UAW Authors - I would love to publish your article but ...

by 39 replies
46
On a few of my blogs I have the UAW (Unique Article Wizard) plugin set up so that I receive articles on specific niche topics. I have it set up so that the articles are posted as drafts, and I go in daily and approve or delete the ones I don't want.

I wish I could say that I post many of them but the sad truth is that I end up trashing 95% of the articles that are submitted. Why?

It's not because my standards are too high - I don't expect literary perfection. It's not because the articles aren't interesting. It's not because the articles are off-topic.

It's because the vast majority of them are CLEARLY written for the sole purpose of promoting a product. Hang on - I'm an affiliate marketer and a product owner too. I don't have a beef with people writing articles to sell something.

My beef is that the articles don't share a single shred of helpful information for the reader. Most of these articles are short, rambling pieces that go on for 300-400 words but don't really say anything at all. Their sole objective seems to be stringing the reader along to the link at the bottom.

I'm sorry but I CAN'T post those articles in my blogs! I just can't subject my loyal readers to that senseless dribble.

You know what kind of articles I'm looking for?

1) Articles that share some helpful tips or insights.

These don't have to be earth-shattering, just a good tidbit or two that make the reader feel like they didn't waste 4 minutes of their life.

2) Articles that offer a helpful technique or idea they can apply in their own life.

The ideas can be simple - in fact, simple is even better than complex.

3) Articles that are interesting to read, perhaps those who share some of the writer's experiences with the subject matter.

Again, nothing too elaborate - maybe just a lesson learned or an insight gained.

4) Articles that show a wee bit of creativity - not rambling monologues that reiterate what the reader already knows.


We know that upper arm flab is gross. We know that it sucks to break up with your ex. And we know that you're just dying to inspire us to scroll down and click on the link where you have surely hidden the secret that tells us how to resolve the problem. But your article doesn't seem as if you know what you're talking about so maybe your link doesn't have anything to offer either. :rolleyes:

All right, I'll stop whining now but if you want your articles to be published anywhere but the article directories and low-quality autoblogs, please do your best to share something worthwhile with the reader.

You don't have to use perfect spelling and grammar. You don't have to write like Stephen King. Just give the reader something they can appreciate. One little nugget of wisdom, wit, insight, help or encouragement.

If I could have more articles like that for my blogs I would be thrilled to post them - even if there is an affiliate link or a product owner's link at the end of it - the way I see it is the affiliate or product owner actually deserves the sale for helping me to make my readers happy.

Thank you for reading.

Wendy
#main internet marketing discussion forum #article #authors #love #publish #uaw
  • Article Marketers after my own heart

    Isn't that the purpose of an article?

    As someone that mass submits daily, I can honestly tell you that nothing that I put out there is a literary masterpiece or even very informative for that matter.

    If they want info, they have to click the link.

    Informative articles < 15% CTR

    "sales article" > 25% CTR
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • LOL I get it Jeremy, I do! And I'm not saying that my own articles are literary masterpieces either. Not at all. And yes, my sole aim in writing the article may be to ultimately make the sale or gain the subscriber. BUT - if the article itself is completely pointless or difficult to read (rambling nonsense), it won't go any farther than the article directory itself. Which is fine if that's your goal. But I assume that some of these authors are submitting to hopefully get their article published in newsletters and blogs that have a large readership. More eyeballs, more sales - unless the article makes the reader feel like sticking a pen in their eye.

      Wendy
      • [1] reply
  • If your article is a rambling POS, then why would a reader of the article expect anything more when they click thru to your site? I don't write award winning content in my articles either, but you have to show them enough to entice the click.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • That's my thinking too Don, thanks. From a reader perspective, I have to feel like the author of the article at least knows what he or she is talking about, and then I'll definitely click. Some of these articles I'd be hitting the back button so quickly I'd leave skid marks.

      Wendy
      • [2] replies
    • I'm not sure why they do...but, they do.

