These five DTC darlings helped pave the way for digitally native brands. Where are they now?

by WarriorForum.com Administrator
6 replies
A new article on Marketing Dive reports that while several brands have experienced success through acquisitions, public listings or investments from larger retailers, others haven't been as fortunate.



Around a decade ago, when many DTC darlings were launching, the retail landscape looked much different than it does today. E-commerce and social media weren't as sophisticated as they are now, and larger retailers and brands were "los[ing] their way trying to appeal to more and more people," according to Katie Thomas, who leads the Kearney Consumer Institute, a think tank at consulting firm Kearney.

The past decade has led several companies in the inaugural class of DTC brands to have great success, including through IPOs, acquisitions or investments from big names in the industry. Others, however, haven't been as fortunate. Custom menswear brand J. Hilburn, for example, last year filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, while other brands have shuttered entirely. From IPOs and acquisitions to C-suite shuffling, here's a look at where five early DTC players ended up:
  1. Casper aimed to disrupt the way consumers purchase mattresses through its bed-in-a-box model. Since its founding in 2014, the brand has expanded beyond mattresses into other categories like dog beds, CBD gummies and a smart nightlight. Casper has formed partnerships with over 25 retailers, including Target, Nordstrom, Costco, Sam's Club, Bed Bath & Beyond and Mattress Warehouse. As of September, the brand operated 72 retail stores. And in March of 2019, Casper reached a $1.1 billion valuation following a funding round. In early 2020, before the pandemic was fully realized in the U.S., Casper filed for an initial public offering. Before making its public debut in February of that year, the brand cut its share price from an initial range of $17 to $19 a share to a range of $12 to $13 a share. Despite high hopes for the brand, Casper's stock price hit an all-time low of $3.18 a share less than two months after going public and has yet to return to its opening share price.
  2. Bonobos was founded in 2007 as a result of not being able to find pants that fit. Since its launch, the DTC brand has expanded into shirts and suits. And the brand caught the attention of the biggest retailer in the world. About a decade after entering the market, Walmart acquired the brand for $310 million in cash -- and brought on co-founder Andy Dunn to oversee the retail giant's collection of digitally native brands. However, in 2019, Dunn announced he would be leaving his role at Walmart.
  3. Warby Parker -- whose success spurred phrases like "The Warby Parker of X" -- made its public debut via direct listing in September amid a slew of DTC brands entering the public markets. Since its founding in 2010, the brand has expanded beyond simply selling eyewear to offering contact lenses and eye exams. Like many DTC brands that have gone public in recent years, though, Warby Parker has struggled with profitability. While its sales have grown, the brand has either reported losses or broken even every year since fiscal 2018, with a $55.9 million net loss in 2020.
  4. Allbirds: Tim Brown, a New Zealand native, was curious why merino wool was essentially nonexistent in the footwear industry. And thus, Allbirds was born. Together with Joey Zwillinger, the pair founded the brand in 2015. Over the years, Allbirds has expanded beyond its wool sneakers into products like performance footwear, apparel and an activewear line. Sustainability has remained a key focus for Allbirds -- which is a certified B Corp -- from using recycled packaging to displaying the carbon footprint of its products. Since going public, the brand has revealed it too struggles to make money, nearly doubling its net loss year over year in its most recent quarter to $13.8 million.
  5. Away broke into the market in 2016 with the goal of creating "thoughtful products designed to make travel more seamless," and around two years later, the company said it had reached profitability -- somewhat of a rarity in the direct-to-consumer space. But the company's culture has come under fire. In an article published by The Verge in 2019, former employees described a "culture of intimidation and constant surveillance" that reportedly involved co-founder and then-CEO Steph Korey, who was "infamous for tearing into people on Slack." Days later, the brand announced Stuart Haselden, Lululemon's former chief operating officer, would be taking the helm and Korey would be stepping into an executive chairman role. However, about a month later Away announced Haselden and Korey would become co-CEOs of the company. To further complicate things, Korey officially stepped down from the co-CEO role in October 2020, positioning Haselden at the helm -- that is, until he too stepped down in February this year. Co-founder Jen Rubio is now the brand's chief executive officer. The brand, which centers around travel, suffered when the pandemic took hold, reporting a 90% decline in sales in April 2020, though it was able to raise $35 million in funding later that year. And last month, Away named its first chief operating officer and chief digital officer.
#brands #darlings #digitally #dtc #helped #native #pave
Avatar of Unregistered
  • Profile picture of the author Darryl Smith
    Too many ego's, and founders unable to see that swift (agile marketing etc) moving does not always make for sustained profitability.
    Some are not meant to be in the position they find themselves and some never hankered for the lime lite that found them.
    Success does strange things to the human brain - sometimes worse things than failure ever will.

