articlemarketer.com ... How has it helped you?

11 replies
Hi everyone I am thinking of trying articlemarketer.com, its pricing seems very reasonable (the lifetime access).

can anyone vouch for its effectiveness?
Has it helped you increase traffic? Sales?

Does your article really go to 3,476 sites?
(also, do you have to sign up for those 3,476 sites indvidually?!, or is this done automatically, or is there no need to sign up in the first place!)

I was very excited when I found this site, it seems so feature rich and user friendly!

Any thoughts or reviews appreciated!
#articlemarketercom #helped
  • Profile picture of the author Newseo903
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1125213].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Santhoshseo
      curious to see any reply on this?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1128257].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author RoyChan
    If you are considering to buy articlemarketer.com which cost about $599.99 (life time access). I obtained my copy sometime ago at 499.99 - it was a good purchase... but, the game's changed due to the content duplication rule.

    I suggest you check out CommissionBlueprint2.0 which is launching on the 9th. CB2.0 includes ArticleBlueprint.com which provides nice spinning function which enables unique article for SEO purpose.
    Signature
    Launch Plan: Watch Me Build A Business From Zero To 5k Per Month
    https://5kpm.com/​​​
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1159285].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author richnicol.co.uk
    Roychan is completely right i bought that package and now due to rules and regulations changing its very hard now with duplication etc to get your articles published on the big article sites.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1160060].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author bigcat1967
    I submit only a couple articles a month - maybe I should try something like you guys are doing.
    Signature

    <a href="https://changeyourbudget.com/save-money-on-your-water-bill/">How to Lower Your Water Bill</a>

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1160168].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Allyn Hane
      I bought Article Marketer a long time ago and got the lifetime for $299.
      Anyway, on average, I get about 25-30 links that actually get indexed from each article I submit.

      Your arts get submitted to like 3,000 sites, but that doesn't mean that all will actually get indexed.
      And, no, you don't have to actually register with all of them, but you do have to confirm some of the accounts it creates for you, but only one time.

      I think Art Marketer is a good value for long term link building.
      Signature

      Drink Beer, Blog, Drink More Beer bloggerillustrated.net

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1161376].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Ashley Gable
        Thanks for the replies.

        May I ask, without sounding like a fool, what you all mean by the new rules of duplicate content?

        Is this something to do with the search engines or the article sites themselves?

        Ashley
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1180399].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dannykth8
    If you worried about duplicate content. There is one article distribution could be better than article marketer. The name is unique article wizard, they claim can distribution to thousand articles and make your article unique.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1180456].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author billythekid
      i've find with a lot of article rewriters/spinners that when they rehash the original article it doesn't make a word of sense.
      I've read the UAW and some others are supposed to be good. But with UAW do you get quality backlinks or is the onus just on quantity. What I would like to know what software tool provides the best value for money as well.
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1187924].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cellington
    Ahh, to spin or not to spin- that is the question:

    Whether 'tis nobler in the mind...

    Ok, enough Shakespeare.

    Duplicate content is an interesting phenomenon. So many people claim to be so certain about it, and yet, no one can say for sure how Google does what Google does.

    In my opinion, there are two approaches to defeating duplicate content.

    The first is simply to submit a wide variety of good, fresh, unique, original content. You can never go wrong feeding the search engines the relevant food they want. And they're always hungry for more. So give it to them.

    The second is to take that relevant content and create (valid, readable, interesting) "versions" so that you can distribute a unique version of each article to each of the article directories around the net.

    I think you should be able to do both. Submit unlimited articles, as many as you want, and include versioning options as well.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1574761].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author dotslash
      I've been a member of articlemarketer in it's various forms.

      It does do what it says, your articles do get distributed to many, many sites. It's fairly straightforward to use you just submit once and then they get distributed.

      Never seem to get any where near that number of links but that's to be expected. Also certainly never got any meaningful traffic from any of the sites distributed to.

      SEO benefit - could be some but not much in my experience, I don't think it works anywhere like it used to - I'm not sure why. Mind you I know people that have had great results from using it.

      Personally I've had better results from a trial of Article Marketing, Free Content & High Quality Backlinks which a warrior runs (Musa_Aykac). Here you spin an article and publishers can download your content as they wish, I get far more registered links and noticeable benefits in the SERPS from this, although I do use their spinner so it does take quite a bit longer.

      Hope that helps
      Neil
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1574862].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cellington
    Having completed over 250 million article distributions, I've heard from authors that they get a ton of backlinks, but no traffic... they get a SERP bump and they get traffic, but no links... they get links and traffic, but no bump in the SERPs... they get a better Pagerank but no backlinks... they get this and they don't get that.

    It used to make me crazy, examining article results for the exact right "formula" so that someone could "get it all". Then I realized that some of these goals are at cross-purposes.

    For example, if you write an article that is amazing at driving traffic to your site, it's not going to get as many backlinks, because most publisher don't want traffic to drain away.

    On the other hand, if you write a great informational article that instructs someone on a topic, you'll get a bunch of backlinks because publishers want to educate and inform - but if you don't give the reader a reason to click through, you will have "solved their need-to-know problem" and they don't need to click through to you.

    At the same time, let the search engine spiders grok that you have something relevant to say on a topic, but don't write your article just for the spiders (increasing SERPs) or you'll get no humans (and you want traffic, right?).

    So it's a balance and a little bit of seduction. Give great information, be pinpoint relevant, and whet the reader's appetite for more.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1584217].message }}

Trending Topics