I'd like some info too. As far as I can see, it's a clone of AMA (Article Marketing Automation).

No bad thing if it is as AMA seems to me to have lost steam. It never really recovered from removing the right to search by keyword IMHO and I found far too many spammy articles placed in the wrong categories.

I'm trying out the UAW Wizard at the moment but not getting many articles sent through. If you're not in the IM niche, it's hard to find good content this way.

Pearson



Nb AMA and My Article Network mentioned by Dexx are the same thing.

I was able to get early access into the program as I wanted to start seriously looking at article marketing as a way to boost offline client websites to the first page of Google at a more reliable/easy rate.

I signed up with UAW and MyArticleNetwork, and then after hammering Brad with questions, was able to also gain access to SEO Linkvine before the "official" opening (mind you a limited amount of users had already been able to pay to access it early also)

Essentially Brad took what he liked and found powerful in the other networks (as far as features), but also added the features he thought were horribly absent (the built in keyword rank tracking system etc. are amazing) and put them into work with his OWN private network community of websites (not literally just sites he owns, but other blgo sites etc. that aren't part of the MAN/UAW network)

So far I'm already seeing my articles showing up in Google and its only been a couple days, so that's great in my eyes as this gave me an early head start even vs the MAN and UAW articles.

I can see the confusion being the 10,000+ blog network comparison, making everyone think they are the same network, but from what I can tell they are not...or at least Google seems to be finding SEOLV articles pretty fast (as I wrote similar articles for the other sites)

All in all I'd have to rank them:

1) SEO Linkvine
2) Unique Article Wizard
3) MAN

and POSSIBLY ArticleRank in there, but I haven't fully tested it out yet, so I can't really comment.

Hope that helps!

~Dexx

Like Dexx I also got early access to SLV.

I'm a self confessed blog network geek, I think I have tried pretty much all of them.

I have SLV for about 2 weeks now and I have submitted articles every single day (well actually not during the week ends)

Before I give you my impressions look at MY stats (screenshot taken from the members area)


Yes... that's about 3,000 blogs publishing my articles and 1,000+ are still pending for approval.

That's really good, especially knowing that more blogs will be added to the system when it will go live, each member will have the possibility to submit their own blogs to get fresh content.

I personally only use SLV to get backlinks so this is mainly what I have played with during those 2 weeks.

In my articles (that are all spinnable) I have added at least 1 non spinnable sentence, just to be able to find where they would be posted.

I have been very happy to see the quality of the blogs in the network - I have several PR2, PR3 or even PR4 backlinks.

With time I suppose the network is going to become even stronger.

It's very easy to submit articles, I prefer it over the other networks, I find it faster. One feature that I liked is that we can select several categories at once by using check boxes while in other networks lile MAN you would have to submit several times the same article to select different categories.

The stats are easy to read, we can see how many times each article has been published as well as having a general overview.

As Dexx said there is also the rank checker that is very useful, so you don't have to go to google each time to check all your keywords/rankings.

At the price it's going to launch I really think it is a wise investment - much more affordable than other networks and I find it better too!

Vita Vee

[DELETED]

thanks for the reviews guys, i am looking forward to this also. I am impressed by those tracking and stats features and the price looks very "civil" also. If my instincts are right this looks like it might become very good - early reviewers and testers in the beta seem to confirm this!

This does look good especially with results from those stats. Does it have the ability to set the number of submissions per day like UAW? Also...I must have missed seeing it, but what is the monthly fee?

james, articleranks is an industry leader? I dont know..but i had the impression its more a "smaller" system by one of our warriors? Make no mistake, i USE it and i love it..its very good. Just didnt know its already considered industry leading...

I'm using this service as an autoblog on one of my website -- I only selected 'Sprituality' and I got some unrelated blog posts...like Piano lessons???

maybe someone tagged posts wrong? possible...

Thanks for all your comments to this thread,

BR LASSE

I can safely assume that LD is about 1000x harder to learn, its a BEAST and almost too much for me even.

Having not seen SEOLV, but i am pretty sure it works like your typical blog network distribution, you submit articles, select categories, can SPIN them etc.... about 1000x more straight forward and easier to use than LD. I would really need to spend a month just learning how to use LD right.

Great review Vita, BTW many many articles you submitted in those 2 weeks?

The thing that sticks in my mind was the offer of a 1.00 to put a blog in the system. If a large % of blogs are in the system are owned by someone else, they could leave or just lose or stop taking care of the blog. Keeping links built , live and growing is the goal on the effort. If all the blogs are privately owned , that is one thing, but just getting articles for their sites and changing what they are doing later and scraping the content put into a blog network concern me.

We have other threads about LD where it would be more appropriate for you to post this.

However, don't confuse 'complicated, confused and difficult to learn' with 'quality'. In another thread, you'll find an LD user complaining about the low quality of some of the blog posts within the LD system. There seems to be the same complaint made of all these systems and it would be interesting to hear how Brad intends to maintain quality posts within his system.

Pearson

Brad,

question:

Is this a fixed network with a set number of blogs or are the blogs by the users themselves (therefore dynamic)?

Ben, the big thing is consistency if you want to avoid the Sandbox.

Most people, when they first get started, will blast out 100+ links to site within the first 2 days...and then send 3-5 backlinks a day after that...

Which seems suspicious to Google!

So if you don't think you can maintain a constant stream of links, then its best to keep it looking normal and very minimal.

Now if you can do, like Brad did, and submit articles frequently so that a constant stream of new backlinks (with varying anchor keywords) keep flowing to the site, then it looks like the site is "popular" and "liked" by Google and they won't hate it.

Otherwise every news-related issue would be an instant sandbox and nobody would use Google (i.e. Michael Jackson's death had the whole internet spiking...but main of the news site articles were being linked to for days/weeks to come as they kept the interest of the public)

Make sense?

~Dexx

Just wanted to chip in on the review:

I was glad that I'm in the beta version. I did a test of Brad's system where I am reviving a website that is somewhere in page 3 rankings.

It has been in page 3 or 4 for 5-6 months and I did nothing else to it.

I changed the website from blog to pure HTML page, submitted a spinned article to SEO Link Vine ONLY. No other backlinks activities.

Started the test on 19 April 2010, I had 23 articles published so far, and this website is currently sitting at #10 place.

A big jump from 30+ position.

Conclusion? It's good, go get it!

Hey Brad, How much is SEO Linkvine going to cost?

Brad,

At $47 it seems like a good bargain. Count me in. Btw how long is the launch price going to last?

Oh and i hope that you will monitor sites that are submitted into the network to maintain the quality of it.

$47p/m to gain access to another well controlled network combined
with a back end interface with stats, spinning and a cherry on the top
in the form of what appears to be an integrated Market Sam lite rank checker.

Pretty much no brainer territory really at this money.

I'll be having a good play and will report back.

Hi,

My question also about importing "the best spinner".

Gary

TBS {utilizes|uses|produces} {standard|normal} jet spinner syntax.

Brad,
It looks pretty good to me too. Count me in. Link building by hand is just too tedious, although I'll continue to do it, this would sure speed things up. Launch price seems right too.

Steve

It looks like SEOLV will be a good tool/network... if you use it.

Regarding spinning... does it really matter other than being able to vary your anchor text and/or url? For instance, even with a large amount of spinning done to an article will version 1 be much different than version 2 because won't version 2 simply be 99% the same as version 1 because it only spins the first spin item it comes to?

Brad, maybe this is a feature that could be implemented to take it to the next level in SEOLV... come up with a way to spin one article into a group of articles that are a minimum % different from each other? For example... 1000 versions are created from a spin and 38 articles are a minimum 68% different from each other?

Maybe this is just WAY too advanced of an idea or not even necessary... I don't know.

But there is Copyscape so I'm sure a comparison engine of some sort could be built that could pull this off. I guess the process would take version 1 and find the next version that will be the minimum percentage different (let's say it's a variable and say 68%) that happens to be version 38... then it continues to find the next version that is at least 68% different than version 38 and when it does it also double checks the minimum difference with version 1 as well... and so on and so on until you get X amount of articles that are INDEED different and subsequently submitted to the network.

It's late, my brain hurt thinking about and typing out that solution... I'm out!

-John

Yes i know its off-topic, but also "somewhat" related to the subject.

Funny i had the same thoughts today about spinning,whether the search engines are actually smart enough and know the synonyms.

Makes sense that more complex spinning (sentences, paragraphs) would be better.

BUT....if we use articles to distribute to OTHER sites (as in blog networks like seolinkvine et al..) does it actually matter (for us)? [I know it matters for the sites who want unique content]

What i mean is, let's take a simple example:

I have an article linking to my site, and i submit the article to article directories (or blog networks for distribution). So even if my article would appear 1:1 unchanged on other article directories or sites...it is hardly to imagine that it "hurts" *my* site if my article is syndicated, as is so often the case eg. by submitting to ezine articles etc. Everyone and their mom is taking articles from such directories and re-uses them.

What hurts would be the site in question since it has duplicate content, but not my site. I would still benefit from the link to my site?

