Anyone Using The Link Juicer?

Honest reply from user and affiliate (sig)

I have used it for almost 12 months. My original test page has been on page one for the main keyword since May 2010 after about 6 weeks of Linkjuicer. Note, other pages of the site benefited from other link building efforts, so I cannot attribute it totally and purely to Linkjuicer.

I did a blog post update in August 2010:

""Yes, I do have an update. The test keyword was "xx xx xx" for http ://site

This keyword has been on page One for at least 3 months, probably longer. I tried some tougher keywords in the insurance niche, but have been unable to get higher than page 10.. So all in all, if you choose a keyword that can be competitive through natural linkbuilding, then this system can be a set and forget way to do it automatically. But it will not get you to page one on a keyword that is too hard."'


However it was enough for me to persevere, and I have done so ever since. It is a set and forget arrangement. I usually keep each campaign up for a couple of months and 600 or so links, then take it down. Drip feed of 50 links a day. Server side proxies are used. A mix of automated content {""web 2.0) and bookmarking sites, all do follow.

It is one of a number of strategies, and not the only linkbuilding strategy to use. I found it superior to the content publishing network (you know, spun arties on no-name blogs) offerings out there that cost the same amount each month.

The 1500 free links for one month attracts a lot of tire kickers, but it is pretty easy to get the system to pay for itself.

To show sig or not to show show sig? My default sig is shown, and yes it is to thelinkjuicer site.

Bottom line, I will continue to use the linkjuicer as part of a comprehensive link building strategy. Hope that helps.