Any experienced guy has good results with some Spinning Software?

10 replies
Hi,

I just wanna ask one thing. Is there anyone here using 'Spinning' articles by using some software like TBS or some other similar software.

I knew 'Readability' wouldnt be good with software. BUT i just wanna know: " Is there anyone getting good results by using some spinning software? "

I can do outosurce articles but i had some financial issues these days, so iam thinking to just wanna give a try with some spinning software.


and Does google filtered out spinning articles in google search results? ( Just curious to know, since I seen TBS software providing content almost unique, though it may not be great readbility. )

So, any experienced guy has good results with some spinning software. If yes, please kindly share your experience.

Thanks
#experienced #good #guy #results #software #spinning #tbs
  • Profile picture of the author ThrillerAuthor
    I have used spinning software some time ago for article marketing, but soon discovered that you need to manually go through the words in the master article and discover synonyms for many of the words and add them manually to get the best results. Only then can you generate a lot of unique "spin-off" articles from the master one.

    I still use this technique today, but only to discover better synonyms for certain words in my own writing. I used to have TBS, but it soon became very expensive, and then I switched to the basic free version of the Chimp Rewriter software. Even the free basic version is a match for TBS on the quality of the output, or at least at the time I started to use Chimp Rewriter.

    You can find more info about the free version on these 2 pages: Chimp Rewriter Download - Chimp Rewriter (just click on the button that says "hide previous versions" to get the free software if the latest version isn't free anymore); and Features - Chimp Rewriter
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9711650].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
      Banned
      "Spinning" is nonsense.

      It's based on a fundamental misunderstanding.

      It's a solution to a "problem" that doesn't actually exist.

      A solution of benefit only to people selling spinning software and services.

      "Spinning" is without value. It can damage your business, but it can't help you. Everyone who actually makes a living from article marketing (rather than from supplying spinning software or services) says the same things about spinning. And there are reasons for that.

      The whole thing is based on a fallacy, and a misunderstanding about what "duplicate content" and "syndicated content" mean and signify.

      The value of a backlink doesn't depend on whether the content to which it's attached is "unique" or "previously published": it depends on many other things, but that isn't one of them, and Google says so openly.

      For people open-minded enough to read them, the following six items explain much more, at greater length and in greater detail.
      • this post explains the benefits of spinning
      • the first half (or so) of this thread contains a good discussion of what you can gain from spinning articles
      • the advice on this subject given by so many people throughout most of this thread has been really helpful to many people here
      • on the meaning and significance of "duplicate content", in this context, this little post from expert article marketer Anne Pottinger includes direct quotations from Google's WebMaster Central Blog on the subject (not easy to find a more authoritative source than that!)
      • this little article is also a very useful and accurate explanation of the subject
      • this post, and its links, explain in detail the closely related subject of how article directories really work and why they exist


      .
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9711662].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author discrat
        I agree.

        You are just 'spinning' your wheels with Spinning software


        - Robert Andrew
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9712047].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author onSubie
    What do you mean by "good results"?

    Do you mean spinning software that produces good results and legible spun documents?

    Or do you mean cash flying into your PayPal account on autopilot because of spun articles?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9712061].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author gillw254
      Originally Posted by onSubie View Post

      What do you mean by "good results"?

      Do you mean spinning software that produces good results and legible spun documents?

      Or do you mean cash flying into your PayPal account on autopilot because of spun articles?
      I mean are you able to get any traffic by using spinning content..?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9712156].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author onSubie
        Originally Posted by gillw254 View Post

        I mean are you able to get any traffic by using spinning content..?
        Oh, then "No".

        It is only common sense. Since spun content is usually not very pleasant for a person to read (I can tell by your post you are not an experienced spinner who can create multiple legible documents), why would anyone read it and then follow your links?

        If nobody reads your article and follows the links, where will the traffic come from?

        You know "traffic" isn't some magical thing like the "space time continuum". Traffic is individual people who may or may not opt-in or buy.

        When you think of "traffic" is some magical "thing" that is when you start paying $5 for 100,000 clicks thinking "if only 1% opt-in and buy then I'll have 1,000 sales".

        Without considering that 1% of nothing is nothing.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9712172].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Sid Hale
          Oh Shit...

          Originally Posted by onSubie View Post

          Since spun content is usually not very pleasant for a person to read, why would anyone read it and then follow your links?

          So That's What's Wrong!!
          Signature

          Sid Hale
          Coming Soon... Rapid Action Profits (Pro)

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9712703].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
        Banned
        Originally Posted by gillw254 View Post

        I mean are you able to get any traffic by using spinning content..?
        It doesn't matter, Gill. Because whatever traffic you can get by using spun content, you can get by using un-spun content anyway. (And it's not as if spinning someone else's content has ever been legal, sensible, or helpful, anyway.) The entire thing's based on a misunderstanding. As explained in all the links in my post above, it's just total nonsense, and actually it always has been. It's like asking if there's any nutritional value in what you eat, if you boil a vegetable for 55 minutes instead of for 5 minutes: there might still be some, but who cares, because whatever it is, it's not as good as if you didn't bother with the last 50 of those 55 minutes, anyway? It really is about as simple as that. Even if you can get some traffic from spun content, it isn't the fact that it's spun that's bringing you any benefit, anyway: you can't gain anything, by spinning it: you can only lose something.


        .
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9712363].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Chris Cole
    We all fall into the trap of thinking we need to be spinning articles. I used to do this myself years ago, and I even had a great method for ensuring my articles had good results. I would re-write every sentence up to 5 times and add this into the software.

    I eventually came to realize I was wasting my time - the real answer is ADD VALUE online!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9712113].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JensSteyaert
    If you are someone looking to build a PBN and need a lot of content, then spinning software might be helpful.

    For all other reasons not so much, as you've seen already explained clearly by everybody else..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[9712818].message }}

Trending Topics