Is Automatic Content Generation Ruining the Internet?

14 replies
Hi Guys

Recently, I have come across a number of sites (actually 3 different sites) that all offer an automatic content generation service. There is even one service that says you can take one if its own autogenerated articles and use it to reseed the system to generate further unique articles.

Perhaps they have been around for some time and have only recently come to my attention because, these days, I am putting a lot more effort into Article Marketing. Anyway, these services sound pretty similar. They all essentially offer to generate original unique articles - automatically. I have to admit I was - and perhaps still am, to some extent - tempted. But, so far, I have resisted the urge to get involved.

Let's face it, we all want to succeed - that's why we are here having our discussions about making money after all. But at what cost? There is nothing wrong, in my book, with seeking to gain competitive advantage by using tactics we are all aware of such as bookmarking, link-building, article distribution, press releases etc, but the whole idea of filling-up the internet with (forgive me) ... garbage seems to me to be something I don't wish to be party to.

Surely, I am not the only person who feels this way. I would think the guys at Google, for example, would be well-aware of these sorts of sites and services; and that they would be discussing - probably right now - how they could combat the problem for the long-term good of the internet. Who knows - perhaps it will never be done. But the point is - what kind of an internet are we building for this and future generations? And is it something we would be proud to be a part of?

I would be very interested to hear what other Warriors think on this subject.

Will
#automatic #content #generation #internet #ruining
  • Profile picture of the author nitin22
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1149840].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CliveG
    Originally Posted by Will Edwards View Post

    Hi Guys

    ... I would think the guys at Google, for example, would be well-aware of these sorts of sites and services; and that they would be discussing - probably right now ...

    Will
    Hi Will,

    I think that Google Adsense does have something in place, but it's not complete. As an experiment, about 2 months ago I set up an autoblog just to see how possible the whole thing was. It worked - it was not particularly good, but probably better than some of the blogs that I have seen. So then I enabled Adsense on it. Ads displayed public service ads nearly all the time. Real blogs in the same niche display real ads as do my other sites on the same Adsense account, hence my thought that Google may be working on this.

    Interestingly, it does not seem to affect Google search (yet).

    Cheers, Clive
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1149952].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Midas3 Consulting
      Originally Posted by CliveG View Post

      Hi Will,

      I think that Google Adsense does have something in place, but it's not complete. As an experiment, about 2 months ago I set up an autoblog just to see how possible the whole thing was. It worked - it was not particularly good, but probably better than some of the blogs that I have seen. So then I enabled Adsense on it. Ads displayed public service ads nearly all the time. Real blogs in the same niche display real ads as do my other sites on the same Adsense account, hence my thought that Google may be working on this.

      Interestingly, it does not seem to affect Google search (yet).

      Cheers, Clive
      Equally there are tens of thousands of autoblogs out there pulling targeted adsense revenue.

      I "think" as I'm not an expert on auto blogs but there does seem to be a bit of difference between them.

      Some of the good ones are pulling in 100% targeted content based on the blog URL, title and so forth, the adsense ads are matching that 100% unrewritten content , no it's not original but it's not far from what the searcher was looking for.

      On the other hand you have autoblogs parsing in god awful crappy spun content which looks and sounds awful which Google may be picking up on.

      The former are really no better/worse than any niche landing page with hand written content , the latter are just cyber junk gumming up the works.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1149967].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Glenn Leader
        Originally Posted by SimonHarrison View Post

        Equally there are tens of thousands of autoblogs out there pulling targeted adsense revenue.

        I "think" as I'm not an expert on auto blogs but there does seem to be a bit of difference between them.

        Some of the good ones are pulling in 100% targeted content based on the blog URL, title and so forth, the adsense ads are matching that 100% unrewritten content , no it's not original but it's not far from what the searcher was looking for.

        On the other hand you have autoblogs parsing in god awful crappy spun content which looks and sounds awful which Google may be picking up on.

        The former are really no better/worse than any niche landing page with hand written content , the latter are just cyber junk gumming up the works.
        And a third option: Where you have spun articles written from scratch
        with the searcher in mind. They result? Google serves relevant articles
        for the searcher, the searcher gets the information they're looking for,
        and quite often, the blog (or website) owner, gets their share of the
        revenue.

        HTH

        Glenn
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1150129].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Mangozoom
    The concept appeals as clearly it enables one to generate a lot of unique pages. But what about the value of the content ... does it read well and serve the visitor to the page with the results they where looking for.

