What are some of your angles on adult traffic?

Don't know what I have to add. It's been years since I've been in the business. And my opinion is not exactly positive. Looks like other posters in this thread might have more current insight.

When I started back in 98, it was easy money. Literally. Wasn't uncommon to have sales ratio's of 1:50 or lower for $25+ trial payouts. Built many ugly small picture sites behind multiple AVS systems and every one I built made money. Back when banners actually got clicked.

I also did link lists, focusing on very narrow niches, very narrow and it worked well. Never did much TGP, and tube sites did not really exist back then.

But over the years conversions decreased greatly and I was working harder for less money. Lucky to get 1:500. Not to mention so many affiliate programs scamming. And the competition grew greatly.

Just wasn't worth it for me any more. After moving in to more mainstream, I was making alot more with less traffic. And I wasn't embarrassed about what I was doing.

Problem with adult was and is even more so these days, is that there is too much free content. Tube sites being the biggest problem. Why should surfers pay when they can get it for free?

I pushed mostly adult membership sites, so dating might still be good these days, I don't know.

There are people who say there is still good money to be made, but I have to call BS. For the most part, for the average person trying to profit from the market it's going to be difficult.

Couple months ago I stopped by an adult webmaster forum I use to frequent, was very popular (not GFY), and it was a ghost town. Very few new posts. From 100's of webmasters posting each day, to nothing at all. Good indication of the biz if you ask me.

But again, I've been out of it for a long time, so maybe my opinion doesn't count.

From reading this:

Under Section 29 of the Films Act, the production, reproduction, importation, distribution and possession of "obscene films" is illegal in Singapore (with penalties involving fines and/or jail terms).

Here, "film" includes those in digital formats and "obscene", what "taken as a whole, such as to tend to deprave or corrupt" those who view it.

Similarly, doing the same with "obscene publications" is criminalised by Section 11 of the Undesirable Publications Act and Section 292 of the Penal Code (where "publications" include books, magazines, periodicals, sound recordings, pictures, drawings, photographs etc) and the sanctions are similar (sidenote: curiously, Section 202 of the Penal Code has a religious exemption, presumably fFor Indian lingams and yonis).

In practice, if you're discreetly consuming it in private no one will likely touch you, especially if it's in digital format.

In fact, the top frequently asked question on the website of the Media Development Authority (which regulates such things; MDA - FAQs)