Is anyone using skool or a similar platform for a course?

Thanks PB and Monitize, I asked before I leaped. My whitepaper is:

Combinatorial Field Reduction via Nested Structural Filtering,
Predictive Trend Tipping Points, and Integrated Capital Allocation
Portfolio Architecture.

The lottery lab will focus on the math behind this theory, not a typical prediction type site and is targeted toward a very small less than 1% of all lottery players who use statistical analysis for their plays. These people are more akin to ROI day traders who only look at bottom line at the end of the year.

And big thanks to Max5ty too, who helped me test and choose what I actually wanted, and through a two year process, came to this conclusion; MY prospects are very targeted and specific, not general lottery players, but we (partners) may have something for them but I won't have any public face for that).

Thanks for your thoughts.

GordonJ

You make a very valid point socialentry; all lottery players, gamers, sports bettors want results. Practical implementation is exactly what the offer will be. Truthfully, the math is already done, the skooler will not be doing the math, just using it in a practical planned out way to play.

They may not even understand it. But they don't need to. Their part is using the charts and tracking forms for whatever lottery they play, a simple 5 min a day strategy, once they have the forms and follow directions.

You hit the nail squarely on the head (on my mind because my neighbor is getting a new roof put on today, so I type this to the beat of the hammers) so thanks for the reminder, RESULTS are the real reason for the skool.

GordonJ


[socialentry;11850637]I think you should further narrow down your market.

Do your target really want math or do they are really after the end result?
If it's the latter, I don't know the niche, but you might want to look up courses with respect to blockchain for developers for inspiration, that's the closest thing: the core is deeply mathematical , but it is focused more on practical implementation (e.g. the math checks out but things like formal proofs are --I believe-- mostly handwaved away). The jargon is also very specialized.


In my experience, there isn't really a lot of market for advanced math classes in the private sector. It's not like e.g. IT where there is a bazillion certifications.
Math education past freshman year is almost exclusively the domain of academia and for very good reasons. But mostly, there is almost always a simpler and cheaper way to do things than math. So there is no real incentive to explore deeper than that beyond the ivory tower.[/QUOTE]