    My instinct tells me that it takes longer to write and create unique content but in the long run will be worth it.

    Maybe thats just me

    John
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1150149].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Midas3 Consulting
      Originally Posted by Mangozoom View Post

      The concept appeals as clearly it enables one to generate a lot of unique pages. But what about the value of the content ... does it read well and serve the visitor to the page with the results they where looking for.

      My instinct tells me that it takes longer to write and create unique content but in the long run will be worth it.

      Maybe thats just me

      John
      Hi John,

      Well, that really is my point about the type of blogs. The content is targeted by keyword/LSI phrase and parsed in, this is what s/w like FirePow does along with various alternatives.

      If the visitor lands on a page with content which is specific to their search, it's really irrelevent whether it's unique or duplicated content. I personally dislike spun content it's almost always dire unless it's "manually" spun and I tend to call that being re-written.

      What you may have however is that with totally unique content on your niche site you may have been SEO than with the same content replicated a hundred times.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1150162].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Jon Alexander
        Originally Posted by SimonHarrison View Post

        If the visitor lands on a page with content which is specific to their search, it's really irrelevent whether it's unique or duplicated content.
        you'd think so, wouldn't you? But this is not the case. Imagine if there was only ONE article about 'dog training'. I could land on a million different pages and keep seeing the exact same stuff. That would be pretty annoying. And pretty irrelevant after the first reading, too.
        Signature
        http://www.contentboss.com - automated article rewriting software gives you unique content at a few CENTS per article!. New - Put text into jetspinner format automatically! http://www.autojetspinner.com

        PS my PM system is broken. Sorry I can't help anymore.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1150203].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author DavidO
          This is just one aspect of a bigger problem that's making the Internet into the much-quoted "cesspool" it is. Even a lot of what passes for "original" content is totally worthless and gives no value to the visitor. Article spinning and poor content are just side effects of the countless instant "authorities" on the web.

          If this were to continue unabated it would eventually ruin the Internet (even more than it has). Thankfully, it looks like the search engines are at least staying even, if not pulling ahead, in their cat and mouse game with scamsters and mere opportunists who call themselves authorities.

          For a long time I've been dismayed at the total junk sites that have been outpositioning my site and other quality resources in the search results. But analyzing the search results of Google Caffeine I see that these sites are finally demoted to double-digit pages where they belong. I hope these results are reflected in other niches.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1150228].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Will Edwards
            Originally Posted by DavidO View Post

            ... But analyzing the search results of Google Caffeine I see that these sites are finally demoted to double-digit pages where they belong. I hope these results are reflected in other niches.
            Yes - interesting how the update project is named 'Caffeine'. I have no idea why but you know there can be a lot in a name!

            Will
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1153023].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kurt
      Originally Posted by Mangozoom View Post

      The concept appeals as clearly it enables one to generate a lot of unique pages. But what about the value of the content ... does it read well and serve the visitor to the page with the results they where looking for.

      My instinct tells me that it takes longer to write and create unique content but in the long run will be worth it.

      Maybe thats just me

      John
      Actually, my pet peeve is the use of the word "unique". IMO, the same info spun using different words is unqiue text strings, but not unique content.

      Truly unqique content should be able to be added to an autoreponder, with the person reading each message discovering new info.

      I'm not saying I'm totally against spun content. I'm just totally against calling the output "unique".
      Signature
      Discover the fastest and easiest ways to create your own valuable products.
      Tons of FREE Public Domain content you can use to make your own content, PLR, digital and POD products.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1150163].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Rich Lowe
    Hey Will,

    My opinion is that the people that rely on this automated content for long term success will end up losing.

    You can add it as a strategy but I certainly wouldnt rely on it for long term success.

    When i have visited sites and i know its automated content that doesnt sound right, I'm done with them and i dont go back to their site again.

    Rich
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1153487].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Hyaku_Man
      It's not ruining the internet. The internet has all kinds of content that is useless or irrelevant to what you need, even if it is original. Most people can quickly judge if content is not what they're looking for and move on.

      I use spun articles, but I spin them manually so I know they make sense. It doesn't bother me that there are near-duplicate articles on different sites. RSS feeds shoot 100% dupes all over the net on purpose, so I don't care.
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1153514].message }}

Trending Topics