I think traditional one.
You may do digital with no funds.

[DELETED]

[DELETED]

This is a very vague question.

What kind of tradition marketing? magazine? tv? radio? billboard? etc?

What about digital? Affiliate? Paid traffic? PPC? Banner ads? mobile? etc?

[DELETED]

I think traditional is more costly. You can start digital with almost nothing. What's more, the ROI of digital is great!

[DELETED]

Traditional marketing is much costly as compare to digital marketing.

'Marketing' is the 'field marketing', whereas 'Digital Marketing' is the 'online/internet based marketing'!
Without any doubt the field marketing is more costly because the travelling expenses are involved, on the other hand the internet based marketing is much better!

Traditional marketing could be a television ad during the super bowl, a postcard, or a phone number scribbled on a bathroom wall. Costs and results will vary.

Digital marketing could be an email, a Facebook Ad campaign to a million people, or a blog post.

In most cases, digital will be cheaper.

Perhaps if we understood the purpose of your question we could give you better answers.

Rose

[DELETED]

The answer is, like with most things, it depends.

An ad in Times Square costs 1.1-4 million dollars a year.

Let's just call it $2.5 million.

Over the course of a year, they'll get one hundred million impressions from foot and vehicle traffic.

That's $.025 per impression which isn't too bad or too good.

When you add in impressions from TV spots that capture Times Square then it jumps to 500 million to one billion impressions (think about New Year's Eve and how it's broadcast from Times Square).

Your cost per impression plummet to $.005 - $.0025 or a CPM of $2.50.

The average on Facebook is over $7.

But you don't have access to a Times Square billboard unless you have a multimillion dollar ad budget.

It's also hard to measure conversions from that.

So it depends on many factors when you ask whether or digital or traditional marketing is more expensive.

It's all digital these days. Even if you were running traditional adverts like TV, magazine, newspaper, billboard, or radio, you're still going to need a website and engage in some type of marketing automation.

But if you're asking what's more costly traditional advertising or digital advertising I'd say definitely traditional. Also you can't track results as easily with traditional advertising.

All of your replies are very logical . Thank you very much. But, here I have a question. Which one saves our time mostly?

Obviously, Traditional.

Digital Marketing reduces cost of Man-force, travelling, Stationary Cost, and a lot of stuff. Also, traditional marketing like door-to-door marketing or poster ads have less conversion rates.

Whereas, if I talk about Digital Marketing, you just need a PC, internet connection and an automated script to directly reach people into their inbox.

[DELETED]

[DELETED]

Hello,
It is obvious traditional marketing is more costly with no output .But In digital marketing,you can do this marketing in reasonable price with profit.
For traditional marketing nobody sure about the leads also and if you start digital marketing for your business then there will be guaranteed leads.so there is no doubt for digital marketing which is less expensive than traditional marketing.

For sure traditional one because even if you print flyers you must pay money to print them etc .But online you can advertise for free as youtube videos ,blog traffic and many others

Traditional marketing is much costlier than Digital marketing in my opinion.

Costing depend on environment or product type etc .

traditional marketing costs a lot, but digital marketing costs a couple of pennies as well.

All in all, when you put every single variable together, digital marketing is much cheaper simply because traditional outbound marketing is no longer a viable option.

We live in the age of the pro-active consumer; if they want something, they come to you and there's a million options and information to choose from!

Even if digital marketing were to be more costly, it would still pay off because it allows you to measure actual results and reach people in a much more efficient way

What kind of business do you run? Maybe I can give you some tips on the best time saving way to go about it.

All the best!

Digital Marketing is less expensive and we can do digital marketing at a reasonable price with profit whereas traditional marketing is costly. In traditional marketing, we are totally unaware of the lead.so, digital marketing is more beneficial than traditional marketing.

[DELETED]

Thanks for the great discussion about Marketing vs Digital Marketing. It's really great to know the difference & important between Marketing & Digital Marketing.

Hi,

The conventional method of marketing in the advertising space with one-way communication and a larger reach which comprise of print ads, hoardings, magazines, billboards, newsletters, promotional brochures, flyers, radio ads, television ads, etc. is called traditional marketing.

The constantly evolving new media landscape that consists of all the digital technologies to bring a more personalized experience and reach the right audience by means of social media, SEO, blogging, content marketing, lead management, paid search, etc. forms the digital marketing.

Thanks for this post...

Traditional Marketing is costly comparing then Digital marketing because in Traditional marketing you are able to spend budget on various activities but not able to compare or check if that activities are working or not working for you. In Digital marketing you can target each and every to whom you are willing to show your ads and pay only if you get any valuable action from your targeted audiences on your ad.

Digital Marketing is definitely cheaper.

In fact, Digital Marketing is the most cost effective way to market your business. You are able to utilize social media which is basically free and very effective.

Small businesses can get more for their marketing spend using digital marketing.

hello,
here about my idea traditional market is more costly than digital market..... now a days digital marketing is very popular and it is nothing but online marketing. for more to know about digital marketing check www.nidmindia.com

When I hear "Traditional Marketing" I don't think of a traveling salesman.

I think of:
Magazine ads
Newspaper ads
Television commercials
Radio ads
Postcards
Printed catalogs
Sales letters that are mailed

That's not all, of course, just the first ones that come to mind. None of them require much traveling but most of them are costly.

Though to be honest, I'm still not sure the point of this thread.

Pamela, when responding please use the quote feature, otherwise we have no idea who you are responding to.

Rose

I would most definitely say that digital is by far the cheapest and the best. With traditional you would be taking on a lot of extra expense and with digital you can run it all yourself and your "shop" is open 24 hours and your customers are "The world"