I cannot see google "penalizing" a site because many other sites (re-)use that content and link back to the site....in fact, it should be an indication that the site where the article is from is quite an authority since so many use that article? So, for the one distributing and wanting backlinks, spinning MIGHT not be so crucial.

Well the debate can go well into the night for spun articles and it's effectiveness. But personally i think that unique articles from different site/blog ip's linking to your site beats duplicate articles from different ip's linking to your site. Simplified.

Yep just spinning words won't cut it these days. Google has a $100 billion budget pays the best money for the most intelligent people on earth to work for them and we IM's beat them with a bit of spinning. I don't think so!

I rewrite each paragraph once, each sentence within each paragraph three times and spin words within sentences. Takes me 45 minutes to an hour but I get 100% uniqueness every time and end up with 100's and 100's of UNIQUE articles for an hours work at most.

So my question earlier has been answered, thanks. I can put this in SEOLV which is great news.

One final point on spinning is that I have blogs where I took UAW articles. But they were poorly spun and I kept on getting the same articles over and over with very little difference. Having dupe content on your site is not a good thing, I think we all agree about that!

In the end I pulled UAW articles from my blogs as I felt they were doing more harm than good. I'll do the same if the articles from SEOLV do the same. Hopefully the articles will be unique enough to warrant being used on my blogs. I know for sure that my articles to SEOLV will be top quality!!

I think the best spinner might not be the best after all - check out the magic article rewriter, they had a powerful auto spin library that work almost as good as contentboss.

Brad - is there going to be a limit on the number of posts per day? The number of sites promoted?

I'm just wondering if I'm promoting multiple sites, at what point is one account not enough?

Brad - here is a 6 level deep example that works correctly (I built my own spinner about 8 years ago, before someone leaked the idea of spinning)

{A1 {B1 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } }|b2 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } }|b3 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } |A2 {B4 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } }|b5 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } }|b6 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } |A3 {B7 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } }|B8 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } }|B9 {c1 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c2 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } |c3 {d1 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d2 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } }|d3 {e1 {f1|f2|f3}|e2 {f1|f2|f3}|e3 {f1|f2|f3 } } } } } }

Hint Hint: spinning isn't just for articles... it is great for web pages too!

Hey Poker, great, thanks for the free ultra spinnable article

I have just tried it and it works well. Here are some variations I'm getting:

A3 B7 c1 d3 e2 f3
A1 B1 c2 d1 e1 f3
A3 B8 c1 d3 e3 f2

So I messed up somewhere when I tried it myself

00:00:22:48 to the grand opening. I'm getting chills

VitaVee, those imbalanced brackets are a b*tch. I used to have a script that checked for them and highlighted the block of code with the bad balance in red, but now with nested brackets, I just haven't been able to get my head around it.

So for {A {1|2|3 |B {1|2|3 } } it is obvious to us that there is a bracket missing after the first 3... OR did we mean that B {1|2|3} was the 4th option of the first nested spin, which case, we're missing the close of the outside bracket. :confused::confused::confused:

That's the hard part of error checking when there is nesting. Even if I flag the start of the first imbalance, that would be {A, which I guess gives some indication, but really you need a clean spinner that just shows you the result of your spin, spot the first stray bracket and back track.

Awesome. Thanks Poker. And good to hear it's working Vita. I'm looking forward to connecting with the members a week or so after we go live, to gather feature additions. That's the part I love about the internet marketing group. There are so many smart people all willing to help each other out.

Brad

Ok i just signed up. There was a bonus for the first 25 signups. Did i make the bonus Brad?

Now to take it for a spin...

Just purchased SEO linkvine; however I can not seem to log into my account? Please help so I can begin using it to build backlinks.

Thanks

Did I make the bonus?

Anybody else have issues with the order process?

Payment went via CB fine, ended up on page saying, you do not have an account so register here.

Did that, ended up logged in but.. with no access.

When I click uploading articles etc, I'm taken back to a payment option screen.

Only me ?

It's working well for me

Finally I am in; now its time to test and play.

Congratz to all the new users

Don't forget to submit some blogs too so we can get more backlinks

And if possible when you add a new blog to the system try to setup some autolink process to have backlinks created to all your new fresh content (ping.fm is your friend)

Hey Warriors,

I'll give one free Ultra Spinnable Article to the first 3 SEOLV customers who PM me
No matter if you purchased it from my affiliate link or not.

Just a gift to support Brad's SEOLinkVine

Make sure that you send me your CB receipt!

PS: If you don't know what an Ultra Spinnable Article is, look at my sig!

UPDATE

Offer not available anymore The 3 spots have been taken.

Hey Vita,

I left a comment recently in your USA WSO when you get a chance to check it out.

Thnx!

~Dexx

I cannot order for some reason.. won't navigate to checkout for some reason. Think this may be on my end.. but i've been trying since the second the launch email hit my gmail. m

I've looked at the videos, but can't seem to find what the word count should be for your articles. Does anyone know the limits?

Brad, this is a nice tool. Clean interface and easy to get around.

On my autoblog, I notice some folks do not even put an anchor link in their article at all.

Now, what would be the purpose? They're not getting backlinks for not having links in their articles.

I got so many emails about this product that I was just going to brush it off. But then I read this tread & just signed up.

I respect reviews from warriors since they are not dropping aff links and there are several really good reviews here.
Brad sounds like you definitely have a winner!
Patricia

What if there are not enough blogs to post to based on your niche?

for example what if my niche was about red dresses.... and there are only 13 blogs about clothing???

Is there a specific niche or niches that this blog network caters towards best?

I remember being a member of AMA but it completely sucked for me because there were not many blogs to post to.

Is there a way to see if this is good for my niche? or perhaps I'll just have to test it.

Hey Brad I gotta say I love what you've created here. It's so easy to use. I've just added three blogs and three articles in a couple of hours. 1 article of mine has been published already and I've received three which were really good quality.

I timed myself at 19 secs so I'm hoping I got in the first 25!!!

It's good to hear more blogs will be added soon. I've got some very small niches where I've not been able to find suitable categories yet. I assume this will improve as the network expands.

Are we able to add images to the articles. I know we can add video but didn't see anything about images.

Thanks,

Phil

SeoLinkVine leaves a BIG FOOTPRINT

"Posted by SeoLinkVine"

---> this is extremely, extremely bad!!

People talking about it on other forums already, the blogs can easily identified that way. Why do you do this? This needs to be fixed ASAP in my opinion.

People are already spreading lists of all the blogs in the network...

Ok, clear now

Brad, I would like to have your reply regarding the article length and image posting questions I posted above.

Thanks...

Hey Brad

I just wanted to let you know that I wrote a review under www[dot]cash-in[dot]us/reviews/seolinkvine/ and awarded it the "Worth-It!" label.

Thanks for a great job on this product. (sorry I can't post links yet here)

Oh dear,
I was thinking for a bit of a newbie, this would be a great intro tool...but you all seem sooo far advanced, I'm wondering if I read & watched the videos incorrectly!

Would it still be worth it to get it as someone just launching out with a real product to promote?
I'm confused now...HELP please...if it's fine, I want in at $47!

Thanks,
Mary

well you do that once...and if you spin them good you basically get infinite articles So its time well spent.

I have one question tho:

Brad, do you have an idea about the current nr. of blogs in the system (i THINK you once said you add(ed) several hundreds more)...and is there statistics about the quality/PR of those blogs?

How do you ensure that no junk sites are added, how is the quality of the network kept up?

Thanks WRays...
I get you now!

There's so many angles in this field, I'm seeing one really does have to decide the focused path to take, as each path seems to go on & get deeper with each learning about it!

Amazing...

Thanks all,

I will get it then, so stand back & ...um, er, ..look for my dust then!

Kindest,
Mary

hmm....is this normal? I submitted an article 3 days ago and it has been published 3 times.....i was expecting a little more than that.

2 other articles I published 2 days ago..have not been picked up at all?

you posted them YESTERDAY <----

I really would give this more time, you cant make such an assumption after one day, IMO.

I think it has promise, but I do have a few concerns... Brad, if you could address these & help clarify...

1 -- The sales page talks about getting 28,900 backlinks in 3 months... Granted, its only been a couple of days, but my posts to the system were only sent to 2 and 5 blogs, respectively. How many blogs do you expect the typical article to run on?

By comparison, when I post through UAW, it goes out 50 per day, to about 700-800 article sites.

I'm not picking one over the other. I'm also thinking about adding AMA, just to get a wider reach. Same with SEOLinkVine. Just want to see more than 2-3 after a few days... and have a better feel for whether those articles are still going out or if they are done.

2 -- I know the posts get 3 backlinks each... so in the above you need 9633 article postings to get that many links. If each article posted gets picked up by 20 blogs, does that mean we're looking at doing 480 postings to get to those levels? If they're picked up by 200 blogs, then its only 48. I'm trying to do the math.

