Bruteforce seo VS SEnuke

by 280 replies
348
Hi

I'd like to seek some opinions on the ratings of the two... I know there are 2 separate threads about the 2 software but I'm wondering if anyone has tried both and could give an objective comparison in terms of results. I think they are quite similar so I would assume having one of them is sufficient, unless someone has more insight about this.

Thanks
#internet marketing product reviews & ratings #bruteforce #senuke #seo
  • SEnuke hands down.

    No offence to Pete but SEnuke is 100 times less buggy, supports a ton more features, the user interface doesn't look like a child designed it and supports better websites.

    Just my 2 cents.
    • [2] replies
    • OMFG.
      You just sold me on SENuke.
    • [DELETED]
    • Also tried bruteforce and was just not that impressed

      • [1] reply
  • SENUke is really cool with a lot of features. Cool program.
  • Yeah I'm having issues with Bruteforce's support system.. sent in a support ticket like 4 or 5 days ago... not a word from them.

    I do think bruteforce has lots of potential but it needs to have better support for a $97 subscription
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • There is another thread about this here:
    Anyone having great success with Brute Force SEO?

    My personal opinion is that Bruteforce SEO gets a big thumbs down for myself and my customers who ask for my reviews. Go with SENuke. Bruteforce SEO It isn't worth $97.00 a month. There are reasons beyond the buggy software that aren't appropriate to discuss here, but beware.
    • [1] reply
    • Definitely SEnuke seems to be far more promising as a good team lead is always keeping it update and that truly has made it more bug free and hence more worth while for all the efforts put in.
  • SEnuke is a wonderful piece of software. I really love it when software works the way it's advertised, and Senuke does that and then some. The latest upgrade is awesome. I never get bored watching the new submission window. The blinking red, blue and green...I haven't seen my wife since.
  • I am using SENuke, so far so good, but you need some SEO and article skills to use it correctly...
  • FOr some reason it won't let me join. When I try and sign up I get Your IP is blocked???

    Has this happened to anyone else? I emailed them but have had no reply.
    • [1] reply
    • Hey Pete, I sent a reply to your email this morning.


      Joe Russell





    • [DELETED]
      • [1] reply
  • I haven't used Brute SEO, but I use SeNuke, and I like it.

    I haven't used it to it's full potential yet, but I'm starting to see many different social bookamrking links showing up in the Se's now.

    However, if you go with SeNuke, remember to get uniqueness above 30%. Seriously! Taking a few minutes extra to do this can make you go from 1 to 20 pages showing up in the search engines!
  • Both of them are good for internet marketing savvy individuals. it does come with a learning curve for newbies.
  • Yeah, SeNuke is best for advanced internet marketers.
    I don't think a newbie would have any clue about what to do in the beginning.
    I have recently started using it, and I see several links to me on the first pages on google.
  • Sound like SeNuke wins hands down.
  • I am testing them both and the auto social, article video account creator add-on for the BF SEO package works quite well.

    Will update as I move through it.
    • [1] reply
    • lol James I saw your location as Sydney, Australia so I got a little bit curious.

      So i dug through your posts and came across this:

      I don't mean to spy into your personal affairs, but any chance you're Pete's friend and just trying to stick up for his product?

      Let's try and keep this as unbiased as possible.
  • Someone doesn't agree that SENuke is good.
    SENuke - SE Nuke
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Donny, I think looking up the background of people who post in this forum is pretty good due diligence. I have no problem with that.

    When I make posts in public I do so with full transparency.

    I first met Peter online when I noticed his blogposts in an SEO competition that we were both competing in. I have exchanged ideas and opinions with him since then and I would say we have a good friendship.

    Yes I went to his house once. I was there presenting to a group of warriors on the subject of traffic at a recent Warrior Forum get together.

    A group of warriors also went to dinner in full public view at a local restaurant.

    In this thread I have not posted a glowing testimonial, I just mentioned the auto account creator works for me since this is one of the slowest aspects of social bookmarking-creating all those accounts. When I ran the software I was delighted with the level of automation and how it can save time.

    Importantly, I am a full paying customer just like anyone else with BruteforceSEO so I feel that I am entitled to comment on my experience with the product. Peter has never asked me to comment on his product.

    So far it is working. I did mention in my review that I am comparing it back to back with SENuke and I'll be posting further comments.

    I'm not compromised by others in my opinion of products. I have personally met and travelled with many of the big name marketers and I never promote products or services that don't meet my standards.

    I checked the rules:

    2. If you post your opinion on a product it must be longer than "it sucks" or "it's great". We're looking for intelligent feedback and reasons why you feel the way you do, good or bad.

    3. Do not attack nor give your opinion about the product creator. This forum is about product reviews, not the people who create the products.

    4. In general, just use common sense and don't come in here just to bash products created by people you may not like. Again, we are looking for intelligent reviews so people can be helped in making a decision one way or the other.

    I couldn't find anything that says you can't post if you've ever met the product creator.
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • lol, that's your blog isn't it? If not, I don't understand why you couldn't have just put the website address here instead of adding keyword-specific anchor text to help that page rank better for the terms "SEnuke" and "SE Nuke"?

    Anyways, that blog is not important because it is attacking the concept behind any automated SEO software and the guy seems to have his own vested interest of selling an eBook or something... it really has nothing to do with comparing brute force seo with senuke.

    @James: Yea that's fine, you're still entitled to your opinion and you very well could be a genuinely nice guy trying to post an unbiased opinion. But the fact that you're Pete's friend just stood out to me so I thought I'd share that knowledge with the rest of the folks reading this, nothing personal.
    • [1] reply
    • When you post a web address the forum automagically converts it to SEO titles.

      I liked that SE Nuke post mentioned above because it makes a valid point. You do not need automation software to rank well. Not BFSEO or SENUKE. Also people often use very easy to rank for terms when they offer examples of SEO.

      I might know peter but we are fierce competitors on the SEO battlefield. You are wasting your time pointing out to other posters who knows who unless you do it for every contributor.

      You have 9 posts in this forum (under this name) and you could be anybody for all we know - so are you being biased? You seem to be quick to jump on anything that counters your anti-Brute stance. Who are you really?
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • I am using SENUKE it works perfect
  • I have compared the account creators between the two and SE Nuke is better because it verifies for you. The new BFSeo one is coming out soon - I'll compare again when it comes out.
  • That's true. When you post a link it automatically anchor text links it to the title of the that page.

    That blog has no merit, because it is judging that it sucks based upon the fact that you can do the same thing by hand. Totally stupid.

    No one says you can't. Even Pete with his software says you can do it by hand, but this software makes it much easier and although I have a couple of beefs with the limitations of SENuke, overall it works quite well and save a load of time.

    By limitations I mean as one example, the random feature in SENuke. Randomization is overrated. It should be there but it should also go through your alternate titles etc., in sequence. Because, if you give it say 10 different titles to name your sites and you are doing 10 sites it may not give each a unique name but rather it very well may pick the same 2 or 3 out of the 10 titles you gave and 3 of your ten will have the exact same title,a nd another 3 and the other 4 too.

    It would be better that it went in sequence, and THEN (if you have more sites than titles) it would then pick at random. So, if you wanted and were doing 10 sites, you could just pick 10 titles and it would name each one uniquely.

    It also is anal about forcing you to put numbers in titles. Maybe it could alert you but in that sense it behaves like MS software. It should be up to the individual how they want to name their sites, etc., and be the user's responsibility.

    Apparently it also used to have the option to interlink sites and then was removed. I also think that should be back in and be up to the user whether they want to do that or not.

    I like it a lot though. And there are fixes and updates that come out regularly.
  • [DELETED]
  • Update - I am finding SENuke to be the most effective.
  • SENuke is the business.
  • SENuke is fantastic ! Both the software and the support is far better than BFS.
  • Well I took BFseo (updated version) out for a run today and it was very smooth. I like how it interlinks the different accounts together. This is more strategic than the SEnuke.

    I like them both.
    • [2] replies
    • Inter linking for me is important... this is something that I actually do manually for SE Nuke created sites.
      • [1] reply
    • James or Joe- Does SEnuke have plans to add the interlinking feature?
      • [1] reply
  • Hi Everyone,

    Thank you very much for your reviews, I had tried BFSEO every month that the software has been rereleased and unfortunately, in my opinion, I haven't been able to get the software to work very well- for me, I contacted support almost a half a dozen times and still no word back to my questions.

