into the work and AI will amplify it. Left alone, AI will just regurgitate and plagiarize with reckless abandon. lmao
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • I still don't get this. Whenever you can not know the difference in between AI and human generated content, so what is wrong with it?

    Soon, we will all think every AI generated thing is human produced already. Even though I wouldn't enjoy the robot generated things when it comes to games, art, music etc. It wouldn't have any spirit.
    • [1] reply
    • Would you rather listen to real discussions from people with life experiences or a program that spews out generic text?

      Human comments here on this forum have led to genuine discussions. AI has no emotion and reads like a wall of text. No one comes here to read responses that sound like they came from a dictionary.
  • What I've noticed is this: AI itself isn't the problem it's the intent behind how it's used.

    Platforms like Google and YouTube don't necessarily hate AI...

    they just reward originality, context, and effort. And right now, most AI content out there feels like copy-paste fluff not because AI is bad, but because most people don't push it beyond the first draft.

    Think of AI like a creative assistant with no taste.

    It can draft, brainstorm, remix but it's up to us to direct it, challenge it, and polish the final output.

    From what you shared, it sounds like Google's demotion of your AI content wasn't just "AI = bad," but likely "this content feels generic, repetitive, or low-E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trust)." Especially with SGE rolling out, Google's sniffing harder than ever for authenticity.

    One thing that's worked for me:

    Use AI for first-pass structure and ideation
    Inject real examples, unique POV, and personal context
    Run it through AI detection tools before publishing
    Add audio/video elements when possible for real signals

    Also, the drop in YouTube reach for AI footage is super interesting and aligns with what I've seen too.

    Human faces and real motion just feel more engaging to viewers, and the algorithm knows it.

    Bottom line: AI isn't a shortcut it's a starting point.

    When we treat it like a collaborator rather than a replacement, the results (and rankings) reflect that.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • Hey Sharmi,
      Thanks for your thoughts its really opened my eyes about AI. I made my first reply to a comment in this forum yesterday it was a genuine comments thanking the member for their input but because i am not good at grammar i run the post through Chat GPT to give it any improvements to the grammar. It was rejected by a forum moderator reason given was because it was AI generated. Although the reply was my own even this small modification using AI had an impact. I'm grateful for the reason given for the moderator removing the post because i dont want to offend anyone here just want to add value where i can. I'm hoping this post will be accepted as it will be my first then. Your post does just that it has helped me immensely thank you so much
      BBB
      • [2] replies
    • Preach!

      Even if current algorithms don't de-prioritize, anything that looks like slop will eventually be de-prioritized, because these platforms will change the algorithms to filter the garbage.

      It's important to track algorithms, but always create quality!!!
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • There's really no need to avoid AI anymore even Google is aware of that. Two years ago, Google used to penalize AI-generated content, but back then, the content truly felt robotic and low quality. Now, things are changing in every way.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • I've noticed the same thing with AI images too. It's wild how much more reach real or heavily-edited content gets. Looks like authenticity still matters to the algorithms!
  • Banned
    It is okay to use AI generated content but I feel like it is taking away our creative ability. people now go for the easy way and they do not want to crack their brains to produce an awesome creative piece and this is the challenges we are facing with the AI invention
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
  • Banned
    I have never really noticed that because honestly you can prompt AI to give you content that feels very human. in esence learning AI ia important . i recommend taking AI courses to help you prompt AI to give you quality contention
    • [1] reply

    • I agree that the content is getting much better.

      FYI the LLMs and image generators can write their
      own prompts, and so can some of the coders.

      You don't really need courses since the LLMs can
      teach you just about anything you need to know.

      Do yourself a favor and start using A.I. more so
      that you will know its capabilities.
  • very intresting point of view , heres my controvertial take . i believe big tech companies are trying to reduce the level of AI generated content to
    1, reduce the level of AI ependency
    2, encourage authentic post
  • Yep, I can confirm -- Google and YouTube really push back on AI-generated content if it's not properly edited. These days I only use AI as a helper, not the main creator. And the results are way better.
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • People always ask if it's okay to use AI content. Legally, yeah... it's fine. You own what you make. But the real issue is how it performs.