3 -- I read the posts that some beta tester named themselves seolinkvine and that it can act as a red flag. I know you are not adding it to everything, but that knucklehead is. So my question is this: if I publish an article and his blog picks it up, will he flag that article as being "posted by seolinkvine" and if it is, that's the kind of thing that Google can find and give a big kick in the crotch to websites that are backlinking from that blog. I know "you" aren't stamping it, but that blog owner is, and that is a big concern.

Can you either drop him/her or force him/her to change that username?

Feature wise, I do like your system a lot. I would offer a couple of suggestions for version 1.1:

1 - You mentioned earlier that spinning is OK in the titles. That should be indicated on your system

2 - You allow people to add (with a + button) additional title boxes. How about a text area type box with separate titles entered one per line? Then we can paste in 50 easily, as opposed to clicking the "add box" 49 times.

You also let us organize the articles into categories, which I like. That leads me to...

3 - When people post, they need to go through the list and "check boxes" for which categories the specific article relates to. I understand why you need that. But can you have it remember the check boxes from the other articles (or last article) within that category, and have them pre-checked next time we add another?

For example, if I have a category about "solar energy" then all my articles will apply to the same categories... it would be great to avoid running down that category checklist on every single article...

Overall, I give it a thumbs up and just hope to see some distribution kicking in.

I'm also contemplating putting up some WordPress blogs and letting you feed the monster

Hey Poker, thanks for the recommendations. As soon as I get to the office in a couple of hours I'll see what we can do about adding ALL of those. I really like the category one and that's already on our "to do" list. As is making the spinner much much better. About your question about the seolv user. I wouldn't be concerned, but we have contacted the owner and have asked him politely to change his settings. If he doesn't, we may suspend his free account. But, I honestly wouldn't be worried about it. Thanks again for the feature recommendations. We're on it. Oh, and about the speed of article publishing, it will pick up. See my post above about that. Thanks!

Update: I'm in the office now. Spoke with developers and in a couple of hours we'll have these added:

1. ability to paste in multiple titles (separated by a new line, so you don't have to hit the "+" symbol each time) and SEOLV will automatically insert the spin tags for you.

2. An autosave feature, so incase something happens to your browser or you have to leave in the middle of formatting an article, it will save for you.

3. Having the preselected categories from previous OR even previous project types wasn't something that we can add and the reason is that it would like lead to much more "off topic" content being posted on user's websites. Some users would get in a rush and publish articles to categories that weren't good fits for, just because it was fast and easy. We're really trying to give the blog owners the content they expect, and this would unfortunately not help with that. Good idea though.

4. More to come...

Brad

I'm really happy with this system. Finally one that works and is very simple to use. I sent three articles on the first day and the last count they've been published 17 times in very tight niches.

Once we get more categories and sub categories added things will improve even more. At the moment I'm rejecting more articles to my blogs than I'm accepting due to the fact my blogs are in small niches and the articles don't fit in.

Brad,

I just signed up and have come across a bug of sorts. When I added my websites and tried to select categories. When selecting the categories, the program doesn't recognize what I am clicking.

For example if I open health and fitness and then proceed to select "cardio" it selects 42 categories excluding cardio. If i select "muscle" it selects about 12 categories excluding muscle.

I submitted a ticket and hope to hear a response soon. Other than that great service for getting backlinks!

Getting the same category error as you guys. It was okay a day ago. Probably a small bug Brad has to step on.

I received an e-mail from support stating that the issue has been fixed.
Will double check in a bit

It's working now! phew, that was quick

Brad,

Just thought you'd want to know the article wysiwyg is buggy using IE 7.0. (Yeah, people still use that.) The wysiwyg doesn't even appear. Fine in FF.

--Max

Wow, this is one sure fire way to learn about a new tool!

Was just reading somewhere else about why blogs are becoming our central hub for our branding efforts.

Very clever tool here Brad...congrats!
Yup, Blog/valuable, informative content ++/social media, ...wow!

It's a huge new business model about to explode.
Now I can see why Google is getting edgy, indexing Tweets etc etc...

Exciting times ahead.

Kindest,
Mary

Well its not *that* new, such blog networks exists for some time already. Known names are UAW (Unique Article Wizard), AMA/MAN etc.. and now SEOLV of course

Agreed.
As a newbie getting to understand traffic sources & SEO intricacies, valuable content is always on top of the list.

So, with a tool as efficient as Brad has made, I'm figuring he has put a "dictionary" of top quality terms inside the software (or whatever) to make it create quality new content each time it's used.

Good info here people, keep it coming...thanks

Kindest,
Mary

Still have concerns long term for any links made. If LV does not own all the blogs they are a X factor long term and a integral part of the system. They will come and go and so will the links. If LinkVine owned 5000 blogs, that's good but here we are counting on people to add theirs, stay in , renew domains, etc.

Looks interresting.

But why use Brad Callens SEOLinkVine, if we are allready useing Matt Callens MyArticleNetwork?

I asume it is the same network, or am I wrong here, Brad?

For me, the thesaurus has proven to basically be useless for the 10 articles I've submitted so far. Very few of the suggestions fit at all. If it had the capability of the the best spinner then this would be an over the top app.

That said, I still like this program and glad I signed up. I'm looking forward to the many positive changes Brad has said will be implemented. Right now it is simply seems to be going through some growing pains with the backlog of unapproved article submissions and needing to have many more blogs in the system.

[DELETED]

Wanted to check some reviews about this product, and all I got was this thread of whiners. Anyway, I'll check it out for myself. Thank you very much.

hey guys, i just signed up.

How much are you guys spinning? one sentence 3 times plus internal word spins? or are you guys doing the UAW type paragraph spins?

From watching the video, the examples look under-spun. Advise anyone?

Hey guys I will give the thumbs up to SEOLV

I am a big fan of this service and MAN

In my opinion the more of these networks a person uses the better, simply because they all have different sites in the network.

I have deep respect for the coder of LD, she must be such a hardcore geek. But its just such a steep learning curve.

As for those networks like SEOLV and articleranks...i wish that many people sign up and also add good sites to them to make any/both of those networks top notch!

dotcomdesigns: i think he's just stirring things up.

I can't wait till the middle of the month when I can finally join SEOLV

SEO is really good way to do this work.I am also doing the same thing for my website.You can get good links from seo.

What PR backlink one can get from SEOLV network?

I have looked at these programs before and have thought about signing up. It sounds great, but I always have one question on it.

What stops Google staff, etc. from going out and subscribing to these networks and finding domains involved and discounting links from it or banning sites etc?

Does anyone know how long the $47 price is going to be around for SEOV please? Thanks,
Mary

I've read though a lot of this thread, and there are a few good questions that I didn't see answered.

1. What is the general PR range for network?

2. I always heard it's NOT about the number of backlinks, it's the SEO value they provide. A lower number of High PR sites will do more good then a lot of LOW pr backlinks... How is this any better than the free traffic system? (other than a better spinner)

3. Do you just sumbit to blogs, or is it blogs & article directories?

Can someone clarify?

Does anybody know when the price will rise from $47 to $97

In what order would you guys use the following paid tools? Meaning if you had to rate them in order of which you would buy and use first. Bookmarking Demon, Senuke, and SEO LinkVine.

Thanks guys.

Hi Brad:

I've got a few questions:

1. What is the general PR range for network?

2. I always heard it's NOT about the number of backlinks, it's the SEO value they provide. A lower number of High PR sites will do more good then a lot of LOW pr backlinks... How is this any better than the free traffic system? (other than a better spinner)

3. Do you just sumbit to blogs, or is it blogs & article directories?

Can you clarify?

Hi Brad. I have a question for you. Why do you think that articles over 500 words will help more with the rankings?

Why are 300 words articles less likely to help?

One reason I can understand is that some blogs and article directories don't accept articles less than 400. Any other good reason? I'm thinking to try SEOLV.

Do you allow spinning of title, article body, summary and resource boxes? Do you allow nested spinning? Do you allow gradual or scheduled submissions?

Waiting for your reply now.

Hi Brad,
As a user of SEOLinkVine, I have a couple of questions. Firstly, I'd like to say how impressed I am in general with the product. You've created a very simple (and I hope very powerful) piece of software. So far the content being delivered to one of my blogs is spot one and very relevant.

My question for you is around getting my articles published. I've now submitted 3 articles to the network (1 on 28th, 1 on 29th and 1 today) and so far only the first one has been submitted to the network (although no-one has yet approved this article). The other 2 articles have not been submitted (I noticed the you are experiencing a delay in submitting - Is this the issue?)

IMHO the articles are of high quality (of course, I would say that ) so I was wondering if there is some reason that only the first article has been submitted and also why it has yet to be published? Any tips of insights would be great.

Thanks

Hi Brad

Great system you got here but,
Why should we put post on our blogs
that will drive people to other sites, I found
a good article for my site but I'm not sure
if I want to post it because my site is starting
to make some money but I really dont want them
to leave my site and go buy a similar product that
I'm selling it might even be the same product.

Anybody can comment on this please.

Alexis

Pardon my ignorance here, but do the Search Engines have a choice when "listing" a site?
I mean, is it optional for them?

I never thought about it before, but if the so called "porn" sites & all that type of stuff that are out there, how do they get found if a search engine doesn't list them?

