Truth be known, I concur with them... to some extent. What individuals are announcing as SEO copywriting is simply catchphrase stuffing. They have no arrangement for incorporating keyphrases in their content, they don't require some serious energy to make sense of which keyphrases work with what pages/sorts of duplicate/messages and they don't do anything more than push them in wherever they may even have a possibility of seeming well and good. THAT is not SEO copywriting.
SEO copywriting does not bring down the business message IF it's done well. Not to boast, but rather I simply had a customer who makes treadmills, ellipticals and so forth set up a page of SEO duplicate that shot his transformation rate up to 312%. Still wanna let me know that SEO duplicate doesn't offer?
Here's my stand: *IF* SEO duplicate is composed the way it ought to be composed, it does its employment with offering and with supporting in rankings.
So where do you stand? Is SEO copywriting insidious?