    I used AI content on my websites before. At first, traffic went up, then crashed. Google doesn't like AI text or images much. Same thing on YouTube Shorts, AI clips get almost no views, but real footage? Boom, it gets pushed.

    Now I always mix AI stuff with real content and do a lot of editing. Also, I use turis vpn to stay safe online and test how my stuff looks in other countries.

    So yeah, AI's useful. But do bare in mind, just don't rely on it 100%.
  • Yes, I found that too. Whether it is pictures, videos or texts, it seems that as long as it is detected that AI is written, it will be resisted by Google and other platforms.
  • Have you checked their Veo3 model and videos generated by it, they are simply indifferentiable.

    And I think they have told people long time ago that content must have EEAT (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness) factors, doesn't matter the content is created with AI or Not with AI.

    EEAT matters a lot in content for Google. If you see your rankings dropped here are the possible reasons::

    1. Your content must be outdated

    2. Content might be out performed by competitors

    3. It lacks EEAT
  • Banned
    it is definitely ok but i think that if we advance, there should be regulatory laws for the use of AI in our daily lives.
    • [1] reply
    • That will never happen mate. Sad but true. Looks like we are all getting addicted slowly but surely to the AI empire.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • People are using it for sure, however you have to be smart about it.. Perhaps, you could use AI sources, but mix them with human ones as well? Or define a custom workflow which is not as easily detectable?

    As a side note, i have seen some plain ridiculous AI vids reach 100M+ views haha.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Have you tried mixing non AI with the AI stuff?
  • I used AI to create 1000s of images that I use in PDFs for speech therapy. There is no way I could ever have afforded to hire an artist - sad but true.
  • [DELETED]
  • you should not do your business thinking AI will replace any real work you need to do. Why would someone pay for a pdf done in chatgpt if they can do the same themselves? The idea is to have something that offers more value, something that is more unique than just things served with AI.
    Now you can alway pass the content generated through an AI to make sure it does not show as AI.
    Make an effort to create human content products and services, use AI as a tool and you will see things will work out fine.
  • Tried AI tools for content and honestly, it saved me tons of time. Still tweaking stuff, but great for drafts and ideas. Cool tech for sure
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Yes, while there are not issues with AI Generated content or images. I also use AudioModify for my youtube chaneel.
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • Thanks for this question I too had this same question
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • I've heard similar things about Google preferring human-edited content for SEO. Interesting that YouTube seems to treat AI visuals the same way.
  • Absolutely not. Google has tools to detect textual spam, but not AI-generated content. Unfortunately, your prompts were not good, so garbage content was generated - a sure way to end up in Google's void. Your site has been penalized for spam, not for AI
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • People use AI wrong. They follow the herd and think short prompts work

    On certain projects I use AI as part of the writing process. Last week I created a 1,500 word post using nothing but AI prompts and some audio notes. To be fair it has taken me months to refine the prompts. Now it works. I can create long reads in very little time. I have tested my work. People who know my writing think I wrote it. The thing is I did, but AI did it for me.

    The secret to AI is training. Simply prompting "do this" or "act like this" will get you nothing special. Training and adding context gets results.

    I am currently humanizing some AI content for a client. I can not believe they had such sh!t on their website. I am enjoying this project as it provides training material for my own projects.

    I am interested to see the quality of AI generated content. Especially if people still have the prompts they used to create it.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • very informative content
  • [DELETED]
  • This is the topic I am interested in, very useful thank you for sharing another useful information
  • Janno what jus' happined to Moi?

    I had a kinda déjà vu.

    But it warn't like I saw ... yeah, I seen this before, sowin' it is BEFORE!

    It was more NEVAH SEEN THIS EVAH! -- same time I knew instant I nevah didn't ain't.

    Gotta distinguish always buttween nouveau reflectshchwaans on the imponderabyoolo an' impossibyool consequences of the inevitabyool, I guess.

    That is how I showah, u wanna know.

    Drench against flesh.

    & then you gotta

    dry ahf

    or drip ovah nowan.