I'm not into that stuff, but I got to thinking, from this conversation, that it seems grossly discriminatory of S/E's to sandbox or slap you isn't it, when you're into G rated commerce?

It seems they have 2 levels of "morals"!

Kindest,
Mary

I agree with the quality of blogs in the network. This can make you or break you so to speak. Brad, if you want long lasting happy campers on your network, weed out those spammy sites which could infact even hurt your whole network in the long run. Those .info's seems to be spammy at first sight. Haven't seen a good .info site in the network...yet.

I'm sure that most will agree with this and won't even mind paying about $100 per month for a high quality blog network. That is all that matters to me. A good, well monitored quality network with links to my site.

Very happy with SEOLV so far and I got to say: My articles have been published over 100 times (in total) already, even though we're apparently in a slow phase because of the poblems Brad mentioned earlier.

Anyway, I have one suggestion I'd like to make: Right now, the rank-checking tool simply picks up every combination of keywords and URL it finds in the articles and starts tracking those. Could you include an option to turn this off, so that the tracking tool only tracks keywords and URLs that the user inputs manually?

I personally like to get a good amount of variation in my anchor texts, to make the backlinks look more natural. This means that I always have to manually remove the listings from the rank-tracker that are just spun variations of my actual, targeted keyword.

I personally thoughts I wouldn't even be using the tracking tool, since I have (expensive) software to do this already. But I reall like the SEOLV tool and it's actually better than what I've been using so far.

it should help all kinds of sites...just do some keyword research and know what keywords you want to rank for.

Guys be realistic. Most blogs in such networks ARE auto blogs because by the time they will actually review the article manually, it will already be published on several other blogs making it duplicate. If you auto accept it, you have the possibility to be at least amongst the first few publishers of that article.

@Brad: Thanks a lot for your detailed reply. I spin my articles before submitting them to any network so 550 will be nearly double work for me, right? Will the benefits far outweigh the efforts in that case? I normally prefer a bit above 300 words, say 315 words. Is that going to be okay with SEOLV?

Since this is going on for a little now, can someone already post results, eg. how many of your articles got distributed since you signed up? So we have a comparison to other such networks?

Brad

I'm aware with AMA that your articles are submitted into their network for only 60 days where you get 1 to 4 links. After that you have to resubmit your articles again.

Is this the same with SEO Linkvine?

I surely hope not!

well i have officially given up with it. 5 articles and about 6 posts in a week. Told time and time again to wait......but I have given up. Maybe it's not for my niche? But the sales copy never mentioned this? Good bye

I have been using UAW and AMA for over a year and those 1000s articles are pointing to around 100 or so different sites.

So it's not 1000 articles at one site.

I do deep linking for all my sites, and 20 of the sites have at least 25 pages minimum.

Hi Brad,

I have a couple of websites in the male enhancement niche. Do you accept this type of content?

I joined a couple days ago and dropped in 3 of my higher-quality new items with a high-level of spin (all manually coded).

So far 0 pickups.

Kind of think there needs to be a limit per user if many people just re-dumping 1000s of articles causes a backflow.

Looking at the guy's stats above, it seems that on average each article gets 10 approvals. That's not bad since you can use the content elsewhere if it's high-level stuff.

I'm just planning for 1 high-level release each day for basically one of my sites to SEOLV to see what happens at the end of the month.

I'm pretty certain you can expect more than 10 approvals/article.

I already have several articles posted on 20 blogs, despite the backlog issue.

Hi everyone, i'm new to the forum and I was looking at some SEO link vine reviews...this thread is awesome. And I wanted to ask you guys (I know you're the experts) a couple of questions:

1.- I was on the "dark side" (black hat SEO) and eventually, I got pretty punished by google.. they deindexed ALL of my sites and dropped their page rank. Yeah I know, learned the lesson the HARD WAY.. sorry , never going to do that again. But I'm worried that every new site that I make Is going to get deindexed because my name was on those sites (second error... keep them coming hahaha). So the questions .. are my new sites safe from "eternal punishment" ?? .. if not... what should i do?? ... and more important.. is SEO Link vine safe from this??

2.- I want to attack spanish markets, could SEO Link Vine help me on this?


Thank you a lot for your time guys, I really appreciate it

Well, I've been using this for a week now, and here are my results:

I've only submitted 4 articles. They've each been about 300-350 words long, and spun to 80%.

Of those, two have been picked up and published eleven times, while one has only been submitted to two other blogs, and the last I just put in yesterday (it hasn't been submitted to any blogs yet). The first one I wrote last Tuesday only has been submitted twice. It's in the gardening niche. I don't know if it's stuck, or there are only two gardening blogs to post to, or it just got stuck in the backlog.

But of the two that have been published, I've seen a significant improval in the SERPS. One has gone from number nine to number four, and the other has gone from eleven to seven.

So overall, I'm pretty happy. It's a very easy to use system with just a few things that could be improved, like the spinner and the accept time. I'm hoping that today's promotion will give us a lot more blogs to publish to, and hopefully we'll continue to see the results!

@GeorgeR: I know what I'm talking about. Duplicate content doesn't hurt but do you know that multiple duplicate content pages can't exist on the same Google results page?

I know of the news aggregator sites too and how they scrape content from others.

The truth is that most blogs don't moderate articles and they just auto accept the articles. The networks have the staff to check articles, so blog owners don't have to moderate articles. There are VERY few bloggers who'd look at such auto networks for content to keep their blogs alive.

So everyone will like to have their post published before others so they can be considered more unique and have greater chances to appear on the first page. This factor IS important. They need the traffic after all, right?

[DELETED]

Brad,

i like what i see, but i have a minor issue with your editor:

When i paste in my spun articles and add hyperlinks, it doesnt seem to get the spaces right in front of the hyperlink - and i always need to fiddle around in the HTML code to correct it. Example:

So it would either either two spaces before the hyperlink or none.

Edit: Seems to work now? Maybe i had a bad copy/paste job

Anyone know if article approval/publishing is random?

The article I did yesterday is live and has been used 6 times so far. However, the ones I did before that are still not published I guess (NA).

Can you guys tell me how you submit "thousands" of articles? In what time did you submit about 1000 of articles? I assume you are with SEOLV since the beta...or you do nothing else the whole day than submitting?

Im using a WP blog, and using SEOLV has gotten my blog suspended for violating the ToS.

Am I the only one this has happened to? Ways to fix this?

Brad, please read http://www.warriorforum.com/internet...ml#post2064196

Issue still persists. The problem appears any time when a hyperlink is put right after a bracked as it seems. Eg. {spin1 | spin2 } http:// somelink.com

It doesnt recognize that separating space unless i add &nbsp; right into the HTML after the bracket.

I know that there's a huge queue going on right now but i've got an article in que (posted once though) backlogged probably 72+ hours now. And i set up postings to 10 per day (i know it's probably max 10 but i'm now not getting min 1 per day).

Yup, i do know that it's backlogged now but i do hope that you've got a backup plan for the future. Spammers (not calling anyone here one) might abuse the network by sending in a bunch of articles, hogging up the queue. Making the other users waiting in a long que to get their article(s) posted.

Anyways, this is what i just was thinking of due to the frustration of not seeing the max 10 articles posted per day. Hopefully this backlog will end quickly.

In general these blog farms work great initially and then they suck. It could be the quality erodes over time - I dont know.

Whenever you have a situation where people can spin junk and plaster it across blogs or web properties the effectiveness dies.

How did it take me to submit 1000 articles?

I sat there for 4 days copying and pasting the articles I had in AMA and putting them in SEO Link Vine.

I was not a Beta tester.

Each of them are spun according to the paragraphs with a minimum of 5 paragraphs each and 3 versions for one article. It's not the best spinning, but hey it works for me.

I added a site for SEOLV to see how the content taker side is. And hahaha some of the crap people submit is funny. The titles are so nonsensical it's amazing.

A couple articles looked to make sense though. Not SEOLV's fault. I just found it amusing. Being able to manually approve stuff is a big plus.

Spinning is like anything else. You can suck at it and produce crap (90% of the people) or you can be good at it and produce good stuff on an upward sliding scale (10% of the people).

I just got SEO articles on an "anti spam" site of mine which i only have under one category which is "spam blockers".

If people keep sending out unrelated articles to the WRONG categories/blogs i will surely start reporting each and any of those articles. (Assuming its not a fault on SEOLV side).

Secondly, i wonder whether Brad could add more strict options for auto reject, not only 30%, maybe even 50% or 75%?

Now to all experienced article writers & article spinners, this is a no brainer to you, so be patient with me please, as I piece this scenario together to see why people would just submit "junk articles" as described..

As a newbie, wanting to get traffic to my new site, I submit hand written articles to this LinkVine Tool/site.

Then I pop it in the tool, perform correct wizardry according to instructions, then pop the resultant articles (after checking them?) in the queue for publishing to relevant blog owners sites.

The recipient blog owners are to read each article for worthiness to be added to their sites & presto...there's another place that has my link out there.

