FTC Releases PDF of Guidelines for New Adv. Ruling

15 years ago

Thanks HaySal,

I've been looking for something like that.

The new rules don't seem to be bothering the big advertisers on TV. Especially the health supplements and insurance. They are going on business as usual.

George Wright

Thanks

Signature

"The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268275].message }}

HeySal

15 years ago

George - as I pointed out in some other thread in some other place (wherever the heck it was), the fines are topping at $11,000 dollars. That's not something that would even target or concern big business. They're after the little guys.

[ 1 ] Thanks
2 replies

Signature

Sal
When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
Beyond the Path

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268303].message }}

George Wright

15 years ago

Or maybe very small business also.

I wonder if there will be a market for some type of E and O insurance for small business.

George Wright

Originally Posted by HeySal

George - as I pointed out in some other thread in some other place (wherever the heck it was), the fines are topping at $11,000 dollars. That's not something that would even target or concern big business. They're after the little guys.

Thanks

Signature

"The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268310].message }}

Stephen Crooks

15 years ago

That's a really good point but surely the big businesses out there have to be seen to be complying with the FTC just for the sake of public relations. It would get a bit embarrassing for some big pharmaceutical company to be openly flouting the FTC rules.

Originally Posted by HeySal

George - as I pointed out in some other thread in some other place (wherever the heck it was), the fines are topping at $11,000 dollars. That's not something that would even target or concern big business. They're after the little guys.

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

Affiliate Marketing Profits 2020 - Step by Step Guides
How to Make $100 a day Online

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268343].message }}

HeySal

15 years ago

Originally Posted by Steve Crooks

That's a really good point but surely the big businesses out there have to be seen to be complying with the FTC just for the sake of public relations. It would get a bit embarrassing for some big pharmaceutical company to be openly flouting the FTC rules.

Seriously? If losing 2.3 bil in a lawsuit for promoting off label usage of a drug that led to deaths of 1/4 of the drugs users didn't embarrass Phitzer (sp?) or pushing vaccines to young children when it reads right on the labels "18 or older" isn't putting a feather in their craws, I don't think violation of FTC guidelines is gonna really do it.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Sal
When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
Beyond the Path

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268374].message }}

Stephen Crooks

15 years ago

Okay, maybe pharmaceutical is a bad example but my point is, big businesses have to be seen to be doing the right thing and not openly flouting laws. Especially when it comes to the public face of the company, i.e. their advertizing.

Originally Posted by HeySal

Seriously? If losing 2/3 bil in a lawsuit for promoting off label usage of a drug that led to deaths of 1/4 of the drugs users didn't embarrass Phitzer (sp?) or pushing vaccines to young children when it reads right on the labels "18 or older" is putting a feather in their craws, I don't think violation of FTC guidelines is gonna really do it.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Affiliate Marketing Profits 2020 - Step by Step Guides
How to Make $100 a day Online

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268392].message }}

Killer Joe

15 years ago

Originally Posted by Steve Crooks

Okay, maybe pharmaceutical is a bad example but my point is, big businesses have to be seen to be doing the right thing and not openly flouting laws. Especially when it comes to the public face of the company, i.e. their advertizing.

Steve, I don't think the new guidelines have taken affect yet, but a lot of the trade associations had input into the new GLs, and their members are probably scrambling right now to reshoot a lot of the media they broadcast to be in compliance when the new GLs do kick in.

KJ

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268407].message }}

Stephen Crooks

15 years ago

Yeah probably.. As someone who is from the UK but does a lot of business in the USA I am really confused also how these new guidlines affect me.

Originally Posted by Killer Joe

Steve, I don't think the new guidelines have taken affect yet, but a lot of the trade associations had input into the new GLs, and their members are probably scrambling right now to reshoot a lot of the media they broadcast to be in compliance when the new GLs do kick in.

KJ

Thanks

Signature

Affiliate Marketing Profits 2020 - Step by Step Guides
How to Make $100 a day Online

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268427].message }}

Killer Joe

15 years ago

How about these passages from that PDF...

§ 255.5 Disclosure of material connections.

