SEO LinkVine

I'd like some info too. As far as I can see, it's a clone of AMA (Article Marketing Automation).

No bad thing if it is as AMA seems to me to have lost steam. It never really recovered from removing the right to search by keyword IMHO and I found far too many spammy articles placed in the wrong categories.

I'm trying out the UAW Wizard at the moment but not getting many articles sent through. If you're not in the IM niche, it's hard to find good content this way.

Pearson



Nb AMA and My Article Network mentioned by Dexx are the same thing.

I was able to get early access into the program as I wanted to start seriously looking at article marketing as a way to boost offline client websites to the first page of Google at a more reliable/easy rate.

I signed up with UAW and MyArticleNetwork, and then after hammering Brad with questions, was able to also gain access to SEO Linkvine before the "official" opening (mind you a limited amount of users had already been able to pay to access it early also)

Essentially Brad took what he liked and found powerful in the other networks (as far as features), but also added the features he thought were horribly absent (the built in keyword rank tracking system etc. are amazing) and put them into work with his OWN private network community of websites (not literally just sites he owns, but other blgo sites etc. that aren't part of the MAN/UAW network)

So far I'm already seeing my articles showing up in Google and its only been a couple days, so that's great in my eyes as this gave me an early head start even vs the MAN and UAW articles.

I can see the confusion being the 10,000+ blog network comparison, making everyone think they are the same network, but from what I can tell they are not...or at least Google seems to be finding SEOLV articles pretty fast (as I wrote similar articles for the other sites)

All in all I'd have to rank them:

1) SEO Linkvine
2) Unique Article Wizard
3) MAN

and POSSIBLY ArticleRank in there, but I haven't fully tested it out yet, so I can't really comment.

Hope that helps!

~Dexx

Like Dexx I also got early access to SLV.

I'm a self confessed blog network geek, I think I have tried pretty much all of them.

I have SLV for about 2 weeks now and I have submitted articles every single day (well actually not during the week ends)

Before I give you my impressions look at MY stats (screenshot taken from the members area)


Yes... that's about 3,000 blogs publishing my articles and 1,000+ are still pending for approval.

That's really good, especially knowing that more blogs will be added to the system when it will go live, each member will have the possibility to submit their own blogs to get fresh content.

I personally only use SLV to get backlinks so this is mainly what I have played with during those 2 weeks.

In my articles (that are all spinnable) I have added at least 1 non spinnable sentence, just to be able to find where they would be posted.

I have been very happy to see the quality of the blogs in the network - I have several PR2, PR3 or even PR4 backlinks.

With time I suppose the network is going to become even stronger.

It's very easy to submit articles, I prefer it over the other networks, I find it faster. One feature that I liked is that we can select several categories at once by using check boxes while in other networks lile MAN you would have to submit several times the same article to select different categories.

The stats are easy to read, we can see how many times each article has been published as well as having a general overview.

As Dexx said there is also the rank checker that is very useful, so you don't have to go to google each time to check all your keywords/rankings.

At the price it's going to launch I really think it is a wise investment - much more affordable than other networks and I find it better too!

Vita Vee

thanks for the reviews guys, i am looking forward to this also. I am impressed by those tracking and stats features and the price looks very "civil" also. If my instincts are right this looks like it might become very good - early reviewers and testers in the beta seem to confirm this!

This does look good especially with results from those stats. Does it have the ability to set the number of submissions per day like UAW? Also...I must have missed seeing it, but what is the monthly fee?

james, articleranks is an industry leader? I dont know..but i had the impression its more a "smaller" system by one of our warriors? Make no mistake, i USE it and i love it..its very good. Just didnt know its already considered industry leading...

I'm using this service as an autoblog on one of my website -- I only selected 'Sprituality' and I got some unrelated blog posts...like Piano lessons???

maybe someone tagged posts wrong? possible...

Thanks for all your comments to this thread,

BR LASSE

I can safely assume that LD is about 1000x harder to learn, its a BEAST and almost too much for me even.

Having not seen SEOLV, but i am pretty sure it works like your typical blog network distribution, you submit articles, select categories, can SPIN them etc.... about 1000x more straight forward and easier to use than LD. I would really need to spend a month just learning how to use LD right.

