Why do they set the prices ending in 7?

15 replies
Why do they set the prices ending in 7?
WSO ebooks $7, $17, $27, etc.?
#ending #prices #set
  • Profile picture of the author Liam Hamer
    I have wondered this too - is it maybe a psychological thing for the(potential) buyer?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1179626].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author thegladiator
    it shows that the purchser is getting some discount...
    i do it for that reason..... and many thinks 7 is a lucky number...lol
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1179628].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Meanna Blog
    There was a lot of research and test and measure done on this. It's a psychological factor that these numbers tend to appeal more. Not 100% sure why but I bet if you have a dig around you'll find out why.

    I did hear though that once most people are using $27 and $97 for their products then the numbers will probably have to change as people will get used to them.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1179638].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Franck Silvestre
    This was tested by a direct marketing expert: Ted Nicholas, and it became popular in IM with the $7 script.

    But you still need to make your own test.

    Franck


    Originally Posted by benkleiner View Post

    Why do they set the prices ending in 7?
    WSO ebooks $7, $17, $27, etc.?
    Signature
    Former Body Guard, Now REAL Traffic & List Building Coach
    >> HOT WSO: Six Figure Solo Sellers <<

    Winson Yeung said: "...Definitively A++ recommended WSO"
    Kevin Riley said: "Franck, glad to see you bringing out MORE and MORE GREAT stuff"
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1179640].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author marciayudkin
      There is a whole academic field called Pricing Psychology, and they test all kinds of things. It was not just Ted Nicholas confirming the power of prices ending in 7.

      Here is a short article I wrote for my newsletter on some of the less-known discoveries in this field.

      Taking the Pain Out of Prices

      by Marcia Yudkin

      A price is a price, right? Not really, according to Cornell
      University researchers, who tested whether restaurant owners
      would profit most when menu prices were formatted as $20.00,
      20.00 or twenty dollars.

      To their surprise, the 20.00 format netted the most, with
      customers spending 8 percent more when menus used numerals
      to represent prices, minus any dollar signs.

      Without the dollar sign or the word "dollars," diners were
      apparently reminded least that what they were ordering was
      making them a tiny bit poorer.

      Specialists in the field of "menu engineering" have also
      discovered that menus bring in more revenue when they insert
      prices at the end of each small paragraph describing the
      item, rather than all lined up in a column that can be
      quickly scanned from top to bottom.

      Likewise, those who study these things tell us that we
      tend to perceive $23 to be less than $23.00.

      One more finding: When looking at menus, we take prices
      like $20.00 as indicative of higher quality food than
      prices like $19.99.

      [taken from The Marketing Minute, www.yudkin.com/markmin.htm]
      Signature
      Check out Marcia Yudkin's No-Hype Marketing Academy for courses on copywriting, publicity, infomarketing, marketing plans, naming, and branding - not to mention the popular "Marketing for Introverts" course.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1179721].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Memo
    Yes and I think Corey Rudl talked about this first in The IM world.

    I have tested and can say that $10 beats the $7. In my tests anyway..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1181267].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Bob Monie
      Originally Posted by Memo View Post

      Yes and I think Corey Rudl talked about this first in The IM world.

      I have tested and can say that $10 beats the $7. In my tests anyway..
      Yes, I agree with you Memo, that the total price would definitely play a part with the $7 technique actually working.

      With a pricing of $10 vs $7, you would require a of 30% increase in conversion just to break even.

      Rather than $100 vs $97 where anything over 3% increase in conversion will be a larger profit.
      Signature
      Will be the next authority article directory. Come take a look around. Submit and Publish your own articles.
      200,000+ Articles, 48,000+ Authors, Articles indexed in Google in under 1 minute
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1181366].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Lance K
        Originally Posted by Bob Monie View Post

        With a pricing of $10 vs $7, you would require a of 30% increase in conversion just to break even.
        At that price point, conversion rate is a more important metric than profitability/break even. Those are prices for lead in (front end) products. And their purpose is to convert as many prospects into customers as possible. Profitability is second fiddle in that case.

        The optimum price for your products and services will vary depending on the purpose of each individual product or service (customer acquisition vs. profit center).
        Signature
        "You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want."
        ~ Zig Ziglar
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1183134].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author jamawebinc
          Testing has stated that prices ending in 7 sell more.

          It is something that has been accepted in direct marketing circles. However there are plenty of other businesses that end their prices with .99 or .95 or other variations.

          If you go into a retail store. Everything does not end in 7.

          I have a report called The Price Point Report which goes into the issue pretty deeply. Apparently it is not always smart to just end a price with 7.

          Although the testing has been done, I have never seen the studies myself. As far as what type of markets were tested and what type of advertisements.

          There are plenty of marketers out there that do not use and ending price of 7. And there are plenty of online stores that don't use it either.

          It is more advantageous to make your own test and see if there is a difference rather than to just except the blanket rule that you must end in a 7.

          The rules are great places to start, but it pays to know when to break them.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1183372].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jhongren
    it is decided by your own test and tweak....i have seen combination of 7 and 9 like 997 or 979...which one converts better? only the tester knows.

    John
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1181326].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Don Schenk
    Aboutalhah had it correct. It was Ted Nicholas who introduced this after testing $149 against $147.

    Twenty years ago he published a newsletter to direct mail info marketers. He tested ending prices with $9 and $7 and found the $7 ending price pulled more sales that one ending in $9.

    Ted Nicholas is a fellow who sold millions of dollars worh of info products about how to sell info products. He owned a business called The Company Corporation that taught people to save money by doing their own incorporation of their businesses.

    Along with this he published manuals and cassette tape (remember those?) courses, and he was a popular seminar speaker. So, when he started talking about his tests of $7/$9 as an ending price, other info marketers began doing the same without test it themselves.

    This is why you still see prices ening in $7 in the info marketing world and not so much elsewhere.

    Ted is still around and every now and then I get an email about some seminar, bootcamp, or other pitch fest at which he will be speaking.

    :-Don
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1181364].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Dave777
    Opinions from a previous thread on the subject...
    http://www.warriorforum.com/main-int...nding-7-a.html

    Dave
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1181377].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Memo
    Exactly I am with you Lance K...When I did (and still doing) that test I look for the conversion rate metric not the profitability. This is my lead in product..
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1183366].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Memo
    Yes and that is why testing is so important in marketing.....Test test always test...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1183386].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alican Yenidogan
    Pretty simple. Lets say it is $97... Just turn your monitor upside down. Now it is $16

    Just kidding

    Have totally no idea...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1183394].message }}

Trending Topics