When there exists a connection between the endorser and the seller of the advertised product that might materially affect the weight or credibility of the endorsement (i.e., the connection is not reasonably expected by the audience), such connection must be fully disclosed.

Additional guidance, including guidance concerning endorsements made through other media, is provided by the examples below.

Example 8: An online message board designated for discussions of new music download technology is frequented by MP3 player enthusiasts. They exchange information about new products, utilities, and the functionality of numerous playback devices.

Unbeknownst to the message board community, an employee of a leading playback device manufacturer has been posting messages on the discussion board promoting the manufacturer's product.

Knowledge of this poster's employment likely would affect the weight or credibility of her endorsement. Therefore, the poster should clearly and conspicuously disclose her relationship to the manufacturer to members and readers of the message board.

**********

We might need some additional space in our sig files for these new disclosures

KJ

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268380].message }}

Stephen Crooks

15 years ago

That sentence "the connection is not reasonably expected by the audience" throws a lot of ambiguity at it. How the heck do you determine the expectation levels of other people in a forum and also who is going to judge that? What has happened to common sense here?

Originally Posted by Killer Joe

How about these passages from that PDF...

§ 255.5 Disclosure of material connections.

When there exists a connection between the endorser and the seller of the advertised product that might materially affect the weight or credibility of the endorsement (i.e., the connection is not reasonably expected by the audience), such connection must be fully disclosed.

Additional guidance, including guidance concerning endorsements made through other media, is provided by the examples below.

Example 8: An online message board designated for discussions of new music download technology is frequented by MP3 player enthusiasts. They exchange information about new products, utilities, and the functionality of numerous playback devices.

Unbeknownst to the message board community, an employee of a leading playback device manufacturer has been posting messages on the discussion board promoting the manufacturer's product.

Knowledge of this poster's employment likely would affect the weight or credibility of her endorsement. Therefore, the poster should clearly and conspicuously disclose her relationship to the manufacturer to members and readers of the message board.

**********

We might need some additional space in our sig files for these new disclosures

KJ

Thanks

Signature

Affiliate Marketing Profits 2020 - Step by Step Guides
How to Make $100 a day Online

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268417].message }}

Josiah

15 years ago

Originally Posted by Killer Joe

How about these passages from that PDF...

§ 255.5 Disclosure of material connections.

When there exists a connection between the endorser and the seller of the advertised product that might materially affect the weight or credibility of the endorsement (i.e., the connection is not reasonably expected by the audience), such connection must be fully disclosed.

Additional guidance, including guidance concerning endorsements made through other media, is provided by the examples below.

Example 8: An online message board designated for discussions of new music download technology is frequented by MP3 player enthusiasts. They exchange information about new products, utilities, and the functionality of numerous playback devices.

Unbeknownst to the message board community, an employee of a leading playback device manufacturer has been posting messages on the discussion board promoting the manufacturer's product.

Knowledge of this poster's employment likely would affect the weight or credibility of her endorsement. Therefore, the poster should clearly and conspicuously disclose her relationship to the manufacturer to members and readers of the message board.

**********

We might need some additional space in our sig files for these new disclosures

KJ

Haha, you're right!

Maybe another 20 lines?

Thanks

Signature

NEW CopyForPennies WSO "GUARANTEED CONVERSIONS" OFFER: Get A Million Dollar Copywriter For $297!
VideoSalesletterKing.com World Class Video Salesletters For MAXIMUM CONVERSIONS!
Want To Hire Me Personally? One Of My Clients Does Over $50 MILLION A Year! MillionDollarAdMan.com

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268421].message }}

HeySal

15 years ago

I would think that it would be a good time for anyone doing ANYTHING to grab an LLC to protect them from personal liability in case there are some loopholes for subjective prosecution - which I would imagine there are, but I haven't read the PDF yet so really can't make any educated statements. Even just the direction this is moving without reading the specifics, though, I'm thinking strongly of grabbing an LLC. Might do insurance later but just wanna protect my private assets for now. (private assets, oh hell LOL - I just got real funny!)