Great review Vita, BTW many many articles you submitted in those 2 weeks?

The thing that sticks in my mind was the offer of a 1.00 to put a blog in the system. If a large % of blogs are in the system are owned by someone else, they could leave or just lose or stop taking care of the blog. Keeping links built , live and growing is the goal on the effort. If all the blogs are privately owned , that is one thing, but just getting articles for their sites and changing what they are doing later and scraping the content put into a blog network concern me.

We have other threads about LD where it would be more appropriate for you to post this.

However, don't confuse 'complicated, confused and difficult to learn' with 'quality'. In another thread, you'll find an LD user complaining about the low quality of some of the blog posts within the LD system. There seems to be the same complaint made of all these systems and it would be interesting to hear how Brad intends to maintain quality posts within his system.

Pearson

Brad,

question:

Is this a fixed network with a set number of blogs or are the blogs by the users themselves (therefore dynamic)?

Ben, the big thing is consistency if you want to avoid the Sandbox.

Most people, when they first get started, will blast out 100+ links to site within the first 2 days...and then send 3-5 backlinks a day after that...

Which seems suspicious to Google!

So if you don't think you can maintain a constant stream of links, then its best to keep it looking normal and very minimal.

Now if you can do, like Brad did, and submit articles frequently so that a constant stream of new backlinks (with varying anchor keywords) keep flowing to the site, then it looks like the site is "popular" and "liked" by Google and they won't hate it.

Otherwise every news-related issue would be an instant sandbox and nobody would use Google (i.e. Michael Jackson's death had the whole internet spiking...but main of the news site articles were being linked to for days/weeks to come as they kept the interest of the public)

Make sense?

~Dexx

Just wanted to chip in on the review:

I was glad that I'm in the beta version. I did a test of Brad's system where I am reviving a website that is somewhere in page 3 rankings.

It has been in page 3 or 4 for 5-6 months and I did nothing else to it.

I changed the website from blog to pure HTML page, submitted a spinned article to SEO Link Vine ONLY. No other backlinks activities.

Started the test on 19 April 2010, I had 23 articles published so far, and this website is currently sitting at #10 place.

A big jump from 30+ position.

Conclusion? It's good, go get it!

Hey Brad, How much is SEO Linkvine going to cost?

Brad,

At $47 it seems like a good bargain. Count me in. Btw how long is the launch price going to last?

Oh and i hope that you will monitor sites that are submitted into the network to maintain the quality of it.

$47p/m to gain access to another well controlled network combined
with a back end interface with stats, spinning and a cherry on the top
in the form of what appears to be an integrated Market Sam lite rank checker.

Pretty much no brainer territory really at this money.

I'll be having a good play and will report back.

Hi,

My question also about importing "the best spinner".

Gary

TBS {utilizes|uses|produces} {standard|normal} jet spinner syntax.

Brad,
It looks pretty good to me too. Count me in. Link building by hand is just too tedious, although I'll continue to do it, this would sure speed things up. Launch price seems right too.

Steve

It looks like SEOLV will be a good tool/network... if you use it.

Regarding spinning... does it really matter other than being able to vary your anchor text and/or url? For instance, even with a large amount of spinning done to an article will version 1 be much different than version 2 because won't version 2 simply be 99% the same as version 1 because it only spins the first spin item it comes to?

Brad, maybe this is a feature that could be implemented to take it to the next level in SEOLV... come up with a way to spin one article into a group of articles that are a minimum % different from each other? For example... 1000 versions are created from a spin and 38 articles are a minimum 68% different from each other?

Maybe this is just WAY too advanced of an idea or not even necessary... I don't know.

But there is Copyscape so I'm sure a comparison engine of some sort could be built that could pull this off. I guess the process would take version 1 and find the next version that will be the minimum percentage different (let's say it's a variable and say 68%) that happens to be version 38... then it continues to find the next version that is at least 68% different than version 38 and when it does it also double checks the minimum difference with version 1 as well... and so on and so on until you get X amount of articles that are INDEED different and subsequently submitted to the network.

It's late, my brain hurt thinking about and typing out that solution... I'm out!

-John

Yes i know its off-topic, but also "somewhat" related to the subject.

