The difference I see is that linklicious will create a short url and then ping that link which is supposed to give you a better chance at getting that link live.
Plus, linklicious will build you links through the onehourbacklinks service and they will pay for the onehourbacklinking service if you use their service.
I would love to hear some thoughts from people who have first hand knowledge on linkbuilding and what works and what doesn't. Let's keep the guessing and theories out of this thread please.
Also, what do you think about using the linklicious service to build the links and then use the linkclaw to get the regular (not the shortened version of the links) indexed? Would this be a waste or cause any flags at google?
Can't wait to hear your thoughts.