Wanna hire a cheap article writer? Here's what you get.

RE: "Yes, the diets of XXX XXX product helps in loosing wait, very first. Let's take a look at how it works in loosing weight."

....see that's the thing. VERY first. Like first thing in the morning. After popping the pill the night before.

Let's take a look. We can watch it in real time. Nice. First in its class.

I like high class copywriters. He seems to be one of the very best,
under payed for sure. You got a deal here. Yeah.

Is the cost-of-living that low in South Africa?

Coz, where I am, for that money, I'll get you a 500-word article and think I'd got paid ok only.

King must not like Patterson because not all Patterson books were written entirely by Patterson: James Patterson: how the bestseller factory works - Telegraph.

He was a businessman above being a writer.

But, to the pertinent part of my thoughts:

Though price doesn't guarantee a certain level of writing quality, usually, very low prices do mean low quality. High prices usually mean better quality.

And, the problem, for all involved is intent and lack of tags.

Writers who write $5 500-word articles that are going to be put on some website so that Google thinks the website is active or so that a particular keyword appears on the site surrounded by other words, should have their own title (and it should not be writer; maybe not even SEO writer).

And the subjective problem still remains. So, we invent yet another set of sub-groups and... the subjective problem still remains. So we invent yet another set of subgroups...

Ad nauseam.

So, the solution?

Clearly communicate to writers what you want and why; hire a few, choose one you like and start (or don't start) Warrior Forum threads about the ones you do not like.

And educate the masses about SEO and marketing, so demand for $5 500-word articles goes down.

Take a look at the guy who posted right after you. He'll deliver a 500-word original article or your money back.

That is fine guarantee. But the poster assumes that original (presumably means passes copyscape) is the same as quality.

Which brings us to why we have the confusion: people define quality too broadly. Passing copyscape might be the right quality for some; it's not for me and others.

And the above brings us to: we must create new sub-groups in the writing world and end up to ad nauseam.

Whew! All those words and I'm still defeated! Who'd have thunk it?!

@Slym I said in my post requesting submissions that I would pay for the sample. So I did.

Dee

Most people who hire are American selling to an American audience. So, the greatest need is for people who can write like Americans You know, for affinity reasons. We're like you, you can buy from us and feel safe doing so, kind of thinking.

Plus, if you're American and you come across a phrase that's common to some other native speakers but not you, that phrase distracts you from buying.

The part I have an issue with is native. Because some natives write like crap; some non-natives write better than most natives. (I know, I know, most of the natives write better than most of the non-natives. But there's enough of natives that write poorly that it should give people pause, if not make them skip the requirement and just judge by samples.

Can you tell by what I wrote above whether I'm a native of an English-speaking country and which one?