Funny i had the same thoughts today about spinning,whether the search engines are actually smart enough and know the synonyms.

Makes sense that more complex spinning (sentences, paragraphs) would be better.

BUT....if we use articles to distribute to OTHER sites (as in blog networks like seolinkvine et al..) does it actually matter (for us)? [I know it matters for the sites who want unique content]

What i mean is, let's take a simple example:

I have an article linking to my site, and i submit the article to article directories (or blog networks for distribution). So even if my article would appear 1:1 unchanged on other article directories or sites...it is hardly to imagine that it "hurts" *my* site if my article is syndicated, as is so often the case eg. by submitting to ezine articles etc. Everyone and their mom is taking articles from such directories and re-uses them.

What hurts would be the site in question since it has duplicate content, but not my site. I would still benefit from the link to my site?

I cannot see google "penalizing" a site because many other sites (re-)use that content and link back to the site....in fact, it should be an indication that the site where the article is from is quite an authority since so many use that article? So, for the one distributing and wanting backlinks, spinning MIGHT not be so crucial.

Well the debate can go well into the night for spun articles and it's effectiveness. But personally i think that unique articles from different site/blog ip's linking to your site beats duplicate articles from different ip's linking to your site. Simplified.

Yep just spinning words won't cut it these days. Google has a $100 billion budget pays the best money for the most intelligent people on earth to work for them and we IM's beat them with a bit of spinning. I don't think so!

I rewrite each paragraph once, each sentence within each paragraph three times and spin words within sentences. Takes me 45 minutes to an hour but I get 100% uniqueness every time and end up with 100's and 100's of UNIQUE articles for an hours work at most.

So my question earlier has been answered, thanks. I can put this in SEOLV which is great news.

One final point on spinning is that I have blogs where I took UAW articles. But they were poorly spun and I kept on getting the same articles over and over with very little difference. Having dupe content on your site is not a good thing, I think we all agree about that!

In the end I pulled UAW articles from my blogs as I felt they were doing more harm than good. I'll do the same if the articles from SEOLV do the same. Hopefully the articles will be unique enough to warrant being used on my blogs. I know for sure that my articles to SEOLV will be top quality!!

I think the best spinner might not be the best after all - check out the magic article rewriter, they had a powerful auto spin library that work almost as good as contentboss.

Brad - is there going to be a limit on the number of posts per day? The number of sites promoted?

I'm just wondering if I'm promoting multiple sites, at what point is one account not enough?

Brad - here is a 6 level deep example that works correctly (I built my own spinner about 8 years ago, before someone leaked the idea of spinning)

{A1 {B1 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } }|b2 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } }|b3 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } |A2 {B4 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } }|b5 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } }|b6 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } |A3 {B7 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } }|B8 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } }|B9 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } } } }

Hint Hint: spinning isn't just for articles... it is great for web pages too!

Hey Poker, great, thanks for the free ultra spinnable article

I have just tried it and it works well. Here are some variations I'm getting:

A3 B7 c1 d3 e2 f3
A1 B1 c2 d1 e1 f3
A3 B8 c1 d3 e3 f2

So I messed up somewhere when I tried it myself

00:00:22:48 to the grand opening. I'm getting chills

VitaVee, those imbalanced brackets are a b*tch. I used to have a script that checked for them and highlighted the block of code with the bad balance in red, but now with nested brackets, I just haven't been able to get my head around it.

So for {A {1|2|3 |B {1|2|3 } } it is obvious to us that there is a bracket missing after the first 3... OR did we mean that B {1|2|3} was the 4th option of the first nested spin, which case, we're missing the close of the outside bracket. :confused::confused::confused:

That's the hard part of error checking when there is nesting. Even if I flag the start of the first imbalance, that would be {A, which I guess gives some indication, but really you need a clean spinner that just shows you the result of your spin, spot the first stray bracket and back track.

Awesome. Thanks Poker. And good to hear it's working Vita. I'm looking forward to connecting with the members a week or so after we go live, to gather feature additions. That's the part I love about the internet marketing group. There are so many smart people all willing to help each other out.

Brad

Ok i just signed up. There was a bonus for the first 25 signups. Did i make the bonus Brad?