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Sal
When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
Beyond the Path

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268352].message }}

LB

15 years ago

Originally Posted by HeySal

I would think that it would be a good time for anyone doing ANYTHING to grab an LLC to protect them from personal liability in case there are some loopholes for subjective prosecution - which I would imagine there are, but I haven't read the PDF yet so really can't make any educated statements. Even just the direction this is moving without reading the specifics, though, I'm thinking strongly of grabbing an LLC. Might do insurance later but just wanna protect my private assets for now. (private assets, oh hell LOL - I just got real funny!)

The FTC always sues the company and the person behind it.

If you look at any of their filings/complaints you will see they go after XYZ LLC and Joe Smith simultaneously.

There's lots of good reasons to have a corporate structure...the FTC doesn't care about that though.

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

Tired of Article Marketing, Backlink Spamming and Other Crusty Old Traffic Methods?

Click Here.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268390].message }}

HeySal

15 years ago

Interesting LB. One of the main reasons people grab LLCs is to avoid damage to personal assets in a law suit. Guess it would be fitting to take a browse at what sort of precedences have been set in such suits to this date.

Thanks

Signature

Sal
When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
Beyond the Path

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268424].message }}

HeySal

15 years ago

The ruling takes effect december first. I already shot my tech a note to strip my salespages of all testimonials - just in case. I have no clue how I would ever be able to judge a "typical" result - especially in light of the fact I have no way to monitor to what extent my outlines are followed to the letter. This whole thing is just bizarre.

I don't want "examples" - I want a nail down of WHAT can and can't be done - to the letter. Any bridging assumptions necessary will allow for financial prosecutions, bias prosecutions, malicious prosecutions initiated by competitors, etc rather than just prosecution of slimy marketing techniques.

Thanks
2 replies

Signature

Sal
When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
Beyond the Path

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268452].message }}

Steven Carl Kelly

15 years ago

Originally Posted by HeySal

I don't want "examples" - I want a nail down of WHAT can and can't be done - to the letter. Any bridging assumptions necessary will allow for financial prosecutions, bias prosecutions, malicious prosecutions initiated by competitors, etc rather than just prosecution of slimy marketing techniques.

I can't imagine where you'd get something like that.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Read this SURPRISING REPORT Before You Buy ANY WSO! Click Here
FREE REPORT: Split Test Your Landing Pages the Easy Way

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268474].message }}

Don Schenk

15 years ago

Originally Posted by Steven Carl Kelly

I can't imagine where you'd get something like that.

You haven't read the document yet. There are many examples given in that .pdf.

In television it will be easy and inconspictuous when the advertiser places the disclosure in a small font, and flashes it on the screen in a long paragraph, for 4 seconds.

The only people who will know what it says are people who can read 5,000 wpm!

:-Don

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Studies prove happier people have massively more success. It has worked for me. Use this one trick too... Click Here

Total Competition Stomper - Simply the most powerful tactic your IM or Offline business will ever use... See it here!

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268515].message }}

Steven Carl Kelly

15 years ago

Originally Posted by Don Schenk

You haven't read the document yet. There are many examples given in that .pdf.

I've read the document many times, and in fact started a thread about how people are blowing things way out of proportion and breaking down parts of the document itself.

And if you will note, HeySal said she DOESN'T want examples. She wants someone to tell her exactly what is and isn't allowed. No one can supply that. Only the courts will decide that over time.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Read this SURPRISING REPORT Before You Buy ANY WSO! Click Here
FREE REPORT: Split Test Your Landing Pages the Easy Way

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268540].message }}

HeySal

15 years ago

Originally Posted by Steven Carl Kelly

I've read the document many times, and in fact started a thread about how people are blowing things way out of proportion and breaking down parts of the document itself.

And if you will note, HeySal said she DOESN'T want examples. She wants someone to tell her exactly what is and isn't allowed. No one can supply that. Only the courts will decide that over time.

You are supposed to decide guilt and innocence in a courtroom. The law itself is supposed to be black and white. How do you rule against people for not constructing the correct bridging assumptions about what might be stepping over the line? It allows arbitrary prosecution. If we are supposed to work within the laws, they need to be able to provide those laws. What should remain to be judged is if you stepped away from those laws, and the intent of doing so - not whether you understood exactly what MIGHT be considered illegal or allowed to fly.