    I really liked the idea and I have over 35 clients that I thought the software would do very well to rank on the search engines for the different keywords by creating this "mini network" but for me that hasn't happend. Just this last time the rerelease hit Dec 13 I believe, I joined one more time because of the rerelease and still I didn't find the software helpful for me, I also tried contacting support again letting them know I understand they may be inundated with support emails but that I had tried a half dozen times to contact them for help and they haven't replied-PLEASE RESPOND-if nothing else than to let me know you had received my support email-no response.

    Oh well- in my opinion I think they were very worried about making sure that they had an ability to shut a person's account off first and foremost who didn't pay rather than making sure the support and software were working correctly.

    I don't know Pete, I do know that he's had quite a following and I wish him the best and will believe eventually he may get the system working till them I am on the sidelines.

    I did sign up for SEO Nuke and believe that this solution has worked very well for me, the support was fast and the account creator very good as well. I'll keep you posted on the seonuke as I continue to use this software.

    James thanks for your insight as well.

    Happy Holidays everyone!!!

    John
    • [1] reply
    • John you will find SENUKE much easier to use and it has Kick butt features like the auto account creation and confirm built in!
  • Hi James,

    Thanks for the follow up, I appreciate your input.

    I look forward to using SENUke, to bad about BFSEO b/c that looked like a really nice idea, have a great holiday!!!

    John
  • I saw that on that other Blog someone gave the point of buying SEOelite for a one time fee of $167 instead of paying $97 a month for SENuke.

    Any opinions here on SEOelite VS SeNuke?
    • [2] replies
    • I cannot comment too much about Bruteforce. However, I did take up the offer for SENuke and I must say I am very impressed. I have found the software to be very intuitive and feature-rich and the support guys very responsive.
    • I haven't used SEO Elite, but I own and use SeNuke.
      As for comparing the price, I'm not sure they can be compared in any way, other than being seo tools.

      SeNuke is a social submission software ( And a lot more!), but as far as I know, SEO Elite is more of an SEO optimizer.

      So SEO Elite is mostly on-page optimization, but SE Nuke is off-page.

      - Preben
  • Just to add my 2c,

    I have used both and Peter Drew's Bruteforce SEO should still be in beta and not charging people $137 per month for what is useless software.

    SENuke is superb and issues get fixed promptly and professionally without being constantly told the stock answer, "Don't sweat it".

    Bruteforce SEO, apart from the moderator Karen and a member called Bill who are both exceedingly helpful, was an atrocious customer experience. The Bruteforce SEO sales page is something like a lawyer, full of lies and half truths. I did a blog post on the comparison between Bruteforce SEO and SENuke and it turned out so one sided it looks like I am a shareholder for SENuke LOL
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • SENuke is great..

    Works very well.. Heaps better than anything else I used so far, sure beats the opposition hands down..

    Take care

    Bruce
  • I've been using automated software now for 3+ years and i've never seen a team of support more dedicated to keeping SENuke running well. There are so many variables they have to deal with, and the service is top notch.

    I've used both and SENuke wipes the floor with Bruteforce, not even a contest in my opinion.

    Matt
  • Yea SENuke may have its quirks but so does any software of this type that needs to be updated as things change, but they have updates very often and customer service has been good in my experience. It's pretty cool. If you are making money with your promotions the monthly fee is a non issue.
    • [1] reply
    • I have been using SENuke since August and I originally wrote a review on it then and I occassionally add updates to it as the service changes.

      I use SENuke as one of 5 total Marketing software products I own to promote my websites. It is almost a total Web 2.0 solution. I haven't really pushed the envelope with the Video promotions because I use Tube Automator and Video Blaster pro for that.

      I tried the BruteForceSEO trial and immediately canceled. I think it has a lot of potential, but maybe should have been developed more before it was released.

      Here is my original SENuke Review:

      SENuke Review: Can SE Nuke Really Deliver? | Black Hat Software

      Thanks,

      Mike
  • I didn't buy Petes BFS because I have brought several of his wso via this forum before and found that a lot of the software stopped working or that the promised additions never arrived

    Google bomber
    Rss submitter

    being just a few that Crapped out the rss submitter promised to submit to 20
    sites yet last time I used it it had had only 5 working.

    I got yahoo360 submitter this worked but the formatting was awful

    I finally came up with a better solution using five programs
    Article Post Robot
    Bookmarking Demon
    Howies evil pinger
    Jonathon Leger Article Wizard Pro and auto social marker

    these combined with proxy lists have produced better results than the previous programs of petes I tried before plus they don't have the bugs

    I can't comment on Senuke never tried it but after spending close to $500 dollars to get the software I mentioned above I probably never will
  • I tried Brute Force SEO and it did not work at all. I followed everything exactly, but I received no rankings whatsoever, and I was targeting low competition keywords.

    I canceled my subscription right before the trial finished. I just came across SEnuke just over a week ago, and I did the trial to see how well it worked. Like any software there are always a few bugs, and the Web 2.0 sites are always changing, so there are short periods of time when the software can't submit to a few of the sites. However, it usually has over 80% success rate, and I am usually having a 100% success rate. The support is amazing, and they are constantly adding to the software, so it is always improving. Everything it promises to do, it actually does. I am very impressed with the software.

    In the trial week I made $80 from my submissions, which almost paid for the first month, and I hadn't even paid for the software yet. If you want proof that I am impressed, you can visit the SEnuke forum. I have been active there and stated my successes.

    I have dominated the first 3 pages of Google for multiple keywords for multiple products I am promoting, and I haven't even had it for two weeks. I have been marketing very aggressively with it, and I have achieved great results.

    Here is a page with my review of it, and also the bonuses I am offering for it: SEnuke Review And Bonuses

    mick535, you have a link there that says SEnuke is a black hat software, but it's not. It is only black hat if you use it as a black hat software. It just automates tasks that you can do manually. It isn't meant as a black hat tool. (although I use it as one)
    • [1] reply
    • I have been a Brute Force member since it launched and although it indeed has a few bugs that annoyingly pop up all the time, the software does what it advertisers.

      I joined SENuke 3 weeks ago and must say, the software is much smoother that Brute Force and is packed with more features that make huge difference.

      In all fairness to Bruteforce's shortcomings however, SE Nuke does have a 6 month head start on the software. (Bruteforce released its software 6 months after SENUKE), so it has ahd more time to iron out the "kinks".

      Right now, SENUKE's interface is much more professionally looking, has much crisper execution and is less buggy that Bruteforce. Bruteforce however, has a much better tool for keyword research, called "My GoldTracker" which to me, pays for the membership alone. Its and awesome tool that saves a heap of time in finding worthwhile niches to target.

      However, since I have 27 blogs and 16 websites running that are making me money, I can afford to get BOTH services, simply because, the sites that they submit to, are different. So in my linking strategy I use both software programs to complement each other, by spending an extra hour or so after each "group" submission to interlink the group of sites from both programs together, thereby, giving all sites in both programs awesome link juice to start.

      However, if I were new to this and wanted the best software and didn't have that much money to blow, I would choose:

      1) One of Peter Drew's ebooks that explain very well his Web 2.0 interlinking strategy

      then

      2) I would join the SENUKE program to start..... then once I get the full feel for SEnuke and its capabilities, and most importantly, making at least $1000/month......I would then invest some of that money in

      3) BRUTEFORCE SEO

      In summary,

      I think both software programs are complimentary and one should not use one over the other. If you are already making a decent income, you should employ both of these SEO domination tools, SENUKE and Bruteforce.

      However, I you are just starting and can't afford to lose money while you get your "feet wet" , the SENUKE should be the first program membership to join, once you get Peter Drew's ebooks.
      • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • You say that SEnuke has a 6 month head start, but on Brute Force SEO's sales page they state that:

    "So they have been working on it for longer than SEnuke, and they are saying that it should basically be perfect, which it isn't. From what they say on their sales page it shouldn't have hardly any bugs whatsoever, but it does, and it has more than SEnuke.

    When I used Brute Force SEO I didn't see any results whatsoever, however when I tried SEnuke I made $100 my first week of submissions. I tried BFSEO about a month ago, so it has probably improved since then, but I am going to wait a while before I bother trying it again, especially since SEnuke keeps adding more features.

    And they do overlap to what they submit to, so they are not completely separate, however I may end up trying out Brute Force SEO again in a month or so.