Now, is that the process please?

If so, what's the reason people would want junky stuff going out in their names in the first place & secondly, why would the blog owners want junky stuff on their sites too?

Seeing as the articles are going to blog sites...why all the "fuss" about back links etc,

Aren't blogs a bit WOM'y (Word of Mouth) & good stuff is regularly passed on via readers to their own networks & so on?

Wouldn't that count more than submitting junky stuff, hoping to get lots of links & really not getting them?

This is my take on where Blogging is going to fit in to the scene over the next few years (only my opinion) & I can see great potential in a well monitored & managed blogging "farm" as someone called it back there!

Quote
From what I'm picking up about blogging is that it seems to be...or maybe, needs to be...the central hub of You Inc.

I feel that it's such a wild place out there that you are just a grain of sand on the beach unless you can rally a following.

The secret to it all seems to be to have something on your blog that will entice people visiting to want to hang around & chat to you & others a bit.

A poll is reported to be a good way for them to offer you suggestions on what they'd like you to offer them.
Others say to have some fun competitions, anything to engage the visitor,,. long enough for them to want to post something & then to come back & see if you have responded, or to see other comments.

I think also, that the days of cold fast blasting posts for content/link building etc are changing to a more community based affair with your audience & people respond warmly & build relationships with real people.

People want to be cared for, connected and cared about.

Perhaps the cold hard interface of the online world is morphing into a living breathing organism that really does want to connect & I think Blogging is the perfect vehicle.

I've only just begun to "get" this facet, which I think is the future of building a long & sustainable online business.

That's my take on it anyways! . ..end quote

Kindest,
Mary

Is anyone else having problems with adding their wp blogs to the network. I created a new author username and password, but i get the:

But when i insert these into selink vine i still get the error:
Error: Error while trying to verify user credentials OR the blog URL is not correct.
Reported error: [XML-RPC #403]: Bad login/pass combination.

However when i simply use my normal WP login it works.
But for security reasons i would rather use author username and password.

Am i suppose to add something at the end of my blogs url in order to get the author to work?

I have to reject lots of articles every day, wrong category, badly spun articles, really badly spun articles, the story goes on. I wish I could approve more to my sites but on the other hand I'm really glad I have the control I have right now, so I can eliminate the junk. If my site is let's say on low cholesterol and I get an article on acne or kitchen cleaning, sorry but that'll be rejected since it's clearly not under the scope of my site.

On another note, I've added the day before yesterday and yesterday an article each and so far both are 0 approved and 0 posted. No movement, nothing, nada on them. Also I have a few from April 28 and 29 with only 16 or so postings. I know, I know, I should be patient...

I try SEOLinkVine and My account suspended

arghl...SEOLV site down, database error. (Too many connections)

Time for a new server

Brad, I joined SEO Linkvine a number of days ago. Good job on creating this network, I'm feeling confident it'll be a good one although it is early days.

A question for you though which I couldn't see in your FAQ. When I joined I spun an article I wrote and added it to your network. It went live and the next day it shown 4 pending, 1 published and none rejected. The thing is, since then there have been no more requests made etc. This is a handful of days later. Also, the day after that submission I submitted another spun article. It's been a couple of days since then and all the stats are showing the same.

I'm hoping that by Monday i will show many more requests, and a few published for both my submissions but just wanted to make sure this is how it should be and to check that my submissions haven't become 'inactive' for some reason.

Cheers

Andy

Just joined linkvine. Got 2 published and 2 pending within 5 minutes since i posted my spun article.

I am not sure if this are already in place but i do think to help both article publisher and blog owners we could:

1) only allow pr 1 or 2 and above site to be in the network.
2) only have manually accepted articles to be published (i mean if you are a sincere blog owner whom wants quality content to be publish, you would definately want to review the article to ensure they are of good readable quality.)
3) give article publisher a report with where the links are placed so that they can review them easily and report any spammy blogs
4) give blog owner the power to report very unreadable content and disable the source of the spun article. (only the article not the whole account unless this has been happening too frequently.)
5) last but not least but probably impossible, review new sites and content submitted. For example, just check through 3-5 spin of the article before allowing it to reach the network of blogs. i dont mind waiting a few days to get things running.

Would really prefer quality of quantity anytime. Somehow i have a feeling the 2 post that were accepted and posted so quickly would probably belong to some spammy blog. O yar how about adding a forum within for all linkvinner to gather and discuss and give feedback to you too. =)

Just my 2 cents worth of thoughs.

I'm willing to see how it pans out over a month or two with this system and will most likely keep subscribed as Brad produces great software and networks. So I'll bear with him on this and suggest that everyon else does too. At least for a few weeks.

It's like any system. After going live it takes time to evaluate its workings and will most likely need ammending or tweaking in some way. I'll be going through this same process myself shortly with Link Abyss. It's all fun and games... but I'm sure Brad will be triumphant with this network.

Hi Andy, it's tough to say without looking at your account, BUT:

1. Submit to as many categories as you're allotted. I see some submitting to like 1 or 2 subcategories and that's it... The chances of there being many blogs related ONLY to 2 tiny subcategories is slim in none. So, be sure to choose as many related categories as you can.

2. Please pm me your registered email address.

For anyone else that has any sort of "bug related" questions, please submit a support ticket and don't post here. It takes me 10x longer to check back and forth with the forum here than respond directly to a support ticket. I want to help fast, and it's just not practical to check the forum every 5 minutes. I've been in the desk with my team for these first few days after launch to make sure anything that needs fixed gets fixed FAST.

Here is the link to the support desk:

Support Desk

Thanks so much!

Brad
P.S. George, the spinner/spacing issue you mentioned above is FIXED. Thanks for pm'ing me a vid of the problem. Everyone else that's pm'd me, I've responded to you also :-)
P.P.S. We're split testing prices right now, but here is the URL to the lowest price, since I did mention earlier that we weren't planning on increasing the price for another month and it's been 1 week. Response has been higher than I expected, so we're trying to slow down purchases by testing a higher price. Going for quality over quantity. Here is the low price though: http://www.seolinkvine.com/get_traffic_b.php

Question, i just got an email where you talk about "upgrading to unlimited submissions". I didnt even know there was another way to use it with "limited" submissions?

Hi George, can you please submit tickets etc. with stuff like this?

This thread will go on forever if questions like these are asked here. This thread has already kind of gotten away from a review and is more of a Q & A with me, and I'm sure the mods don't want that.

But... to answer your question. If you're already a paid monthly member, which you are, you're fine. This is for those that signed up for the "get content" side FIRST, and then wanted to purchase article by the credit. You've never seen that option because you're already a full member.

Brad

Quick update: Today, some of the backlog seems to have cleared up, as a lot of my articles got submitted in quite short succession. Currently, I'm averaging 18 publishes per submitted article.

@ronitdeep: The tracking tool is part of SEOLV.

That's great. I did 3 as a test. 2 from 5 days ago have 0 publishes and a NA acceptance. Then I have one from a few days ago with 11 accepts and 86% acceptance. It's odd.

My niche is finance. Thought I'd see more action.

i am not sure about ow tis goes but i tried 2 industry both had 4 submitted (of which 6 is publish 1 rejected 1 pending) within the first day and it stopped. now on day 4.

Here are my stats.. so far so good. I submitted my first article just 2 days ago, and so far I've had 11 published.

Submitted for approval (26)
Approved (11)
Rejected (0)
Pending (15)
Published (11)

Will be interesting to see the improvement in the SERPS..

By the way, I'm not using the built in spinner.. I'm using 'The Best Spinner' to do all my spinning, and then pasting it into SEO LinkVine.. Everything works like a charm... I really cant say if this product is good or bad quite yet, I'll need to see the changes to my rankings over time.. but so far so good, and I really do like the keyword tool that tracks your rankings and links.. pretty slick stuff.

I hope the people complaining about the low quality of articles realize one thing - they are getting content for FREE! All they need to do is filter out the crappy things they don't like!

So it's absurd to even bitch about it, I mean, people are building your site for you, without cost of your own, and all you need to do is just read their article for a few seconds to see if it's worth it.

I think it would be good if some people stop taking things for granted and be thankful that such a service exists.

One quick thing to note for those that don't like some of the articles you're being presented with; we're adding a new module inside of SEOLV called "Articles On Demand" which will allow blog owners to actually write the topic for the EXACT article they want written on. It will then be presented to those wanting backlinks in return for writing articles. The article will be written specifically for the blog owner. And presto, everyone is happy. I just received the mockup design for this today. This week we'll be implementing it. I don't know how long it will take to program, but it should be ready soon.

Brad
P.S. Mrizos, no that's not really how it is at all. Please signup and see for yourself so you can see for yourself without just guessing.

Here is an update of mine, without any bias i can say i like the system more and more every day. I am with the system for only 5 days now - but recently it really started to take of.

I am getting a lots of pings and trackbacks, almost every time i check my emails. So i know something is going on. In those few days i submitted 13 articles, all are heavily spun with TBS.

I also added 12 of my own sites to the system.

