6 replies
Twitter follows (pardon the pun) the normal online philosophy -- meaning the listener has all the control -- the listener (follower) controls whom he/she listens to -- but the speaker "leader?" cannot choose (subscribe) who he may speak to.

So, here' the mystery -- I see this on twitter...

"Email [me] when I receive a new direct message"

Receive a new DIRECT MESSAGE?!!?

What's a "direct message" at twitter?

-- TW
#mystery #twitter
  • Profile picture of the author AmyBrown
    It's the twitter equivalent of a pm - personal message.
    Signature
    "Test fast, fail fast, adjust fast."
    Tom Peters

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1794251].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kitty Kiki
    Yes, I agree with you unless you have a small bunch of followers then it is not a waste of time.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1794477].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TimothyW
    That is VERY odd. It would seem to violate the overriding internet philosophy (which I happen to disagree with) that consumers can reach marketers, but marketers cannot reach consumers (directly).

    With some offline methods, I can reach the people *I* choose to reach -- even if they are just sitting there, minding their own business (have made no active effort to search for what I offer).

    But the internet seems to be built on a framework where the consumers' privacy is placed higher than the marketers' need to actively reach out to the people he/she targets. For instance, I am not permitted to gather a list of email addr's, and send them an email -- but I am permitted to gather a list of phone numbers and/or mailing addr's, and call or mail to them (yes, minus the people on the do-not-call registry).

    This DM option seems to be a bow to the traditional marketing philosophy (which I DO agree with).

    It would appear to be an unheralded milestone, if you ask me.

    -- TW

    [edit] -- cancel all of the above -- one can only DM people who have already *chosen* to follow you. The 'listener' was (still) in control from the start. Oh well. The marketer is once again stuck being merely be the dartboard, not the dart.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1794530].message }}
  • It may be too early to dismiss the value of DMs. I can see it being useful to users that would like to quickly exchange private or sensitive information with their friends/followers. This dismissal (not the first time here) may be due to a few aggressive marketers using it to spam their followers with their promotion / affiliate links. In the not too distant future, I envision Twitter users filtering their DMs with help from DM spam filtering tools or even Twitter itself to make DM a more useful feature akin to dealing with spam within their email accounts.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1794538].message }}

Trending Topics