David Garfinkel VSL
with him for 5 months on it. These are my honest opinions on the VSL, and
as such should not be mistaken as facts.
The good:
The use of emotive language was utilized well in the VSL, it was
effective in driving home the realities of their situation, the use of
graphic images would have been very effective as well.
The proof points were strong. The VSL cited a number of clinical
trials that support the claims made in the ebook.
It is very common in this niche to frame a conspiracy that is against
the prospect, this is done very well in the VSL and is backed up by
relevant sources.
The references for the VSL are extensive and thorough.
The bad:
There didn’t seem to be any angle to the whole VSL. Every single
successful offer on the market in this niche constructs their argument
by pointing out the underlying cause of the condition, then offers a solution
to that problem in the form of the product. The VSL did not do this. It
seemed to be out of focus, and didn't have a concise message to convey.
Overall thoughts
Overall the VSL is very boring, long winded, conservative, had way too
many ideas/concepts, was too complex, isn’t strong enough, didn't have
any clear direction and didn't follow the format of the current winners. It
fundamentally fails to persuade the prospect to take action.
Note: Because this isn't a normal review of a product, I submitted this to
support before posting here, they gave me the go ahead to post it as it is.
-
Oziboomer -
Thanks - 1 reply
SignatureFrame Signed sports jerseys for fun or profitIncludes Full basic framing course, Could this be the start of your new career?{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10147252].message }}-
Kay King -
Thanks
SignatureSaving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10147278].message }} -
-