Lets Go Another Route With PLR Rights

Suppose someone sells PLR and sets the bottom price that the product can be sold at, lets say $37.00.

Then the person who sold the PLR rights originally makes the same available for his affialites to sell for LESS money?

HERE IS MY BIGGEST ISSUE. Lets say that hackers, bootleggers and just all around unethical IM, which there are lots get a hold of this same product and offer it online for say 15.00, 10.000 and even as low as 2.00.

Lets go a little further and say that not only 1 person does this with the same product but many do it.

So now you have legitimate people who have legally PAID GOOD MONEY for PLR content and their sales are now diminished because any one can google the products that they are selling legally at a set price, while the unethical dishonest marketer are giving away the products for next to nothing?

What is your stance on the above scenarios?

Is the original person who sold the PLR to his clients ethically right to make those who purchased his PLR stick to the lowest price, meaning they are not going to have a marketable product ANYMORE at all due to the theifs who are selling the products for next to nothing?

This is a real problem as many of you have realized.

It puts those who spend good money on PLR in a tight spot, they cannot compete being honest against the non honest marketer who has basically given the product away and continues to get away with it.

So you as a marketer what do you do. I am assuming you are honest and want to be honest. But you have paid high dollar for PLR content or products and now have found you cannot sell these products at all if you stick to your PLR agreement...?

What do you do, What would you do? I know many of you are in this situation.....