    I am not trying to put down Brute Force SEO, but I just didn't get any results when I tried it.
    • [1] reply
    • Well, thats true, but nothing replaces the real-world testing of over 800-900 customers using the software on a daily basis. All software companies, routinely work for years on ideas and programs, but its not until the software is released into the real world, that they can perfect the product and iron out the kinks that will work in all environments, all browsers, all platforms and all types software that already exist in computers.

      Like I said SEnuke is better for a variety reasons, already mentioned right now. But if you already make a decent income online, I would get both...its just me. I like to dominate my niche markets
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • I do as well. I have starting to dominate the niche markets I am in, but I am also fairly new to internet marketing, and I am achieving good results with SEnuke, so I am going to stick with it for now.

    Like I said, in a month or so I will try Brute Force SEO again and then hopefully they will have worked out even more of the bugs and it will be even more effective for me. Until then, I am going to stick with SEnuke, as it has done well for me so far.
  • Great posts! My mind is made up - Thanks for the good information and honest opinions!
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • Thanks everyone for your input, Im off to get my trial!

      Cheers!
      Don
      • [3] replies
  • SENuke FTW! SENuke is less buggy plus the web20 sites it builds pages on are great. For BF, it creates pages on Geocities and just a handful of others.

    Also, you can't get yourself off of Pete Drew's mailing list once you're on it because he doesn't include an Unsubcribe link! Is that even legal? Since he's in Australia, maybe Spam laws are different

    He shouldn't make people email him personally to unsubcribe. Unsubscribing from someone's list should be as easy as possible.
    • [1] reply

    • Just continue to send him requests to unsubscribe. Or Remove. He has been very busy with some new additions to Brute Force lately, so maybe that why he has not responded.
      • [1] reply
  • How does SENuke and BruteForce SEO compare to SEOmoz's PRO membership?
  • Senuke is great and these guys provide fantastc support

    BruteForce, first pissed off Peter customers by sending misguiding email about a 1$ offer that was just a way to join the affiliate program

    and when released was more a way to lose time than to earn , doesn't justify the price

    overhyped as didn't deliver the promise for me and i really tried to make it work

    If you put a week-end to learn all the things you can do with Senuke, you have a great leverage.

    Mary
  • Thanks for some great reviews. This one was a no-brainer, just signed up for SEnuke!
    • [1] reply
    • Be patient with it too. Both SENuke and Bruteforce, require a short "learning curve" to master....so be prepared for crappy results in the beginning, until you develop your own style on how it works for you.

      good luck
      • [1] reply
  • [DELETED]
  • I have found that I can get a quicker response by posting in the forum as opposed to filling out a help desk ticket.
  • I'm using Brute Force SEO and stumbled upon this thread as I was
    looking for information on comparisons.

    Seems like an overwhelming majority here votes for SENuke; I had
    a horrible time during the first 2 months of BFS as well but it's
    working fine for me now.

    I am considering switching to SENuke (as it's cheaper) or getting
    both, and am curious about folks who have experience with using
    both; as in, using both for the same sites.

    Do you get good results?
    • [1] reply
    • I would say both are complimentary right now, the only 2 sites that overlap is Blogger and WP.com..... as far as site construction on those 2 sites, there is no difference in the softwares. I used to think SEnuke was better than BF, but now I would say it is a dead heat between both of them.

      BF has pretty much cleaned up its software code and is now clean, and virtually 100% bug-free as is SE Nuke.

      SE Nuke provides some neat tools such as the a tool that provides the probability of dominating a keyword phrase niche, before you embark on the web2.0 building campaign, and BF has an awesome keyword research tool called Golddigger, that is the best I have seen....it is such a time saver when doing keyword research....I am addicted to it!

      As far as speed of submission and construction of the web of sites, they are both "currently" even. The only thing that may make SENUKe a tad bit better, is that SEnuke has its own Video directory submission module, that submits to mostly "do-follow" video directories, whereby, BF relies on a third party submission service ( Heyspread) that has mostly all "no follow", which to me, are worthless. I use SEnuke's video submission module for all my video directory submissions, including my BF campaigns.

      Also, SENuke's social bookmarking submission, you can "spin" the title and descriptions, wereas, BF's social bookmarking submission does not have that feature, at least not yet.

      So, in summary, neither service really competes "head to head" with each other, instead the are very complementary in everything they do, that why I have both.

      That is pretty much it...hope this helped.
  • [DELETED]
  • I was thinking about getting Brute Force SEO since the new version has been released. Does anoyone have a review on the latest version?
    • [1] reply
    • After having paid a lot of money for Brute Force SEO for many months and being plagued with too many software updates (including 3.15 which I don´t think was such an improvement-) and things that did not work I finally was fed up and tried SENuke. I liked the systematic no-hpye approach of SENuke and I cancelled BFSEO.
      Pete has opened the doors again and is selling BFSEO for $147 month (after the $1 trial) which I think is way too expensive.
      In my opinion SENuke is much better and works much more smoothly.
      As a new completely overhauled version of SENuke will be available in 2 or 3 months I decided to buy Big Mike´s RSS Bot and Social Bot for a ridiculously low price (WSO !).These 2 packages work wonder and are so easy to use. What I still need is a good article submission software that is reasonably priced. I have also made a decision not to buy monthly subscription offers if they are not beyond doubt - you end up co-financing the software development before you realize.
  • ***Updated after this week-end suffering*****

    Hi Warriors

    here is my experience with these great tools

    they are both great tools to automate your business

    BUT, they can be counter productive if you don't have a clear plan and follow some rules

    if you acquire them for a miracle push button, you may start to submit like a mad PLR all around. And that's the worst way to use these tools

    Rating:
    i rate SENUKE 9/10 for the results
    I rate bruteforceseo 3/10 as just was unable to use it, account creation and twitter just never worked. and the tutorials videos are just useless small talk of Peter

    cheers
    Mary
  • SENuke it is.
  • sorry to say that, but it just after buying 50 software, that only 5 work; you start to become really cautious about the next big things

    I have joined and unsubscribed after testing the last bruteforceseo

    the videos are useless, and the software are too buggy so far
    it does not command a price of 147$/month for no results...worst just lost hours trying to use it, and the videos are really unprofessional.
    Peter was more concerned to send tons of emails to promote and he made good cash but poor work on the tutorials side
    really disappointed, as i tried to use it

    use Senuke, it's much more professional with a real support and real tutorials
    I have to say Thumbs up to the guys of Senuke, as they have created a really amazing piece of software.

    my 2 cents
    Mary
    • [1] reply
    • I have used SENuke for over 6 months now and I have watched it grow and improve over that time. These guys are tirelessly working at making this software better. In fact, they are working on a complete rewrite of the software now in order to create even more functionality.

      You won't get this type of dedication from too many internet marketing software companies. Most are short lived. I would say right now that they have built this product as a long term project, not a quick money maker.

      SENuke is my only choice for Web 2.0 SEO promotion.
  • It's been a while since using senuke myself. I've considered it again most recently simply to speed up the web 2.0 side of my campaigns and I'm ramping up my video submission now. Generally I don't like programs that automate my account process and create sites.

    One thing I'm wondering if a current user could answer for me, does senuke still create accounts with numbers in them? That always really bothered me for some reason, it just screams of automation.
    • [1] reply
    • hbsjcd3 has some really great advice. I currently use neither, but plan to at some point, after I streamline what I have.

      I never knew that about using a Sprint card changing you IP address every time automatically... does that work for all cell phone/wireless internet carriers?
      • [1] reply
  • SE Nuke is freakin awesome!! THis is the only tool I use for my Internet marketing and encompasses everything I do in my campaigns. Its certainly cut down my work time 90%. I definately recommend this software to any one!!
  • Banned
    Pardon my very basic and maybe stupid question here, but what does SENuke really do? Is it similar to BookMarking Demon and those kinds of automated social bookmarking thingies? Or is it something different and/or more?
  • are you asking if leaving a big old footprint hurts? Because senuke is VERY careful not to leave any prints.
  • From all of these reviews ... Senuke .. Hands Down !!!

    Thanx !
  • The monthly fee is stiff, but if you practice using it, you should be able to make the recurring payment in a day...
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • All the way, SENUKE!

    This software is ultimately neat. Creates account on the fly, including account creation for 4 emails (your choice), then the Web 2.0 sites, video sites, bookmarking sites and RSS sites.

