AI Copy Writing Helper

tbh I ain't too bright on any initiative threatens my skillset.

What AI writin' stuff lacks is noowance -- not jus' for the woids themselves but also the interaction.

I wrote 3 emails today -- naht sales, jus' simple comms -- an' for each one I had to take a real definite stance.

First was for a guy I've known for a while ... others were noo, 1 guy, 1 gal.

Gotta figure the interaction between product & audience defines the voice of the narrative.

That's why AI always seems kinda clunky to Moi.

To me it could be a tool in the kit to accelerate/make more efficient short form ancillary writing (Tweets, texts, etc) ... still hard for me to envision full displacement of copywriters for the reasons Princess alludes to (just taking Princess' very comment here - it evidences such a high degree of understanding of the English language, how words *sound*, and the effect different inflections have on the picture being painted in your head ... that kind of unique voice just seems hard to replicate through AI. So Princess, at least, seems safe to me

That said, totally agree about tech. It's pretty unbelievable. In case you're interested, related thread here with some cool GPT-3 examples:

https://www.warriorforum.com/main-in...ments#comments

Hi Joshua

Have you tried copy.ai ?

There's a 7 day free trial, so you can try out the different tools.

I find it is good for ideation but the copy needs to be checked and edited before you can use it.

Hello Joshua Killingsworth!
Creating works using artificial intelligence could have very important implications for copyright law. Traditionally, the ownership of copyright in computer-generated works was not in question because the program was merely a tool that supported the creative process, very much like a pen and paper. Creative works qualify for copyright protection if they are original, with most definitions of originality requiring a human author. Most jurisdictions, including Spain and Germany, state that only works created by a human can be protected by copyright.

It's interesting, but I think of it as a retread of the resume rewrite templates. Garbage In, Garbage Out, to begin with. Then it follows the same format every time ("AIDA!"). I've seen three of these kinds of "AI" (which as a company owner who has a data science division I do NOT believe it is AI: it's templated output) in the past couple months and none have especially impressed me. I suppose someone who has no idea what copywriting is would benefit from it, and I'm sure a bunch of fiverr "copywriters" who are subscribing to the service or paying credits will now appear, using the "AI" in the background to process their low budget work.

When everyone is using the same methodology, nobody stands out. And the first purpose of marketing is to Stand Out. I do not believe this kind of thing allows offers to stand out.

Sure, there are excitedly held up examples of "when the AI beat the human writer!" but those are cherrypicked, easy to create, and I doubt very much that the sample size was large enough to be meaningful. People don't understand statistics and are looking for the magic Easy Button. If they want this option let them have it, but for me it's a misrepresentation--not AI--and a pass.

For the sake of this discussion, I decided to make an example article using 2 AI copywriting tools. I'm curious to know your reactions :-)

I fed the first tool this sentence "7 things AI copywriting tools can help you with", and received lot's of suggestions. I cherry picked 7 bullet points, and fed them into another AI copywriting tool with the article title + an intro sentence or two added from my brain.

I then clicked "write for me" a couple of times, until the article was done. I edited for 30 seconds.

The below 727 word piece of text took me 5 minutes and 39 seconds to create from start to finish, including checking it via CopyScape (no plagiarism found) :

PS! The AI made that last paragraph up, the only thing correct there is that I live in Norway :-)

If artificial intelligence continues to develop, the future earth may not need humans. Definitely artificial intelligence "writing tool" can be better than that of human writers.

Machine-written advertisements can be more lively than human writers, and attract double the click-through rate. For example, a human writer will generally say "get cash from the property rights of your house." while the robot will say "Yes-you can unlock cash from the property rights of your house."