13 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}
13 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}

New change at EzineArticles

by Adrian Jock
11 replies
Brand new change posted today on EZA blog:

"Effective immediately, we will be keeping the same 2% keyphrase rejection threshold as before, but will now include the Resource Box in the word count & keyphrase density calculation."

Source: Keyphrase Calculation to Include Resource Box
#change #ezinearticles
  • Profile picture of the author Kevingators
    Isn't that great. Thanks for the info.

    Kevin
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1322227].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Amanda_Davis
      Thanks for the info. Shouldn't be too much of a problem.

      Is anyone else a Premium subscriber at EZA?

      I currently am and I'm AMAZED at the speed of response. If you submit a lot of articles, I highly recommend it.
      Signature
      Join My No B.S. Internet Marketing Launches Newsletter [Info, Rebates, Bonuses & More!]
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1322959].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Adrian Jock
        Originally Posted by Amanda_Davis View Post

        Thanks for the info. Shouldn't be too much of a problem.
        No, it's not a problem if ... you know about the change; that's the purpose of this thread

        Adrian

        P.S. Too bad that many marketers are busy telling how bad EZA is and there is no much time left for them to actually read the Editorial Guidelines and other updates. For some people it's easier to complain than to read the terms ... (no offense intended to anyone)
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1322986].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author MikeCollins
          Originally Posted by ezine ads View Post

          P.S. Too bad that many marketers are busy telling how bad EZA is and there is no much time left for them to actually read the Editorial Guidelines and other updates. For some people it's easier to complain than to read the terms ... (no offense intended to anyone)
          Imagine if people took all the time they've been spending complaining and used it to write some high-quality articles that wouldn't get rejected.

          :rolleyes:
          Signature

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1323247].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author STKING
    Thank you for the post. I have just started submitting articles there...
    Signature
    Electronic Cigarette All in stock and ship within 24 hours!
    Electronic cigar: Fattest, longest lasting e-cigar you can buy
    E-Liquid Nicotine Feel the hit without the cancer.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1322985].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Slin
    Cool, this won't change my articles much.

    Thanks.
    Signature
    search engine cloaking
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1323005].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author gange10
    Thanks for letting us know!!
    Signature

    >>> Sign up to our Exclusive Free Amazon Masterclass Video Training Today!

    >>> 1,000 Visitors to ANY Offer for $20 - Yours for $1 (LIVE)...

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1323163].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author LuisEAvila
    Sweet deal!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1323170].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yommys01
    I notice it when I was submitting my articles today but it is not a big problem at all.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1323256].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Marhelper
    Wow, I am not sure I understand the reasoning behind this. I wonder if they will make you change all previous articles that violate the 2% rule to inlcude the resource box?
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1323319].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Adrian Jock
      Originally Posted by Marhelper View Post

      Wow, I am not sure I understand the reasoning behind this. I wonder if they will make you change all previous articles that violate the 2% rule to inlcude the resource box?
      Most probably the articles that are already approved won't be changed. There are tons of old articles that don't comply with other "not so new" rules but nobody touched them

      As for the articles that were submitted before announcing this change, but not yet approved (they are under review) ... I don't know. I asked Penny (the Managing Editor) via Twitter, but got no answer yet.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1324769].message }}

Trending Topics