    I create a new set of Web 2.0 sites everyday. You don't need to create too many bookmarking sites, few profiles are enough to work for few weeks. On RSS, about 2 to 3 is enough as only 3 sites need login, the rest are free submit.

    I like the keyword research tool inside, coupled with Google Adwords Tool and the batch research tool, I can easily find easy keywords to target. I am actually using SENUKE's keyword tool to do my Sniper sites!

    Further, SENUKE can submit your Web 2.0 sites in as many threads as your PC can handle. I just got a new laptop, so now I can open 15 submitters and let them work all at the same time! Within minutes, I can complete a full nuking, including social bookmarking and RSS nuking! This is one of the most important feature every program must have, multi-threading!

    The updates are frequent. It has a built-in bug/not-working report tool, just key in your problem and submit. You will most likely see a fix on the next update. This kind of support is really the success of SENUKE!

    I am 4 months into SeNuke already. I agree, you need the right skill and mindset to success with SeNuke, just like every other tool.

    Daniel
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    I have been using both SEnuke and BFSEO extensively for almost two months now. Yes, I prefer SEnuke over BFSEO because it looks better, it is more SEO friendly and the latest version has a whopping 490 sites in its Web2.0 Profile Nuke versus BFSEO's 100 sites in Linking Loophole.

    But, guess what? I have had enormous success with BFSEO and LL getting dozens of KWs (some very difficult one's) to first spot or first page of Google. To-date I have not achieved a single result with SEnuke. This baffles me as I would expect far better results with SEnuke. Instead nada.

    The only thing I can think of is that SEnuke is used by far more IM's than BFSEO and the sites are extensively spammed causing many of the SEnuke sites to fight back.
  • I use SEnuke on a daily basis,, and it works.. if it works and I get higher rankings and make more money.. then I am happy to pay

    You can get a 58% discount on senuke for the first 5 weeks of membership at SENuke Review, 58% Off Discount, Huge SE Nuke Bonus | Senuke Review & SEO Guide

    I am interested to see what happens with BFSEO EVO2 but we will have to wait and see that is for sure.
  • What do you find is the best feature of SENuke? Does anyone find the link wheel strategy helpful?
    • [1] reply
    • As someone who has been considering using SENuke as a tool to use in my IM business, I'm at their 7-day free trial page and I have one quick question about it.

      I'm currently in the process of switching banks, and because of this, I've not yet received my new debit/visa card and the account linked to my PayPal account will be closed down shortly. Seeing as they say you don't pay for the 1st 7 days...would anyone for see any problems if I just go ahead and sign up and not worry about the bank account situation as long as I cancel w/in the 7-day grace period...or would it just be better if I just wait till I get my new bank card in the mail?
      • [1] reply
  • It seems that if the new bruteforceseo evo II delivers on all the promises it will bring it closer to senuke. Senuke may still have some features that evo II does not.
    • [1] reply

    • Yeah, it seems as though EVOII is implementing some of the things that SENUKE already has in place which will bring it closer.

      BUT

      SENUKE is going through an overhaul as well so, at least in my opinion, the rest of the pack will still be chasing SENUKE.

      I'm definitely going to try EVO out, because I like to try all the new stuff that comes out, but SENUKE the software as well as the support that AReeb offers, is damn near unbeatable, in my opinion.
  • I just came off my free trial for SENuke...I believe that it would be more cost effective to buy various flat rate software packages instead of over $100/month recurring. However, if you are making $500+ a month with IM, I can see the cost justification to have everything there at once.
    • [1] reply
    • They seem to have just released the "vip" purchase period for the all new singing and dancing version of Bruteforce, be interested to hear people's thoughts who have a play with it.
      • [1] reply
  • I'm trying BF EVO 2 as well. I've put the link in my sig file but I haven't really tested it at this stage. Some of the ancilliary software that comes with the membership I have been using for a couple of weeks and do like - but I dont use SE Nuke so can't compare.
    We will see.
    Cheers
    Alan
  • I have used SENuke, and am quite happy with it. My friend used Brute Force, and he discontinued after a week and switched over to senuke, so I got the answer!
    • [1] reply
    • I've been using Evo for about 2 hrs so far and it looks pretty cool so far....

      Nice and easy, couldn't get it to load at first, but support got back to me in 10 mins which impressed me.
      • [1] reply
  • Still trying it out.

    So far I really like how nicely laid out the interace is and how quick it can create an e-mail account and password for the account creation.

    First It automatically creates an e-mail account and password to use for your account creation.(within seconds) Then you can select which accounts you would like the software to create.

    Video sites, article sites (including EZA), bookmarking,rss feeds,etc.

    Then it goes to work on creating those accounts.

    When I first ran the account creation it seemed to stall out for long periods of times on some captcha solving in the beginning. It got stuck on one site so I tried to enter captcha myself and it froze the program. So I had to restart program. Luckily it lets you save your project file to load again.

    Now I'm just letting it run throuhg all the account creation without any intervention just to see how it handles everything on its own.

    It seems to be going through all the sites. I will have to wait and see how many sites it created successful accounts for. Its suppose to verify the accounts that go to your e-mail.

    I will have to check and see when the dust settles on the account creation to see whats going on.

    Then I guess move on to next step which is loading content to have EVO put it up on the sites.

    I guess what your suppose to do with the videos sharing sites is to upload one video to youtube (which it does not create an account for) then the software pulls that video from youtube using its url to use in HeySpread to upload your video to the other video sharing sites.

    Again have not got to the content part yet. Still creating accounts stage.

    I like the idea and concept of EVO2.

    I really hope that everything contineus to run smooth.

    EDIT: WOW sweet after all the account creation. A small window pops up and tells me that it is checking e-mail. Now I get to watch the software login to my newly create yahoo e-mail account and verify all the accounts it just created for the content sites. I see 24 e-mails in there.And more are showing up as the software verifys each account.

    EDIT: Ok the dust has settled on the account creation.

    Heres the breakdown of my account creation. Your results may be different but these are mine...


    1) Out of 5 possbile feed sites it created 4 accounts

    2) Out of 9 possbile article sites it created 2 accounts (not happy with this)
    I elected to exclude EZA (Edit: just found out has stopped allowing submissions from everybody)

    3) Out of 13 possbile social sites it created 11 accounts

    4) Out of 11 possbile video sites it created 9 accounts (they tell you in .pdf that revver might be problem- which it was) Youtube is not included in account creation

    5) Out of 1 possbile tools sites(rss site) it created 1 accounts

    Frank Bruno
    • [1] reply
    • I've been involved with the launch of Brute Force, aint EVO a cute little guy

      A graphics Genie creation....

      Would love to hear more thoughts

      Darren
      • [1] reply
  • My girlfriend seems to think that EVO is a real robot that does all the work for me...AWWW Bless
    • [1] reply
  • Just found out has stopped allowing submissions from everybody.

    also EAsyarticles blocking submisisons.

    So they need to remove these sites from the software

    Frank Bruno
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • EVO2-

    Most if not all the article accounts were indeed created and setup.
    Its just that most of them were not showing on the right of each article directory in the sofware.

    What I recommend to do until admins of EVO2 can resolve is to try to login to each site that is not showing as successully created on left. You may find that indeed the accounts were created.

    Then just copy and paste your user/pass from one of the others accounts since they are all the same.

    Now need to move on to test the rest of the software

    Frank Bruno

    Thanks
    Frank Bruno
    • [1] reply
    • OK.
      So i have been busy with BF EVO2 for about 4 hours now.
      The interface is clean easy to use.
      The registration process is a bit tedious with Captha's taking a bit of time to solve.
      Setting up Articles and RSS function also quite easy.
      Submission shows quite a few failures, the Gmail account created by BF EVO has already been disabled, cannot verify accounts.
      (You can buy Gmail accounts, but at $157 pm i don't expect to)

      Support
      I can't gain access to Forum as the password that was emailed to me does not work?
      Logged a ticket with support 5 hours ago no reply? (Maybe time dif between Aus and USA)

      Positives
      Clean
      Easy to work with
      90% automated

      Negs
      Price $157pm
      Slow Support
      Automated Email accounts useless, Disabled within 30mins by Google
      Time taken to submit two URL's start to finish 5 Hours

      All submissions still have to be verified manually to get a clear picture of how well BF performs.