    Some are born to be natural successors and some were born for obscurity.
    Funny old place this world!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11694611].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author WF- Enzo
      Administrator
      Some founders might be a little, you know, ground-bound.



      Originally Posted by Darryl Smith View Post

      Too many ego's, and founders unable to see that swift (agile marketing etc) moving does not always make for sustained profitability.
      Some are not meant to be in the position they find themselves and some never hankered for the lime lite that found them.
      Success does strange things to the human brain - sometimes worse things than failure ever will.

      Some are born to be natural successors and some were born for obscurity.
      Funny old place this world!
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11694838].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author rickeyshirts
      Sooo true about the egos...geesch.

      i would disagree, majority of humans are meant to be in the lime lite or they would never have been born (yes even the beings who caused a lot of pain and suffering on the earth)...(it's a huge universe (see my latest blog post...about advanced dna activation and holographics)

      Your right about how success can change a man/ or woman.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11696847].message }}
  • Most successes depend upon superlatives.

    eg Facebook did what MySpace did bettah.

    So ... your biz might be (say) leanah.

    Cheapah.

    Fastah.

    Greenah.

    If you can demonstrate you can superlativize sum proven pre-existent want ... an' you gaht the promo chops to point the right people in your drecshn, then natrlly they gonna fall ovah 'emselves to come see.

    Superlativize 2 or 3 things as a meaningful combo, prolly you gotta start buildin' a bunker to shield you from the maraudin' hordes.

    Course, superlatives are merely adverbial or adjectival, so they gaht limits.

    Ultimately all definition points to WHAT.

    Which is why audiences seek novelty, always -- an' why breakthrough products definin' umselves flat out will always command max attention.

    Prahblem is, most stuffs break through pretty much nuthin'.

    "Zapsmooch panties pull down 3% faster than regular brands -- yet still keep your whooshyhole 2% fresher!"

    But it is often this immeasurable nuthin' that offahs the most room for actschwl momentum.

    Bcs people get real stuck in all kindsa ways they don't like.

    So: unless you a bonefidelic genius gonna change the Caahsmos forevah, bettah start soundin' like you might.

    Frequent small degrees turn the most magnificent cornahs.
    Signature

    Lightin' fuses is for blowin' stuff togethah.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11694892].message }}
  • Don't you guys notice that a lot of these start-ups seem to have a culture of (to put it politely) being too intense?

    We've seen in the news that Amazon, Uber, and Blizzard have this toxic work culture where employees are often pushed too hard and abused.

    I can't help but wonder if the work culture played a factor what these DTCs are experiencing now.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11697581].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author rickeyshirts
    Some of these "start-ups" that all of a sudden can get major corporation deals in a short time, were never start-ups.

    They are parts of a fragmented/bankrupcy/dissolved company. Then the ideas/patents/etc go into a newly formed company.

    Then for some odd reason, a start-up acquires all these major corporation partnerships/deals...hmm

    nah, most of these start-ups are formed corporations that already have parterships and family ties, then put their other children in those positions and look behold, some "little" startup somehow gets ahead.

    or maybe i'm wrong and somehow, someone succeeded in their business interactions.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[11697605].message }}
Avatar of Unregistered

Trending Topics