Is it worth getting a paid membership to ezinearticles?

Well if you have been in the main forum for the past few days (or even longer), you may have recently viewed a few threads/posts speaking of just that: articles not being approved, they are given no reason why, and the Editors take forever to respond and even give a reason.

I would call that a PMS day, if *you* (*meaning whoever the editor was*) are going to reject something, and can't even at least give a reason or some information, and leave people distressed, angry, upset and ticked off while you take your sweet time to respond?


Of course some of the people who are getting their articles rejected may not be paid members either, but so far, they have been.

Well their offer seems fine, as long as your articles are getting approved. Lance Winslow submits thousands of articles all the time, but he doesn't promote anything.


Maybe he has a membership and sees that as worthwhile, since he writes all the time, and then he can choose where they go. Since that is his hobby, to write on political subjects and whatnot, maybe to him it's good.


But if you are an article marketer, and you want to submit many articles and optimize on the traffic, that alone may be an incentive, as long as money is not an issue.


However the EZA membership, to me, is not cheap. It's quite a hefty one at that. Which means one should seriously consider all options when it comes to their membership, and more so, one should consider whether or not EZA will also allow them to EARN BACK that money too.


Not everyone who submits to EZA as a paid member or a standard member reaps in the same benefits. Maybe it's because some do not back link, or some are not as effective at marketing, but if EZA cannot even give you back what you are putting in, it would be very wasteful to continuously put money into them, in that sense.


There are quite a few paid members on this forum, from what I have seen recently, and they all enjoy the fact that they can choose when their articles come out. That is important to be able to choose, to some people, because if your articles go out too soon, they could be buried by your competition just 3 hours from the time they were approved.


That may put your entire article writing efforts to waste, when no one will even view or see your articles. That is the SOLE reason why anyone would want to purchase this membership, because that is LITERALLY all that it has to offer, aside from fast review times.



Also keep in mind the fact that although they say your articles will be approved faster, many times I have seen their editors fall behind in their work, and then you can see your articles sitting there for 2 days or more.


And if that is during a long weekend or a weekend in general, you can see your articles sitting there collecting dust for a week then. Which pretty much defeats the purpose of the membership, don't you think?


At the end of the day, the editors are human, which means they are not perfect, so do you want to pay the editors to approve your articles quickly, so long as they choose too, and so long as they are up to date with their work?

So here is the REAL HARD HITTING QUESTION:


Do YOU want to PAY for your articles to be scheduled and approved the same day?


Answer that question, and you will know if you really want this membership or not.

There is nothing they could do to get me to pay $97 month ... Many other sites out there that can outrank EZA and are 100% ad free and do not cost anywhere near what EZA charges..

I find the site useless, but that is just me ...

James

Nope .. I would not waste my money ...

James

LOL, check the main forum, I posted something there, and thanks for the idea!