      It's early stages and maybe once all the bugs are ironed out, and they figure out how to give support on USA time BF may compete, but as of now SE NUKE is the clear winner.
      • [2] replies
  • Interesting you mention that you can't get into the EVO2 forum as Pete just responded to a post that I made a few minutes ago and didn't even ask him a question ,I just posted my feedback and he gave a suggestion.

    I also got a warm welcome over there from other forum contributers and my name was not even shown in the forum. It was under a different username.

    Yahoo e-mail works like a charm. Not sure how they work the yahoo or gmail and who gets them and if they are rotated,etc. behind the scenes or if its rotated within the software

    Frank Bruno
  • Guys,

    Sorry to interrupt here.

    But I really just want to let the cat out of the bag here.

    I'm currently also developing something similar that will compete with the best of the best tools.

    Aptly titled, SEOmated. Check my sig.

    Listening to Feedback is the most important thing any businessman can have.

    As such, please leave as much feedback as possible in this thread.

    Remember, a free market only benefits the consumers!

    Just to let you guys know: Yes, I hear and understand the same old cries of the users of such software ..

    ..not to forget that I was the user before.
    • [2] replies
    • Hi Jeff! Stoked to hear that you're developing an automation tool, I just popped over to your SEOmated site and it sounds great. If you can provide equal or better service to SENuke and match their update frequency, you should be able to crush it as long as your pricing is competitive.

      SENuke has been my favorite IM tool for the past year or so, but lately it seems like only about 25-30% of the sites actually work, and their captcha service has been less than reliable over the last month or so.

      On that note, I'm trying BFSEO EVO II at the moment. Right now I'm going through the account creation and I'm feeling like the price is a bit high. The captcha service is blowing through the "Retries" in 5 seconds each, I'm guessing either everyone has gone home for the evening or they're swamped, but either way, when it's advertised as "total automation", it's disappointing. As a former customer of BF LLH, it's pretty unexpected, as issues with that particular piece of software were few and far between.

      If you're looking for user feedback to channel into your own product, here's my 2 cents. Focus on customer service and providing quality above anything else. I'd rather have a piece of software with 10 sites in each section that works close to 100% of the time than one with 40 sites that works 50% of the time. The frustration is simply not worth the "chance" of having everything work IMO.

      Oh, and if you provide a captcha breaking service, make sure it's a good one. There are few things more irritating in my site-promoting process than setting up a piece of "fully automated" software to create accounts, going and getting some housework done, and coming back to see it stuck on the first site telling me to manually enter the captcha. Awesome.

      Oh, and to keep this on topic, for account creation, SENuke is winning by a landslide at the moment in both the speed and reliability categories. We'll see how the posting features work.
      • [2] replies
    • Banned
      It's about time more coders jumped on this bandwagon. Competition'll yank the prices of this type of software down to earth, where it belongs.

      Stuff like SENuke and Evo2 will cost about $20 one-time payment when the dust settles, I'll bet. Hellelujah.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • thanks for your suggestion . I am a new member of thsi forum.
  • still indecisive if i should get it too...

    keep the reviews coming guys...

    toni
  • signed up for your list Jeff.

    I got the Evo II trial yesterday and just kept hitting the button to create my email account and kept getting the error message - then gave up. I already have to babysit enough automation programs with captchas and account creations.

    I'm glad I found this thread - probably not even going to mess with this for now. to think, i was seriously pondering the upsell 2-yr deal but then thought - what IM product is ever good (not obsolete) for 2 whole years? very few...
    • [1] reply
    • Trish,

      You may have missed in the PDF instructions, it says you need to make sure you are updated to Windows .NET 3.5, IE8, and the latest windows operating system. Links are in the PDF. Took me 10 minutes to update everything and get started. It's easy to miss this important point if you only watch the tutorial videos and not the PDF instructions.

      Also, like I said in my last post, the CAPTCHA really isn't a big deal during account creation. I just had to enter CAPTCHAs about twice a minute for 23 minutes. Maybe I'm weird, but I enjoyed watching it run through the account creation on all the sites while I waited for the CAPTCHA box to pop up.

      • [1] reply
  • BruteForce is way too buggy. Automation products are supposed to save you time, not waste it trying to get the programs to work. Besides that, their support sucks as with most of his products!
  • No - I'm not always the best with "directions" and that's entirely my fault. - ends up costing me more time in the end sometimes.

    I guess my only source of heartburn here would be committing to a 2-yr deal when I don't see any (hardly) guru's keeping up with any product or service for that amount of time. These things require CONSTANT tweeking to keep up with all of the site changes, url switches, you name it. It's a constant update race where your "miracle" automation machine could become a nice desktop ornament in under a week if you don't have some seriously dedicated programmers behind it.

    I've seen it happen and it's disappointing when you spent $30, $50 or even $100. ...they're asking a bit more for this.

    could be worth it. I'm wrong all the time....
    • [2] replies
    • Yeah it is a big financial leap of faith. I'm not going to try to talk you into it. But, my hope is, as with SENuke, a high monthly fee will be huge incentive for the programs to keep the software up to date and keeping the users happy.

      So far that model seems to work well with SENuke. Looks like Brute Force was off to a rocky start, but hopefully they've been in$pired to step it up.


    • Hi Trish,

      You hit the nail on the head!

      Keeping up with the changes to the sites SEnuke submits to in order to maintain an acceptable submission rate is a constant battle. It takes an extremely dedicated team of programmers to manage this...the more sites and strategy we add the more frequent updates are needed and we do update SEnuke constantly...almost monthly.

      I can assure that SEnuke/SEnuke X will not become anyones "Desktop Ornament" anytime soon

      Joe Russell
  • BF2 - I watched the video on the sales page where he walks you through the software showing you what it does, but I won't buy it because I think it's too expensive $157 per month.

    As far as I can see it's supposed to automatically create accounts (but the reviews are saying it's hardly automated and requires manually entering captchas), be able to post articles and videos, do some bookmarking, and submit rss feeds. Anything else?

    There's already cheaper software (for a one off payment) that does article submission.
    And another program that does bookmarking to more sites, also a once off payment and not a high monthly fee.

    My 2c.
    • [1] reply
    • If the software worked as well as it should, $157 / month would be a bargain, as you could easily make that back in a day or so.

      An article submitter and bookmarking software will only get you so far. If you want to go the "one-off" route, then eventually you'll want to buy a web 2.0 / blog submitter, an RSS submitter, and a video submitter. And if we're talking about matching Pete's products, as far as I know, there's nothing like Linking Loophole on a single payment.

      It really depends on what you have more of, time or money. For me, I'd rather spend $127-$157 / month to free up 2-3 work hours per day that I can spend doing other stuff. Considering I can put up a brand new site with a couple of articles in that time, it's significantly more valuable than $157.
      • [2] replies
  • Just tried another run of the static account creator with the new update.

    PROS: Fills in account details faster, seems to be taking less time to navigate from page to page. Using Yahoo mail instead of Gmail is a very wise choice, as well.

    CONS: That damn captcha service. Seriously, it takes 4-5 minutes to get through the 10 tries, and then I have to do it manually anyway. If there aren't enough staff on hand for the service, or if the staff aren't being monitored properly, it would be nice to have an option to use a paid service or set it to manual entry.

    If they can work out the captcha problems, it'll be a great piece of software.
    • [2] replies
    • Agreed...

      As of right now, I'd say that SENUKE is still the clear cut winner.

      Pete has made this software WAY better than it was before though...so, it is obvious that he is going in the right direction...I can't wait to see where it ends up.

      I probably won't keep my trial, but will give it another shot the next round of updates etc...
    • Banned
      When you say staff, does that mean the captcha service has real people filling in the captchas behind the scene? If so, I didn't realize that.
      • [1] reply
  • I haven't tried SENuke. I have tried BruteForce (the old model) and cancelled it.

    Apart from the account creation problems, created accounts being closed down rapidly, etc., I found the article distribution leaves a lot to be desired.

    Grabbing an article, plonking your keyword in front of the title, and throughout the article seems to me to be a bit shonky. Could have something to do with why the accounts get deleted almost instantly. I can't help but wonder what the authors of these articles think about their creations being used in this manner. I hope they get some links/traffic from the use of their articles as well

    Until this is improved, BF/EVO is on the "better value elsewhere" list.

    From what I can see SENuke can distribute "unique" content to each account. Although that to is probabaly not without flaws as well. Swings and roundabouts I guess.