    (Less'n you gaht a déjà vu says sumthin' else -- hey, but that's jus' Moi cookin' UNINCINERATED WHATEVAH for guests said hey mebbe second time won't kill us all too bad.)

    Yeah so ima all 'Whores an' Desperados' rn -- like it is evin a Disney movie fulla all yr swanksyest supah stars.

    The Rock cuts in:

    "Cut out the dependence on hairstyle smarts! You can rule the planet on that impossible supernexus we call MUSCLES + LUCK. Most athletes and movie stars pack just one of either. But I've got like eight of each. Go see me tomorrow at your local movie theater. And maybe jism on out upon command."

    My view?

    It has always been impossibyool to say for shoore what may proliferate beyond alla our wishes, like we all senityoore of the Caahsmaas on out.

    But mebbe that is a coolah refrince point than perpetyool schwangomusho.



    Long as I can choose muh own undahgarments, we perpetyooly gtg on this ticket, Sweetiepoppets.
  • I have had similar experience
    Original/human content >> AI content
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • AI has saved me a lot of time in my work
    • [1] reply
    • That's cool! It saves you time, not completely replaces your job))))
  • [DELETED]
  • Hi everyone,

    AI creation is a great tool for speeding up content production, but combining it with human editing ensures quality and a natural voice. Staying updated on platform guidelines, like Google's focus on E-E-A-T, helps your content stay credible and visible. Thoughtful use of AI plus human input gives the best results.
  • Using AI creations is fine for personal use, but risky for online growth. Search engines and social platforms prefer original, human-made content. AI text and images can hurt visibility because algorithms detect and down-rank them. If you use AI, always rewrite, edit, or mix it with real content. For best results, keep your main creative work authentic, AI should only assist, net replace you.
  • [DELETED]
  • Yes, you are correct. I tested both AI videos and real videos on my channel. The AI videos got very few views, but the real footage still attracts a lot of attention.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • I used AI-generated content on a site a couple of years ago and most of the pages were initially indexed but after a month, the pages were no longer indexed. It was good to learn this before getting too far into completing more projects like this.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • The problem isn't just "using AI," but using it without providing any sign of authenticity or real-world experience. As far as I understand, no platform will penalize you for using AI; they penalize generic content, content without its own value and, of course, without any indication of the author. If you publish text exactly as GPT generates it, it's normal for it to get dropped because you're not contributing anything unique to the index. Something quite similar happens with images and videos; YouTube prioritizes content generated by "real engagement." The solution isn't to avoid AI, but simply to integrate it, use it as a draft, rewrite thoroughly, and add your own personal, real-world examples.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
  • Naturally, "human" text is more important for Google, but AI text is also perceived.

    it's up to you to choose what you prefer
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    Se cerchi un'esperienza di gioco coinvolgente e interattiva, runa casino Casinò live che porta l'emozione del tavolo reale direttamente sul tuo schermo. Su questa piattaforma puoi trovare una selezione di giochi con croupier dal vivo, come la roulette, il blackjack e altri classici, trasmessi in streaming con qualità video eccellente per un'esperienza autentica.
    L'interfaccia intuitiva rende semplice scegliere il tavolo giusto e partecipare alle sessioni in tempo reale, mentre le promozioni dedicate al live gaming aggiungono valore e opportunità di vincita. Con metodi di pagamento sicuri, transazioni rapide e un supporto clienti disponibile, questo casinò live è progettato per garantire un divertimento responsabile e dinamico.
    Sia che tu sia nuovo nel mondo dei giochi live sia che tu sia un giocatore esperto, qui troverai un ambiente coinvolgente e professionale per vivere l'adrenalina del gioco dal vivo.
Join the discussion

Next Topics on Trending Feed

  • 70

    Using AI Creation

    People often ask whether it's okay to use AI-generated material. While there are usually no legal restrictions--pure AI creations are open source, and anything generated with a user's creative input belongs to the user--the question is far more complex. After all, nobody is wondering whether they can send an AI-generated birthday card to their mom. The real concern comes from people who want to use AI-generated content on their websites, books, and videos. And that's where we run into a whole different set of rules, dictated by big companies and their clientele.