What if speed limits were set at "around 55"? Would you like to be the guy pulled into court for doing 58 and told they felt it wasn't close enough?
Law is supposed to be black and white - it is judgment that should allow for prima facae argumentation.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Sal
When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
Beyond the Path

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268737].message }}

Steven Carl Kelly

15 years ago

Originally Posted by HeySal

The law itself is supposed to be black and white. How do you rule against people for not constructing the correct bridging assumptions about what might be stepping over the line? It allows arbitrary prosecution. If we are supposed to work within the laws, they need to be able to provide those laws. What should remain to be judged is if you stepped away from those laws, and the intent of doing so - not whether you understood exactly what MIGHT be considered illegal or allowed to fly.

Sorry Sal, it just doesn't work that way.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Read this SURPRISING REPORT Before You Buy ANY WSO! Click Here
FREE REPORT: Split Test Your Landing Pages the Easy Way

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268742].message }}

HeySal 15 years ago

Originally Posted by Steven Carl Kelly

Sorry Sal, it just doesn't work that way.

It was meant to. It used to. I'm sorry, too.
- Thanks
Signature

Sal
When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
Beyond the Path
{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268811].message }}

Charann Miller

15 years ago

Originally Posted by HeySal

The ruling takes effect december first. I already shot my tech a note to strip my salespages of all testimonials - just in case. I have no clue how I would ever be able to judge a "typical" result - especially in light of the fact I have no way to monitor to what extent my outlines are followed to the letter. This whole thing is just bizarre.

I don't want "examples" - I want a nail down of WHAT can and can't be done - to the letter. Any bridging assumptions necessary will allow for financial prosecutions, bias prosecutions, malicious prosecutions initiated by competitors, etc rather than just prosecution of slimy marketing techniques.

You're right, it's impossible to gauge what an average or typical result is. It's so ambiguous.

Say for instance if you pre-launch a product, get 50 people to test it out and on average they each make $1,000 in a 30 day period then is that not an average result?

Anything outside of controlled testing and monitoring is like blowing sand to the wind, too many variables to consider, there's no way of garnering such figures, especially if most people don't act upon your information then there's no way of getting a true representation.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Hot Weight Loss PLR
Ex Back Niche PLR
Short Reports PLR
Self Esteem Niche PLR
Aromatherapy PLR

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268576].message }}

Steven Carl Kelly

15 years ago

Originally Posted by Charann Miller

Say for instance if you pre-launch a product, get 50 people to test it out and on average they each make $1,000 in a 30 day period then is that not an average result?

They avoid using the word "average" because marketers are not expected to create a mathematical average. Instead, it is a generally expected result and based on circumstances, so yes -- you could list those circumstances and say that is a generally expected results in those circumstances.

Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Read this SURPRISING REPORT Before You Buy ANY WSO! Click Here
FREE REPORT: Split Test Your Landing Pages the Easy Way

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268699].message }}

Stephen Crooks

15 years ago

So in other words, we just make it up and that will satisfy the FTC. It's just madness!

Originally Posted by Steven Carl Kelly

They avoid using the word "average" because marketers are not expected to create a mathematical average. Instead, it is a generally expected result and based on circumstances, so yes -- you could list those circumstances and say that is a generally expected results in those circumstances.

Thanks

Signature

Affiliate Marketing Profits 2020 - Step by Step Guides
How to Make $100 a day Online

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1270399].message }}

Steven Carl Kelly

15 years ago

Much ado about nothing, really.

Thanks

Signature

Read this SURPRISING REPORT Before You Buy ANY WSO! Click Here
FREE REPORT: Split Test Your Landing Pages the Easy Way

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1268473].message }}

FTC Releases PDF of Guidelines for New Adv. Ruling

Trending Topics

Struggling to Understand How SEO Really Works - Is It Just About Keywords?

Looking for an Up-to-Date Affiliate Marketing Course

Struggling with SEO Traffic - Need Some Real Advice from Pros

HUGE Structures Discovered 2km BELOW Pyramid of Khafre

New to Worrier Forum