    Will get around to trying SEN shortly.
    • [1] reply
    • whateverpedia,

      I use fairly related articles and just add something in the beginning to introduce it and tie it into my keyword. The author's name and links stay intact with Brute force SEO. As an article writer myself, I'm hoping people re-distribute my articles (with my links). That's the point of me writing it and uploading it to eZine articles.

      And, if you don't want to do that, you always have the option to write your own articles and distribute them with Brute Force SEO or SENuke.

      Same thing with SENuke, they have a "download seed article" from eZine articles button (which I believe does not keep the author-box links). But, they tell you to re-write the article since you aren't giving credit. Or again, you can write your own article from scratch.

      Basically, how people use other people's writing is up to the user. Can't blame the software if someone writes unreleated articles and they get pulled down. Or, steals content without giving credit.

      It's interesting to see all the negativity around this software when I'm happy as a clam with it running quietly on another computer getting me backlinks all day long today. Seems it got a bad rep from the first release, which I totally missed. Might have been smart if they renamed it. But it looks like they have plenty of people downloading the 7 day free trial anyway.

      • [2] replies
  • It is amazing how he is the only one that does not have the captcha problems as jeremy said. I started a run lastnight, got up the dam thing is stuck, so for the next 30 minutes or so I wait to see if at anytime it overcomes anything. Nothing. Im doing the work.

    And here is the issue someone named Daniel Mcgonagle brought up in a review of the linking loophole, The links by themselves are ineffective without some sort of promotion of the profiles as a few people have pointed out. In other words if there is no pinger built in to these profiles hard to say if they will ever really benefit.

    So if we let it grab articles, with no uniqueness to them and build linkwheels with them whats the point? By the time I put 5 articles in, did multiple titles, 3x resource boxes for each article, I was then thinking these things still need to be accepted (the articles), then after they are accepted they can be social bookmarked , and submitted to rss feeds to help the articles.

    But their is no such feature. My impression is this is to be the next step in link wheel building. If it is and we are hoping to get some traffic from the links, the article needs some ability to have someone want to come further.

    Hell maybe its me, Im missing the point.But for 157.00 a month I should be able to go to bed, wake up and have results not baby sit this thing paying someone money hoping they get it right. Will do my own work same amount of time.
    • [2] replies
    • Did you update your computer .NET 3.5, Explorer8 and the latest operating system? Maybe that's why I'm not having the problems others are. I'm not trying to push this on you if you aren't into it. Just trying to help.

      Good point about the Pinging. At the end of each run, Brute Force SEO generated a list of the links it made. I'm going to pop them into the SENuke pinger.

    • I've used the Linking Loophole software a few times to see if it will work.
      I created accounts on one month's worth of links at a time, and then posted my links, and then waited another week and did another month's packet of links.

      Only four backlinks stuck, the rest (must be around 40-60) did not.
      I did not abuse the system by spamming/creating multiple accounts and multiple links either.
      This was just my experience and I have not unsubscribed from linking loophole. I'm prepared to try it a few more times to see if the stickiness improves.
      Another downside is a few of the sites stopped new user registrations within the same day that a new monthly packet of links were released because obviously too many people were creating too many accounts all of a sudden. So it goes.

      So I wonder how long the links created with this evo2 will actually stick/last.
      Check your backlinks after a month's time and you will have a good idea.
  • Here is that review from Terry McGonagle on linking loophole:

    [CENTER]As you may know if you're a regular reader of this blog I started to test and review Peter Drew's Brute Force Linking Authority Loophole or BFLAL for short.


    I thought terrys review had a lot of good points. Again for 157.00 a month you need to be spot on. This hang in there untill it works better stuff is not cutting it. And like SEnuke right now their effectiveness has been cut down by over half because spammers have blown up the sites with over use and abuse.

    These tools get abused and then become less effective. Make your own opinion, this is just mine and like butts everyone has one. Now there is a secret I use of 2 services combined that end up costing 2/3rds of that 157 a month that is spot on and are so good together that it is scary.

    But that secret would cost money and I am not sure how much, in fact I am keeping it to myself. Hell they don't even know how good they are for each others service.....
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • Coming back to the title of this thread "Bruteforce seo VS SEnuke,"

      For me I still can't get my head around what Bruteforce does that SEnuke can't do and do much more effectively.

      I am still playing with Bruteforce because I thought it had two things that SENuke didn't.

      1. I just plug my website and keywords in and then I let it go and do its thing. This does not seem to be the case and currently it needs a lot of babysitting; however, Peter will probably sort this out at some point.

      2. I wouldn't have to worry about creating content to promote my sites. I still can't get my head around exactly what Bruteforce does here, unless I supply my own articles then it seems to have a data base of articles that eveyone pulls from; surely somewhere like ezine articles won't accepted this types of articles, there doesn't seem to be any spinning or rewriting involved.

      All, in all, at the moment SEnuke seems to be able to still do much more (with more in the pipeline as always) and do it much quicker and more effectively.

      Now if I could just plug in my money website and evo II would go off and create real links that would last (at least for a while) and throw out real content then I am still very interested.

      If you are able to buy both SENuke and Evo II then that is great, but if it is a choice of one or the other, then for me SENuke still wins hands down, with one caveat, with SENuke I think you need to have a system in place and be quite organised.

      If you don't have a system in place with what you are doing with SENuke you will be just creating links all over the place and probably getting very little benefit out of them. This is one thing that Bruteforce seems to be better at, it seems easier to just let the software do it and the software will (or should) do it in a structured way, where as with SENuke, the user has to plan the structure more.

      Anyway, that's my 2 cents on this issue.
      • [ 4 ] Thanks
      • [3] replies
    • have already cancelled and uninstalled. would hate to forget and get hit with $157.

      on a brighter note, I have been a member of Lexorsoft for months and love that - real people doing IM stuff for me - no babysitting a "semi-automated" program.
      • [1] reply
  • Please link to third party reviews - unless you have express permission to quote them here.

    Affiliate links in signatures are, of course, strictly forbidden. I have not removed the related posts because they contain useful comments (which I don't believe are being made just to boost affiliate sales) but other actions are being taken.

    Pearson
    • [1] reply
    • Sorry Pearsonbrown, I had done a quick search of the FAQ and Help Section for "Affiliate Links Signature". I didn't see anything forbidding it. My bad.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • EVO II:

    I had to frequently intervene during the account creation process in Evo II.

    1.
    There was a problem with many of the captchas, particularly those with 2 words and I got sick of waiting around. So, I just manually entered the remaining captchas.

    2.
    Although the software didn't show all of the account passwords, usernames etc, after manually logging in to the accounts, I found that many had been created and I just entered my details into the software.

    3.
    Four of the accounts were not created by the software, so I manually created these as well. I have created all of the accounts that came with the program, including revver and bharatbhasha.

    4.
    The software had a problem with the gmail account it created. When it was trying to check emails, it kept entering the complete email address into the gmail username submission form, rather than just the username. I got around this by manually logging into gmail, using the created name and remaining logged in while it completed the process.

    Although I'm not impressed with the account creation process, especially for the price, I will keep an open mind until I have tested the rest of the software, before my trial expires.

    Mike
    • [1] reply
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [2] replies
    • Interesting. I know SENuke's service is human provided, so I figured Pete's was the same. I guess it's probably substantially cheaper to use software, but it's definitely slower and less accurate in my experience.

      If I was paying for HTML2RSS, I'd be choked, but as a free service, I have to give Pete the nod here. That's one of the most brilliant ideas I've ever heard of for linkbuilding, and he can just pop in a new link any time he starts something new. Why do SEO when you can have your customers do it for you?

      Now, the fact that he sends all of your RSS from EVO II through there, thus getting himself tons of links from people who are paying to have that link juice diverted to their own sites, well, that's not very classy.

      Maybe create a version of HTML2RSS without that function and include it as part of the membership. Making your members pay $157 per month when you're getting almost as much out of their linkbuilding campaign as they are... Well, that takes cojones, for sure.

      Are you kidding? Well if that's true, maybe we should all just link to Pete's sites from all our domains and watch our rankings surge! BRB, writing the WSO up...
      • [1] reply
    • I have used SeNuke in the past and am as well trying BF.

      SeNuke- Con- If you don't have a strategy or are willing to learn one, save your money. Pro - The crew over there work their butts off to keep things running as smoothly as possible. That and SeNukeX is due in a few months.

      BF- Love the profile and rss masher. Slow? Yep. If I keep it, another cpu is in order.