Now to take it for a spin...

Just purchased SEO linkvine; however I can not seem to log into my account? Please help so I can begin using it to build backlinks.

Thanks

Did I make the bonus?

Anybody else have issues with the order process?

Payment went via CB fine, ended up on page saying, you do not have an account so register here.

Did that, ended up logged in but.. with no access.

When I click uploading articles etc, I'm taken back to a payment option screen.

Only me ?

It's working well for me

Finally I am in; now its time to test and play.

Congratz to all the new users

Don't forget to submit some blogs too so we can get more backlinks

And if possible when you add a new blog to the system try to setup some autolink process to have backlinks created to all your new fresh content (ping.fm is your friend)

Hey Warriors,

I'll give one free Ultra Spinnable Article to the first 3 SEOLV customers who PM me
No matter if you purchased it from my affiliate link or not.

Just a gift to support Brad's SEOLinkVine

Make sure that you send me your CB receipt!

PS: If you don't know what an Ultra Spinnable Article is, look at my sig!

UPDATE

Offer not available anymore The 3 spots have been taken.

Hey Vita,

I left a comment recently in your USA WSO when you get a chance to check it out.

Thnx!

~Dexx

I cannot order for some reason.. won't navigate to checkout for some reason. Think this may be on my end.. but i've been trying since the second the launch email hit my gmail. m

I've looked at the videos, but can't seem to find what the word count should be for your articles. Does anyone know the limits?

Brad, this is a nice tool. Clean interface and easy to get around.

On my autoblog, I notice some folks do not even put an anchor link in their article at all.

Now, what would be the purpose? They're not getting backlinks for not having links in their articles.

I got so many emails about this product that I was just going to brush it off. But then I read this tread & just signed up.

I respect reviews from warriors since they are not dropping aff links and there are several really good reviews here.
Brad sounds like you definitely have a winner!
Patricia

What if there are not enough blogs to post to based on your niche?

for example what if my niche was about red dresses.... and there are only 13 blogs about clothing???

Is there a specific niche or niches that this blog network caters towards best?

I remember being a member of AMA but it completely sucked for me because there were not many blogs to post to.

Is there a way to see if this is good for my niche? or perhaps I'll just have to test it.

Hey Brad I gotta say I love what you've created here. It's so easy to use. I've just added three blogs and three articles in a couple of hours. 1 article of mine has been published already and I've received three which were really good quality.

I timed myself at 19 secs so I'm hoping I got in the first 25!!!

It's good to hear more blogs will be added soon. I've got some very small niches where I've not been able to find suitable categories yet. I assume this will improve as the network expands.

Are we able to add images to the articles. I know we can add video but didn't see anything about images.

Thanks,

Phil

SeoLinkVine leaves a BIG FOOTPRINT

"Posted by SeoLinkVine"

---> this is extremely, extremely bad!!

People talking about it on other forums already, the blogs can easily identified that way. Why do you do this? This needs to be fixed ASAP in my opinion.

People are already spreading lists of all the blogs in the network...

Ok, clear now

Brad, I would like to have your reply regarding the article length and image posting questions I posted above.

Thanks...

Hey Brad

I just wanted to let you know that I wrote a review under www[dot]cash-in[dot]us/reviews/seolinkvine/ and awarded it the "Worth-It!" label.

Thanks for a great job on this product. (sorry I can't post links yet here)

Oh dear,
I was thinking for a bit of a newbie, this would be a great intro tool...but you all seem sooo far advanced, I'm wondering if I read & watched the videos incorrectly!

Would it still be worth it to get it as someone just launching out with a real product to promote?
I'm confused now...HELP please...if it's fine, I want in at $47!

Thanks,
Mary

well you do that once...and if you spin them good you basically get infinite articles So its time well spent.

I have one question tho:

Brad, do you have an idea about the current nr. of blogs in the system (i THINK you once said you add(ed) several hundreds more)...and is there statistics about the quality/PR of those blogs?

How do you ensure that no junk sites are added, how is the quality of the network kept up?

Thanks WRays...
I get you now!

There's so many angles in this field, I'm seeing one really does have to decide the focused path to take, as each path seems to go on & get deeper with each learning about it!

Amazing...