I have not seen any "garbage" spun articles (YET) - although i had some miss-placed articles because some people just cannot get categories right. For example, they send articles about weight loss pills into "food / cooking" and then i am getting weight loss articles on my cooking recipe site, things like that.

But that's minor because you can simply reject those wrong category articles - and of course you can also reject "garbage" articles, but as said i still need to see one first!

Overall i am really very pleased with the system, both sites, article distribution and getting content! It's almost "addictive", now i want to spin and submit articles the whole day and also make and add new sites for getting content. Everything is incredible easy and straight forward. I know i sound like a TV commercial, but i think you get very good value for your money there.

(Add: That little ranking checker app is pure genius too )

Is there a "drip" feature?

Is there a "drip" feature?

thank you ! ))))

Is the price increased? I thought it's $47/month but when I proceed to order it said $67/month.

Brad, have you considered allowing people to manually set a auto reject.
Im finding 30% auto reject is not enough for me personally.

Also i have noticed a big different with the rewrite % seolinkvine is giving me in comparison to Dupefree Pro. Dupefree pro is much more accurate.

Mrizos,

If I were you, I'd just give it a try. I'm not affiliated with Brad or his products in any way, so I have absolutely nothing to gain from you trying out SEO LinkVine. However, what I do know is once you do try it, you'll quickly realize what a little gem Brad has managed to create.

This is the the ONLY tool, I would recommend to my friends. It's everything Brad advertises.. I'm truly impressed.

My first two articles finally got picked up. Nothing mind blowing, but they are live now. Not sure why it took about 7 days though.

At any rate, I'd definitely try it out before the price goes up. Worst case, you get some links and dump a 50 spot. Unlike buying software and books, you're guaranteed to get something back for your money here.

Any chance of making an option where the article creator can give the site owner the right to create their own title? Was just thinking that since the title is a major SEO component that it would improve things.

Or not ...

Just to pop in here guys.

SEO Link Vine, is not a WL of AMA as some have suggested here.

As many know Brad and I are good mates, though this is not anything to do with AMA, though you will see us in our training reccomending many link networks SEOLV being one of them.

Cheers
Marc

Hi Brad

I just wasted more than $100 on linkracer and bought the top package of 5000 links to my website and it has been more than 2 months and I only had less than 5 showing on seoquake. Basically I wasted my time hoping and checking my sites every now and then and found out today that most likely it could be a scam.

I am definitely looking for a replacement, my question here is:

1)Is your concept the same as linkracer?

2)Can google stripped our backlinks if they decide to penalized the blogs?


Thanks
Lina

Is anyone in the top 10 for the competition? i have a total of 100 points, but im still not in the top 10!!

chini...argh..and i though i am "elite" with my 12 pts... ;/

Is anyone's articles being submitted more than what they initially set?

I put mine at 10 per day. The ones I initially put on there for 10 per day, like 3-4 days ago have only been submitted 10x total.

Happening to anyone else?

Does everyone who is a member here download the rank checker application, I'm a bit wary as I thought Google didn't like automated rank checkers?

yes..works great. there is big delays so you dont get temporarily blocked by google.

I tried to add one of my blogs today to get some free content but there were no applicable sections for it.

Do you plan on adding more catagories for smaller niches?

Hi Brad, will you be adding support for blogs built using blogengine.net anytime soon? Thanks.

i've been using SEO link vine for a couple of weeks or so now and it's definitely looking to be a very good investment, especially with all the new features brad and the team are adding to it.

Hi Brad, see here:

BlogEngine.NET | An open source ASP.NET 2.0 powered blogging engine

AR publishes OK using the metaWebLog API

Found a bug:

I'm receiving my own articles, that I published, as free content and is asking me to approve/reject my own articles. Lol.

Hey digsea, thanks for your kind words. About the [] with RR, unfortunately we can't make that change quickly/easily. But what you can do (sort of a pain) but just do a search and replace where you replace [ with { and then ] with } . And you'll be good to go. This is on our "to do list" at some point.

Brad

Though this has become kind of a discussion thread (and there's nothing wrong with that), it's still in the review section.
So, for anyone who's interested, here's my video showing of some SEOLV features as part of my review of the system:

YouTube - SEOLinkVine: Article Submission Features
(HD watchable, if you go through to YouTube)

I'd do the usual "ask me anything and I'll do a video about it" thing, but since it's closing so soon, I guess it's not really worth it, this time.

Cheers,
Shane

Any chance you could add a feature where you just put in your keywords and URL's below the article in a separate field and it hyperlinks the keywords in the article to the corresponding URL's?

Hey Bad, thanks for your reply. As a TBS user, the thesaurus isn't very important to me anyway. However, I'm planning to give my review an update if you re-open SEOLV, eventually and I'll definitely take a second look at the thesaurus, by then.

-edit-

Thank you Brad! You're awesome!

Brad, no way you can get TBS API then ?

Didn't Johnathon send an email out
not long ago discussing the fact it was
"available".

It's now fully integrated into SEN.

DJBory,

I think it could be the topic of the articles and the number of blogs that are related to that subject.

I know that there are some topics where I didnt even spin them, and multiple blogs picked them up, and there are some where I spun them (over 70%), and not many were picked up.

Brad or anyone ast SEOLV really have no control over which publishers decide to publish your article, but I do fervently believe that once Brad launches the option where publishers can "request" content, it will enable us article writers to write custom written content for blogs, thus getting us lots of more of that link juice we love so much....

Hi Djbory,

Maybe the opposite is happening.

You're in a very competitive niche, which lots of people writing content for the same audience.. perhaps the blog owners just are completely inundated with articles, that they just need time to go through them. Not sure how many members there are, but if even 50 people submitted just 5 articles, thats 250 articles potentially they have to go through and approve. Maybe your articles are just in the que of several publishers who are "drip feeding" the content.

One of my niches is in parenting, and I noticed those seem to have been picked up more, compared to some of my personal tech ones.

Hey digsea, we've added support for [] so you can ignore my other post above. You should now be able to use that spinner in conjunction with SEOLV :-)

Brad

Brad,

Is there a problem with clickbank because I have tried at least 2 times to place an order for seolinkvine this morning and the order page with clickbank is not being displayed?

Donald

Hey Brad,
I submitted 3 articles 7-8 days ago and so far they've been published a combined total of 3 times. One was published twice, one published once and the other one hasn't been published. The articles are original and hand spun to over 90% using tbs and each submitted to about 5 categories. Should I delete them and resubmit, what's weird is another article I submitted a few days before these has been published 12 times.
Thanks

Hi guys im just checking does the elite memberrship include the traffic and content part?

The syndication (submission) part will be closed TOMORROW - so if you want in i would do it now! Brad did this to grow the network so people can get more links.

Tx George, so if i puchase it it is all included I also read it closes up friday!

it looks like Brad increase the price to $67 for the one day because it is closing to new memberships tomorrow

[DELETED]

Brad, is there a support forum where questions can be posted as this probably isn't the best place to post them but it's probably not worth me submitting tickets for little questions I have where as you have probably already answered the same questions a hundred times from other members?

Thanks for the link as well!

[DELETED]

I agree a forum would be a good idea

Also i think another good idea is to let us know why our articles were rejected.

When a site owner rejects an article would be good to make them give a reason so we know how to improve it

Always nice to see the owner sticking around to answer questions and help out in the forum's when they launch something!

Just signed up myself as an affiliate as Brad's stuff is always amazing (especially interface wise as he certainly knows how to make things user friendly and SEOLV is no exception).

Glad to see your promotions to get more blogs in there and was thinking about adding a few of my own but still haven't got around to it yet

Mark Blaze

Brad and others,

What is the average number of blogs your articles have been submitted to?

As always with these things it has to be factored against cost/time used. It takes quite a long time to spin articles, so is it worth it?

I have signed up for this and is hoping for great results.

Hey Richard, I pm'd you the link.

Hey Jack, that's a tough question to give a good answer for because it depends on a bunch of various factors. Some members will have a ton of publishes, some will have a moderate number of publishes and some will have a few. A lot depends on the uniqueness %, the topic, the categories/subcategories selected, etc.

What I can say is after we close SEOLV to new members today, we'll be building only the "get content" side of SEOLV, so our user base of blog owners wanting the free content will greatly increase over the next few months... bringing the ratio of "get links" users and "get content" users into one that should REALLY increase all numbers for both sides.

Plus, with the new "articles on demand" feature that should hopefully be done today, the number of publishes can depend entirely on how many articles you write. You'll be able to login to your account and see the exact article blog owners are requesting, and will be able to write specifically for them.

So, kind of a watered down answer, but hopefully that helps at least a little.

Brad

i have added a site to seolinkvine and on my Site Stats tab it says 2 articles waiting approval
Total number of articles submitted to you for approval request: 2

but when i go to get content on the site it says no requests and i havent recieved any emails to approve any artices?

