Brand loyalty is eroding under supply chain and price pressures, survey finds

by WarriorForum.com Administrator
9 replies
A new article on Marketing Dive says that more than eight in ten consumers purchased a different brand from the one they normally purchase in the past three months, according to new research from Inmar Intelligence sent to Food Dive. Lower prices of substitute brands influenced this decision for more than 65% of shoppers while out-of-stocks for the original brand motivated 51% to make a switch.


  • About 65% of consumers have switched brands "often" or "very often" in the past three months, the survey found. Among shoppers who made a switch, 44% said they would repurchase the new brand even if the original preferred brand was available again, while 36% would return to the original brand.
  • The CPG supply chain has been wracked by labor and ingredient shortages, shipping delays, and fuel price increases, which has left many store shelves with insufficient inventory. Meanwhile, manufacturers have been passing along higher costs to the end consumer, who appears to be taking note and shifting their shopping behavior.

Supply chain constraints and out-of-stocks have been a key challenge for food and beverage manufacturers in 2021. This unreliability has driven many consumers to try other brands on shelves. Brand switching is especially apparent in categories like dry grocery goods (crackers, cookies, and cereals), where nearly 66% of consumers have opted for alternate brands.

Cereal manufacturers have seen a wave of demand as consumers committed to breakfast at home during the pandemic, which has triggered out-of-stocks for brands such as Post's Grape-Nuts and Kellogg's Frosted Flakes. Last week, Kellogg announced it would invest around $45 million in restructuring its North American supply chain over the next three years to meet the demand for its ready-to-eat cereals.

Frozen foods (55%), nonalcoholic beverages (46%), and alcohol (42%) round out the list of categories where most consumers have bought different brands than they usually purchase. Conagra, manufacturer of frozen brands such a Healthy Choice, Marie Callender's, Birdseye, and Banquet, has faced millions in expenses as it made adjustments to its distribution network to keep up with demand and reduce out-of-stocks.
#brand #chain #eroding #finds #loyalty #pressures #price #supply #survey
Avatar of Unregistered
  • Profile picture of the author Odahh
    Calls into question the whole concept of brand loyalty. Also the response to higher prices is people looking for cheaper options or not buying at all.

    This is far more an economic article than a marketing one .
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11678733].message }}
    • Originally Posted by Odahh View Post

      Calls into question the whole concept of brand loyalty. Also the response to higher prices is people looking for cheaper options or not buying at all.

      This is far more an economic article than a marketing one .

      I was thinking the same thing. People are more open to buying less expensive options because they have less money. In the past, they may not have even thought to do that as they were happy with their regular brand. But now that they've switched, many have found that the differences either don't exist at all or are so minuscule that no one even cares. I think this pandemic has made permanent changes to our economy.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11678734].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Odahh
        Originally Posted by Angela V. Edwards View Post

        I was thinking the same thing. People are more open to buying less expensive options because they have less money. In the past, they may not have even thought to do that as they were happy with their regular brand. But now that they've switched, many have found that the differences either don't exist at all or are so minuscule that no one even cares. I think this pandemic has made permanent changes to our economy.
        I am not worried about food shortages higher prices and stores limited the amount people can purchase will prevent that . The supply shortages hit highly processed/ packaged foods and the higher prices hit meats. And the meat supply is being manipulated by the four major producers because they are make twice as much money as they where and only producing half as much product.

        I cook for myself and can eat for less than10 dollars a day .

        The problem markers and every business will face is as prices go up and people's incomes stay the same many of the things that are in the luxury that have become necessary. Will go back to luxuries that can be replaced or just not needed.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11678737].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Serene Carmen
    Agree that this is more about about affordability than brand loyalty.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11678747].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Odahh
      Originally Posted by Serene Carmen View Post

      Agree that this is more about about affordability than brand loyalty.
      Well this is probably blue sky thinking but it's the cheaper foods put out by the large brands that are going up the fastest.

      But there are a wide range of very small brands and distributors who are selling organic sustainable and the list of healthier foods. That where far more expensive and people are shifting to as the gap gets smaller and perception wise the luxury stuff starts looking more affordable. When you compare it to the cost of going out to eat.

      So big brands may lose out but the brands that are a bit more expensive and ship products directly to people's homes have opportunities for growth.

      Silicone chips, batteries, and indoor soil-less food production will be the oil, fertilizer,pesticides,and herbicide of the rest of this century
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11679094].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nicenet
    Food shortages and inflation is now a global problem. Every nation is feeling the impact, and consumer behavior has shifted to hoarding their money.
    The blame goes to the nations planning a world government where humans become the property of government.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11679433].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Odahh
      Originally Posted by nicenet View Post

      Food shortages and inflation is now a global problem. Every nation is feeling the impact, and consumer behavior has shifted to hoarding their money.
      The blame goes to the nations planning a world government where humans become the property of government.
      A difference of opinion here .but there is no real blame unless you blame everyone.

      The world built highly efficient global supply chains that turned out to be a very fragile thing in the face of a world wide economic event no one ever predicted. Which was handled like a normal slowdown. So people where given money to buy stuff. While many factories where closed down. And because shipping was halted for months it became more profitable for companies to scrap shops than to operate them while empty.

      We are seeing the rapid collapse of globalization. 66% of China has been dealing with brown outs from the power companies just shutting off the power. Which will cause more problems for those manufacturing goods in China.

      As for food harvests/yields seem to be lower worldwide bad weather patterns around to world rising costs of workers and chemical imputs
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11679508].message }}
  • This is why it's important to develop redundancies in a supply chain. Our dependence on China for manufacturing and logistics has a lot of vulnerabilities. We have to make meaningful investments in creating multiple manufacturing and distributions hubs if we want our economies to keep going even when (not if) we're hit by the next pandemic.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11679512].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Odahh
      Originally Posted by John Jonas Phil VA View Post

      This is why it's important to develop redundancies in a supply chain. Our dependence on China for manufacturing and logistics has a lot of vulnerabilities. We have to make meaningful investments in creating multiple manufacturing and distributions hubs if we want our economies to keep going even when (not if) we're hit by the next pandemic.
      Many of the supply chains will just shrink because the world wide shipping system is just going to keep getting more expensive as energy prices go higher. North America can produce all its own energy at lower costs than the rest of the world.

      Anyway we solve a lot of long term climate and environmental problems if we are forced to grow food locally and not ship food all around the planet.

      The world is at the end of 500 years of more . As the world got more connected constantly had more people and a financial system that spread around the world and required growth.

      The population was getting bigger because humans where getting old but many countries are now seeing birth rates fall and the older populations retire. Banks in major developed countries are paying almost no interest or charging money to keep cash in the bank. And we are seeing major problems with global supply chains
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11679521].message }}
Avatar of Unregistered

Trending Topics