Thanks all,

I will get it then, so stand back & ...um, er, ..look for my dust then!

Kindest,
Mary

hmm....is this normal? I submitted an article 3 days ago and it has been published 3 times.....i was expecting a little more than that.

2 other articles I published 2 days ago..have not been picked up at all?

you posted them YESTERDAY <----

I really would give this more time, you cant make such an assumption after one day, IMO.

I think it has promise, but I do have a few concerns... Brad, if you could address these & help clarify...

1 -- The sales page talks about getting 28,900 backlinks in 3 months... Granted, its only been a couple of days, but my posts to the system were only sent to 2 and 5 blogs, respectively. How many blogs do you expect the typical article to run on?

By comparison, when I post through UAW, it goes out 50 per day, to about 700-800 article sites.

I'm not picking one over the other. I'm also thinking about adding AMA, just to get a wider reach. Same with SEOLinkVine. Just want to see more than 2-3 after a few days... and have a better feel for whether those articles are still going out or if they are done.

2 -- I know the posts get 3 backlinks each... so in the above you need 9633 article postings to get that many links. If each article posted gets picked up by 20 blogs, does that mean we're looking at doing 480 postings to get to those levels? If they're picked up by 200 blogs, then its only 48. I'm trying to do the math.

3 -- I read the posts that some beta tester named themselves seolinkvine and that it can act as a red flag. I know you are not adding it to everything, but that knucklehead is. So my question is this: if I publish an article and his blog picks it up, will he flag that article as being "posted by seolinkvine" and if it is, that's the kind of thing that Google can find and give a big kick in the crotch to websites that are backlinking from that blog. I know "you" aren't stamping it, but that blog owner is, and that is a big concern.

Can you either drop him/her or force him/her to change that username?

Feature wise, I do like your system a lot. I would offer a couple of suggestions for version 1.1:

1 - You mentioned earlier that spinning is OK in the titles. That should be indicated on your system

2 - You allow people to add (with a + button) additional title boxes. How about a text area type box with separate titles entered one per line? Then we can paste in 50 easily, as opposed to clicking the "add box" 49 times.

You also let us organize the articles into categories, which I like. That leads me to...

3 - When people post, they need to go through the list and "check boxes" for which categories the specific article relates to. I understand why you need that. But can you have it remember the check boxes from the other articles (or last article) within that category, and have them pre-checked next time we add another?

For example, if I have a category about "solar energy" then all my articles will apply to the same categories... it would be great to avoid running down that category checklist on every single article...

Overall, I give it a thumbs up and just hope to see some distribution kicking in.

I'm also contemplating putting up some WordPress blogs and letting you feed the monster

Hey Poker, thanks for the recommendations. As soon as I get to the office in a couple of hours I'll see what we can do about adding ALL of those. I really like the category one and that's already on our "to do" list. As is making the spinner much much better. About your question about the seolv user. I wouldn't be concerned, but we have contacted the owner and have asked him politely to change his settings. If he doesn't, we may suspend his free account. But, I honestly wouldn't be worried about it. Thanks again for the feature recommendations. We're on it. Oh, and about the speed of article publishing, it will pick up. See my post above about that. Thanks!

Update: I'm in the office now. Spoke with developers and in a couple of hours we'll have these added:

1. ability to paste in multiple titles (separated by a new line, so you don't have to hit the "+" symbol each time) and SEOLV will automatically insert the spin tags for you.

2. An autosave feature, so incase something happens to your browser or you have to leave in the middle of formatting an article, it will save for you.

3. Having the preselected categories from previous OR even previous project types wasn't something that we can add and the reason is that it would like lead to much more "off topic" content being posted on user's websites. Some users would get in a rush and publish articles to categories that weren't good fits for, just because it was fast and easy. We're really trying to give the blog owners the content they expect, and this would unfortunately not help with that. Good idea though.

4. More to come...

Brad

I'm really happy with this system. Finally one that works and is very simple to use. I sent three articles on the first day and the last count they've been published 17 times in very tight niches.

Once we get more categories and sub categories added things will improve even more. At the moment I'm rejecting more articles to my blogs than I'm accepting due to the fact my blogs are in small niches and the articles don't fit in.