I just came across an article about 'handbags' . This article was submitted to these categories

Food and Drink > Coffee
Food and Drink > Cooking Tips
News and Society > Economics
Computers and Technology > General
Food and Drink > General
News and Society > General
Home and Family > General
Shopping and Product Reviews > General
Health and Fitness > General
Shopping and Product Reviews > Gifts
Home and Family > Holidays
Food and Drink > Low Calorie
Food and Drink > Main Course
Home and Family > Parties
News and Society > Pure Opinion
Food and Drink > Tea
Food and Drink > Wine Spirits


Most of those are just wasting everybody's time. There needs to be some reporting system to complain about this.

Pearson

Hey Brad. One idea might be to restrict the number of chosen categories to, say, 3 or 4.

Pearson

It would come in handy, that if we received an article for one site but it was better suited for another site that we had in the system, that we could somehow move it over to the better suited one.
Like others have mentioned above I have received some really killer articles but the author had not chosen the best category for their article.

Is anyone's articles being submitted more than once per week?

Question:

If i receive an article, is it already randomly (pre-)spun?

I have started using SEO link Vine on 12MAY10. I have used Amautomation very heavily for my link building for approx 18 months.

I will be jamming Seo link vine full of high quality spin articles (most my spins are 98-100%), and will monitor the SERP and backlinks for my sites.

One thing that I HATE about Amautomation the links dont stick for long.... However it works, so if Seolinkvine is what it is talked up to be its going to be amazing for link building. I will update this post with my results.


Brad Callen - Two suggestions for the site:

1) When I select "project name" can we make it so the categories I have selected previously are saved?

2) To help avoid users selecting wrong categories and submitting poor quality articles, there could be a reward for the top 10 submitters. I think this would only do good for the seolinkvine network.

^Just click on Mark Blaze's sig. =)

You really should test with more than 1 article; I have been using SEO Linkvine since the first day it came out and I have to say that I really like it. Of course I use it in conjunction with AMA and UAW to get the best bang for the buck..

Mind you i am only a member for 10 days now:







No complaint at all here! I am amazed that people submit ONE article and then already considering a refund

By the way..i am also seeing rankings for some sites of mine improved. Again..i am only with SEOLV for 10 days!

well instead of complaining, add some sites to the system

I figured out a nice way to clone wordpress sites now, i myself put a bunch of insurance/loan sites in the system myself. I cant see there being only 9 in the whole system...

I have been consistently (more or less) adding articles since I joined. And while it's been a "bumpy ride" with spurts of publishes and dry spells, none of my articles appear frozen and most of them have been published more than 20 times.

So, my suggestion would be to just submit some more articles and watch it for a while.

I accidentally set the max request number to 1 a day for an article and then left it. The article has now only been published once after 3 days.

I think we really need clarification on how this works?

How often do articles get shown for siteowners?

I have submitted more than 1000 articles, all of them spun UAW style and so they are unique and written by humans.

Anyways, I have some articles submitted more than 30 times already and some submitted 0 times.

I guess it's randomly fed into the system. Sure, some articles are syndicated more and some less, but overall I think they should equal each other out.

So just sit back and wait is my advice.

Here are my stats below for seolink vine :

Total articles submitted to the system: 51 (51 total articles)

Total number of times those articles have been approved: 2455

Total number of times those articles were presented to site owners: 6853

Total acceptance rate by site owners: 93 %

I started adding articles before the launch of the site and those articles were being distributed 50 + times within a week, now the site has launched i have been adding articles which have been distributed max 5 times per week. It seems the system can't keep up with the influx of new members.

Just signed on to this and am wondering about the way submissions are handled.

If I submit to max 10 blogs per day and there are 50 (how many blogs are in the system? would be good to know...) blogs in the system, but by next month there are now 200 blogs in the system, will my article continue to be distributed? Or will I reach "The End" at which point my article stops being distributed to blogs entered into the system after I submitted my article?

As new blogs come aboard are we able to resubmit the article?

Not knowing how many blogs/how many possible links I'll get for submitting an article would have a great influence in the length, the uniqueness, quality, etc. of the article.

Brad, what say you?

Thanks!

Evita

i remember brad mentioning 14.000 blogs in the system a while ago. If that number is correct (which i dont know ) it should be even more now since i am sure there is many added each day. From that point of view, assuming there is really that many blogs, yes, i think the distribution rate could be higher. (?)

I would personally be interested in some kind of statistics, eg. what niches receive the most articles, which less, whether selecting MORE categories for an article actually hurts distribuion or benefits it. PR distribution of existing blogs, things like that.

I am king of disappointed so far. Bare in mind I do have only 5 articles, the first 2 articles got presented the day I posted them for a total of 20 presentations of owners. I've had a total of 4 articles published, 3 for 1 article, 1 for another article and other 3 articles have not even been presented to blog owners. Are articles presented to blog owners every day?

After posting some more and screaming at my notebook these are the stats as of this morning:

Total articles submitted to the system: (7 total articles)
Total number of times those articles have been approved:
Total number of times those articles were presented to site owners:
Total acceptance rate by site owners: %

Every day when i log in and manually distribute articles to my own sites, i get a relatively BIG number of miss-categorized articles.

Today i had to reject like 30% of articles.

The problem is that people use too many categories on their articles, not all are always fitting and right. EXAMPLE ("Insurance for pregnant women")..... is tagged as financial, women's issues, even HEALTH, self-improvement or whatever.

So it arrives for a site for "natural remedies" because it is tagged under "health/women's issues"...except that "health insurance for women" has nothing the slightest to do with the topic of (my) site.

And so on...

And they need to address this since every rejected article makes me sad especially if there are other sites where i could need that article, eg. an insurance site!

Maybe this has something to do with the low rate of distributions.

(edit: By the way i am actually NOT blaming the people tagging their articles, since from a certain point of view those tags COULD make sense. But the system needs to handle this better in a way.)

[DELETED]

Suggestion.

How about a stats page for tellling members how many articles were posted previously. Broke down into a daily stats or weekly stats. That way we could see how many were actually posted on a daily basis or total for the week etc...

I've checked backlinks to a site I added an article to on April 27 which so far apparently was posted 27 times (only). Used the many variations of title spins in Google search and I found so far 4 pages indexed in Google.

1 site is a quickly thrown together Wordpress blog with the basic blue theme on it, site PR NA. I think it's not even indexed yet. A second site on a subdomain with PR NA where the main domain is PR 0, and then two domains that are currently in Godaddy's parking as the domains have expired. Wasted backlinks there. Nothing else found and I sat there across 2 different IPs for over an hour checking what all Google indexed for my site.

I figured after over 3 weeks something should give...I'm really not impressed so far, I have to admit. With how much time I spent spinning just that article to be 100 unique (sentence spinning and variation and then regular spinning as well), I really start to feel I've wasted my time. I could have sent that article to the many smaller PR article directories which at least are better than 2 parked domains (so my links are wasted) and some PR NA and 0 quickly thrown together blogs that don't even have the decency to look like a site a real person put together.

Hi Guys, the reason we closed SEOLV is to increase the number of TOTAL blogs in our system from low 20,000s to double that... without adding more "paying customers".

Doing this will easily double the number of publishes you get. We just closed on Friday.

Also, we've just added the brand new "Article On Demand" feature where blog owners can requests specific topics to be written about, and article writers can then write specifically based on the topic that is currently "in demand".

We're adding a lot of new requested functionality and are working hard to increase the network size. This is why we closed it to new paying customers, as I'm more concerned about maximizing the benefits for paying members than getting more paying customers into our system.

Thank you for your patience. We're working as hard as we can over here :-)

Brad
P.S. Hi Jenny, you've written only 6 articles and have gotten 25 x 3 = 75 links and all in a little over 2 weeks time, and you're "highly unimpressed"? I'm not sure what you're expecting.

I dont think you can blame brad or the "the system" for people a***-lazy and not even bothering throwing together a halfway ok site.

I also see sites where people not even bothered to remove the "hello world" standard post etc....but this not only SEOLV but on some other system.

It really disgusts me seeing such sites.

I like the new Article/Content on Demand feature.

I was under the impression that they checked out every new blog added to the system. I'd like to get some clarification on whether someone is actually looking over each blog added or not. Links on blogs with parked domains and Hello World isn't going to do anyone any good. You can add 100,000 new blogs to the system but if they are crap it's useless.

OK, but are you looking at new blogs being entered into the system? Kislany in her post, as well as many others here, brought up some good points that need addressed. What's the perameters on blogs being accepted? I'm a paying customer as well and if any and all types of junk is going to be the norm then I'm not going to continue to fork out $50 every month.

They funny thing, there are some "quirks", but as of today i have not seen ONE garbage spun article. Problem is rather the categories and miss-distribution, IMO. I have to say ALL articles i received up to today looked very high quality.

I'd really like to see the auto-reject filter improved. Got a site in the system, and I just auto-reject anything under 70%. Be great if this was an option.

BTW, if you're just on the content creation side, pay great attention to your headlines. If it sucks, you're probably going to get rejected by anyone who is actually paying attention—regardless of what your article actually says.

I got a pingback from one of the sites who posted my content and it was a pr6 site. Sweet, found another one checking the title tags and came up with a pr4 site. it's starting to look up for me. Just wished blog owners would approve or reject stuff more quickly. So far 27 approved, 25 published, 1 rejected and 67 pending.