      Here is my latest concern though. Unless I am doing something wrong here, the forum has been temporarily disabled.

      Only 2.0 sites it will create for me are tumblr. WP, bloglines etc, no go. Though, my brother's creates all without fail. I use a proxy, he doesn't. I tried to help along WetPaint, and it crashed.

      Tried running it without posting to the profiles. Crashes everytime. Don't know what it is due to. I am now running it as I type with the profile's and see what happens.

      All in all, MASSIVE bugs, but i'm gonna stick it out for at least a month.

      -Shawn

      P.S. Clear your cookies between every run.
      • [1] reply
  • Hi guys,

    Just signed up and am looking at purchasing possibly Senuke OR Brute force (not both, lol). I've been reading that Senuke is the better product. My question is, when I checked out the terms that Bruteforce was ranking in google for ("seo software" and "twitter software") Bruteforce was second on the first page. The term "seo software" and "twitter software" are very difficult to rank for, so it seems that BS is doing something right.

    However, Senuke ranked for "how do you get to the top pages of google" which I am sure is also a competitive phrase, but not as competitive as "seo software." Also, on the sales pages Senuke emphasized more about bringing traffic and BS emphasized about rankings.

    So what are the goals of each software? Traffic or rankings? Is Bruteforce more about getting ranked on google/yahoo and Senuke more about getting traffic from social bookmarkings? Can you rank on the first page of google with Senuke for competitive keywords? What am I missing?
    • [1] reply
    • Note if you reread about the last 10 posts you will see that the terms "seo software" and "twitter software" probably appear in about 1 million RSS feeds at the moment due to html2rss.com adding in those links to all rss feeds. Don't think your experience will be simiilar.
  • RE: BF EVO2
    Canceled my subscription: @ $157pm overpriced, backlink portfolio very limited, support a bit arrogant, software to buggy at the moment.
  • This software communicates with and creates accounts on a massive amount of websites and promotes YOUR websites via them.

    Once you get your IE used to working with them, the software works flawlessly, the simplest way to do this is to update to IE8 with most sites are designed to use anway.

    If you have IE 6, your IE will most likely have errors on page, resulting in EVO II or any software that relies on IE modules to stop..

    its not rocket science.

    Btw, one of the main problems users are experiencing is trying to stop the software to fix one error on just one site out over over 100. This is not a good idea., users are getting in the way of the software doing its job through to the end.

    Start it, let it finish, all done
    • [1] reply
    • Pete, that's all well and good, but it doesn't really address the issues that people have been complaining about. In no particular order:

      1) The captcha-breaking is unreliable, and rather than skipping sites, it will hang asking for you to enter the captcha manually.

      2) The articles EVO pulls are often completely unrelated to the topic and look spammy. If there's any degree of moderation on the sites EVO posts to, the articles (and our links with them) are unlikely to stick.

      3) Rather than having some kind of inbuilt way of caching where you are in the submission process and just closing the offending window when there's one of those IE errors that you mentioned, the software crashes completely and you have to restart.

      4) The software literally has no tolerance for user intervention. Some people like to exercise a bit more control over their linkbuilding, or would prefer to take 5 seconds to fix something that isn't working right on one of the sites so that they can get another link out of the run or to stop it from hanging. There's no pause button... Not even a stop button.

      5) Speed. There have been a number of people in here that have had issues with the length of time EVO takes to jump between sites and get its work done. The length of time it takes to break captchas (the one area where doing it manually is usually faster) exacerbates this issue.

      Don't take this the wrong way. There's more done right than wrong in EVO II. The interface is the best of any automation software I've used, and the idea of integrating static accounts for some sites and dynamic for others is great. The software DOES do what it's supposed to do, for the most part, and I'd much rather use EVO than do everything by hand.

      This would be more than enough if EVO existed in a market without competition. The problem is, as soon as there is a competitor, comparisons are inevitably drawn. At some point, one of the available options is going to be heralded as superior, and they will gain the market share for that particular niche. If you've read the posts on this thread, you know where the general consensus seems to be standing on that issue.

      In closing, Pete, you've got a great piece of software in EVO. If you work out the kinks with the above issues, I don't doubt that you'll be able to take the alpha spot.
      • [3] replies
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • Hi, there is no hard fast rules, but as noted in the PDf, you will get an initial high listing, try to catch that as explained in the PDF, it may drop a bit then come back very nicely

      Cheers

      Pete
  • i think senuke is much better than Bruteforceseo
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • Two things I'm wondering with EvoII

      First it doesn't look like you add your own article, seems strange.
      How many sites total does it post to.

      Also wondering how many total sites SE Nuke post to if all modules are used?

      I probably should read more about them but maybe a quick answer here
      • [2] replies
  • Hi Stephen,

    I tried the 7 day trial of EVOII and I refunded it, as I didn't think it was that great an SEO tool to be honest.

    It posts profile links for your on high PR sites, but in such a way that they look majorly spammy and risk deletion. Also if takes random articles and posts this content to sites like Tumblr and places your link in them and keeps the original author's link also.

    It them creates RSS feeds and like an earlier poster mentioned does something pretty checky/clever with the links to points links at their own sites, but regardless they still create RSS feeds and mash them up and get links.

    Only problem I have is that if you are in competitive niches where you needs a solid SEO plan, then this tool is perhaps a nice little add on, but it aint no one stop solution, that's for sure. It posts to a set number of sites, which means you don't get much IP address diversity in your links, which is not great.

    I asked this in their forum but never got a good response from the administrators. I also emailed their support and they never got back to me.

    I think for easy keywords it does have value though.

    That's just my opinion, but as I said I did invite discussion from them and never got it, instead got something along the lines of "check it these results!! They rock!!" and I am no into hype, I like evidence and facts.

    Cheers
  • I'm quite new on this site, so don't flame me but;

    I've been using EVO2 for the past few days, and although I can't speak as to how good it is against SENuke, what I do know is EVO2 is easy to use and the support is better than I could have expected. I had some problems with crashing and IE errors. Then upgraded to IEv8 and its been fine ever since. Out of the 5 support tickets I've raised 3 were issues, 2 were me being an idiot...but what I can say is that they were answered same day, within a few hours with quality responses.

    For me at an intermediate level its a great tool, and I'm really surprised at some of these comments in this thread?

    I've now set my site up as an affiliate and started tracking progress myself on a new site, and we'll see where it ends up in a few days - as they say the proof is in the pudding.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Who is really having success with these when it comes to actual SEO? Seems like you can create backlinks in these profiles until you are blue in the face, but it seems that google doesn't find them very often. I subscribed to receive backlink notifications through google and noticed very few after several weeks of SENuke.

    Anyone else?
    • [2] replies
    • I don't believe Google reports all the links they find. You might want to try Yahoo Site Explorer for a more accurate overall picture. But even with that, it does seem like only a small fraction of the backlinks show up.

      I got my keyphrase to hit #1 in Google last month with SENuke. So, it worked for me. Hope to use Brute Force SEO with SENuke to do the same thing, with less effort.


    • Did you check your AW stats? Try EVO II, it worked for me.
  • [DELETED]
  • Profile Links for get picked up, I am totally convinced of that now. I have been using them and setting up weird user names, and then after a week or two searching in Google for that name, and I find loads of my profiles, even when back link checkers and Google alerts tell me otherwise.
  • Sometimes it takes time for your rankings in the SERPS to show up. Google finds your anchor text links but won't really give you any juice, sometimes right away, or a few weeks or even a few months later.


    Frank Bruno
  • I just cancelled during my 7 day trial of evo2, and cancelled my brute force linking loophole too.

    The evo2 is poor, the linking loophole only created links on 45 sites out of 103.

    At that rate I can build the links faster.

    Going to try senuke too and maybe the link dominator.
    • [1] reply
    • Simply not true, that was your experience however many others get more links per run besides the links would have taken you a week of work to get -so enjoy the links on the house from Pete. Don't really appreciate people getting "freebies" and then making disparaging remarks about a product - its a slim thing to do.
      • [2] replies
  • I had been using LinkingLoophole, i see some results so far, but not as much traffic/link love as i was expecting. Just signed up for the trial and installed EVOII, we'll see how it goes...
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • I am staying with evo 2 for at least the first month to see if I see a noticeable difference with articles or youtube vids. But one thing I do like about it is that it pretty much does it's thing without me having to "help it along". It failed a couple times trying to set up an email address for me but that was it.
    • [1] reply
    • I just ran evo2 version 6.2 for the first time and while it dd run pretty well it did glitch a couple of times, as it did seem to have a java issue on a couple of sites. Overall it opened most of the accounts and while I have not run senuke yet (planned for tommorrow) it did seem to take awhile.