      I wish some of the article directories would let me submit articles that were 10 words long and a resource box. I'd even be willing to make the 10 words all run together and make no sense whatsoever.

      I tend to target niches where people want to buy stuff...not research it.

      When someone has their credit card out...they are looking for a link. I give it to them.

      The mentality of many people, myself included when using a service like UAW is that noone is going to see the content that gets submitted. More or less, it is a backlink service.

      If I wanted people to see it, I'd put it on my own site or on EZA.
      • [2] replies
  • I have to agree with Don here. If I see a crappy article that is all about the sale I assume that the link in the resource box will more or less be the same. On the other hand, when I see genuinely useful information being offered I think, "Wow, this guy or gal probably has something really interesting on their site if they're offering this information here".

    I personally find that while some of my sales oriented articles get more people coming to the article, my more informative pieces have a higher CTR to my website.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    [DELETED]
  • I don't know but should you complain about the quality of free content?

    UAW is amazing for backlinks but when I look for good quality content to publish on my own blogs- I'm not expecting to get it from a free wordpress plugin.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Good point Slash, I should point out that UAW is by far NOT my only source for content. I write my own high quality content, sometimes use guest authors, even a bit of high quality PLR. But I like to include some good reprint articles too. And I do get them from other places besides UAW.

      Wendy
  • ^^ But yet you track the CTR of your mass submissions?
    • [1] reply
    • No, I track the CTR of the ones I get through at EZA

      UAW and services like it are little more than ethical spamming.

      I submit the article there and set it to submit to 50 directories a day. After 3 weeks, I go back, change the categories and submit it to 50 more directories a day.

      Result?

      Backlinks for months to come
      • [1] reply
  • To the OP. I am with you on this one. There are many out there that 300-500 words equals content. Words do not equal content. I want an article that has some meat and potatoes or at bare minimum a good appetizer ... not one that is just leaving me a few crumbs to follow. Many of these deleted articles could have said it in one sentence.

    I have several blogs that use the same plugin "UAW and I find myself deleting at least 80% or all articles for that reason and one other.

    The other reason is some people hoping to get covered in more directories are using so many tags many that are not even directly relate to the article itself. The point it is much easier to delete that to deal with it ... besides there are enough articles to sort through that do it right.

    Unfortunately the deletion rate keeps getting higher not because of my standards getting higher but because of those two reasons.

    When I first started dealing with accepting articles about 80% a few years back were acceptable now it is the other way around. Not to mention there is a lot of spun cr@p that is not even readable.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Ahh... it's free content.

    What's there to complain about?
  • I am an article marketer too and agree that writing informative content is the way to go. If you write useless and pointless articles, you will have to write a lot more articles to get the same results as you can get from a few good quality articles.
    I believe this to be true based on whatever little experience I have from trying out both the things - writing informative articles as well as not-so informative ones.

    By the way - people who are using UAW or AMA articles on their blogs, do you get a nice stream of traffic and good rankings on such blogs which only have content from these services? I am curious to know as I am interested in trying out autoblogging.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    That's exactly why I don't use other people's articles as content. I've yet to find an article directory that wasn't full of this type of article. Great for conversions for the writer perhaps, but very poor as content for anyone else.

    It's probably also why EZA is cleaning house. I suspect that they want articles that are a bit more informative and interesting rather than articles that just shill a product.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • I really like using other authors' articles - it's just getting harder and harder to find good ones. Maybe I need to hire a fleet of really great writers and flood UAW with high quality material to push out the crap. LOL

      Wendy
      • [1] reply

Next Topics on Trending Feed

  • 46

    On a few of my blogs I have the UAW (Unique Article Wizard) plugin set up so that I receive articles on specific niche topics. I have it set up so that the articles are posted as drafts, and I go in daily and approve or delete the ones I don't want. I wish I could say that I post many of them but the sad truth is that I end up trashing 95% of the articles that are submitted. Why?