Ah yes, that too. I have 2 websites to get content on there. Haven't received an email telling me there is articles waiting for my approval/rejection but I have logged in to see and there are articles. I've approved some but they have to be published.

i wouldn't want to get 50+ emails every day that i received articles. Its a given i receive articles, thats why i log in every day in the morning and approve

50 emails a day is not necessary, one email at the end of the day or start of the day telling you how many articles are waiting for your approval is enough. It'd be insane to email you each time an article is there for your approval.

Of course, make this notification optional, defaulted to be notified and let members chose whether or not to opt out from the notifications.

Brad, I have been a user of AMA, SENuke UAW and other services for the past year and here are my suggestions:

1. Integrate The Best Spinner within this package. It really reduces a lot of the bad spun articles.
2. Have a PREVIEW function for the article.
3. Make sure you can submit HTML without actually clicking the HTML button, I find this IRRITATING!
4. Make sure the system automatically saves the previous categories in the existing project you have saved. I know you want people to manually choose the right categories to prevent spam, but if they saved a site within a project, then it's safe to say that most of the other articles in that project are for the same niche.

I think that's it so far...

Oh since you own MAN, why don't you have a mass import function for MAN articles into SEO Linkvine also? Since both articles are spun the same way and the services provided identical things... it's only logical?

Thanks! =]

There is already a preview function...

Just save your article, then select "view" from the list of articles. I definitely recommend doing this, just to check if all of the spin syntax is properly inserted and all the links are okay etc.

Brad, I have started using SEOLV for almost 2 weeks and the system is great so far. One thing I found out is there are few blog owners accepting articles from SEOLV but all outgoing links are nofollow. (No Link Juice??)

Can you set a restriction that all websites must set do-follow outgoing links before getting any articles from SEOLV. So it is fair for everyone. Just my 2 cents.

I don't want to hijack this thread but I am preparing a spun article for use in SEOLV and I wonder if anyone has any thoughts as to how to best do the proofreading to make sure all the article variations are well written.

If so, I started a thread on the topic in the copywriting forum. Being new here I can't post a link but I think you will able to find it without any trouble.

Thanks!

Brad,

On the get content side. You know how writers pick tons of categories and we can see which categories they picked. Can you give us an option to pick which category that article will get posted on our sites? Like a tick box next to the categories. If the tick box is not marked, then it'll default to what it does now, submit it randomly to one of those categories.

-edit-
I approved an article that had multiple categories and my blog had many of these categories, it got posted to every single category. I only want it posted to one. I think you should add the option right above this edit.

Thank you,
Oscar

ALCON

Joined SEOLinkvine 11 days ago - have started writing at my NoJokeGuide blog.

Brad, I know you keep URLs of blogs private, but really, what's the point? As my artciles get posted I can do sentence searches and see where they are showing up and find out some (maybe not all) of the SEOLinkvine blogs.

IN the interested of quality and transparency, and to further enable the community to control the quality of the blogs, just tell us where the articles are being published. Let me click on teh number next to my article to get a list of URLs. I can then go to each one and see for myself if it's a quality blog. If not, provide a mechanism for me to easily report it as junk.

uhm...no! This would not be wise on many levels...i understand your concern but the blogs part of such a network should never be made public.

[DELETED]

I have used seo linkvine for weeks now and have secured some top rankings in Yahoo.

There has also been some improvement in google but i guess it takes time. The best part about this is that once i submit the articles, i can forget about it and just wait for more backlinks, since everyday, the same articles will be published by other blogs.

I still have an article where I by mistake set the daily requests to 1, that article still only has been published ONCE in a week.

It would be really nice to know if this is what to expect?

Just curious as it was open then closed so damn fast that I didn't get to see:

What does the paid option entail? How much is it? What are the benefits?

Thanks guys, I missed the boat this time, so sorry for the questions.

Hey Brad, could you send me a pm - i dont have enough posts to send one
thanks,
Al

Has Brad dissapeared from this thread?

I think a lot of people really want to know just how many links to expect.

I signed on Friday and submitted 1 article, till now all my stats are 0, can anyone tell me how many days do they take to start distributing articles?

They claim 48 hrs but its more than 72 hours now.

Hey Jack,

It's nearly impossible to give you a number on how many links you can expect. Just today I was helping a user and saw that a single article he submitted had almost 200 publishes. I've also seen others with 3-10 publishes an article. 1 publish = 3 links. So, for the 200 publish person, that's 300 links! and 30 for the 10 publishes people, which is still quite a lot for only writing 1 measly article.

Number of publishes depends on many factors (i.e. number of blogs in the categories/subcategories you select, % of rewrite uniqueness for each article you write (80% and up is good), number of total articles you write (we submit no less than 1 a day. Some ppl do more. Some do less), whether you submit article using the new "on demand feature", how quality your article is in terms of whether or not blog owners accept or decline your article, and the list goes on and on)

You CAN expect plenty of links to raise your rankings if you write quality articles. I honestly wouldn't worry about an exact number. Just focus on writing good articles, revolving around good topics... and let us handle the rest :-)

We're adding more and more blogs every day, so you can expect more publishes as time goes on. It's scary to think what things will look like after adding blogs for 2 years. Please keep in mind that we've only been open to the public for a couple of weeks.

Hey John, See my comments to Jack above and make sure that you're a-ok on all of those things. The cron job was down all day on Monday because of a mySQL error generated from a "bad" title that a user submitted. We caught it late Monday, and it caused a small back load of article in the queue, which is now almost emptied. Stuff like this will happen. Like I said above, my best advice is just to write quality articles and don't worry about the rest. The system will work well if you're doing that. Hope that helps.

Brad

@Brad, my article is ok ,it has 10 tittles and has got sentence and word level spinning.

Here are my stats

Total articles submitted to the system: 0 (1 total articles)

Total number of times those articles have been approved: 0

Total number of times those articles were presented to site owners: 0

Total acceptance rate by site owners: 0 %

Will u mind looking into my account?

Brad,
Do you think you can add the feature I suggested on page 11 of this topic? The one where we can select of the many categories people to chose to publish the article, we can select which category/categories they will be published to?

Ok Brad, let me wait for couple of days, also i will be adding more articles now.

^ Thank you!

if we want catagories added do we do a support ticket?

I have been using SEO Link Vine for getting content for some of my sites. I have to say for the most part it is pretty good. But I will point out that some of the quality of these articles is pretty cheezy and you usually have to edit the article once its on your site as it seems to have issue with punctuation etc.

But all in all it is working pretty nicely. I also tried to sign up for submitting my own articles but it is closed.

Yeah agree, most articles are crappy. But i guess if they are they won't get accepted. So the higher quality your article the more it will get accepted.

darn i had to reject like 40%-50% today...all weird categories.

I have just started (just over a week) and am at 100% acceptance on submitted articles. I use the Best Spinner and am very selective in my spinning process so it is like a human spinner. Only takes a good 10-15 minutes for me.

For incoming articles, I am 50/50 for accepting. Usually it is because of bad category selection, but only a few because of bad copy or a bad title.

The new format on the site today for receiving content is absolutely horrible. It doesn't show %rewritten and doesn't allow for a re-spin (if needed). Hopefully this is just a testing process or else my rejection rate will climb closer to 99%. Please go back to the previous version!

I can't click the close button in the new format of get content side. Can you make the lightbox smaller so that the close button isn't out of my window? I have to hit back currently if I want to close the lightbox.

I finally have my first article almost ready for posting and I am eager to pull the trigger. Since SEOLV doesn't seem to have a forum started yet, I wondered if I could get some feedback here since this thread has sort of evolved into a SEOLV users forum.

I am using the article to promote a new just recently indexed website. The article is 550 words +/- and spun with The Best Spinner (2 options for each sentence and lots of synonyms). SEOLV shows it as 100% rewritten and DupeFree shows approximately 35% duplicate content between spun versions of the article.

I have 3 links in the article with the same 6 anchor texts spun for each link. Each link goes to a different page of my site.

Any thoughts so far? Does this sound like I have done what I needed to do to maximize the benefits of posting the article in SEOLV?

I was thinking of setting the publish for 5 requests per day and unlimited max publishes. Is 5 requests a day too many for a new site? Also, I can't think of a reason to limit the times the article is published in total in my case. Am I missing something?

Finally, can anyone tell me how to convert spun text to a bold font? The bold command in the software does not seem to work on spun text. I submitted a support ticket this morning but have not heard back yet.

Thanks!

Bill

Some of us will close this thread if the rules are not adhere to.

This is a review forum, not a support or flaming thread.

For support, please go to:
Support Desk

Thanks for your attention.

Brad, are you thinking of starting a WSO about SEOLinkVine here?

If yes, do PM me the link.

I think theleader has provided the straw that has broken this camel's back. Posting that so soon after two different mods have asked for REVIEWS only is unacceptable.

This product is not currently available for sale so I think we should close this thread down and then start a new one when the product is available again.

Pearson