      Most of the captcha seemed to work ok but it did seem to hang on the two word ones more than any of the others. To be honest this was the first time I have run a captcha defeating piece of software so I was pretty impressed on how well it did overall.

      As far as the number of sites go the program reported 62 successful profiles. The update says there are now 97 total so it was successful right at 2/3 of them. Not sure about the stick rate as I will have to check back on them in a couple of weeks to see.

      One thing I did not see was the extra links on the rss feeds. Not sure if I am just not looking in the correct place or maybe that was discontinued in the new version. If someone could send me an example I would like to see it for myself.

      Overall I would say the automation worked pretty good. Is it worth the price? Not sure yet If the links stick then I would lean towards yes but I will have a better idea after I run my other test tomorrow and have something else to compare it to.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
  • The only thing I do not like about SEnuke is the babysitting that you need to do sometimes...

    I like the idea of not having to touch something once it is up and running.. I would like SEnuke to be like this as well... Just to fill out a form and press go.. and it does everything... and you can choose modules to use or not... that would be cool...
    • [1] reply
    • Well I ran SEnuke today and I found the experience quite different from evo2. The learning curve is quite a bit steeper. Honestly I think these two products are geared towards different markets. Evo2 is much easier to use but I think the results are not quite as polished as SEnuke making its target in my mind at least more towards people who do not have the time, inclination, or ability to master SEnuke. I think SEnuke is more geared to the professional or someone who has the time and ability to spend on learning the program in order to get the most out of it.

      I did have a couple of glitches when running SEnuke, first off it could not seem to create the yahoo account and then after using gmail I ended up having to give google one of my cell phone numbers because the program seem to raise some flags creating all the accounts. I had an extra phone that is just basically backup so I did not have to give them my main number which to be honest I would have been reluctant to do. I did however receive an update today that was supposed to fix those issues according to the email but was not able to test it yet.

      As far as the captcha solving went it did seem to do a better job but I was told at the beginning to stay off the computer while it was working in order for the auto captcha to work. I did not see that message from evo2 but I have to wonder if it would have been more successful if I had, that probably needs to be tested.

      Most of the accounts and the posts/articles did get created just fine, I found them less spammy looking than the ones that evo2 created leading me to believe that the stick rates may be higher but only time will tell on that one. The total number of sites was less and some of the article sites did not go through but it did give me a reason for most of them and offered some solutions.

      One thing I did love (once I figured it out) was the article spinner. that is a very cool piece of software to have included in the package.


      Bottom line:

      Learning to use SEnuke is a much more time consuming project than evo2. You really have to watch the videos to work it. For me it is going to be worth the time as I think the end result is better but if you do not have that time to invest then evo2 is probably a better program for you as you can get started pretty quick and with a lot shallower learning curve and even if SEnuke is better it will do you no good at all if it is not being used.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • [DELETED]
    • [1] reply
    • Sheesh @justeenwinters, why not tell us what you really think.

      That is one hell of a rant, most of which is against the forum rules. "Attack" the product/service, not the people/person delivering it.

      "Attack" of course means constructive criticism.

      Your rant did contain one gem though that I believe needs to be recognized.

      That's the funniest thing I've read all day.

      BTW I am not a fan of BFSEO/Evo either.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • I'm finding that since the last EVO update it has crashed almost every single time that I have used it. Nothing worse then letting it work 2 hours creating accounts and then crash as it starts to post.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • have not used senuke though plan on testing it out here shortly

    i have been using linking loophole/brute force for a few months and like it quite a bit overall. i admit it is quite buggy but overall it gives you alot of punch on relative autopilot

    to give a completely honest review its powerful software but especially the 2.0 module is really buggy. 5 sites total which i dont feel is enough to begin with.and alot of the time most of them dont work

    bottom line, even if the 2.0 module doesnt work.its still worth it to me to pay the full member sub for it as its basically an automatic creator/confirmer for the linking loophole module and rss submission(not many rss aggs available anymore though which sux)

    article module works well too though hopefully they will add in a spin/submit module like awa has and have way more sites to submit too

    thats as honest of a review as i can give as a full member that doesnt do any affiliate promos for the product

    ps-running evo right now,the auto capture is slow but a thing of beauty nonetheless
  • Ewffff!!! I am on the trial for SeNuke. I've used other programs for this but Se just rocks!! After watching the videos it super easy to use.

    Can't say enough about how cool this "robotic" age is.

    And, after my business partner spent three days in Yahoo answers answering and posting normal "human" questions and getting BANNED (argh!!!!) and then having her account cancelled. We'll now fight the good fight with robotics... thank ya!!

    Tx again SeNuke!!
  • I've used SENuke and canceled after my first month. I ran into many bugs and then the accounts would get closed down either after the next day or sometime within the week. I used different proxies and email accounts but all had the same aftermath. I'm still in owe how some people swear by it though. Perhaps they don't care to check the work after it's done a week later.
  • [DELETED]
  • All I can say is that with one run of Terry Kyle's linklist, and a few Brute Force SEO sessions, I am sitting at #1 for my product name as a keyword, competing against 700,000+ sites.

    That is in just a little over a week. Not too shabby at all.

    Brute Force kicks ass.

    SENuke doesn't even compare... Having to solve my own captchas? Please... not anymore....
    • [2] replies
    • lol SEnuke had auto-captcha solving long before Bruteforce did. Have you even tried it?

    • Interesting ... give the SENuke trial a try; not only will you find the captcha solving works great but you will have something to 'actually' compare!!!
  • [DELETED]
  • I have been using EVO2 for a week now and I haven't had a chance to work with SEnuke just yet. I can say that my main page went from PR0 to PR1 this week. And every site I am promoting has had an increase in traffic - ranging from 17-200%. The higher number is of course for a new site that just jumped from 2 - 6 visitors in the last week.

    I would be interested to see what traffic bumps I can get with SEnuke. I think both products are strong but do some different things.
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • I would be interested to see what type of statistical results people are getting with either of these programs. Please let me know.
    • [1] reply
    • Hello,
      i would like to know about payment scheme.. for $127 (SENUKE).. is it possible if the payment not in continuous basis instead case basis... i mean, when i want to use it, i'll pay for a month contract.. then i stop the subscription... in short, i use manual extend instead automatic billing.

      is it possible ?
  • interesting reads here.
    so far it looks like senuke is far ahead
    • [1] reply
    • I am actively looking for Beta testers for my new product that is a direct competitor to EVO and SENuke.

      Please drop by my site to see the free "lite" version (video now posted too!) and sign up for it. You will then be automatically included in the phased Beta program for the "full" edition that offers an alternative to the "big guys".

      Link is in the signature. I'd love your feedback.

      -Dave
      • [2] replies
  • I own and use SEnuke and am very happy with it.
    • [1] reply
    • I am still quite happy with SEnuke. It is updated regularly and the profile list is long.
  • senuke is definately the software for me, I've had very good affiliate success with it, haven't tried Brute Force, but from what I hear it can be quite buggy, not that SENuke is still totally bug free! Nothing will ever be perfect with IM software though!
  • I'd like to see proof for all of those that have said they received any SERP movement at all using these programs. I've tried SENuke for 3 months and it did absolutely nothing for my sites.
  • [DELETED]
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • Since Brute Force just relaunched, I'd be curious to hear what others think about the 2.

    I feel like I should just buy both and see which one is better: Brute Force SEO or SENukeXcr
    • [1] reply
    • I do have two copies of SEnukeXcr and iam going to sell one copy and use the money to buy another seo software

      so far SEukeXcr sound good for me because of the new Xcr feature but it required alot of outsource you need time to create all these Xcr sites however senukexcr can run using any window server without need to leave computer on

      regarding brute force I just came across it today and iam too want to know what is the advantage from other seo softwares, the video inside sales page look like a hollywood starwar video but i want to hear from real users

Next Topics on Trending Feed

  • 348

    Hi I'd like to seek some opinions on the ratings of the two... I know there are 2 separate threads about the 2 software but I'm wondering if anyone has tried both and could give an objective comparison in terms of results. I think they are quite similar so I would assume having one of them is sufficient, unless someone has more insight about this.